Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1008311283234588coded Inequality PDF
1008311283234588coded Inequality PDF
CODED INEQUALITY
Reasoning Ability
13. 4; D < X ... (i), F > Y ... (ii), D > F ... (iii) From (iii), (iv) and (i), we get, M > R > P <
Q No conclusion about the relationship
From (ii) and (iii), D > F > Y...(iv) D>Y..
between M and Q can be established.
Hence II may be correct but not necessar-
ily so. 25.2 26.4
From (i) and (iv), X > D > F >Y X >Y.. 27.4; U > V .... (i), W < Y .... (ii), Y > U ..... (iii)
Hence I may be correct but not necessari- From (ii) and (iii), W < Y > U No rela-
ly so. tionship between W and U can be deter-
14.2 15.5 16.3 mined. Hence I is not true. Now, using (i),
again no relationship between W and V can
17.2; M < N...(i), T > U ... (ii); N< U... (iii)
be determined.
28.5; B< A.... (i), D > E .... (ii), E > A ..... (iii) conclusion. Hence II is not true.
From (ii) & (iii), we get D > E >A D > A. 38.3; U >V .... (i), W < X ..... (ii) , U > X ...... (iii)
Hencen I is true. From (i) and (iii), we get V< U > X no
From (i) and (iii), we get B < A < E B < conclusion, means either V > X, or V = X,
E. Hence II is true. or V < X. Hence either I or II is true.
29.1; S > Q ... (i), R> T ... (ii), R < S ... (iii) 39. 5; K < T ... (i), D > F ...(ii), T < F ...(iii)
Combining all, we get, Q < S > R>T No From (ii) and (iii), we get D > F >T D
relationship between Q and T can be deter- >T. Hence II is true.
mined. Hence II is not true. But S > T. Hence From II & (i), we get, D >T > K D >K or
I is true. K < D. Hence I is true.
30.3; M < N .... (i), P > Q ..... (ii), P > N ..... (iii) 40.4
From (ii) and (iii), we get N < P > Q No 41.2; G > M..(i), N > L...(ii) G < L .... (iii)
relationship between N and Q can be es- From (ii) and (iii), we get G < L > N no
tablished. But I and II together are exhaus- conclusions. Hence I is false.
tive. Hence either I or II is true. From (i) & (iii), we get L > G > M L > M.
31.2; G < H...(i), K > L...(ii), L< G...(iii) Hence II is true.
From (ii) and (iii), we get, K > L < G I 42.4
can’t be established. 43. 4; K > R...(i), L B...(ii),B < K,...(iii)
From (i) & (iii), we get, L < G < H L < H. From (iii) and (i), we get B < K > R no
Hence II is true. conclusion. Hence I does not follow. No re-
(32-36): In these questions the negative meaning lationship between R and L can be deter-
of these symbols is given to establish the mined. Hence II does not follow.
relation between A and B, which can be 44. 4; J < M ...(i), W = E ...(ii), J > W ...(iii)
easily converted to its simple and positive From (i) and (iii), we get M > J > W M >
meaning. Expressing them mathematical- W. Hence I is not true.
ly, we get @ > (greater than),
From (ii) and (iii), we get J > W=E J >
c = (equal to), £ (means either
E. Hence II is not true.
greater than or smaller than, but no definite
conclusion), ? < (smaller than), and $ >. 45.4 46.4
32. 4; N < S ... (i), S > P ... (ii), P M ... (iii) 47.5; P # Q .... (i), Q > R ..... (ii), P = R .... (iii)
From (ii) and (iii), no definite relationship be- From (ii) and (iii), we get Q > R = P Q >
tween S and M can be established. Hence I P. Hence both I and II are true.
is not true. From (i) and (ii), we get, N < S > 48.1; A = B ..... (i) B C ..... (ii), C < A ..... (iii)
P no conclusion. Hence II is not true. From (iii), conclusion I is true. II contra-
33. 4; J = P ... (i), P > N ... (ii), J H ... (iii) dicts statement (ii), hence it is not true.
From (i) and (ii), we get, J = P > N J > N 49. 4; Y > Z ...(i), Z > Q ... (ii), Q P ...(iii)
I may be true but not necessarily so. From (i) and (ii), we get Y > Z > Q Y > Q
From (i) and (iii), P = J H P H. ... (A) Hence I is not true. From (iii), two
Hence again II may be true but H < P may possible relationships between P and Q
be other possibility. Hence II is not true. are;
34.2 35.5 36.3 Case I : When P > Q
37.1; P > Q ..... (i) R > S ..... (ii), P < R ..... (iii) Now, using (A), we get Y >Q<P no con-
From (i) & (iii), we get R > P > Q R > Q clusion.
or, Q < R. Hence I is true. Case II : When Q > P
From (ii) and (iii), we get P < R > S no using (A), we get Y > Q > P Y > P..
