SC 2012 PDF

School Performance Report
HSSC Examination 2012
St. Bonaventure's High School

School Code (0059)
CONTENTS
1. MISSION STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION
2. HOW TO USE THIS REPORT
Table 1: Grade/Percentage Mark Conversion
3. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORT TO HEAD TEACHER
Figure 1: Comparison of your school’s performance with all schools in 2012
Figure 2: Cumulative frequencies of candidates at each overall grade in HSSC 2010,

2011 & 2012
Table 2: Comparison of subject group performance with total candidate entry
Figure 3:* Subject Wise Comparative Analysis using Box plots - (Compulsory subjects)
Figure 4:* Subject Wise Comparative Analysis using Box plots - (Elective Subjects)
Table 3: Comparison of your school subjects with all schools
Figure 5:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part I)
Figure 6:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part I)
Figure 7:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part II)
Figure 8:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part II)
Figure 9: Comparison Of Subject Performance in Part I and II
Table 4: Best Performing Schools (Only for SSC)
4. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORT TO SUBJECT TEACHER
Table 5: Subject Wise Item Analysis MCQ
Table 6: Subject Wise Item Analysis CRQ
*(Only for the Subjects having more than 5 Candidates).

1
Mission Statement And

Introduction
MISSION STATEMENT
In pursuing its educational objectives, AKU-EB will:
 Provide high quality SSC and HSSC examinations for both English and Urdu medium schools.
 Train teachers and develop supplementary learning material in support of National Curriculum
for secondary and higher secondary education.
 Develop expertise in educational assessment and testing in Pakistan.
‫ی ن‬
: ‫ درج ذ‬ ( ‫ )اے ۔ ای‬ ‫ل‬ ‫ا‬
‫ت ا د۔‬ ‫ ا ر ا ا اور ا ا ا ا‬ ‫ں‬ ‫ ا‬ ‫ اور اردو‬ ‫ا‬ 
‫۔‬ ‫ہ‬ ‫ ر اد ری ا‬ ‫ ب ون ض ا‬ ‫ری اور ا‬ 
‫ رت ا ۔‬ ‫ اور‬ ‫ن‬ 

INTRODUCTION
Aga Khan University Examination Board is Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary
Education established by Aga Khan University in response to demand from schools for more
appropriate school examinations. AKU-EB was founded in August 2003 in accordance with
Ordinance CXIV of the Government of Pakistan to offer examination services for both secondary
school certificate (SSC) and higher secondary school certificate (HSSC) throughout Pakistan and
abroad. It offers its qualification both in Urdu and English medium. AKU-EB’s primary purpose
is to improve the quality of education by making examination of reputable standard more
accessible to Pakistani students and having then increasingly valued by leading higher education
institution in and outside the country.
‫رے رے‬
‫ری ا‬ ‫ ا‬ ‫ رل رڈ آف ا‬ ‫ رڈ )اے – ای ( ا‬ ‫آ ن ر ا ا‬

‫ اس رڈ م‬ ‫ م‬ ‫ں‬ ‫ ۔ ا‬ ( ‫آ ن ر )اے‬
‫ اے – ای‬2003 ‫ ا‬ CXIV ‫ن آرڈ‬ ‫ ۔‬
( ‫ )ا ا ا‬ ‫ری ا ل‬ ‫ )ا ا ( اور‬ ‫ری ا ل‬ ‫ن‬ ‫ن اور‬
‫ ۔ اے – ای‬ ‫ ت ا‬ ‫ دو ں‬ ‫۔ اردو اور ا‬ ‫ ت ا‬ ‫ ا‬
‫ اور‬ ‫ ر‬ ‫ ز دہ‬ ‫ م‬ ‫ ر ا‬ ‫ ر اس‬ ‫دی‬
‫ ۔‬ ‫ ا ازہ ا‬ ‫ اداروں ذر ان ر و‬ ‫د ا ا‬ ‫ اور‬
2
How To Use This Report

How to use this report
The first section, ending in Table 4, is intended primarily for the head teacher. It is intended to
inform strategic decision making.
Figure 1 displays the overall performance of your candidate entry relative to the entry as a
whole. Here and throughout the report the mark/grade equivalence approved by the Inter‐Board
Committee of Chairmen (IBCC) is used.
Table 1: Grade/Percentage mark conversion
GRADE Percentage of marks
A1 80 – 100
A 70 – 79
B 60 – 69
C 50 – 59
D 40 – 49
E 33 – 39
F 0 – 32
All three parts of Figure 1 relate to the current year’s examinations. As a result the
“Performance in 2012 Part I” is that of this year’s Grade XI whereas the “Performance in
2012 Part II” is that of Grade XII, a different group of students. However the consolidated
outcome refers to the results shown on the HSSC certificates of these same Grade XII
candidates. Differences between the Part II distribution and the consolidated distribution are
due to the impact of Part I. In general there is a one grade improvement between the Part I and
Part II results.
Figure 2 shows whether this year’s results are part of a rising or a falling trend. Choose a basis of
comparison, say, the achievement of half of your student body. Read Figure 2 from 50% across to
the right. The first ‘curve’ you encounter has the best performance and the curve furthest from the
outright the worst. You will see that relative order is not the same through the range of candidates.
You may be interested in the bottom 20 percent. The data are there. Though performance is
expressed as overall grade you can interpolate using Table 1. Taken together, Figures 1 and 2 are
a snapshot of the current position of your school’s academic achievement.
To act on the information calls for a more detailed analysis. You will already be guiding
students’ choice of subjects within the curricular options you have on offer. In schools which
offer more than one of the Science, Humanities and Commerce groups, Table 2 reveals how
Page 1 of 3
successful that guidance has been. The “all schools’ achievement” indicates the probability of
each grade achievement in each subject group. The best grades are achieved by the science
group but there are opportunities for less high flying students elsewhere.
Schools adopting AKU‐EB’s Grade VIII Progress Tests will be in a better position to steer
students towards a subject group which maximizes theirs and the school’s chances of attaining
good grades, always providing that the school is able to offer multiple subject groups, a
prerequisite in maximizing school performance.
Figures 3 and 4 offer an insight into the subject group performance reported in Table 2. It
displays side by side the subject performances that account for the Table 2 outcome. These
subject distributions can be readily compared as in Figure 3 the same students have attempted all
five compulsory subjects. I n Figure 4 the candidates within each group have most of the
subjects in common. Where the school has offered a choice of subjects only entries of more
than five candidates are deemed reliable enough to report.
The shaded area of the box plots in Figures 3 and 4 show the range of scores in the subject of
the central 50% of students from your school. However it is the bottom whisker which is
particularly worthy of attention. If a candidate fails a subject, his or her whole group
performance becomes a fail. Subject “whiskers” which extend into the “F” range have a
dramatic effect on the overall attainments of the school since IBCC does not allow any
compensation between subject performances in the HSSC group certificate. The remaining
feature of the ‘block and whisker’ plots is the occasional circle, o , which indicates an ‘outlier’.
These are scores, usually isolated, which are so far removed from the overall distribution of the
data that to include them as of the same kind as the remaining scores would distort the overall
picture. In AKU-EB’s experience in Pakistan, positive outliers, whether extreme or not, are
usually associated with exceptional student or teacher performance, qualitatively different from
that of their peers and deserving close attention.
Before expecting Figures 3 and 4 to reveal the root cause of any achievement problems the
school may face, it is important to recognize that there are inevitable differences in subject grade
distributions (reported difficulty) when all subject examinations are required to conform to the
same pattern of questioning. You will note that the overall patterns in Figures 3 and 4 are much
the same for HSSC Parts I and II. Any marked deviation in the relative ease of subjects
between Parts I and II in y o u r sc h o o l is probably due to changes of staffing. If not, it may be
the result of deliberate action by AKU‐EB to redress a glaring imbalance. Such cases will be
highlighted in the Chief Examiner’s report. The “inevitable differences” in reported subject
difficulty in Figures 3 and 4 are dealt with in Table 3 which displays individual subject
performance in relation to the results of the total AKU‐EB entry.
By comparing t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n the average marks in your school and the average

