Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rubric

    Uploaded by

    wilson tarrayo
    30 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating practice teaching portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Educators will use the rubric to assign ratings from 1 to 5 on indicators within each criteria to evaluate student portfolios, with ratings described in a legend. The rubric includes spaces for the student and evaluator information and signature.

    Original Description:

    hollistic rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating practice teaching portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Educators will use the rubric to assign ratings from 1 to 5 on indicators within each criteria to evaluate student portfolios, with ratings described in a legend. The rubric includes spaces for the student and evaluator information and signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    30 views1 page

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    wilson tarrayo
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating practice teaching portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Educators will use the rubric to assign ratings from 1 to 5 on indicators within each criteria to evaluate student portfolios, with ratings described in a legend. The rubric includes spaces for the student and evaluator information and signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    NORTHWEST SAMAR STATE UNIVERSITY

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    Rubrics for Practice Teaching Portfolio

    Mentee: _____________________________________________
    Evaluator: ___ Self ___ Peer ___ College Supervisor
    Directions: Tick (/) the box below the score that best describes the indicator. The
    legend below gives the description of each score.
    Legend:
    5 – Outstanding 2 – Fair
    4 – Very Satisfactory 1 – Needs Improvement
    3 – Satisfactory

    Ratings
    Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
    A. Visual Appeal (20%)
    1. Cover
    2. Lay-out
    3. Tone/mode
    4. Creativity
    5. Resourcefulness
    6. Neatness
    B. Organization (20%)
    1. Order of entries
    2. Coding Techniques
    3. Readability of entries
    4. Correctness of form (e.g.
    Grammar)
    C. Content (30%)
    1. Statement of Purpose
    2. Completeness of entries
    3. Diversity of selection
    D. Reflections (30%)
    1. Depth of understanding
    2. Application of ideas
    Final Rating:

    ___________________________
    Signature of Evaluator

    You might also like