3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

THE STRAITS TIMES

China's Mirrorless Celebrity
Xinhua camera Couples
presents growth a Editor Choice
news double-
Sponsored
i g dg d

Recommended by

What 18-year-olds tell us about

Singapore's future
Eddie Teo

 PUBLISHED OCT 10, 2015, 5:00 AM SGT

As chairman of the Public Service Commission (PSC), Mr Eddie Teo interviews
350 young people vying for scholarships each year. In this excerpt of a speech at
an Overseas Singaporean Unit event in Melbourne, Australia, on Sept 24, he
outlines the strengths and weaknesses of these teenagers, as gleaned from their
essays and interviews.

Every year, my colleagues and I interview some 350 of the top students from our junior colleges and
polytechnics in order to offer them scholarships to study in university, both locally and overseas. (The 350
have been shortlisted from some 2,500 applicants for the PSC scholarship. Although there is no quota or
cap, we award some 70 scholarships a year on average.) Those who accept will serve in the public service,
initially under a bond of between four and six years.

During the half-hour interview, PSC has the opportunity to ask candidates questions not only to determine
how suitable they are for the public service but also to get a sense of how young Singaporeans feel about
our country and its future. One of the topics they have to write an essay on is indeed what kind of
Singapore they would like to see in 15 years' time.

POST-LEE KUAN YEW GENERATION

What can we say about the present generation of 18-year-olds, judging by the essays they write, their
school records, their psychological profiles and their responses at PSC interviews?

Our young people are not unaware of the values espoused by our founding fathers, particularly Mr Lee
Kuan Yew.

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 1/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

They may not be fully conscious of them, and they may quietly rebel against National Education taught in
schools, but because they live in Singapore, go to Singapore schools, and have grown up with family and
friends, they are still cast in the same mould as previous generations of young Singaporeans. Many of them
have heard the Singapore national narrative. This narrative was emphasised a hundred times over during
Mr Lee's funeral and the recent SG50 celebrations: how Singapore was cast adrift post-Separation and
survived against all odds, how vulnerable we are as a nation given our size and the neighbourhood we are
in, and how we must remain exceptional to continue to prosper. How our people must work hard and stay
disciplined because no one owes us a living. How social benefits must not be allowed to erode our work
ethic.

ADVERTISING

Learn more

Our best and brightest - the potential public-sector leaders - have imbibed many of
the values passed down by our founding fathers. By and large, success has not gone
to their heads. They work hard, stay humble and help the less privileged. Many are
committed to serve the public and see their job as a calling. But they must shed the


"kiasu" and "kiasi" attitude which other Singaporeans continue to share and become
bolder, less risk-averse and more innovative.

The ideal citizen envisaged by Mr Lee is someone pragmatic, responsible, disciplined, frugal, hard-working,
well-behaved, family-focused and puts society before self.

Mr Lee also expected public servants to have all these values as well as stay incorruptible.

Singaporeans often take our zero-tolerance policy for corruption for granted, but many foreigners regard it
as exceptional and want to learn how we do it.

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 2/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

But the young, while cast in the same mould, are not exact copies of the old. Older Singaporeans should
not be surprised that the younger generation has different views and different aspirations - even different
values. All they have to do is speak to their own children or grandchildren.

Their values have changed, leaving the old somewhat bewildered. When Mr Lee visited Australia during
my term as High Commissioner, he asked me to organise tea with ex-Singaporean migrants in Perth. He
wanted to hear from them why they chose Australia over Singapore.

When one of them told him that he gave up a well-paid job in Singapore to migrate there so that he could
work half-day and go fishing in the afternoon, Mr Lee nearly fell off his chair. He just could not understand
why anybody would make such a lifestyle choice. To Mr Lee, it was irrational. You see, Mr Lee came from
the era when the term "work-life balance" had not been invented. To him, life was work and work was life -
it was the same thing, no need to balance the two.

Besides, we should be worried if the young are not different from us. If they imbibe everything they are
taught uncritically, it means they are not thinking for themselves and have closed minds.

Thankfully, the best and brightest who appear before PSC do still think critically and question what is
happening in Singapore, including our socio-economic disparities, our educational policy and system, and
our political environment. I am especially pleased that more of our young now aspire to work in the social
sector, so that they can help the underprivileged.

When they worry about social inequality and the lack of social mobility, some may have moved away from
one cardinal belief that our founding fathers had - that social welfare should be discouraged because it
breeds a poor work ethic and a dependence on government handouts.

But they believe that the Government should do more for the poor because they feel it is just, not because
they are socialists or communists. Like students elsewhere and unlike those during my time (the 1960s),
they want peaceful change, not violent revolution. Their concerns arise from youthful idealism, not
dogmatic ideology.

The young are critical of the educational system because they think it overemphasises exam results and
academic excellence. This is quite remarkable, seeing that they have excelled in, and are benefiting from,
such a system. Yet, they are big-hearted enough to welcome greater diversity in our criteria for success -
wishing to see that those who excel in sports and in the arts should be recognised and rewarded as well.
Judging by the changes being made by the Ministry of Education, when our students express such views,
they are only keeping abreast of government thinking, not streaking ahead.