mark in all schools you can see in which subjects your students put in a better than average
performance and in which subjects your performance is below average. T h i s i s s h o w n a s
“ O v e r a l l ” i n t h e "Differences". If that difference is marked with an asterisk (*) it is very
likely a real difference (not a random fluctuation) and one you should pay particular attention to.
The remaining three differences show how the overall differences have occurred in Multiple
Choice (MCQ), Constructed Response (CRQ) or Practicals. These differences between formats
are not always in the same direction as the overall difference.
Page 2 of 3
The cells in the column “overall differences” should not differ very much from each other if all
your teachers are of much the same calibre. A difference which is much out of line on the
positive side reveals teachers or staff teams who have insight into how to bring out the best in
your students. You should arrange to have these teachers share their insights with colleagues in
other subject groups. A much enlarged negative difference indicates a subject teacher or
teachers in need of professional assistance. The focus of the required assistance is also signaled
in Table 3. You might for example choose to send the staff involved to an AKU‐EB item writing
workshop.
If the type of item / question does not reveal any explanation of a marked difference, it may arise
from teacher expectation. If a teacher has little hope of high achievement from a class, the class
can sense that and will not give of its best. Or in large classes it can be a matter of how the teacher
chooses to deploy his or her energies ~ teaching to the most promising students in hope of a place
holder, or to the weakest in hope of avoiding any failures. You can get a picture of what your
teachers are doing in larger classes from Figures 5 to 8. The block graphs show the distribution of
marks in your school for each subject. The curve shows the distribution of marks in all schools on
the same scale. Where the block graph emerges above the curve, that is where the teachers’
attention is focused if the score is high, or not focused if the score is low.
These are troublesome issues for head teachers, none of whom can be expected to have mastery
of every school subject. Figure 9 will offer a ray of hope in most schools. It shows the growth in
achievement between Grade XI and Grade XII for students completing both years. Subjects to the
left of the line are improving their performance from Part I to Part II. Subjects to the right of the
line are performing less well in Part II than in Part I. If that is not solace enough, Table 4 offers a
lifeline. You can look there for another AKU‐EB affiliated school of approximately the same
size of subject entry and with the same gender balance (girls outperform boys in almost all
subjects) to set up a dialogue between teachers which can be the beginning of a turnaround in the
subject and perhaps the staff room.
The remaining sections of the report are tactical. They reveal to each subject teacher where the
students prospered and where they floundered. The subject teacher may know why without
having to seek independent assistance. Certainly only in the classroom can these detailed
problems be rectified.
Page 3 of 3
3

To The Head Teacher
Firgure 1 : Comparison of Your School's performance with all schools in 2012
Performance in 2012 HSSC Part-I Your School and All Schools
70
60 Your School
50 HSSC Part-I
Candidates %
40
30
20 All Schools
10 HSSC Part-I
0
A-1 A B C D E F
Grade
Performance in 2012 HSSC Part-II Your School and All Schools
40
Your School
30 HSSC Part-II
Candidates %
20
10 All Schools
HSSC Part-II
0
A-1 A B C D E F
Grade
Performance in 2012 HSSC Consolidated Your School and All Schools
50
Your School
40 HSSC
Candidates %
Consolidated
30
20
All Schools
10 HSSC
Consolidated
0
A-1 A B C D E F
Grade
St. Bonaventure's High School (0059)

Figure 2: Cumulative frequencies of candidates at each overall grade in HSSC 2010, 2011 & 2012
Performance in HSSC Part-I 2010, 2011 & 2012 in Your school
100%
90%
80%
70%
HSSC‐I 2010
60%
50% HSSC‐I 2011
40%
HSSC‐I 2012
30%
20%
10%
0%
A‐1 A B C D E F
Performance in HSSC Part-II 2010, 2011 & 2012 in Your school
100%
90%
80%
70%
HSSC‐II 2010
60%
50% HSSC‐II 2011
40%
HSSC‐II 2012
30%
20%
10%
0%
A‐1 A B C D E F
St.Bonaventure's High School Hyderabad (0059)
Student Grade Distribution in HSSC Annual Examinations 2012
Table 2 : Comparision of subject and group performance with total candidate entry
HSSC Part-I Annual Examination 2012

Student % of Candidate % at each Grade excluding Absent
Group
Count Pass % Absent % A-1 A B C D E F
Pre-Medical 16 100.0% 0.0% 6.3% 50.0% 37.5% 6.3% - - -
Pre-Engineering 10 100.0% 0.0% 10.0% 50.0% 20.0% 20.0% - - -
Your School General Science 7 100.0% 0.0% - 85.7% - 14.3% - - -
Acheivement Humanities - - - - - - -
Commerce - - - - - - -
Overall 33 100.0% 0.0% 6.1% 57.6% 24.2% 12.1% - - -
Pre-Medical - 84.6% 3.7% 6.1% 27.6% 33.1% 19.2% 1.7% 0.0% 12.2%
Pre-Engineering - 80.4% 3.8% 4.2% 26.5% 26.9% 22.7% 3.2% 0.0% 16.4%
All Schools General Science - 53.7% 4.6% 0.0% 8.7% 19.4% 22.3% 5.8% 0.0% 43.7%
Acheivement Humanities - 43.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 10.0% 30.0% 0.0% 56.7%
Commerce - 79.7% 1.4% 1.4% 6.7% 28.7% 32.1% 11.5% 0.5% 19.1%
Overall - 79.0% 3.4% 4.1% 21.9% 28.5% 22.5% 4.7% 0.1% 18.2%
HSSC Part-II Annual Examination 2012

Student % of Candidate % at each Grade excluding Absent
Group
Count Pass % Absent % A-1 A B C D E F
Pre-Medical 13 92.3% 7.7% 25.0% 33.3% 41.7% - - - -
Pre-Engineering 8 100.0% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% - - -
Your School General Science 3 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% - - - - 33.3%
Acheivement Humanities - - - - - - -
Commerce - - - - - - -
Overall 24 91.7% 4.2% 30.4% 34.8% 26.1% 4.3% - - 4.3%
Pre-Medical - 80.8% 10.8% 31.5% 36.2% 16.9% 4.4% 0.5% 1.0% 9.5%
Pre-Engineering - 80.4% 8.1% 14.3% 32.4% 28.3% 9.6% 2.2% 0.7% 12.5%
All Schools General Science - 33.3% 11.1% 6.3% 12.5% 6.3% 6.3% 0.0% 6.3% 62.5%
Acheivement Humanities - 90.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 10.0%
Commerce - 81.2% 4.8% 10.7% 34.5% 27.4% 11.7% 0.5% 0.5% 14.7%
Overall - 80.0% 8.6% 20.8% 34.1% 22.6% 7.8% 1.2% 0.9% 12.5%

Subject-wise Comparative Analysis (HSSC)
Figure 3: Subject-wise comparative analysis of grade performance (Compulsory Subjects)
HSSC Part-I
A1
1.00
A
2.00
B
Grade Distribition
3.00
C
4.00
D
5.00
E
6.00
F
7.00
English Compulsory Urdu Compulsory

Subje ct
HSSC Part-II
A1
1.00
A
2.00
B
Grade Distribition
3.00
C
4.00
D
5.00 È
E
6.00
F
7.00
English Compulsory Islamiyat Pakistan Studies Urdu Compulsory

Subje ct

Subject-wise Comparative Analysis (HSSC)
Figure 4: Subject-wise comparative analysis of grade performance (Elective Subjects)
HSSC Part-I
5.00 È
A1
4.00
B
Grade Distribition
C
3.00 È
E
2.00
1.00
Biology Computer Sc ience Physics

Chemistry Mathematics
HSSC Part-II Subje ct
A1
1.00
A
2.00
B
Grade Distribition
3.00
C
4.00
D
5.00
E
6.00
F
7.00 È
Biology Chemistry Mathematics Physics

Subje ct

Table 3: Comparision of your school subject with all schools
AVERAGE ACHIEVEMENT BY SUBJECT PAPER IN 2012 HSSC-I
Max. Average Marks Difference

Subjects
Marks Your School All Schools Overall MCQ CRQ Practicals
Compulsory
English Compulsory 100 69.48 60.24 9.25 3.60 5.67 -
Urdu Compulsory 100 70.79 65.51 5.28 1.06 4.22 -
Pre-Engineering Group
Mathematics* 100 67.40* 51.76* 15.64* 3.02 12.97 -
Physics* 100 77.00* 62.09* 14.91* 3.03 7.56 0.93
Chemistry* 100 71.80* 58.81* 12.99* 2.94 7.62 -0.47
Pre-Medical Group
Physics 100 72.94 62.09 10.85 3.03 7.56 0.93
Chemistry 100 66.94 58.81 8.13 2.94 7.62 -0.47
Biology 100 69.44 61.10 8.34 3.52 5.58 -0.70
Science General Group
Mathematics* 100 68.00* 51.76* 16.24* 3.02 12.97 -
Computer Science* 100 80.43* 66.37* 14.06* 4.36 6.23 3.47
Physics 100 70.00 62.09 7.91 3.03 7.56 0.93
AVERAGE ACHIEVEMENT BY SUBJECT PAPER IN 2012 HSSC II

