You are on page 1of 79

Protection Coordination

Serge Beauzile
Chair IEEE FWCS
Ch i Power
Chair P &EEnergy SSociety
i t
serge.beauzile@ieee.org

June, 10,
June 10 2014
8:30 -12:30

Florida Electric Cooperatives Association


Clearwater, Florida
Seminar Objective
• Distribution Circuit Protection
– Fuse to Fuse Coordination
– Recloser to Fuse Coordination
– Breaker to Recloser Coordination

• Transmission Line Protection


– Distance Protection
– Pilot Protection Schemes
– Current Differential Protection

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 2


Art & Science of System Protection
• Not an exact science, coordination
schemes will vary based on:

– Company Philosophy
– Protection engineer preference
– System requirements

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 3


C
Coordinating
di ti D Devices
i
Basic concept: All protective devices are able to
detect a fault do so at the same instant.

If eachh device
d i that
th t sensedd a fault
f lt operated
t d
simultaneously, large portions of the system
g
would be de-energized everyy time a fault needed
to be cleared. This is unacceptable.

A properly designed scheme will incorporate time


delays into the protection system, allowing
certain devices to operate before others.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 4


C
Coordinating
di ti D Devices
i
Timing of device operation is verified using time-
time
current characteristics or TCCs – device
response curves plotted on log-log graph paper.

Devices have inverse TCCs. They operate quickly for


g magnitude
large g overcurrents,, and more slowly
y
for lower-magnitude overcurrents.

Operating time is plotted on the vertical axis,


axis and
current magnitude is plotted on the horizontal
scale.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 5


C
Coordinating
di ti D Devices
i
100
Four different TCCs
are shown
h on the
th
10 left. Device “D” is
the fastest to
operate, and device
Time in Seconds

1
“A” is the slowest.
.25
25 sec A

0.1 B
For a given current
C
value, the operating
ti
time can be
b found.
f d
D

0.01
10

100

1000

10,000

100,000

3 kA
Current in Amperes

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 6


Coordinating
g Devices

100 In this example,


Device A is clearly
l l
Uncertain
10 Coordination
faster than Device B
for low ((400-700 A))
fault currents.
Time in Seconds

Device B is clearly
0.1
faster for high
A
(>1000 A) fault
B currents,
t but
b t iin the
th
0.01
700-1000 A region,
10

100

1000

10,000

100,000

g is uncertain.
timing
1

Current in Amperes

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 7


Coordinating Devices
Expulsion Fuse to Expulsion Fuse
100

Minimum Melt
Average Melt + tolerance
10
Time in Seconds

1 Total Clear

Average Melt + tolerance


0.1 + arcing time

Curves are developed at 25ºC


With no preloading
0.01
10

100

1000

10,000

00,000
10

Current in Amperes
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 8
Coordinating Devices
Expulsion Fuse to Expulsion Fuse
100

In this example, the red


TCCs represent the
10 downstream (protecting)
fuse, and the blue TCCs
represent the upstream
Time in Seconds

1 (protected) fuse.

The protected fuse


0.1 should not be damaged
by
y a fault in the
protecting fuse’s zone of
0.01 protection.
10

100

1000

10,,000

100,,000
1

Current in Amperes
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 9
Coordinating Devices
Expulsion Fuse to Expulsion Fuse
100

Four factors need to be


considered:
10

1. Tolerances.
Time in Seconds

1 2. Ambient
temperature.
p

0.1
3. Preloading effects.

4. Predamage effects.
0.01
10

100

1000

0,000

0,000
1

10

100

Current in Amperes

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 10


Coordinating Devices
Expulsion Fuse to Expulsion Fuse
100

Consideration of these
four factors can be
10 quite involved.

Practically, the “75%


Time in Seconds

1 Method” can be used:


the maximum clearing g
time of the protecting
0.1 link shall be no more
than 75% of the
minimum melting time
0.01 of the protected link.
10

100

1000

10,000

100,000
1

Current in Amperes
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 11
Coordinating Devices
Expulsion Fuse to Expulsion Fuse
100

Minimum melting time of


protected link at 5 kA is
10 0.3 seconds.

Total clearing time of the


Time in Seconds

1
protecting link at 5 kA is
0.22 seconds.

