Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SALIENT POINTS
efficientcarbon
Salient features of AP 1000 MW Solar RfS (Draft)
This document highlights the important features of the RfS bid document and attempts to point a
few issues identified through thorough review.
Capacity details:
Total Capacity: Approximately 1000 MW (Total Capacity identified with sub-stations is 1160 MW)
Here is a table containing the different capacities of power plants based on the substation type and
voltage levels
Also, each company is allowed to submit only 1 bid per location (chosen sub-station).
1
Timelines:
The procedure for bid selection as mentioned in the RfS document is as follows:
Selection of eligible bidders will be based on least quoted price per commercial unit of
electricity.
The bidders will be required to submit Financial Bid in format-6.12 quoting their lowest
minimum levelized tariff over a period of 25 years to survive the plant for whole tenure of the
agreement.
The developer shall submit a Contract Performance Bank Guarantee (CPBG) to the concerned
DISCOM before issuing LOI, for the difference of amount between viable tariff determined by
the Committee constituted and the L1 tariff on the expected energy from the project in a year.
However CPGB is not required if the tariff difference is below 5%.
In case any bidder does not communicate acceptance of the LoI within 10 days from the date of
issue of the LoI (excluding the date of issue), then his EMD (Bid security) and CPBG will be
forfeited and bids will be further processed.
If some of the bidders do not agree for L1 price, L2, L3, L4………Ln whoever agrees will be called
for acceptance and LoI will be further processed .
In the eventuality of a tie in the bidding process in a particular location, the applicant would be
selected by draw of lots.
2
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA):
Once the LOI is accepted by the selected bidder, a PPA will be signed between the respective
DISCOM and the bidder. The PPA shall be valid for a period of 25 years from scheduled Commercial
Operation Date (COD).
A maximum variation of 10% in the rated output is permissible in the first one year. However,
DISCOMs shall not purchase any additional electricity generated beyond the PLF of 20% for Solar PV
and 25% for Solar Thermal plants. An annual reduction (resulting from degradation) of 1% is
permissible Year 2 onwards.
Technical Qualification:
Standard technical requirements seem to have been placed for both Solar PV and Solar Thermal
equipment. The following are the minimum criteria that Solar Panels (in case of Solar PV plants) and
Solar Thermal equipment need to meet:
Solar PV Module
The PV modules used in the grid connected solar power projects must qualify to the latest
edition of any of the following IEC PV module qualification test or equivalent BIS standards:
o Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell Modules IEC 61215
o Thin Film Modules IEC 61646
o Concentrator PV modules IEC 62104
In addition, PV modules must qualify to IEC 61730 for safety qualification testing. For the PV
modules to be used in a highly corrosive atmosphere throughout their lifetime, they must qualify
to IEC 61701.
Solar Thermal
3
Financial Criteria:
Net Worth:
The net worth of the bidder should be equal to or greater than the value calculated at the rate of Rs
1 Crore per MW. The Net Worth criteria should be met on any date within seven days prior to the
date of submission of RfS document by the Project Developer.
There seems to be some ambiguity with respect required documents to be submitted for the net
worth criteria to be satisfied. The bid documents in one place mentions requirement of annual
audited accounts for the last four financial years viz 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11, 2011-12 (If the
period of existence of the company is less than four years, then accounts starting from the year of
incorporation) and in another place mentions only last financial year (2011-2012).
In case a new company, there has been no clear cut specification as to what qualifies as a new
company. But where annual accounts have not been prepared for a new company, the bid
document requires unaudited financial statements of the company too, for the date on which the
Certificate of Chartered Accountant has been obtained. New companies were given the provision to
seek qualification on the basis of financial capability of its parent, ultimate parent and / or its
affiliate(s) for the purpose of meeting the qualification requirements. But the required net worth has
to be infused in the project Company before signing of PPA.
Guarantees:
Bid security:
EMD in the form of BG or DD of Rs. 2 lakhs/MW DD drawn in favour of Pay
Officer/APTRANSCO (or) BG in favour of Chief Engineer/IPC/APPCC/APTRANSCO.
Validity period - 90 days from the date of bid submission.
Claim period: one month over and above validity period.
4
Land Requirements:
2 hectares/MW i.e. 4.94 acres (~ 5 acres)/MW must be under clear possession of the project
developer. Ownership hold rights for at least 30 years in the name of the project developer
and possession of 100% of the area of land required for the project.
Certificate by the concerned and competent revenue authority for the acquisition/
ownership/ vesting of the land in the name of the project developer.