HSSC-II
Max. Average Marks Difference

Subjects
Marks Your School All Schools Overall MCQ CRQ Practicals
Compulsory
English Compulsory* 100 77.91* 73.69* 4.22* 2.33 1.83 -
Urdu Compulsory* 100 78.39* 75.37* 3.02* -0.04 3.14 -
Islamiyat 50 43.14 42.45 0.69 0.16 0.61 -
Ethics* 50 46.50* 45.60* 0.90* 0.50 2.10 -
Pakistan Studies 50 35.83 35.12 0.71 -0.55 1.22 -
Pre-Engineering Group
Mathematics 100 59.29 60.42 -1.13 0.37 -2.54 -
Physics* 100 76.71* 69.03* 7.68* -0.38 -0.42 0.18
Chemistry* 100 76.14* 73.05* 3.09* -1.02 -1.92 -1.53
Pre-Medical Group
Physics* 100 62.62* 69.03* -6.42* -0.38 -0.42 0.18
Chemistry* 100 64.23* 73.05* -8.82* -1.02 -1.92 -1.53
Biology* 100 70.85* 76.04* -5.20* -1.19 -2.30 -1.18
Pre-Medical Group
Mathematics 100 56.33 60.42 -4.08 0.37 -2.54 -
Computer Science* 100 78.33* 73.17* 5.17* 1.00 5.00 -1.17
Physics 100 72.33 69.03 3.30 -0.38 -0.42 0.18
St. Bonaventure's High School(0059)

Note: * Significant difference
Figure 5:
Students Students Students
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0-5 0-5
0-5
6-10 6-10
6-10
11-15 11-15
11-15
16-20 16-20
16-20
21-25 21-25 21-25

26-30 26-30 26-30
31-35 31-35 31-35
36-40 36-40 36-40
41-45 41-45 41-45
46-50 46-50
(Based on candidate appeared in the subjects)
46-50
51-55 51-55 51-55
56-60 56-60 56-60
Marks Obtained
Marks Obtained
Marks Obtained
Mathematics n=17
61-65 61-65 61-65
Urdu Compulsory n=33
66-70 66-70
English Compulsory n=33
66-70
71-75 71-75 71-75
76-80 76-80 76-80
81-85 81-85 81-85
86-90 86-90 86-90
91-95 91-95 91-95
96-100 96-100 96-100
Distribution of Subject Achievement in Compulsory Subjects in HSSC-I 2012
Figure 6:
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
1
2
3
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0-5 0-5
0-5
6-10 6-10
6-10
11-15 11-15
11-15
16-20 16-20
16-20
21-25 21-25 21-25

26-30 26-30 26-30
31-35 31-35 31-35
36-40 36-40 36-40
41-45 41-45 41-45
46-50 46-50
46-50
51-55 51-55 51-55
Physics n=33
56-60 56-60 56-60
Chemistry n=26
Marks Obtained
Marks Obtained
Marks Obtained
61-65 61-65 61-65
Computer Science n=7
66-70 66-70 66-70

71-75 71-75 71-75
76-80 76-80 76-80
81-85 81-85 81-85
86-90 86-90 86-90
91-95 91-95 91-95
96-100 96-100 96-100
Distribution of Subject Achievement in Elective Subjects in HSSC-I 2012
Figure 6: Distribution of Subject Achievement in Elective Subjects in HSSC-I 2012
Biology n=16
5
4
Students
0
0-5
6-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
61-65
66-70
71-75
76-80
81-85
86-90
91-95
96-100
Marks Obtained

Figure 7: Distribution of Subject Achievement in Compulsory Subjects in HSSC-II 2012
English Compulsory n=25

6
5
4
Students
3
2
1
0
0-5
6-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
61-65
66-70
71-75
76-80
81-85
86-90
91-95
96-100
Marks Obtained
Urdu Compulsory n=25
9
8
7
6
Students
5
4
3
2
1
0
6-10
96-100
0-5
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
61-65
66-70
71-75
76-80
81-85
86-90
91-95
Marks Obtained
Islamiyat n=23
16
14
12
10
Students
8
6
4
2
0
0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50
Marks Obtained

Figure 7: Distribution of Subject Achievement in Compulsory Subjects in HSSC-II 2012
Pakistan Studies n=25

12
10
8
Students
0
0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50
Marks Obtained
Mathematics n=11
2
Students
0
6-10
96-100
0-5
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
61-65
66-70
71-75
76-80
81-85
86-90
91-95
Marks Obtained

Figure 8:
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0-5 0-5 0-5
6-10 6-10 6-10
11-15 11-15 11-15
16-20 16-20 16-20
21-25 21-25 21-25

26-30 26-30 26-30
31-35 31-35 31-35
36-40 36-40 36-40
41-45 41-45 41-45
46-50 46-50 46-50
51-55 51-55 51-55

Physics n=25
Biology n=14
56-60 56-60 56-60
Chemistry n=22
Marks Obtained
Marks Obtained
Marks Obtained
61-65 61-65 61-65
66-70 66-70 66-70
71-75 71-75 71-75
76-80 76-80 76-80
81-85 81-85 81-85
86-90 86-90 86-90
91-95 91-95 91-95
96-100 96-100 96-100
Distribution of Subject Achievement in Elective Subjects in HSSC-II 2012
Figure 9: Comparison Of Subject Performance in Part I and II
90
80 English Compulsory
HSSC Part II (Year 2012)
Urdu Compulsory
Mathematics
70
Computer Science
Physics
60 Chemistry
Biology
50
50 60 70 80 90
HSSC Part I (Year 2011)
St.Bonaventure's High School Hyderabad (0059)

4

To Subject Teacher
ENGLISH
CONTENTS
I. School Performance in MCQ (Paper-I)

II. School Performance in CRQ (Paper-II)
Explanation:
Table 5 and 6 will assist the teacher to identify topics which were well understood
and topics which require more time and effort. Table 5 shows the proportion of your
candidates getting each MCQ correct, compared with the total candidate entry from
all schools. Table 6 gives the same information for CRQs.
PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH COMPULSORY PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Table 5 : Comparison of your school with all schools
Paper : English Compulsory - I (Paper-I)

No. of Candidates 33
Your School Proportion Proportion

Question ID Answer Key Level of Question
P. Correct Correct Difference
1 A K 0.75 0.79 -0.04
2 A A 0.50 0.61 -0.11
3 C U 1.00 0.83 0.17
4 B U 0.50 0.64 -0.14
5 C U 0.75 0.41 0.34
6 D U 0.88 0.84 0.03
7 A A 0.50 0.44 0.06
8 D U 0.75 0.53 0.22
9 C U 0.75 0.58 0.17
10 B U 0.63 0.43 0.20
11 D A 0.88 0.73 0.14
12 C K 0.38 0.23 0.15
13 D A 0.38 0.41 -0.03
14 D A 1.00 0.77 0.23
15 D U 0.75 0.66 0.09
16 C A 0.13 0.21 -0.08
17 D K 0.00 0.08 -0.08
18 B U 0.88 0.71 0.17
19 D U 0.63 0.59 0.04
20 D U 0.75 0.54 0.21
21 B K 0.50 0.23 0.27
22 D U 1.00 0.73 0.27
23 B U 0.63 0.57 0.05
24 B A 0.50 0.29 0.21
25 B A 0.88 0.73 0.15
26 B K 0.88 0.69 0.18
27 D K 0.88 0.86 0.01
28 C U 0.63 0.50 0.12
29 A K 0.75 0.92 -0.17
30 B K 0.88 0.62 0.26
31 C U 0.63 0.53 0.10
32 D K 0.63 0.58 0.05
33 B K 0.00 0.20 -0.20
34 B K 0.00 0.20 -0.20
35 D U 0.63 0.62 0.00
36 C U 0.88 0.71 0.16
37 B U 0.75 0.65 0.10
38 D U 1.00 0.70 0.30
39 A U 1.00 0.54 0.46
40 C U 0.75 0.63 0.12
KEY: K = Knowledge U = Understanding A = Application

PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH COMPULSORY PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 0111120
Average marks of Average marks of