0.1
0.22 < 0.3 × 75% = 0.225,
so coordination is
assured for current
0.01
magnitudes ≤ 5 kA.
10

100

1000

0,000

0,000
10

100

Current in Amperes
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 12
Utility
y Distribution Feeders
Multiple Feeder Segments

Segments are defined as sectionalizable pieces of a


feeder that can be automatically or manually
separated from the rest of the feeder.
feeder

Segments are delineated by reclosers, fuses,


sectionalizers or switches.
switches

Two primary concerns: number of customers per


segment andd time to isolate
l segment.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 13


Utility
y Distribution Feeders
Number of Customers per Segment

The number of customers per segment has a major


impact on reliability indices.

As the number of segments per feeder increases,


reliability
y can also be adversely
y impacted,
p and
construction cost will increase.

A optimum
An ti point
i t mustt b
be sought
ht tto d
determine
t i ththe
best segment size.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 14


Utility Distribution Feeders
Present and Future Load Requirements

Even the best load forecasts are full of errors.

You must continuously monitor your fuse


coordination due changes in the load.

It is impossible to predict everything, so versatility is


the key.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 15


Coordination Goal

1. Maximum Sensitivity.

2. Maximum Speed.

3. Maximum Security.

4. Maximum Selectivity.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 16


Basic Coordination Strategy
gy
1. Establish a coordination
pairs.

2. Determine maximum load


of each segment and the
pickup of all delayed
overcurrent devices.

3. Determine the pickup


current of all instantaneous
overcurrent devices, based
on short-circuit studies.

4
4. Determine
D t i remaining
i i
overcurrent device
characteristics starting
from the load and moving g to
the source.
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 17
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 18
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 19
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 20
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 21
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 22
Fuse Peak Load Capability

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 23


IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 24
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 25
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 26
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 27
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 28
Fuse Blow Vs. Fuse Save
• Fuse Blow
– Eliminates Instantaneous trip of the breaker or recloser
(1st) by having the fuse blow for all permanent and
temporary faults.
– Minimizes momentary interruptions and increases SAIDI.
SAIDI
Improves power quality but decreases reliability.

• Fuse Save
– Minimizes customer interruption time by attempting to
open the breaker or recloser faster than it takes to melt the
fuse.
fuse
– This saves the fuse and allows a simple momentary
interruption.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 29


Fuse Blow

FUSE is BLOWN

Lateral experiences
sustained interruption
30
Fuse Blow
– Used primarily to minimize momentary
interruptions (reduces MAIFI)
– Increases interruption duration (SAIDI)
– Very successful in high short circuit areas
– More suitable for industrial type
customers having very sensitive loads

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 31


Fuse Save

Entire Feeder trips


Momentary occurs

FUSE is SAVED

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 32


Fuse Save
– Minimize customer interruption time
– Reduce SAIDI
– Increase MAIFI
– May not work in high short circuit areas
– Work well in most areas
– Not suitable for certain industrial
customers that cannot tolerate immediate
reclosing
– Works best for residential and small
commercial customers

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 33


Both ((Fuse Save & Fuse Blow))
• Many utilities use both schemes for a variety of
reasons
– Fuse Blow for high short circuit current areas
and Fuse Save where it will work.
– Fuse Save on overhead and Fuse Blow on
underground taps.
– Fuse Save on rural and Fuse Blow on urban
– Fuse Save on stormy days and Fuse Blow on nice
days.
– Fuse
F Save
S on some circuits
i it andd Fuse
F Blow
Bl on
others depending on customer desires

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 34


Fast Bus Trip

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 35


SEL-351S
SEL 351S
Protection and Breaker Control
Relay

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 36


Modern Microprocessor Relay
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Extremely versatile, many applications


Most commonly used on distribution feeders
Communicates with EMS system (DNP 3.0 Protocol)
Key element of “Substation Integration”
Provides many “traditional” features
Provides new capabilities

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 37


SEL-351S
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Protection Features:

P f
Performs att lleastt 18 different
diff t protection
t ti functions.
f ti

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 38


SEL-351S
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Protection Features:

B U
Bus Undervoltage
d lt (27)
Phase Overvoltage (59P)
G
Ground
d Overvoltage
O lt (59G)
Sequence Overvoltage (59Q)
O
Overfrequency
f (81O)
Underfrequency (81U)

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 39


Modern Microprocessor Relay
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Protection Features (continued):

Ph
Phase Di
Directional
ti l Overcurrent
O t (67P)
Ground Directional Overcurrent (67G)
S
Sequence Di
Directional
ti l Overcurrent
O t (67Q)
Instantaneous Phase Overcurrent (50P)
I t t
Instantaneous Ground
G d Overcurrent
O t (50G)
Instantaneous Sequence Overcurrent
(50Q)
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 40
SEL-351S
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Protection Features (continued):