Hence II is not true.
50.2; E > F .... (i) F > L .... (ii), L = N .... (iii) Combining all, we get
From (ii) & (iii), we get F > L=N F > N or J<M=N<T T>J
N < F. Hence, only conclusion I is true
Hence I may be true but not necessarily 67. 4; V < F ....(i); F > R ....(ii); R > G ....(iii)
so. Combining (ii) and (iii), we get F > R > G
From (i) and (ii), we get E > F > L E > L ....(iv) Comparing (i) and (iv), we can’t get
Hence II is true. any specific relationship between G and V.
5 1.4; H > J...(i), J < K... (ii), K > M....(iii) Hence, both conclusions are not true.
From (ii) and (iii), we get J < K > M no 68. 4; M < K ... (i); K = D... (ii); D < P... (iii)
relationship between J and M can be es- Combining all the equations, we get
tablished. Hence II can’t be established. P > D = K >M P > M. Hence, conclusion I
Again, combining all we can’t conclude the (M < P) & conclusion II (M = P) are not true.
relationship between H and M. Hence I is 69.5; W > T..... (i); T > M ..... (ii); B < M ..... (iii)
not true. Combining all, we get W > T > M > B
52.3; M > T ... (i), T = V....(ii),V < E ... (iii) W > B and W > M. Hence, both conclu-
From (i) and (ii), we get sions (W > B, M < W) are true.
M > T = V M > V either V = M or V < M 70. 4; H = D ... (i); D < R ... (ii) R > N .... (iii)
is true. Combining (i) and (ii), we get
53.4 54.2 55.356.5 57.1 58.5 R > H = D ... (iv)
59.2; K > B .... (i), B < D ..... (ii), D < K .... (iii) From (iii) and (iv), we cann’t get any specif-
From (i), B < K. Hence II is true but I is not true. ic relation between N and H. Therefore, con-
60. 3; N = R ... (i), R < M ... (ii), M > J ... (iii) clusion I (N = H) and conclusion II (N > H)
From (i) and (ii), we get N = R < M N < are not true.
M. Hence either I or II is true. 71.4; Z < R...(i); R > D...(ii); D < T...(iii)
61.1; S > T ..... (i), T < R..... (ii), R < M ...... (iii) With these equations no relation can be
From (ii) & (Hi), we get T < R < M T<M established between D and Z, and Z and T.
or M > T. Hence I is true and II is not true. 72. 3; Q < P ... (i); P < F ... (ii); F = M ... (iii)
62. 4; H < V ... (i), V = M ... (ii), M > R ... (iii) Combining all the equations, we get
Combining all, we get H < V = M > R no F = M > P > Q M > P, ie M > P or M = P..
relationship between H and R can be es- Hence, either conclusion I or II is true.
tablished. Since conclusions I and II are 73. 4; E > J ... (i); J < H ... (ii); H > M ... (iii)
not exhaustive, neither of them is true. No relation can be established between E
63.2; Z < N ..... (i); F > N ..... (ii) ; F < K ...... (iii) and M or between J and M. Hence, conclu-
Combining all, we get sion I (E > M) and conclusion II (J > M) are
K > F > N > Z K > N and K > Z not true.
Hence, conclusion I (K = N) is not neces- 74. 2; R > P ... (i); P > M ... (ii); M < D... (iii)
sarily true but conclusion II (K > Z) is true. Combining (i) & (ii), we get R > P > M...(iv).
64. 3; D = T ...(i); T > M ...(ii); M < K ...(iii) From conclusion (iv), we get R > M. Hence,
Combining (i) and (ii), we get conclusion II (M < R) is true. But we can’t
D = T > M D > M D = M or D > M get any specific relation between D and R.
Hence, either conclusion I (M = D) or con- Therefore conclusion I is not true.
clusion II (D > M) is true. 75.3; F < K ..... (i); K > D .... (ii); N < D ..... (iii)
65. 3; W > A ... (i); B < A ...(ii); B > M ...(iii) Combining the equations (ii) and (iii), we
Combining all, we get get
W > A > B >M B <W K > D > N K > N, i.e. K>N or K = N.
B < W or B = W Hence, either conclusion I or conclusion II
Hence, either conclusion I or II is true. is true.
66. 1; J < M .... (i); M = N....(ii); N < T....(iii)