Question ID Total Marks
your school all schools
K U A K U A K U A
1a 3 - - 2.61 - - 2.50 - -
1b - 4 - - 3.88 - - 3.53 -
1c - 3 - - 2.12 - - 2.10 -
2 - - 10 - - 4.21 - - 3.76
3a 6 - 3 4.56 - 2.61 3.90 - 2.05
3b 6 - 3 4.87 - 2.13 3.78 - 2.01
3c - 6 - - 4.55 - - 3.75 -
4a 8 - 8 6.29 - 5.76 5.41 - 4.71
4b 8 - 8 5.67 - 6.67 4.72 - 4.17
4c 8 - 8 6.46 - 4.31 5.85 - 4.34
4d - 9 - - 6.27 - - 5.38 -
KEY: K= Knowledge U= Understanding A= Application

PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH COMPULSORYI PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : English Compulsory - II (Paper-I)


1 C U 0.83 0.73 0.11
2 C U 0.83 0.60 0.24
3 C U 0.17 0.41 -0.24
4 D U 1.00 0.53 0.47
5 A U 1.00 0.78 0.22
6 B U 0.83 0.50 0.33
7 B U 0.83 0.83 0.00
8 C U 1.00 0.71 0.29
9 A U 1.00 0.83 0.17
10 D U 1.00 0.90 0.10
11 C U 0.83 0.89 -0.06
12 A U 0.67 0.77 -0.10
13 C U 0.50 0.40 0.10
14 C U 0.67 0.86 -0.19
15 C U 1.00 0.86 0.14
16 A U 0.83 0.78 0.05
17 B U 0.83 0.65 0.18
18 B U 1.00 0.69 0.31
19 D U 1.00 0.73 0.27
20 B U 0.67 0.75 -0.08
21 C U 0.67 0.67 0.00
22 D K 0.67 0.58 0.09
23 A U 0.83 0.66 0.17
24 C U 1.00 0.83 0.17
25 C U 1.00 0.82 0.18
26 C A 0.67 0.78 -0.11
27 C U 1.00 0.82 0.18
28 C U 0.83 0.74 0.09
29 D U 0.83 0.59 0.24
30 B K 1.00 0.89 0.11
31 A K 1.00 0.60 0.40
32 C A 1.00 0.67 0.33
33 C K 0.83 0.44 0.39
34 A U 1.00 0.79 0.21
35 C K 0.83 0.56 0.28
36 C U 0.67 0.59 0.07
37 B K 1.00 0.68 0.32
38 A K 0.83 0.82 0.01
39 D A 0.67 0.57 0.10
40 D K 1.00 0.84 0.16

PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH COMPULSORY -IIPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0121120

K U A K U A K U A
1a - 4 - - 3.57 - - 3.66 -
1b 2 - - 1.57 - - 1.59 - -
1c - 4 - - 2.96 - - 3.11 -
2 - - 10 - - 5.26 - - 5.10
3a 7 - 2 4.22 - 1.33 4.96 - 1.41
3b 6 - 3 4.93 - 2.07 4.50 - 2.07
3c - 6 - - 3.91 - - 4.12 -
4a 8 - 8 5.42 - 5.50 5.71 - 5.38
4b 8 - 8 5.50 - 4.63 5.09 - 4.58
4c 8 - 8 5.00 - 5.67 5.63 - 5.08
4d - 9 - - 6.22 - - 6.06 -

URDU
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN URDU COMPULSORY -I PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper : Urdu Compulsory -I (Paper-I)


1 A U 1.00 0.74 0.26
2 D U 0.38 0.35 0.03
3 C U 0.25 0.28 -0.03
4 D U 0.88 0.87 0.00
5 A U 0.63 0.80 -0.18
6 B U 0.38 0.35 0.02
7 D U 0.63 0.50 0.13
8 B U 1.00 0.90 0.10
9 D U 0.63 0.59 0.04
10 A U 1.00 0.96 0.04
11 D U 1.00 0.95 0.05
12 A U 1.00 0.96 0.04
13 C U 1.00 0.90 0.10
14 A U 1.00 0.96 0.04
15 D U 0.88 0.90 -0.02
16 C U 1.00 0.93 0.07
17 D U 0.50 0.80 -0.30
18 B U 1.00 0.93 0.07
19 B U 1.00 0.92 0.08
20 A U 1.00 0.94 0.06
21 A U 0.25 0.40 -0.15
22 D U 1.00 0.89 0.11
23 A U 0.88 0.89 -0.01
24 B U 0.25 0.32 -0.07
25 D U 0.75 0.90 -0.15
26 C U 0.75 0.69 0.06
27 C U 0.38 0.27 0.10
28 D U 1.00 0.96 0.04
29 A U 1.00 0.96 0.04
30 C U 1.00 0.84 0.16
31 A U 0.63 0.34 0.28
32 A U 1.00 0.93 0.07
33 D U 0.88 0.80 0.08
34 A U 0.88 0.84 0.03
35 D U 1.00 0.93 0.07
36 A U 0.50 0.51 -0.01
37 D U 1.00 0.92 0.08
38 A U 0.75 0.73 0.02
39 B U 1.00 0.94 0.06
40 A U 1.00 0.87 0.13

PERFORMANCE IN URDU COMPULSORY PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 0211220

K U A K U A K U A
1a - - 6 - - 3.88 - - 2.68
1b - 4 - - 2.94 - - 1.96 -
2a - 2 - - 1.85 - - 1.83 -
2b - 3 - - 2.58 - - 2.67 -
2c - - 5 - - 2.91 - - 2.80
3a - 4 - - 3.03 - - 2.01 -
3b - 2 - - 0.21 - - 0.09 -
3c - 2 - - 1.94 - - 1.70 -
3d - 2 - - 1.42 - - 1.04 -
4a 6 - 3 2.64 - 2.07 3.18 - 2.41
4b 6 - 3 2.74 - 1.58 2.58 - 1.53
4c - 9 - - 3.73 - - 4.44 -
5a - 6 - - 4.61 - - 3.89 -
5 4 - 2 3.09 - 1.36 2.70 - 1.39

PERFORMANCE IN URDU COMPULSORY -II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Urdu Compulsory -II (Paper-I)


1 A U 1.00 0.98 0.02
2 C U 1.00 0.95 0.05
3 A U 0.83 0.96 -0.13
4 B U 1.00 0.96 0.04
5 C U 1.00 0.96 0.04
6 A U 1.00 0.97 0.03
7 C U 1.00 0.94 0.06
8 B U 1.00 0.97 0.03
9 B U 0.33 0.26 0.08
10 D U 1.00 0.97 0.03
11 C U 1.00 0.93 0.07
12 D U 1.00 0.97 0.03
13 B U 1.00 0.93 0.07
14 C U 1.00 0.91 0.09
15 B U 1.00 0.93 0.07
16 B U 1.00 0.94 0.06
17 D U 1.00 0.52 0.48
18 C U 1.00 0.94 0.06
19 C U 1.00 0.94 0.06
20 A U 0.83 0.61 0.23
21 A U 0.83 0.71 0.13
22 A U 1.00 0.96 0.04
23 B U 1.00 0.96 0.04
24 A U 1.00 0.97 0.03
25 A U 0.67 0.23 0.44
26 B A 1.00 0.87 0.13
27 D A 1.00 0.85 0.15
28 A U 1.00 0.97 0.03
29 A A 0.50 0.56 -0.06
30 B U 1.00 0.97 0.03
31 A U 0.83 0.90 -0.07
32 A U 0.33 0.24 0.09
33 D U 1.00 0.87 0.13
34 A A 1.00 0.94 0.06
35 B,D U 0.33 0.35 -0.01
36 A U 1.00 0.94 0.06
37 D U 0.67 0.57 0.10
38 C U 0.83 0.91 -0.08
39 B U 0.83 0.57 0.26
40 B A 0.00 0.42 -0.42

PERFORMANCE IN URDU COMPULSORY IPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0221220

K U A K U A K U A
1a - - 5 - - 2.22 - - 2.04
1b - 3 - - 2.91 - - 2.91 -
1c - 2 - - 1.96 - - 1.82 -
2a - - 4 - - 2.87 - - 2.44
2b - 2 - - 1.74 - - 1.54 -
2c - 2 - - 1.65 - - 1.46 -
2d - 2 - - 1.74 - - 1.75 -
3a - 2 - - 1.52 - - 1.28 -
3b - - 4 - - 2.57 - - 1.93
3c - 2 - - 1.52 - - 1.70 -
3d - 2 - - - - - 0.04 -
4 6 - 3 4.78 - 2.39 4.21 - 2.15
4a - 9 - - 5.78 - - 5.70 -
5 7 2 3 4.78 1.43 1.83 4.53 1.19 2.03

ISLAMIYAT
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN ISLAMIYAT - II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Islamiyat - II (Paper-I)


1 B U 1.00 0.98 0.02
2 C K 0.71 0.67 0.05
3 D K 0.43 0.47 -0.04
4 A K 0.43 0.65 -0.23
5 C A 1.00 0.77 0.23
6 B U 1.00 0.81 0.19
7 A U 1.00 0.97 0.03
8 D U 1.00 0.89 0.11
9 C U 1.00 0.85 0.15
10 B A 1.00 0.94 0.06
11 A A 0.57 0.40 0.17
12 C K 0.57 0.69 -0.12
13 D A 0.57 0.69 -0.12
14 * U 1.00 1.00 0.00
15 C K 1.00 0.97 0.03
16 A U 1.00 0.90 0.10
17 D A 1.00 0.85 0.15
18 B U 0.14 0.25 -0.10
19 C U 1.00 0.94 0.06
20 A U 0.29 0.21 0.08

* Unsatisfactory item. Candidates given the benefit of that doubt.