POLITICAL PRAGMATISTS

The views of the 18-year-olds on politics in Singapore are also non-ideological and pragmatic. They want
the People's Action Party (PAP) to continue in power, but they also desire a strong but moderate
opposition. Some are attracted to the Workers' Party not because they are against the PAP per se but
because they share the belief that the Government needs checks and balances in order to be more
responsive to the people.

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 3/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

They want the best of both worlds - the PAP to run an efficient and effective government and the
opposition holding seats short of one-third of the total seats in Parliament. Enough to question and
criticise the ruling party but not enough to deprive the ruling party of its two-thirds majority, let alone to
form a government.

When pressed, the students will admit that it is unlikely that the one-party dominant political system we
had in the last 50 years will continue indefinitely in the next 50 years. But if the change does occur, they are
confident in their belief that Singapore will not collapse because more and more good and capable people
will eventually join the opposition, as many as those who join the PAP today. They are sceptical about the
ruling party's contention that Singapore does not have enough talent to fill two strong teams. As more well-
educated Singaporeans join the political fray on the side of the opposition, our students may feel that their
scepticism is being vindicated.

But these views are those of a few 18-year-olds solicited over the last five years. We should not read too
much into them as predictors of how the young vote today or in the near future. So, my sense is that in the
recent general election in Singapore, when there was a big swing back to the PAP, it would be inaccurate to
say that the young voted differently from the old. I think what it meant was that if there were among
younger voters those who felt the way our 18-year-olds feel, they were prepared to put aside their
aspirations for a stronger opposition to vote in a stronger government because we are in turbulent
economic times, they find that the Government has become more responsive since 2011, and they were not
convinced that the opposition fielded better teams. Very pragmatic and rational. And very Singaporean.

FLAWS AND WEAKNESSES

Lest I give you the impression that our best students are flawless, let me now turn to the negative traits we
sometimes see in those who apply for our scholarships. There are four main flaws.

First, they have a poor knowledge of Singapore's history. Second, only a few are knowledgeable about, or
interested in, current and foreign affairs. Third, they are too risk-averse. Finally, they lack imagination and
creativity.

PSC members are often dismayed and saddened when candidates reveal their ignorance on basic historical
facts about Singapore. For instance, they do not know who S. Rajaratnam is, and they only knew who Goh
Keng Swee was when he died. The exhibitions on our founding fathers and a rather belated attempt to
revise the way history is taught in our schools will go some way to fill the gaps. But it is a sign of the times
that even trying to teach our young basic historical facts is being challenged and contested, and the
outcome will no doubt be controversial. While history is often written by winners and victors, questions
have been raised on how much should be taught about those who lost.

The textbook writers in the Ministry of Education will have to grapple with how much our history syllabus
should teach about people like Lim Chin Siong and what their motives were - to fight against the British
colonialists or to establish a communist republic, or both?

Despite the fact that our students nowadays travel quite frequently, and much more than students in the
past, many lack knowledge about, or interest in, current and foreign affairs. This apathy will not breed
active citizens. Perhaps the Internet has produced a generation of young people more interested in bite-size

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 4/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

news than deeper analysis found in books and magazines? And if they know about current events, it is
often about global rather than regional affairs. Those who are better off know London and Sydney well, but
have never visited Yangon or Phnom Penh.

It is important for our young to know and understand the neighbourhood Singapore is in. Many influential
and powerful people in Indonesia and Malaysia still view Singapore negatively. They regularly seek to
remind us that we are a small country and should know our place in the pecking order among nations, and
behave accordingly, instead of trying to punch above our weight.

I suspect that is why Mr Lee once exhorted our young public servants to study Machiavelli - not so much
because he wanted us to act like knaves, but because he wanted us to be aware that there are
Machiavellians around us, who will take advantage of those who are naive and weak.

Why are our best students fearful of taking the less trodden paths? Why do so many choose to be public
servants, lawyers and doctors, and go to the same universities in the US and UK? Why do they apply for
government scholarships and not launch into business like Steve Jobs or Mark Zuckerberg?

I hope that this is partly because the students we see have self-selected themselves and that the private
sector is getting its fair share of our top talent. The more entrepreneurial students may have opted not to
apply. PSC does not believe in hoarding Singapore's top talent. We are happy to point candidates to the
private sector if their aptitude and passion are better suited there.

But the public service also needs a few mavericks like Philip Yeo. Enough to prevent groupthink, but not so
many as to disrupt the institution. Philip himself has disclaimed the label. He says that the real maverick
was not him, but Dr Goh Keng Swee. However, Philip's peers think that Dr Goh was also a powerful mentor
and protector.

