Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answer 2
Answer 2
X-------------------------/
ANSWER
2. Paragraph 4 of the Complaint is strongly denied for the fact that said
occupation by the Defendant is not by mere tolerance but by a Contract of
Lease hereto attached as Annex “A”.
3. Paragraph 5 of the Complaint is denied due to the fact that the Plaintiff has
knowledge that such “KASABUTAN” was not signed by the Defendants.
That such “KASABUTAN” was then made to another “Contract of Lease”
(Annex “B”) stating thereto that Defendants be notified five (5) months
before their evection.
4. Paragraph 7 is also denied since Plaintiff only made a single request made
orally, three (3) weeks prior to their eviction.
1
5. Paragraph 9 is vehemently denied due to the fact that that Defendant did not
maliciously and fraudulently acted with regards to vacating the said property
co-owned by the Plaintiff.
The Defendants respectfully pray for such and other reliefs as may be deemed
just and equitable in the premises.
RACQUEL M. DELIMA
PTR No. 8438426; 1/04/2007; Iligan City
IBP No. 568943; 1/04/2007; Iligan City Chapter
Roll of Attorneys No. 34328
2
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )
CITY OF ILIGAN ) S.S.
3. That we hereby certify that we have read and understood all the denials
and admittance contained therein;
4. That the contents therein are true and correct to the best of our personal
knowledge and based on documents in our possession;
5. That we further certify that there is no other action pending between the
same parties for the same cause of action and subject matter before the Supreme
Court, the Court of Appeals, or any other court or tribunal, and we hereby warrant
that if one is filed, or is known to exists, we will forthwith inform or notify this
Honourable Court within five (5) days from notice thereof.
ANTONIO Y. LAMANGAN
GENOVIA G. LAMANGAN
Affiant(s)
3
4