PERFORMANCE IN ISLAMIYATPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0421220

K U A K U A K U A
1a - - 3 - - 2.86 - - 2.70
1b - - 3 - - 2.57 - - 2.47
2a - 3 - - 2.43 - - 2.57 -
2b - - 3 - - 2.86 - - 2.70
3 - - 4 - - 3.52 - - 3.72
4 - - 4 - - 3.62 - - 3.83
5 - 3 - - 2.48 - - 2.53 -
6a 7 - - 6.33 - - 5.80 - -
6b 7 - - 6.17 - - 4.97 - -

ETHICS
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN ETHICS - II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Ethics - II (Paper-I)


1 A K 0.50 0.40 0.10
2 B U 1.00 1.00 0.00
3 C K 1.00 0.80 0.20
4 A K 0.00
5 A U 0.50 0.60 -0.10
6 B U 1.00 0.80 0.20
7 A K 1.00 1.00 0.00
8 B U 0.50 0.40 0.10
9 A K 1.00 1.00 0.00
10 D U 1.00 1.00 0.00

PERFORMANCE IN ETHICSPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0521120

K U A K U A K U A
1a - 3 - - 2.50 - - 2.61 -
1b - 2 - - 2.00 - - 1.80 -
2a - 2 - - 2.00 - - 1.39 -
2b - 3 - - 2.50 - - 1.37 -
3a - 3 - - 3.00 - - 2.80 -
3b - 2 - - 2.00 - - 2.00 -
4a - 5 - - 5.00 - - 5.00 -
4b - 2 - - 2.00 - - 2.00 -
5a - 4 - - 4.00 - - 2.98 -
5b - 4 - - 4.00 - - 4.00 -
6b - 5 - - 4.50 - - 4.80 -
7a - 5 - - 4.00 - - 4.50 -
7b - 5 - - 4.00 - - 4.69 -

PAKISTAN STUDIES
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN PAKISTAN STUDIES PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Pakistan Studies (Paper-I)


1 B U 0.50 0.44 0.06
2 D U 0.75 0.63 0.12
3 C U 0.25 0.37 -0.12
4 B U 0.25 0.33 -0.08
5 D A 0.88 0.62 0.25
6 C U 1.00 0.80 0.20
7 D K 0.63 0.64 -0.01
8 B K 0.13 0.28 -0.15
9 A U 1.00 0.79 0.21
10 A U 0.50 0.21 0.29
11 A A 0.38 0.59 -0.22
12 C K 0.13 0.37 -0.25
13 C U 0.13 0.17 -0.04
14 A U 0.75 0.48 0.27
15 B K 0.25 0.36 -0.11

PERFORMANCE IN PAKISTAN STUDIESPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0621120

K U A K U A K U A
1a - 3 - - 2.52 - - 1.93 -
1b - 3 - - 1.57 - - 1.68 -
2a - 4 - - 3.78 - - 3.05 -
2b 4 - - 2.35 - - 2.25 - -
3a 4 - - 2.65 - - 2.62 - -
3b - 3 - - 2.48 - - 2.35 -
4a - 2 - - 1.78 - - 1.85 -
4b - 3 - - 2.43 - - 2.41 -
5a - - 2 - - 1.70 - - 1.74
5b - 2 - - 1.48 - - 1.80 -
6a - 5 - - 5.00 - - 3.52 -
6b - 5 - - 4.59 - - 4.66 -

MATHEMATICS
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN MATHEMATICS- I PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper : Mathematics- I (Paper-I)


1 C A 0.50 0.54 -0.04
2 C A 0.75 0.52 0.23
3 B A 0.75 0.75 0.00
4 B K 1.00 0.68 0.32
5 B A 0.50 0.60 -0.10
6 A A 0.50 0.56 -0.06
7 D U 0.25 0.31 -0.06
8 A U 0.75 0.55 0.20
9 A A 1.00 0.59 0.41
10 B A 0.50 0.37 0.13
11 B U 0.50 0.38 0.12
12 C K 0.25 0.25 0.00
13 D U 0.75 0.44 0.31
14 C U 0.50 0.36 0.14
15 A U 0.25 0.15 0.10
16 D U 0.25 0.35 -0.10
17 A U 0.25 0.34 -0.09
18 A K 0.00 0.20 -0.20
19 D U 0.75 0.56 0.19
20 B U 0.25 0.51 -0.26
21 C U 0.50 0.32 0.18
22 D A 1.00 0.73 0.27
23 C K 0.00 0.09 -0.09
24 C U 0.25 0.48 -0.23
25 C A 0.75 0.58 0.17
26 C U 0.75 0.62 0.13
27 A K 0.25 0.52 -0.27
28 C U 0.50 0.44 0.06
29 C K 0.50 0.61 -0.11
30 D U 1.00 0.79 0.21
31 A U 0.25 0.36 -0.11
32 B K 0.00 0.45 -0.45
33 B K 0.50 0.35 0.15
34 B U 0.50 0.48 0.02
35 B U 0.75 0.45 0.30

PERFORMANCE IN MATHEMATICS PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 0711120

K U A K U A K U A
1i - - 2 - - 1.24 - - 1.22
1ii - 2 - - 1.24 - - 0.99 -
2i - - 4 - - 3.53 - - 2.39
2ii - - 3 - - 2.47 - - 1.88
3 - - 5 - - 4.41 - - 3.77
4a - - 3 - - 2.80 - - 1.84
4b - - 3 - - - - - 1.00
5a - - 4 - - 3.71 - - 1.86
5b - - 4 - - 1.70 - - 1.51
6i - - 4 - - 3.47 - - 1.87
6ii - 2 - - 0.76 - - 0.69 -
7ai - - 4 - - 0.47 - - 0.75
7aii - - 3 - - 0.24 - - 0.55
7bi - - 3 - - 2.24 - - 1.57
7bii - - 4 - - 2.94 - - 1.85
8 - 2 - - 1.71 - - 0.56 -
9 - - 6 - - 3.82 - - 2.91
10ai - - 4 - - 3.12 - - 1.85
10aii - 2 - - 0.76 - - 1.07 -
10bi - - 2 - - 0.59 - - 0.50
10bii - - 4 - - 0.82 - - 0.70
11ai - - 5 - - 1.24 - - 1.55
11aii - - 3 - - 0.88 - - 1.29
11bi - - 6 - - 4.06 - - 2.21
11bii - 2 - - 1.41 - - 0.67 -
12ai - 4 - - 0.76 - - 0.50 -
12aii - - 3 - - 0.24 - - 0.19
12b - - 7 - - 1.65 - - 1.68

PERFORMANCE IN MATHEMATICS- II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Mathematics- II (Paper-I)


1 A K 0.80 0.74 0.06
2 C U 1.00 0.79 0.21
3 B U 0.60 0.52 0.08
4 B A 0.60 0.43 0.17
5 D U 0.80 0.76 0.04
6 B U 1.00 0.84 0.16
7 C U 0.80 0.73 0.07
8 B A 0.50 0.43 0.07
9 D A 0.70 0.68 0.02
10 A U 0.70 0.40 0.30
11 A K 0.60 0.60 0.00
12 D U 0.90 0.77 0.13
13 B U 0.30 0.08 0.22
14 C U 0.80 0.72 0.08
15 D A 0.80 0.78 0.02
16 D A 0.10 0.49 -0.39
17 A U 0.30 0.25 0.05
18 D A 0.70 0.77 -0.07
19 A U 0.70 0.39 0.31
20 B A 0.80 0.71 0.09
21 D U 0.10 0.14 -0.04
22 C U 0.60 0.40 0.20
23 C U 0.80 0.62 0.18
24 B U 0.10 0.31 -0.21
25 A A 0.70 0.67 0.03
26 D U 0.30 0.53 -0.23
27 A U 0.70 0.51 0.19
28 B K 0.60 0.63 -0.03
29 C U 0.80 0.58 0.22
30 A U 0.70 0.52 0.18
31 C U 0.70 0.60 0.10
32 D A 0.20 0.25 -0.05
33 A U 0.10 0.22 -0.12
34 B K 0.00 0.19 -0.19
35 C A 0.70 0.49 0.21

