Professional Documents
Culture Documents
contributors
for contributors
1. Scope and editorial policy website, at: http://www.equator-network. viewed (see: http://www.who.int/bulletin/
org/about-us/uk-equator-centre/equator- volumes/84/1/3.pdf ). Operational and
1.1 Content
publications/equator-network-publica- implementation research reports should
The mission of the Bulletin of the World tions-2010/. Operational and implemen- follow the specifications described above
Health Organization is “to publish and tation research should be reported in for the research section.
disseminate scientifically rigorous pub- compliance with the guidelines published
lic health information of international in this issue (available at: http://www. Perspectives
significance that enables policy-makers, who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/1/1675851).
Views, hypotheses or discussions (with
researchers and practitioners to be more Intervention trials as defined by WHO
a clear message) surrounding an issue
effective; it aims to improve health, par- (i.e. “any research study that prospectively
of public health interest; up to 1500
ticularly among disadvantaged popula- assigns human participants or groups of
words, no more than 12 references; peer
tions”. The Bulletin is fully open-access humans to one or more health-related
reviewed.
and charges no author fees. interventions to evaluate the effects on
The Bulletin welcomes a variety health outcomes”) require registration 1.1.2. Commissioned manuscripts
of unsolicited manuscripts (see below, in a public trials registry acceptable to
The categories of articles shown below are
1.1.1.). These are initially screened in the International Committee of Medical
normally commissioned by the editors.
house for originality, relevance to an Journal Editors (ICMJE) before submis-
Authors wishing to submit an unsolicited
international public health audience and sion, and the registration number must
manuscript for one of these categories
scientific rigour. If they pass the initial be provided at the end of the abstract. Ac-
should first contact the editorial office
screening, they are sent to peer reviewers ceptable registries are listed at: http://www.
(see below, 2.1).
whose opinions are taken into account by who.int/ictrp/network/primary/en/. Web
the journal’s editorial advisers when they publication constitutes prior publication.
Editorials
decide whether to accept a manuscript for This includes institutional websites that are
publication. Accepted papers are subject open to the general public. Authoritative reviews, analyses or views
to editorial revision, which may involve of an important topic related to a theme
substantive changes, shortening or re- Systematic reviews or to one or more papers published in a
structuring the text and deleting super- given issue; not more than 800 words,
Exhaustive, critical assessments of
fluous tables and figures. The word limits maximum 12 references.
published and unpublished studies on
given for each type of contribution do not
research questions concerning inter-
include the abstract (where applicable), Round tables
ventions, policies or practices in public
tables, boxes, figures and references or
health, with meta-analysis when fea- A base paper on a controversial current
appendices, if any. The principal types of
sible. Not more than 3000 words plus a topic in public health (not more than 2000
manuscripts are outlined below.
structured abstract (see below, 2.7); the words and an abstract) is the core of a
1.1.1. Unsolicited manuscripts number of references in accordance with debate by several discussants invited to
the scope of the review; peer reviewed. contribute not more than 500 words each.
We welcome unsolicited submissions
How studies were included and excluded
to the Research, Systematic reviews, 1.2 Ethical issues
should be illustrated in a flow diagram.
Policy & practice, Lessons from the field
Authors should strictly follow the re- The World Health Organization (WHO)
and Perspectives sections of the Bulletin.
porting guidelines for systematic reviews publishes the results of research involv-
All manuscripts destined for the first
and meta-analyses (PRISMA) available ing human subjects only if fully compli-
four of these sections must include two
at: http://www.equator-network.org/ ant with ethical principles, including
paragraphs indicating what they add to
reporting-guidelines/prisma/. the provisions of the World Medical
the literature. The paragraphs should
Association Declaration of Helsinki (as
briefly explain:
Policy & practice amended by the 59th General Assembly,
• what was already known about the
Seoul, the Republic of Korea, October
topic concerned; Analytical assessments, debates or hy-
2008; available at: http://www.wma.net/
• what new knowledge the manuscript pothesis-generating papers; not more
en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.
contributes. than 3000 words and 50 references, plus
pdf ) and with the additional require-
a non-structured abstract (see below, 2.7);
ments, if any, of the country in which the
peer reviewed.
research was carried out. Any manuscript
Research
describing the results of such research
Lessons from the field
Research, methodologically rigorous, of must contain a clear statement to this
relevance to international public health. Papers that capture experiences and effect and should specify that the free
Formal scientific presentations having not practice gained in solving specific public and informed consent of the subjects or
more than 3000 words and 50 references, health problems in developing countries. their legal guardians was obtained and
plus a structured abstract (see below, 2.7); Convincing evidence of effect should be that the relevant institutional or national
peer reviewed. As clear reporting is needed provided. Not more than 1500 words and ethics review board approved the inves-
for readers and reviewers when judging the 15 references, plus a structured abstract tigation. The Bulletin is a member of the
quality of research, studies should comply (see below, 2.7); not more than one Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE;
with the relevant reporting guidelines, table and one figure; must include one see: http://publicationethics.org). Issues
available on the EQUATOR Network box listing three lessons learnt; peer re- involving publication ethics may be re-