You are on page 1of 5

Volume 9, number 4 MATERIALS LETTERS February 1990

ac ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF HIGH-CURIE-POINT BARIUM-LEAD TITANATE


PTCR CERAMICS

T.Y. TSENG and S.H. WANG


Institute of Electronics, College of Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, China

Received 7 August 1989; in final form 2 1 December 1989

Hip-~~e-~int ~miconducting baas-lead titanate PTCR ceramics of imposition B~.s~,Pb~.~~~,~~TiO~ were prepared.
The electrical properties of grain and grain boundary of the sample were studied by a combination of complex-plane impedance
analysis and impedance spectra methods. The PTC originated only in the grain boundary material.

The positive temperature coefficient (PTC) of re- a combination of complex-plane analysis and
sistance observed in semicondu~ting BaTi03 ce- impedance spectra methods.
ramics is well explained qualitatively by Heywang’s Commercial barium titanate, BaTiOx was used as
barrier model [ 11. The grain boundary potential starting material. PbO was used to shift the Curie
barriers have been observed by means of a decora- point. La203 as semiconducting dopant was pre-
tion technique [ 2 1, emission electron microscopy pared from La(N03)*6H,0. TiOz was used to con-
[ 3 1, voltage contrast imaging [ 41, and at room tem- trol stoichiometry. The mixtures of the raw materials
perature via cathodoluminescence [ 5 ], and the two- were mechanically b~l-milled for about 24 h in
probe method using a micromanipulator and fine Al deionized water with plastic coated iron ball media
wire [ 6 1. However, there is still a lack of experi- in a plastic jar. The milled slurry was dried by an IR
mental evidence of the nature of the grain boundary lamp and calcined at 950°C for 2 h. The calcined
potential barrier. powders were then ball milled, dried as previously
described and sieved through 140 mesh screen to
Several authors have indicated the usefulness of
produce starting semiconducting powders with a
the complex-plane impedance diagram to differen-
composition of ( Bao.897Pb0.10Lao.oo3)Ti03. The pow-
tiate between bulk, grain boundary, and electrode in-
ders were pressed into samples of 10 mm in diameter
terface resistances for semiconducting barium titan-
and 2 mm thick. The pellets were stacked inside an
ate [ 7-91. Recently, Tseng and Lu [ lo] have
A1203 crucible packed with PbTiOll powder, and
reported that the grain boundary resistance in-
covered with a tightly fitted lid to prevent volatili-
creased with increasing tempe~ture abruptly and that zation of PbO during firing. Sintering was performed
the bulk resistance only slightly changed with in- at a temperature of 1250°C for 30 min in a pro-
creasing temperature by using complex-plane grammable furnace. A cooling rate of lOO”C/h was
impedance analysis. Unfortunately, with this method used.
it is impossible to obtain the resistivity of the grain The average weight gain of the sample after sin-
boundary when the low-frequency intercept is large tering is about 3.7 wt”h. It is expected that Pb from
and beyond the capability of the measurement in- the PbTi03 packing powder diffused into the pellet
strument. This problem can be overcome by using during sintering resulting in a considerable weight
the concept of impedance spectra [ 111. The purpose gain. The X-ray diffraction patterns of fired speci-
of the present work is to examine how the temper- mens all belong to BaTiO, single phase. A two-probe
ature affects the electrical property of the grain method with dc bias in the ohmic region was used to
boundaries of (Bao.89,Pbct.,dlao.oo3)Ti03ceramics by measure the resistivity-temperature characteristics

164 0167-577x/90/$03.50 0 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)


Volume 9. number 4 MATERIALS LETTERS February I990

of the sample. An indium-gallium alloy was rubbed cept. The resistivity of the grain can always be ob-
on both surfaces to produce good ohmic contact for tained from the Cole-Cole plot. Nevertheless, at
testing. Prior to the resistivity measurement both the higher temperature, it is difficult to extract the re-
electrode surfaces of a sample were covered with thin sistivity of the grain boundary from the complex-
steel sheets pressed on to prevent the electrode ma- plane impedance due to the spread of the Cole-Cole
terial from vaporizing during heating. The measure- plot at the grain boundary resistance of PTC ce-
ments were executed on heating at a rate of S”C/min ramics at higher temperatures. As shown in fig. IB,
in a programmable furnace. The temperature of the the impedance spectrum, i.e. a plot of Z” (imagina~
samples was determined by the attachment of a ther- part of the impedance) versus log w (u is the an-
mocouple to the sample surface. The complex-plane gular frequency) appears as a symmetric (Debye)
impedance of the sample was measured at different peak which is proportional to RGB as shown by the
temperatures up to 600°C with an HP 4192 imped- equation
ance analyter. Based on the equivalent circuit for the
PTC resistance shown in ref. [ 12 1, the resistivity of 2” =
RGB~(RGBccm
)
the grain can be decided from the highest-frequency 1+ (WRGBCGB)~ ’
real-axis intercept of the Cole-Cole plot and the grain
Tim = R&2 . (2)
boundary resistance from the low-frequency inter-
Therefore, the grain boundary resistance ( RGB)can
be obtained.
t RGB iA)
The typical resistivity-temperature characteristic
of the present sample is shown in fig. 2; this sample
CGB
108c

c
106 c

Fig. 1. (A) Proposed equivalent circuit of PTCR ceramics with


good ohmic contact (negligible contact resistance) and its asso-
ciated Cole-Cole plot at low (solid line) and high (dashed line)
temperatures. R, is the grain resistance, ROB the grain boundary
resistance, Co, the grain boundary capacitance. (B) Proposed Temperature ( “Cl)
impedance spectra for PTCR ceramic with good ohmic contact. Fig. 2. Resistivity-temperature characteristics of the sample.