PERFORMANCE IN MATHEMATICS IPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0721120

K U A K U A K U A
1i - - 2 - - 1.56 - - 1.71
1ii - - 2 - - 1.44 - - 1.44
1iii - - 2 - - 0.56 - - 0.50
2a - - 6 - - 0.67 - - 1.73
2b - - 6 - - 1.00 - - 1.07
2c - - 6 - - 2.56 - - 3.60
3a - - 7 - - 4.44 - - 4.22
3b - - 7 - - 0.67 - - 1.05
3ci - 2 - - - - - 0.07 -
3cii - - 5 - - 0.44 - - 0.41
4a - - 5 - - 3.00 - - 1.82
4b - - 5 - - 1.56 - - 2.36
4ci 1 - - - - - 0.04 - -
4cii - - 4 - - 0.89 - - 1.12
5a - - 7 - - 1.56 - - 1.64
5bi - - 4 - - 1.67 - - 1.64
5bii - - 3 - - 0.89 - - 0.99
6a - 6 - - - - - 1.95 -
6b - - 6 - - 2.78 - - 2.31
6c - - 6 - - 4.00 - - 2.57
7a - - 4 - - - - - 1.06
7b - - 4 - - 2.78 - - 1.72

COMPUTER SCIENCE
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE - I PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper : Computer Science - I (Paper-I)


1 A U 0.43 0.59 -0.16
2 D U 0.43 0.22 0.21
3 C U 0.14 0.72 -0.57
4 C U 0.86 0.48 0.38
5 C U 0.86 0.58 0.28
6 A U 0.86 0.28 0.57
7 A U 0.57 0.26 0.31
8 D K 0.86 0.73 0.13
9 C K 1.00 0.86 0.14
10 B U 0.86 0.35 0.51
11 B,C K 0.71 0.46 0.26
12 A K 0.43 0.25 0.18
13 D U 0.86 0.64 0.22
14 C K 1.00 0.74 0.26
15 A K 0.43 0.19 0.24
16 B U 0.86 0.68 0.18
17 B U 0.14 0.32 -0.18
18 C U 0.43 0.35 0.08
19 B U 0.71 0.73 -0.01
20 B U 1.00 0.78 0.22
21 C U 0.43 0.37 0.06
22 A U 1.00 0.77 0.23
23 D K 0.71 0.72 0.00
24 A K 0.57 0.65 -0.08
25 B K 0.86 0.25 0.61
26 A U 0.43 0.64 -0.21
27 D K 1.00 0.75 0.25
28 C K 0.71 0.43 0.28
29 D U 1.00 0.60 0.40
30 A U 0.71 0.68 0.04

PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 0911120

K U A K U A K U A
1 - - 4 - - 3.00 - - 2.85
2 - 4 - - 2.71 - - 2.27 -
3 - 4 - - 3.57 - - 2.70 -
4 - 4 - - 2.29 - - 0.32 -
5a 2 - - 2.00 - - 1.90 - -
5b - 4 - - 3.14 - - 3.33 -
6 - 3 - - 2.71 - - 2.32 -
7 - 3 - - 2.86 - - 2.34 -
8 4 - - 3.29 - - 2.97 - -
9 - 3 - - 2.86 - - 2.49 -
10b - 10 - - 7.29 - - 6.26 -

PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE - II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Computer Science - II (Paper-I)


1 C K 1.00 0.83 0.17
2 D U 1.00 0.67 0.33
3 B K 0.67 0.33 0.33
4 C U 1.00 0.33 0.67
5 B U 0.33 0.58 -0.25
6 B U 0.67 0.58 0.08
7 C U 0.67 0.50 0.17
8 D K 1.00 0.67 0.33
9 B U 0.67 0.67 0.00
10 * K 1.00 1.00 0.00
11 A K 0.33 0.17 0.17
12 B K 0.67 0.25 0.42
13 C U 1.00 0.67 0.33
14 B,D K 1.00 0.58 0.42
15 A K 0.00 0.42 -0.42
16 C U 0.33 0.67 -0.33
17 C U 0.67 0.58 0.08
18 A K 0.67 0.67 0.00
19 B,C K 0.67 0.75 -0.08
20 * U 1.00 1.00 0.00
21 B K 0.67 0.33 0.33
22 C,D U 0.67 0.83 -0.17
23 B U 0.67 0.58 0.08
24 B K 0.33 0.25 0.08
25 A U 0.33 0.33 0.00
26 C U 0.67 0.17 0.50
27 C,D U 1.00 0.83 0.17
28 C U 0.33 0.33 0.00
29 D,C K 1.00 0.50 0.50
30 B U 0.67 0.42 0.25

* Unsatisfactory item. Candidates given the benefit of that doubt.

PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE IPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 0921120

K U A K U A K U A
1 - 4 - - 3.67 - - 2.71 -
2a - 2 - - 1.67 - - 0.91 -
2b - 2 - - 1.33 - - 0.67 -
3 - 2 - - 1.67 - - 1.23 -
4 - - 6 - - 4.67 - - 3.39
5 - 3 - - - - - 1.32 -
6 - 5 - - - - - 1.87 -
7 - - 4 - - - - - 0.97
8a 3 - - - - - 0.99 - -
8b 2 - - - - - 0.65 - -
9 2 - - - - - 0.44 - -
10a - - 10 - - - - - 1.90
11 3 - - 2.33 - - 0.90 - -
12 - 5 - - 3.33 - - 1.54 -
13a - - 2 - - 2.00 - - 0.89
13b - - 2 - - 1.00 - - 0.34
14 - 5 - - 3.67 - - 1.56 -
15 - 2 - - 1.33 - - 0.66 -
16a - - 10 - - 5.67 - - 1.94

PHYSICS
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN PHYSICS - I PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper : Physics - I (Paper-I)


1 C U 0.44 0.41 0.04
2 A U 0.78 0.74 0.04
3 B A 0.56 0.43 0.12
4 C A 0.56 0.39 0.16
5 A K 0.56 0.72 -0.16
6 C K 0.78 0.70 0.08
7 A U 0.78 0.70 0.08
8 B U 0.56 0.59 -0.04
9 C A 1.00 0.78 0.22
10 A U 0.78 0.73 0.05
11 B K 0.89 0.80 0.09
12 B K 0.67 0.71 -0.05
13 D K 0.56 0.72 -0.16
14 D K 0.11 0.02 0.09
15 C U 0.33 0.36 -0.03
16 D U 1.00 0.54 0.46
17 B K 0.67 0.55 0.12
18 B K 0.78 0.77 0.01
19 C U 0.22 0.28 -0.06
20 C U 0.44 0.49 -0.05
21 D K 1.00 0.89 0.11
22 D U 0.89 0.65 0.24
23 D K 0.67 0.74 -0.07
24 B K 0.44 0.55 -0.11
25 D K 0.67 0.64 0.03
26 A K 0.78 0.90 -0.13
27 A K 1.00 0.84 0.16
28 A U 0.67 0.63 0.04
29 D U 0.78 0.77 0.00
30 A K 0.78 0.79 -0.01

PERFORMANCE IN PHYSICS PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 1711120

K U A K U A K U A
1a - - 3 - - 2.03 - - 1.60
1b 2 - - 1.52 - - 1.09 - -
2a - 3 - - 1.91 - - 1.75 -
2b - 2 - - 1.61 - - 1.51 -
3 - 4 - - 3.09 - - 2.49 -
4 3 - - 2.61 - - 2.07 - -
5a 3 - - 2.94 - - 2.46 - -
5b 1 - - 0.79 - - 0.63 - -
6 - - 4 - - 3.45 - - 2.25
7 - 5 - - 0.64 - - 0.32 -
8 3 - - 2.21 - - 2.21 - -
9a 2 - - 1.21 - - 1.03 - -
9b - 2 - - 1.18 - - 0.65 -
10 - 3 - - 2.55 - - 1.85 -
11a - - 5 - - 3.00 - - 2.36
11b - - 5 - - 0.83 - - 0.74
12a - 5 - - 0.90 - - 1.14 -
12b - 5 - - 3.57 - - 2.56 -
13a - 5 - - 2.83 - - 3.13 -
13b - 5 - - 4.62 - - 3.35 -