Sworn affidavit from the developer listing the details of the land and certifying total land
required for the project under clear possession of the project developer.
All land documents must be submitted within 60 days of signing the PPA or at the time of
financial closure whichever is earlier.
Solar PV: 6 months from date of signing of PPA or 8 months from date of issue of LoI
whichever is earlier
Solar Thermal: 13 months from date of signing of PPA or 15 months from date of issue of LoI
whichever is earlier
In the case of project developers not meeting this deadline, Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG)
shall be encashed as per following schedule:
While the monetary terms have not been mentioned, penalty will be computed based on difference
between minimum pre-determined level of electricity generation (80% of expected energy
generation) and actual quantum of electricity generated during the given year.
Clarification needs to be made as to whether the monetary penalty would be the product of this
difference in energy and the tariff at which PPA has been signed.
List of sub-stations: As per the RfS document, the capacities mentioned for each 132/33 KV
substation are cumulative of capacities available at the 33/11 KV substations under the respective
132/33 KV sub-stations. Download the list of sub-stations identified by APTRANSCO for the 1000
MW capacity addition here.
1. Non-refundable Processing Fee of Rs.2 Lakhs is a very high amount to be shelled out just for
submitting the bids.
2. Financial Criteria: Ambiguity prevails regarding the submission of audited financial records is
for the last 4 years or 1 year.
3. New Company: No specific definition has been provided as to what a new company refers
to. It could be a company that has been just established for the purpose of participation in
the RfS which may or may not have financial records/statement or it could mean a company
that has been in existence for less than an year and has considerable data.
6
4. Penalty for Shortfall in supply of electricity: The penalty has been mentioned only in terms
of the difference between minimum pre-determined level of electricity generation (80% of
expected energy generation) and actual quantum of electricity generated during the given
year. Though it is most likely to be the value of this energy deficit at PPA tariff, no clear
indication has been given in the document.
5. Earnest Money Deposit (EMD): An EMD of Rs.2 lakh/MW has to be deposited at the time of
submission of bids. However, no mention has been made as to who will be entitled to
receive a refund of this amount and when such a refund would be made.
6. No payment security mechanisms such as Letter of Credit (LC) to ensure timely payments to
the selected bidders.
7. Committee determined benchmark Price: This benchmark price has been specified to play a
role in determining the Contract Performance Bank Guarantee (CPBG). However, it has not
been mentioned how this price will be arrived at and when it will be disclosed.
8. Performance Bank Guarantees (CPBG): 2 different formats (Forms 6.3 and 6.13) for Bank
Guarantees have been provided in the ‘Formats for Bid Submission’ section in the RfS
document. Both these documents contain the same information and hence a clarification
regarding the same is required.
Moreover, the definition of CPBG itself is ambiguous and there is no justification as to why
this amount is to be paid by successful bidders to DISCOM (in the case of difference between
L1 price and committee determine benchmark price is less than 5%). In addition to this,
Annexure B (Page 87) says that CPBG is not required in case the price difference is not less
than 5% while point 3.7 (c) of ‘Selection process of bidders’ (Page 27) states that CPBG is not
required if the price difference is less than 5%.
7
Appendix
Solar PV and Solar Thermal Benchmark Costs by CERC
As per Suo-Motu petition 242/SM//2012 dated 25th October, 2012, Central Electricity Regulatory
Authority (CERC) proposed that the Benchmark Capital Cost for Solar PV and Solar Thermal projects
for 2013-14 be Rs.8 Crores/MW and Rs.12 Crores/MW respectively. Here’s a breakup of the costs for
Solar PV projects as recommended by CERC:
8
About EfficientCarbon
EfficientCarbon (http://efficientcarbon.com/) is a Hyderabad based company working in the Energy,
Environment and Sustainability domain. We provide focussed services in the following areas:
Renewable
Energy
REC Advisory
Technical
Consulting
Carbon Sustainability
Management Strategy
Our team consists of graduates from respected institutions such as BITS-Pilani and IFMR-Chennai
with several years of experience in companies like Infosys, Godrej and Titan. We are also supported
by a team of advisors who, on average, have more than 25 years of experience in the above
mentioned 6 different areas.
We have a highly qualified team with expert knowledge on the commercial and technical aspects of
various Solar Energy technologies. Also, we pride ourselves in being capable of delivering the best
services on the REC front as we are backed-up by a powerful back-end which constantly monitors
the REC Market.
Contact Us:
Pradeep Palelli
Managing Partner, EfficientCarbon
pradeep@efficientcarbon.com
Phone: +91-9052224701.