Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moral Leadership - Lect - 3 PDF
Moral Leadership - Lect - 3 PDF
Value-based Leadership
• Cultural Model:
• values are at the heart of the organisation.
• as they move from the periphery to the heart of the
organisation they become more acquainted with the
values of the culture contributing to its development.
• consequently these values influence the behaviour of
the members creating a style of comportment
synonymous with the ideals of the institution.
• The more the members move towards full participation
the more they become part of the institution
intensifying ultimately an increased sense of identity
with the institution’
institution’s values and ideals.
1 2
Leadership based on values and collaboration • This form of leadership carries dual
implications:
• High performance in schools depends on a strong ¾A sense of obligation and commitment
sense of connectedness among the members. Parents,
teachers and students need to be bound together to a
from the members.
set of shared purposes and ideals that are important and ¾A sense of obligation and commitment to
which give to both the school and the members a sense live out the school’
school’s ideals from the
of direction. It transforms the group into a community leader/s. (Kam
(Kam--cheung Wong, 2001).
striving towards common aims and ideals (Sergiovanni
(Sergiovanni
2001). • This implies a moral standing on the part of the
• Schools that are driven by a community spirit base their
leader. Leaders are expected to teach not only
relationships and commitments not on rules or through words but also through their actions.
bureaucratic dictates but on the school’
school’s values and • To be credible, leaders need to be truthful to
purposes – “centres”
centres” or “repository of values”
values” what they claim to believe in.
(Sergiovanni,
Sergiovanni, 2001)
5 6
1
Authoritative vs. Authoritarian
Leaders can very often face difficult challenges
and certain conflicts can pose painful choices, • When leadership is based on shared ideals and common
purposes he members within the setting are morally
but it is precisely in these moments that bound to show allegiance to the values and purposes of
leaders have to show loyalty to the purpose the organisation rather than the authority attached to
the office of the leader.
and values of the institution. They are • “Authoritative”
Authoritative” leadership (Lakomski
(Lakomski,, 2001) – a
expected to take up the challenge and show leadership derived from the agreement on ideas and a
disagreement when the common goals and strong interdependence towards which the members
are committed to.
values of the institution are threatened • Authoritative leadership empowers the members to
(Lashway,
Lashway, 1996) take decisions and act in the light of values and ideals
commonly held within the organisation instead of
exerting power over the members to follow rules and
obligations.
7 8
• Authoritarian leadership
encompass a sense of control,
• Authoritative leadership style is
“goal-
goal-bound”
bound” that is committed to
• People opt to embark on projects and
exerting power over the members
in what, when and how they do
shared goals and purposes endeavours for intrinsic reasons, finding what
(Sergiovanni,
Sergiovanni, 1992)
things
• Members are empowered by their they are doing to be personally significant in its
• it is rule-
rule-bound. People follow
rules determined by the people at
leaders to follow shared values that
define the institution.
own right. What people believe in and what
the helm who are expected to set
the tone of the organisation.
• Members perceive these shared they feel obliged to do because of a moral
values as duties and obligations and
• individuality is de-
de-emphasised therefore feel morally bound to put commitment gets done and it gets done
while structure and commitment to them into practice.
rules abounds.
• It is more concerned with
successfully (Sergiovanni
(Sergiovanni,, 1992)
• structure within these settings obligations to agreements as a
tends to be hierarchical and source of authority instead of
vertical, with staff being submission to rules. Three rules of Motivation
accountable to their super
• Authority led by reason relying on Rule Motivation Involvement
Involvement
ordinates.
shared values rather than on power
or psychological manipulation. What gets rewarded gets done Extrinsic gain Calculated
What is rewarding gets done Intrinsic gain Intrinsic
What is good gets done Duty or obligation Moral
9 10
2
¾ Meaningfulness Transformational leadership
¾ Responsibility
¾ Knowledge of results • Leaders define organisational reality through the
3 determining factors for motivating people, helping articulation of a vision which is a reflection of
them experience intrinsic satisfaction at work. how he/she conceptualise the organisation’
organisation’s
(Hackmann and Oldham, 1976)
mission and the values that support it.
• When people perceive what they are doing as
worthwhile and important they engage more fully in • A vision is a possible and desirable future state
their endeavours. of the organisation that excels in some way the
• People who experience these feelings do not depend present one (Bennis
(Bennis and Nanus,
Nanus, 1985).
any more on extrinsic forces to motivate them. They • The task of the leader is to influence the
get internal satisfaction from their work that eventually members and secure substantial commitment of
induce them to higher levels of performance and their time and energy in realising these ends.
commitment.
13 14
3
How can we as school leaders bring this to • Intrinsically satisfying work makes sense because
fruition it leads to higher levels of commitment and
• Use more of their talents and skills (skill variety) performance (effectiveness aspect)
• Engage in activities that allow them to see the whole and
understand how their contributions fit into the overall purpose
• Intrinsically satisfying work also makes sense
or mission (task identity) because it is right and good for teachers and
• View their work as having a substantial and significant impact on
on others to find their jobs satisfying and
the lives or work of other people (task significance)
• Experience discretion and independence in scheduling work and
meaningful (moral aspect)
in deciding classroom arrangements and instructional procedures
(autonomy)
• Get firsthand, and also from other sources, clear information
about the effects of their performance (feedback)
19 20