PERFORMANCE IN PHYSICS - II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Physics - II (Paper-I)


1 A U 0.83 0.87 -0.04
2 C U 0.50 0.34 0.16
3 C K 0.17 0.38 -0.21
4 A U 0.67 0.76 -0.09
5 A U 0.83 0.74 0.10
6 C A 0.67 0.78 -0.11
7 D A 0.50 0.67 -0.17
8 B K 0.83 0.80 0.03
9 C U 0.83 0.74 0.09
10 B U 0.67 0.75 -0.09
11 B K 1.00 0.80 0.20
12 B U 0.67 0.82 -0.15
13 C U 1.00 0.88 0.12
14 D K 0.50 0.38 0.12
15 C U 0.17 0.35 -0.18
16 B U 1.00 0.88 0.12
17 D K 0.50 0.32 0.18
18 C K 1.00 0.76 0.24
19 B K 1.00 0.69 0.31
20 A K 0.83 0.53 0.30
21 D U 0.67 0.56 0.11
22 A K 0.83 0.84 -0.01
23 B K 0.83 0.69 0.15
24 C U 0.83 0.81 0.02
25 D K 0.67 0.74 -0.08
26 B K 1.00 0.78 0.22
27 A K 0.67 0.46 0.20
28 C K 1.00 0.95 0.05
29 C U 0.50 0.63 -0.13
30 D K 0.50 0.65 -0.15

PERFORMANCE IN PHYSICS IPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 1721120

K U A K U A K U A
1 3 - - 2.57 - - 2.37 - -
2 - 4 - - 2.30 - - 2.40 -
3 - 5 - - 2.57 - - 2.26 -
4 - 5 - - 2.83 - - 2.88 -
5 - 5 - - 2.22 - - 2.31 -
6 3 - - 2.83 - - 2.69 - -
7 3 - - 0.35 - - 0.22 - -
8 - - 3 - - 0.61 - - 0.65
9 - - 4 - - 1.70 - - 1.94
10 - 5 - - 1.83 - - 2.53 -
11a - 5 - - - - - 1.82 -
11b - 5 - - 2.45 - - 2.65 -
12a - 5 - - 2.50 - - 2.48 -
12b - 5 - - 2.40 - - 2.27 -
13a - 5 - - 3.43 - - 2.87 -
13b - 5 - - 3.11 - - 3.44 -

CHEMISTRY
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN CHEMISTRY - I PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper : Chemistry - I (Paper-I)


1 B A 0.50 0.51 -0.01
2 B A 0.67 0.57 0.10
3 C A 0.33 0.35 -0.02
4 A U 0.83 0.56 0.27
5 B A 0.50 0.49 0.01
6 C K 0.00 0.28 -0.28
7 A K 0.67 0.45 0.22
8 D U 0.50 0.22 0.28
9 C,A U 0.83 0.70 0.13
10 B U 0.33 0.34 -0.01
11 A U 1.00 0.94 0.06
12 C K 0.83 0.63 0.20
13 B K 1.00 0.72 0.28
14 B K 0.83 0.71 0.12
15 C K 0.17 0.12 0.04
16 D U 1.00 0.60 0.40
17 D K 0.83 0.44 0.40
18 B U 0.33 0.48 -0.15
19 C U 0.67 0.51 0.16
20 D U 0.50 0.34 0.16
21 A K 0.67 0.41 0.26
22 A K 0.17 0.14 0.03
23 C U 0.83 0.58 0.25
24 D A 0.83 0.57 0.26
25 C U 0.50 0.63 -0.13
26 C A 0.33 0.63 -0.29
27 B U 0.67 0.43 0.23
28 A K 1.00 0.58 0.42
29 B U 0.33 0.20 0.14
30 D U 1.00 0.53 0.47

PERFORMANCE IN CHEMISTRY PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 1811120

K U A K U A K U A
1a - - 2 - - 1.08 - - 0.86
1b - 2 - - 1.81 - - 1.37 -
1c - - 2 - - 1.42 - - 1.18
1d - 2 - - 1.46 - - 0.94 -
2a - - 2 - - 0.65 - - 0.70
2b - 4 - - 2.42 - - 2.38 -
3a - 3 - - 2.31 - - 1.73 -
3b - 2 - - 1.38 - - 1.26 -
4a - 2 - - 1.85 - - 1.55 -
4b - - 2 - - 1.50 - - 1.19
5a - 2 - - 1.00 - - 0.59 -
5b - 2 - - 0.58 - - 0.79 -
5c 2 - - 1.42 - - 1.01 - -
5d - 2 - - 1.23 - - 0.58 -
6a 1 - - 1.00 - - 0.86 - -
6b - 2 - - 1.65 - - 1.37 -
6c - 1 - - 0.96 - - 0.70 -
7a 1 - - 1.00 - - 0.82 - -
7b - - 4 - - 2.62 - - 2.00
8a - - 5 - - 3.50 - - 2.61
8b - - 5 - - 4.06 - - 3.36
9a - - 5 - - 2.50 - - 1.65
9b - - 5 - - 3.00 - - 2.65
10a - 5 - - 3.50 - - 1.97 -
10b - 5 - - 3.50 - - 2.76 -

PERFORMANCE IN CHEMISTRY - II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Chemistry - II (Paper-I)


1 A K 1.00 0.64 0.36
2 C U 0.57 0.62 -0.05
3 A U 0.14 0.40 -0.26
4 B U 0.29 0.48 -0.19
5 C U 0.43 0.62 -0.20
6 B K 1.00 0.83 0.17
7 C U 0.71 0.67 0.04
8 A U 0.86 0.64 0.22
9 D K 0.00 0.18 -0.18
10 A U 0.71 0.49 0.22
11 B K 1.00 0.83 0.17
12 C U 0.86 0.70 0.16
13 C U 0.29 0.31 -0.02
14 B K 0.14 0.51 -0.37
15 D K 0.86 0.62 0.23
16 B U 0.86 0.67 0.19
17 A U 0.57 0.75 -0.17
18 B U 0.57 0.70 -0.12
19 D K 0.86 0.35 0.51
20 B U 0.14 0.26 -0.12
21 A U 0.86 0.86 0.00
22 D U 0.71 0.72 0.00
23 C K 0.86 0.71 0.14
24 C U 0.57 0.59 -0.02
25 A U 0.14 0.55 -0.40
26 D U 0.43 0.72 -0.29
27 C U 0.86 0.67 0.18
28 D U 0.43 0.57 -0.15
29 C U 0.86 0.73 0.13
30 B U 0.29 0.13 0.16

PERFORMANCE IN CHEMISTRY I PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 1821120

K U A K U A K U A
1a - 2 - - 1.25 - - 1.31 -
1b - 4 - - 2.80 - - 3.17 -
1ci - 2 - - 0.80 - - 0.53 -
1cii - 2 - - 0.70 - - 0.74 -
2a 3 - - 2.80 - - 2.81 - -
2b - 3 - - 1.15 - - 1.57 -
3a - 2 - - 1.65 - - 1.81 -
3b - 2 - - 1.20 - - 1.30 -
4 - 4 - - 1.20 - - 1.50 -
5ai - - 2 - - 1.45 - - 1.57
5aii 2 - - 1.15 - - 1.48 - -
5b - 2 - - 0.90 - - 1.00 -
6 - 4 - - 2.60 - - 2.24 -
7a - 3 - - 0.90 - - 1.44 -
7b - 3 - - 2.30 - - 1.79 -
8a - 5 - - 3.19 - - 3.14 -
8b - 5 - - 3.75 - - 4.12 -
9a - 5 - - 3.45 - - 3.64 -
9b - 5 - - 2.11 - - 3.12 -
10a - 5 - - 4.12 - - 3.78 -
10b - 5 - - 5.00 - - 3.91 -

BIOLOGY
CONTENTS

Explanation:
PERFORMANCE IN BIOLOGY - I PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper : Biology - I (Paper-I)


