Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1038/nature08859
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
1. Preparation of picene
Figure S1 (a) Synthetic route for picene. 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz,
CDCl3) of (b) sample prepared by our synthetic method and (c) material
purchased from Fluka.
www.nature.com/nature 1
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
www.nature.com/nature 2
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
fraction in the pellet samples. The Meissner fraction reflects the exact diamagnetic
volume of the superconducting phase, and the enhancement of the Meissner fraction in
the pellet samples suggests that the superconductivity originates from the bulk phase,
and small shielding and Meissner fractions observed in the powder samples may be
attributed to the small grain size in comparison with λL. Namely, we do not require a
possibility of surface phase so as to explain the small shielding fraction because of the
small size of crystallites and large λL.
Finally, we have ruled out the possibility that a decomposition product produces
superconducting behaviour, because the picene molecule is known to be very stable at
high temperature up to 570 K and it shows no chemical reaction with alkali metals
under high vacuum. Actually, the 1H NMR spectrum of CDCl3 solution of
superconducting Rb3.1picene showed only peaks of picene. This shows strongly that
picene molecule is not decomposed in the Rb3.1picene sample, suggesting that the
superconductor is a picene based material.
www.nature.com/nature 3
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
the physical properties of Axpicene, the properties of AxC60 are particularly relevant
because both materials are molecular superconductors having π-orbitals associated
closely with their Fermi levels. The pairing symmetry of Kxpicene superconductors is
not yet clear, but normal BCS-type superconductor, i.e., s-wave symmetry, is expected
by analogy with AxC60 superconductors and the fact that exotic behaviour is not still
observed in picene superconductor.4 The electronic structure of a pristine picene
molecule is shown in Figure S2. The LUMO and LUMO+1 are not degenerate, but the
levels are very close to each other, suggesting a high density of states, N(εF), in the
Fermi level as in AxC60.4 If three electrons are transferred from three K atoms to picene
in K3picene, the LUMO+1 level is half occupied. The phonon mode responsible for
electron-phonon coupling is probably the molecular vibration of picene, judging from
the phonon mode in the electron-phonon coupling of C60 superconductors.4
The Tc values for K2.9picene, K3.3picene and Rb3.1picene were estimated from
the onset temperature (Tconset), and the temperature of the inflection point (Tcinf) and the
minimum value (Tcend) of M/H – T plots, as is shown in Figure S3. These values are also
described in the main text. Furthermore, we estimated the Tc values (Tcth) from the
extrapolation of the M/H – T plot along the steepest slope, as shown in Figure S3; the
Tcth values are 7.03 and 18.1 K, respectively, for K2.9picene and K3.3picene. Even if the
Tcth of 18.1 K is the exact Tc without thermal fluctuation, the picene superconductor
remains a very high Tc organic superconductor. The M/H – T curves at each magnetic
field for K2.9picene are shown in Figure S4. This graph can be compared with that for
K3.3picene shown in Figure 2c of the main text.
www.nature.com/nature 4
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Figure S4 Magnetic field dependence of M/H vs. T for K2.9picene. For the
measurement of M, the K2.9picene sample was placed in a quartz tube
(ESR tube) in a glove box (O2 < 0.1 ppm and H2O < 0.1 ppm). M was
measured by SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS2) in the
temperature region of > 5 K.
www.nature.com/nature 5
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
and this gives the N(εF) of 1.2 states eV-1 picene-1 spin-1. This N(εF) value should be
close to the exact value for K3.3picene, because the conduction electron ESR gives
selectively only the Pauli paramagnetism. Therefore, we cannot recognize the magnetic
susceptibility from SQUID as exact one of conduction electrons and it should be noted
that the magnetic susceptibility from ESR corresponds to the spin of conduction
electrons. On the other hand, the conduction electron ESR in K2.9picene (Tc = 7 K) was
too small to estimate the spin susceptibility, suggesting a smaller N(εF) for K2.9picene
(Tc = 7 K) than for K3.3picene (Tc = 18 K). This result is reasonable judging from the
lower Tc in K2.9picene.
