Tarlac State University

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
RUBRIC FOR FIELD STUDY PORTFOLIO

Class No.: ___ Student Teacher: ___________________________________ Course & Section: BSED 4-D1
Evaluator: ______ Self ______Peer ______Supervisor

Directions: Tick (/) the box below the score that best describes the indicator. The legend below gives
the description of each score.

Legend: 5- Exemplary 4- Proficient 3- Satisfactory 2- Developing

CRITERIA 5 4 3 2

A. Visual Appeal/Packaging
1. Cover Page Format
2. Lay-out
3. Creativity
4. Innovativeness
5. Neatness

B. Organization
1. Order of Entries
2. Coding/Labeling Technique
3. Readability of Entries
4. Correctness of form (grammar, punctuation,
spelling, etc.)
C. Content
1. Clarity of the statement of purpose
2. Completeness and quality of entries
3. Diversity of Selections
4. Reliability and authenticity of sources
5. Vividness of documentation with captions
6. Depth of Analysis and Reflections
D. Promptness in Submission
1. Submitted on or before the set deadline
Total Score

__________________________________________
Name & Signature of Evaluator

ehpbalanquit/2018 adopted from Experiential Learning Courses Handbook 2007

 Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY SHEET
FIELD STUDY PORTFOLIO

Class No. ____Student Teacher: ______________________________ Course & Section: BSED 4D1
Directions: Write the score that best describes the indicator. The legend below gives the description of
each score.
Legend: 5- Exemplary 4- Proficient 3- Satisfactory 2- Developing

CRITERIA SELF PEER (30%) Supervisor

(20%) (50%)
1 2 3
A. Visual Appeal/Packaging
1. Cover Page format
2. Lay-out
3. Creativity
4. Innovativeness
5. Neatness
B. Organization
1. Order of Entries
2. Coding/Labeling Technique
3. Readability of Entries
4. Correctness of form (grammar,
punctuation, spelling, etc.)
C. Content
1. Clarity of the statement of
purpose
2. Completeness and quality of
entries
3. Diversity of Selections
4. Reliability and authenticity of
sources
5. Vividness of documentation of
evidences with captions
6. Depth of Analysis and
reflections
D. Promptness in Submission
1. Submitted on or before
deadline
Final Rating

ehpbalanquit/2018 adopted from Experiential Learning Courses Handbook 2007

 Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT

RUBRIC FOR PRACTICE TEACHING MODULE

Class No.: ___Student Teacher: ___________________________________Course & Section: BSED 4D1

Evaluator: ______ Self ______Peer ______Supervisor
Directions: Tick (/) the box below the score that best describes the indicator. The legend below gives
the description of each score.
Legend: 5- Exemplary 4- Proficient 3- Satisfactory 2- Developing

CRITERIA 5 4 3 2
A. Depth of Reflections
-Profoundness of understanding
-Application of ideas

B. Quality and Substance of Responses

-Directions/instructions were strictly followed
-All questions were substantially, skillfully, reflectively, comprehensively, and
objectively answered.

C. Organization of Ideas/Concepts
-Ideas/concepts reflected in the responses were coherent, intact and clearly
highlights the salient points.
- evidences of learning are documented with captions

D. Appropriateness of Form
-Responses were structured in sentences and paragraphs free from technical
lapses.

E. Legibility and Neatness

-Handwriting is legible and free from extraneous erasures, marks and patches.
F. Promptness in the Submission
-Submitted on or before the set deadline.
Total Score

___________________________________________
Name & Signature of Evaluator

ehpbalanquit/2018 adopted from Experiential Learning Courses Handbook 2007

 Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT

SUMMARY SHEET
Practice Teaching Module

Class No. ____Student Teacher: ________________________________Course & Section: BSED 4D1

Directions: Write the score that best describes the indicator. The legend below gives the description of
each score.
Legend: 5- Exemplary 4- Proficient 3- Satisfactory 2- Developing

CRITERIA SELF PEER (30%) Supervisor

(20%) (50%)
1 2 3
A. Depth of Reflections
-Profoundness of understanding
-Application of Ideas
B. Quality and Substance of
Responses
-Directions/instructions were
strictly followed.
-All questions were substantially,
skillfully, reflectively,
comprehensively, and objectively
answered.
C. Organization of Ideas/Concepts
-Ideas/concepts reflected in the
responses were coherent, intact,
and clearly highlights the salient
points
D. Appropriateness of Form
-Responses were structured in
sentences and paragraphs free
from technical lapses
E. Legibility and Neatness
-Handwriting is legible and free
from extraneous erasures, marks
and patches
F. Promptness in the Submission
-Submitted on or before the set
deadline
Final Rating

ehpbalanquit/2018 adopted from Experiential Learning Courses Handbook 2007

ehpbalanquit/2018 adopted from Experiential Learning Courses Handbook 2007