Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Nobody comes into work to do a 'bad job', indeed we strive to do our very best. Despite our
best endeavours however, mistakes happen and accidents occur as a result of those
mistakes. It was Cicero, a renowned Roman politician who first coined the phrase 'to err is
human', and I believe we can all agree that this is so. What we must also believe in
however is that we can learn from mistakes, both the ones we ourselves make and also
from the mistakes made by others. If we can grasp this basic concept, of learning from our
own and others mistakes then we will reduce the possibility of accidents occurring.
This course is designed to study the underlying causes which may result in a well
intentioned AME making a maintenance error. We will also look at what we can do to
prevent ourselves from contributing to events which lead to an accident.
You will get out of this course only what you are prepared to put into it. Be open-minded, but
if you disagree with anything that is being said, then feel free to speak up. Because we are
dealing with the human in the equation, you will find that there are often no "right" or "wrong"
answers but "what works for you" and it could work for someone else if you share it.
We will start with a look at some of the factors which can influence how we see and interpret
our (working) environment. We will then progress to the means whereby we can by
understanding their impact utilise our knowledge in order to reduce the possibility of
maintenance error occurrences. First though some facts:
Aviation Accidents
During the first flight following a trailing edge flap change the aircraft developed a persistent
roll to the right after take-off with loss of spoiler control. Spoilers 2 to 5 on the right wing
were found to be in maintenance mode on subsequent inspection. A number of human
errors were identified during both the initial flap change maintenance and during potential
recovery operations.
During the first flight following windscreen replacement the new windscreen was blown out
under cabin pressure causing explosive decompression and the commander to be half
sucked out of the windscreen aperture. Investigation found that the bolts used to secure the
windscreen were of an inadequate size (approximately 0.026 inches smaller in diameter
than required) and were not, therefore, capable of withstanding the normal operating cabin
pressure loads.