The majority of those we interview do not score highly on creativity and imagination. Only a few are
deemed by the psychologists as being able to think out of the box and to offer unconventional ideas and
solutions. Again, self-selection may have played a part, and the more creative and imaginative students may
have opted not to apply. My old friend, Kishore Mahbubani, has been criticising the present generation of
public servants for being unimaginative and uncreative, unlike the older generations of public servants. He
claims that there is no incentive for public servants today to surface new ideas and they are rewarded for
playing safe, not being innovative. Kishore is, as usual, being deliberately provocative. I agree that we need
our public servants to be more creative, but I think Kishore overrates the creativity of the older public
servants and underrates the creativity of younger public servants. It is counter-intuitive for a highly
competitive meritocracy like Singapore to regard failure as acceptable.

Many years ago, I invited the American innovation guru Gary Hamel and then Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly
Fiorina to Singapore to brief our senior public servants and politicians. They spent a whole day explaining
how innovation requires experimentation and repeated failures. The response from the audience was, at
best, lukewarm. One minister told me that it was not feasible in our government culture to get people to
accept failure; we were too focused on success.

The public service needs more creative people because it has to transform itself to help bring Singapore to
a higher level of economic and social progress. Future productivity can come only from greater innovation,
not from the addition of more labour and capital. Private-public sector collaboration can work only if there
are innovative people both inside and outside the public service.
https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 5/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

Unconventional ideas coming from one party alone is a recipe for failure. And if the service wishes to utilise
behavioural economics to "nudge" citizens to behave in ways contributing to the public good, it must have
creative people to imagine clever ways to do so. Wicked problems that are unpredictable and come from
the realm of "unknown unknowns" also need creative solutions.

Having said that, I am not at all suggesting that we abandon all rules.

There are, in fact, good reasons for public servants to follow rules. Rules help keep them honest and
impartial. If public servants are given too much discretion to interpret rules, and become too creative, it will
be a matter of time before our system degenerates into one where guanxi (connections) prevails. One rule
for the common citizen, and another - or even no - rule for family and friends. On the other hand, an
inflexible adherence to rules will cause bureaucratic inertia and create an unthinking public service which
lacks initiative and compassion.

Our best and brightest - the potential public-sector leaders - have imbibed many of the values passed down
by our founding fathers. By and large, success has not gone to their heads. They work hard, stay humble
and help the less privileged. Many are committed to serve the public and see their job as a calling.

But they must shed the "kiasu" and "kiasi" attitude which other Singaporeans continue to share and
become bolder, less risk-averse and more innovative. Hopefully, they will pick up these traits in university
and carry them bravely through their future career. Hopefully, too, their bosses will give them enough space
to experiment and make mistakes, because anyone in Silicon Valley will tell you that, without failure, there
can be no innovation.

A younger generation of political leaders and public servants must imagine and invent totally different
solutions as they govern a population that will become more difficult to govern.

The people must be critical but remain responsible and reasonable; the Government must welcome and
not fear disagreement. If the Government draws the bandwagon too tightly, it will make too many enemies.
If managed well, those outside can be co-opted and turned into allies. If the Government's new skillsets
prove inadequate, Singapore will slowly cease to be exceptional and start to decline.

Fight muscle loss Alibaba bets on Camera makers fight BCA orders
and resist ageing Frenchman for back: Counting on unauthorised level at
Lazada's S-E Asia mirrorless cameras The Alexcier to be
growth demolished by early
April

 Mar 04, 2019  Mar 05, 2019  Mar 05, 2019  Mar 04, 2019

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 6/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

Recommended by

MORE FROM THE STRAITS TIMES

Huawei preparing to China's Xinhua Man taken to SCDF puts out fire
sue US government: presents news using hospital after coffee near Lim Chu Kang
Sources robot news anchor shop scuffle cemetery after 19-
hour battle

 Mar 05, 2019  Mar 04, 2019  Mar 04, 2019  Mar 06, 2019

FROM AROUND THE WEB

Free Workshop How to stay invested Celebrity Couples Sugar Causes

RSVP: From Zero To across all climates with Big Age Diabetes? 12 Myths
Hero Selling On Differences You Fell For
Qoo10

Workshop SG Allianz Global Investors Editor Choice Mount Elizabeth Hospitals

Recommended by

ST VIDEOS

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 7/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

China will open up sectors to foreign investors: Premier Li

Keqiang

Baby 'dumped' by S'pore couple in Taiwan: Blood samples

found in hotel room match newborn's…

Aussie firefighters battle 25 blazes in Victoria amid heatwave

Three 'explosive devices' found in London airports and station

Recommended by

BRANDED CONTENT
Sydney, Dad, and I: My proudest milestone yet

5 Ways to Smarter Food Management at Home

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 8/9
3/6/2019 What 18-year-olds tell us about Singapore's future, Opinion News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

This country is the perfect place to escape the summer heat

Radio DJ Andre Hoeden is tuned in to thrift and saving

What makes a criminal?

New hope for lung cancer patients

 Terms & Conditions  Data Protection Policy

 Need help? Reach us here.  Advertise with us

SPH Digital News / Copyright © 2019 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn. No. 198402868E. All rights reserved

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-18-year-olds-tell-us-about-singapores-future 9/9