1 C K 0.88 0.77 0.10
2 A A 0.88 0.63 0.25
3 D U 1.00 0.70 0.30
4 D U 0.69 0.63 0.06
5 C U 0.56 0.61 -0.04
6 A U 0.81 0.54 0.27
7 A U 1.00 0.78 0.22
8 C U 1.00 0.80 0.20
9 A A 0.69 0.54 0.15
10 C A 0.56 0.48 0.08
11 B K 0.50 0.36 0.14
12 A U 0.69 0.51 0.18
13 B U 0.69 0.49 0.20
14 C K 0.81 0.53 0.28
15 A U 0.81 0.65 0.16
16 D U 0.75 0.58 0.17
17 D K 0.81 0.64 0.17
18 C U 0.94 0.74 0.20
19 B K 0.69 0.67 0.01
20 D U 0.81 0.76 0.05
21 A U 0.81 0.56 0.25
22 C U 0.63 0.48 0.14
23 C U 0.69 0.56 0.13
24 D U 0.94 0.74 0.20
25 B K 0.94 0.86 0.07
26 C U 0.44 0.44 0.00
27 A K 0.56 0.47 0.09
28 B U 0.63 0.47 0.16
29 B U 0.56 0.56 0.00
30 D U 0.25 0.33 -0.08

PERFORMANCE IN BIOLOGY PAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-I
Paper ID : 1911120

K U A K U A K U A
1a 2 - - 1.56 - - 1.19 - -
1b - 2 - - 0.75 - - 0.68 -
2 - 4 - - 3.00 - - 2.72 -
3a - 2 - - 0.63 - - 1.01 -
3b - 2 - - 1.94 - - 1.30 -
4 4 - - 2.00 - - 2.26 - -
5a - 3 - - 2.19 - - 1.87 -
5b - 3 - - 2.13 - - 1.50 -
6a 1 - - 0.63 - - 0.45 - -
6b - - 4 - - 0.75 - - 1.21
7a - 3 - - 2.06 - - 1.27 -
7b - 2 - - 0.94 - - 0.91 -
8 - 4 - - 2.94 - - 2.08 -
9 - 4 - - 2.44 - - 1.32 -
10a - 5 - - 3.67 - - 1.35 -
10b - 5 - - 4.15 - - 3.96 -
11a - 5 - - 3.25 - - 2.86 -
11b - 5 - - 4.38 - - 3.98 -
12a - 5 - - 1.80 - - 1.87 -
12b - 5 - - 3.50 - - 2.26 -

PERFORMANCE IN BIOLOGY - II PAPER-I IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper : Biology - II (Paper-I)


1 A U 0.92 0.83 0.10
2 C U 0.23 0.38 -0.15
3 B U 0.85 0.80 0.05
4 C K 0.92 0.76 0.16
5 C U 0.54 0.64 -0.10
6 B K 0.69 0.59 0.11
7 A U 0.69 0.48 0.22
8 A K 0.31 0.43 -0.12
9 B U 0.15 0.22 -0.07
10 C U 0.92 0.86 0.06
11 B K 0.23 0.41 -0.18
12 D U 0.69 0.62 0.07
13 D U 0.46 0.52 -0.06
14 C U 0.69 0.71 -0.02
15 D U 0.85 0.73 0.11
16 B K 0.69 0.63 0.06
17 D K 0.69 0.57 0.12
18 C K 0.31 0.55 -0.24
19 A A 0.54 0.60 -0.06
20 D U 0.54 0.52 0.02
21 B U 0.85 0.65 0.20
22 C K 0.85 0.87 -0.02
23 D U 0.69 0.70 -0.01
24 B K 0.69 0.69 0.00
25 C U 0.92 0.86 0.06
26 B U 0.85 0.78 0.07
27 B K 1.00 0.88 0.12
28 D U 0.23 0.39 -0.16
29 C K 0.46 0.33 0.13
30 C U 0.69 0.70 -0.01

PERFORMANCE IN BIOLOGY IPAPER -II IN 2012 HSSC-II
Paper ID : 1921120

K U A K U A K U A
1 - 4 - - 2.93 - - 3.35 -
2 - 4 - - 1.79 - - 2.17 -
3a - 3 - - 1.86 - - 2.11 -
3b 3 - - 2.43 - - 2.30 - -
4a - 4 - - 1.57 - - 2.18 -
4b 2 - - 1.43 - - 1.29 - -
5a - 2 - - 0.64 - - 0.61 -
5b - 2 - - 1.21 - - 1.12 -
6a - 3 - - 2.00 - - 2.11 -
6b - - 3 - - 2.71 - - 2.42
6c 2 - - 1.29 - - 1.40 - -
7a 1 - - 0.64 - - 0.71 - -
7b 3 - - 1.71 - - 1.79 - -
8a - 2 - - 1.07 - - 1.19 -
8b - 2 - - 1.50 - - 1.40 -
9a - 5 - - 3.42 - - 3.57 -
9b - 5 - - 4.00 - - 3.13 -
10a - 5 - - 2.75 - - 2.78 -
10b - 5 - - 3.10 - - 3.53 -
11a - 5 - - 3.33 - - 2.20 -
11b - 5 - - 3.18 - - 3.63 -

THE AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION BOARD
Bungalow # 233/E.I Lines’ Daudpota Road,
Karachi, Pakistan. Fax: (92-21) 35224711, Telephone: 35224702-10,
E-mail: examination.board@aku.edu, website: www.aku.edu/akueb

SC 2012 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SC 2012 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

School Performance Report

HSSC Examination 2012

St. Bonaventure's High School

2. HOW TO USE THIS REPORT

Table 1: Grade/Percentage Mark Conversion

3. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORT TO HEAD TEACHER

Figure 1: Comparison of your school’s performance with all schools in 2012

Figure 2: Cumulative frequencies of candidates at each overall grade in HSSC 2010,

Table 2: Comparison of subject group performance with total candidate entry

Table 3: Comparison of your school subjects with all schools

Figure 5:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part I)

Figure 6:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part I)

Figure 7:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part II)

Figure 8:* Subject Performance and Comparison - (Part II)

Figure 9: Comparison Of Subject Performance in Part I and II

Table 4: Best Performing Schools (Only for SSC)

4. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORT TO SUBJECT TEACHER

Table 5: Subject Wise Item Analysis MCQ

Table 6: Subject Wise Item Analysis CRQ

*(Only for the Subjects having more than 5 Candidates).

Mission Statement And

In pursuing its educational objectives, AKU-EB will:

 Develop expertise in educational assessment and testing in Pakistan.

: ‫ درج ذ‬ ( ‫ )اے ۔ ای‬ ‫ل‬ ‫ا‬

‫ت ا د۔‬ ‫ ا ر ا ا اور ا ا ا ا‬ ‫ں‬ ‫ ا‬ ‫ اور اردو‬ ‫ا‬ 

‫۔‬ ‫ہ‬ ‫ ر اد ری ا‬ ‫ ب ون ض ا‬ ‫ری اور ا‬ 

‫ رت ا ۔‬ ‫ اور‬ ‫ن‬ 

is to improve the quality of education by making examination of reputable standard more

institution in and outside the country.

‫ری ا‬ ‫ ا‬ ‫ رل رڈ آف ا‬ ‫ رڈ )اے – ای ( ا‬ ‫آ ن ر ا ا‬

How To Use This Report

Table 1: Grade/Percentage mark conversion

GRADE Percentage of marks

By comparing t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n the average marks in your school and the average

School Performance Report

Performance in 2012 HSSC Part-I Your School and All Schools

Performance in 2012 HSSC Part-II Your School and All Schools

Performance in 2012 HSSC Consolidated Your School and All Schools

St. Bonaventure's High School (0059)

Performance in HSSC Part-I 2010, 2011 & 2012 in Your school

Performance in HSSC Part-II 2010, 2011 & 2012 in Your school

HSSC Part-I Annual Examination 2012

HSSC Part-II Annual Examination 2012

St. Bonaventure's High School (0059)

Figure 3: Subject-wise comparative analysis of grade performance (Compulsory Subjects)

English Compulsory Urdu Compulsory

English Compulsory Islamiyat Pakistan Studies Urdu Compulsory

St. Bonaventure's High School (0059)

Figure 4: Subject-wise comparative analysis of grade performance (Elective Subjects)

Biology Computer Sc ience Physics

Biology Chemistry Mathematics Physics

St. Bonaventure's High School (0059)

AVERAGE ACHIEVEMENT BY SUBJECT PAPER IN 2012 HSSC-I

Max. Average Marks Difference

AVERAGE ACHIEVEMENT BY SUBJECT PAPER IN 2012 HSSC II

Max. Average Marks Difference

St. Bonaventure's High School(0059)

Students Students Students

St. Bonaventure's High School(0059)

Students Students Students

St. Bonaventure's High School(0059)

66-70 66-70 66-70

St. Bonaventure's High School(0059)