Figure S5. M/H vs. T plot of K1.0picene. For the measurement of M, the
K1.0picene sample was placed in a quartz tube in a glove box (O2 < 0.1 ppm
and H2O < 0.1 ppm). M was measured by SQUID magnetometer (Quantum
Design MPMS2) in the temperature region of > 2 K.
www.nature.com/nature 6
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
response. The M /H of the ESR tube was –5 x 10-7 emu g-1, and that of the core
magnetization of K3picene can be estimated to be -6.0 x 10-7 emu g-1. These values
imply very small diamagnetic contributions to the observed M /H from the ESR tube
and the core part of K3picene. Therefore, the Pauli- or Curie-like magnetization shown
in Figures S5 and S6 reflects the nature of non-superconducting picene materials.
Finally, we determined the Curie constant to be 5.1 x 10-7 emu g-1 K from M/H vs. T plot
(Figure S6), and the spin concentration was estimated to be ~14% of picene molecules,
although the origin of the spin is unknown. Details of magnetization of A1picene and
A4picene should be further investigated inclusive of normal states of 7 K and 18 K
A3picene superconductors.
6. Structure of Kxpicene.
The X-ray diffraction pattern of pristine picene is shown in Figure S7a. The X-
ray diffraction pattern can be reproduced well with the structure reported previously;5
space group of P21 with lattice constants a = 8.472(2), b = 6.170(2), c = 13.538(7) Å
and β = 90.81(4) º. From the Le Bail fitting for X-ray diffraction pattern (Figure S7b),
the lattice constants of a = 8. 707(7), b = 5.912(4), c = 12.97 (1) Å, and β = 92.77(5) º
were determined for K2.9picene (Tc = 7 K). Actually, the X-ray diffraction pattern of
K2.9picene shows a good correspondence with that of pristine picene (Figures S7a and
www.nature.com/nature 7
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
b), and the unit cell parameters estimated by simple index analyses for picene and
K2.9picene show a good consistency with those determined by Rietveld and Le Bail fit,
respectively.
Here it should be noted that the unit cell volume of pristine picene and
K2.9picene are 715.6 and 667.1 Å3, respectively, showing that the K intercalation
contracts the unit cell. This result strongly suggests a deformation of the herringbone
structure of picene. Actually, the density functional theory (DFT) calculation shows that
the crystal structure of highly K-doped pentacene, K2(pentacene)2, is different from
those of pristine pentacene and lightly doped pentacene, K1(pentacene)2.7 In highly
doped pentacene, the pentacene molecules translate relative to each other to break the
layered structure and distort the herringbone structure. Kosugi’s calculation also
predicted the deformation from Herringbone structure in K2.9picene.6 Furthermore, the
X-ray diffraction pattern of K2.9picene could not also be analyzed by use of the
herringbone structure model but by Le Bail fitting and simple index assignment without
a precise model structure, which supports the departure from the herringbone structure
in highly doped picene, or K2.9picene. Furthermore, the X-ray diffraction pattern of
K0.9picene (not shown) is quite similar to that of pristine picene, which is consistent
with the result that the crystal structure of lightly doped pentacene is similar to that of
pristine pentacene.6
www.nature.com/nature 8
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Figure S7 (a) Rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffraction pattern for picene
at 295 K. (b) Le Bail refinement of the X-ray diffraction pattern for Kxpicene
at 295 K; the K2.9picene sample shows a Tc of 7.1 K. The X-ray diffraction
pattern was measured at KEK-PF, Tsukuba with synchrotron radiation of λ
= 0.99937 Å. Black circles and red line are the observed and calculated
diffraction patterns, respectively, and the blue line is the difference
between the observed and calculated patterns. Green vertical bars
correspond to the predicted peak positions.
www.nature.com/nature 9
doi: 10.1038/nature08859 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
References
www.nature.com/nature 10