165
Volume 9. number 4 MATERIALS LETTERS February 1990

with the Curie point around 2 10’ C exhibits a PTCR


effect of more than 3.5 orders of magnitude. The
composition with 10 mol% PbTi03 should have a
Curie point of 180’ C, but the present sample’s Curie
point around 2 10’ C is expected to be due to the dif-
fusion of Pb into the pellet during sintering. The
sample with the Curie point of 2 10” C is reprodu-
cible under the same processing procedure. The
scanning electron micrograph of the fracture surface
of the sample as shown in fig. 3 revealed a wide dis-
tribution of grain sizes with pores at the grain
boundaries and grain junctions. From electron probe
microanalysis, it is found that the sample was non-
uniform, with a higher Pb content near the surface
than exists in the interior, as shown in fig. 4. Fig. IA
shows that the uncompleted circle observed at higher
temperature results from the overscale of the instru-
ment used. Therefore, the resistivity of the grain
boundary cannot be obtained from Cole-Cole plots.
The impedance spectra were used to decide the re-
sistance of the grain boundary. As shown in figs. 5A,
5B and 5C, the Z” Debye peaks were shifted slightly
to higher frequency values when the temperature was
below 143’ C; when temperatures were increased over
143°C the Z” Debye peak heights increased dras-
tically and were shifted to lower frequency values
until 483’ C. The Debye peak heights decreased and
were shifted to higher frequency values again at tem-

Fig. 4. Electron probe microanalysis of the sample: (A) Pb X-ray


mapping of the surface and (B) Pb X-ray mapping of the frac-
ture surface of the sample.

peratures higher than 483°C. There is only one De-


bye peak for each temperature.
Based on the Debye peak values shown in imped-
ance spectra plots, the grain boundary resistance can
be calculated by using eq. (2) for each different
temperature.
Grain resistances were extracted from Cole-Cole
plots. The available grain resistance and grain
boundary resistance data are plotted in fig. 6 as a
function of temperature. It is obvious that even be-
Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrograph of the fracture surface of low the Curie temperature the grain boundary resis-
the sample. tance is dominant, the PTC effect is attributed to in-

166
Volume 9. number 4 MATERIALS LETTERS February 1990

106
- IJ grain boundaries
- 0 grain

105-

10-2:
100 102 lo4 106 106

f (Hzb---
106b I

lolo 0

Temperature (‘C)

Fig. 6. Resistance-temperature characteristics of the grain and


grain boundaries of the sample.

100 102 104 106 106 ter-grain boundary layers. The result is in good
agreement with that obtained by Nemoto and Oda
f (Hz)-
[ 61, who directly examined the electrical properties
1 of single grain boundaries by the two-probe method
using a micromanipulator and fine Al wire, but stul-
tifies the result reported by Sinclair and West [ 13 1,
who indicated that both the grain boundary and the
bulk resistance exhibit the PTC effect.
With the use of a combination of complex-plane
impedance analysis (Cole-Cole plot) and imped-
ance spectra methods, the resistance of bulk grains
and grain boundary in high-Curie-point PTCR ce-
ramics were revealed. Based on the result obtained

4 Fig. 5. Impedance spectra of the sample at different tempera-


tures: (A) 43-143°C; (B) 163-483°C; (C) 503-603°C.

167
Volume 9, number 4 MATERIALS LETTERS February 1990

by these methods, the PTC obviously originates only [6] H. Nemoto and I. Oda, 3. Am. Ceram. Sot. 63 (1980) 398.
in the grain boundary. However, whether the PTC [ 71 N.E. Cipollini, J.M. Sowa, C.E. Forbest and J.F. Lynch, in:
Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on
mechanism should be related to a change of the po-
Applications of Ferroelectrics, Lehigh University,
tential barrier height at the grain boundary or to a Bethlehem, PA (1986) p. 665.
change of the electron mobility in the grain bound- [S] R.N. Basu and H.S. Maiti, in: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE
ary has still to be clarified. International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics,
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA ( 1986) p. 685.
[ 91 H.Y. Lee, S.S. Villamil, and L.C. Burton, in: Proceedings of
the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applications of
References
Ferroelectrics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA ( 1986)
p. 361.
[ 1J W. Heywang, J. Am. Ceram. Sot. 47 (1964) 484. [lO]T.Y.T~ngandY.Y.Lu,Cer~.Intem. 14(1988) 195.
[Z] P. Gerthsen and K.H. Haerdtl, Z. Naturforsch. I8a ( 1963) [ 111 I. Hodge, M.D. Ingram and A.R. West, J. Electroanal. Chem.
423. 74 (1976) 125.
[ 3 ] H. Rehme, Phys. Stat. Sol. 26 ( 1968) Kl. [ 121 H.S. Maiti and R.N. Basu, Mater. Res. Bull. 21 (1986) 1107.
[4] H.B. Hannstra and H. Ihrig, Phys. Stat. Sol. 39 (1977) K7. [ 131 D.C. Sinclair and A.R. West, J. Mater. Sci. Letters 7 ( 1988)
[ 51H. Ihrig and M. Klerk, Appl. Phys. Letters 35 (1979) 307. 823.

168

You might also like