Ti
Time Ph
Phase Overcurrent
O t (51P)
Time Ground Overcurrent (51G)
Ti
Time S
Sequence Overcurrent
O t (51Q)
Directional Neutral Overcurrent (67N)
I t t
Instantaneous N t l Overcurrent
Neutral O t (50N)
Time Neutral Overcurrent (51N)

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 41


SEL-351S
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Breaker Control Features:

S
Synchronism
h i Ch
Check
k (25)
Automatic Circuit Reclosing (79)

TRIP/CLOSE Pushbuttons
Enable/Disable Reclosing
Enable/Disable Supervisory Control

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 42


SEL-351S
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

Other Features:

E
Event
t Reporting
R ti and
dRRecording
di
Breaker Wear Monitor
St ti Battery
Station B tt M
Monitor
it
High-Accuracy Metering
F lt Locator
Fault L t

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 43


SEL-351S
Protection and Breaker Control Relay

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 44


• Advantages of microprocessor relays
ƒ Extremely flexible
ƒ Have many different elements (UF, UV, Directionality, etc…)
ƒ One relay can protect on zone of protection
ƒ Inexpensive and require much less maintenance
ƒ Alarm if they fails and don’t need calibration
ƒ Provide fault information
ƒ Provide oscillography and SER data
ƒ Can provide analog data to SCADA

• Disadvantages of microprocessor relays


ƒ Can be very complex to program due to given flexibility
ƒ Require
R i more training
t i i to t Relay
R l T Technicians
h i i
ƒ Require more training to Relay Engineers

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 45


Relays
• Basic relay settings:
ƒ Phase overcurrent elements must be set above maximum
possible loads
ƒ Ground overcurrent elements must be set above maximum
anticipated
p unbalanced loads
ƒ Must be coordinated with downstream protective devices
ƒ Under Frequency elements must be set according to the
predetermined set point

• TAGGING
ƒ NORMAL mode – 2 reclosing
g attempts
p
ƒ WORK mode – HOT LINE TAG
ƒ COLD mode

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 46


Relay Curves
100

10

S
e
c Moderately Inverse
o 1
Inverse
n
d Very Inverse
s Extremely Inverse

0.1

0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Multiple of Pick Up

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 47


Very Inverse Curve Time Dial
0.29s
100

In this example
p

Multiple of Pickup = 3.
10

TD = 0.5
05 Time = 0.3s
0 3s
TD = 2 Time = 1.1s
SECONDS

1
TD=0.5
TD = 6 Time = 3.4s
TD=2
TD=6
TD 6
TD = 15 Time = 7.0s
TD=15

0.1

0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Multiples Of Pick Up

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 48


Very Inverse Curve Time Dial
0.29s
100
In this example,

Pickup
Pi k = 600 A A.
Fault Current = 1800 A.
10

T = 0.5
TD Time = 0.29s
0. 9s
TD = 2 Time = 1.16s
SECONDS

TD=0.5 TD = 6 Time = 3.48s


1
TD=2 TD = 15 Time = 8.72s
TD=6
TD 6
TD=15
Pickup = 900 A.
0.1 Fault Current = 1800 A.

TD = 0.5 Time = 0.69s


TD = 2 Time = 2.78s
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
TD = 6 Time = 8.33s
Multiples Of Pick Up TD = 15 Time = 20.8s
20 8s

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 49


Pickup
p Current of Delayed
y Ground OC Devices

Source Side Load Side

Backup Primary

Single
g Phase to Ground Fault
IMU<IPU<I MIN Fault
IMU = Maximum Unbalance

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 50


Pickup
p Current of Delayed
y Phase OC Devices

Source Side Load Side

IML<IPU<Imin Ø‐Ø Fault Phase to Phase Fault

IML = Maximum Load

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 51


Typical Pickup Setting

TB > TR + CTI CTI = Coordination Time Interval (Typically 0.2-0.5sec)

Recloser Ct ratio 600:1 Breaker Ct ratio 240:1


IPU = 1 A IPU = 3.75 A
IPU Primary= 600 A IPU Primary= 900 A

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 52


IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 53
Trip Logic
TR = OC + PB9 + 51P1T + 51G1T * (LT6 + LT7) + (50P3 + 50G3) * LT7 + (50P2 + 50G2) * SH1

OC: OPEN COMMAND (SCADA TRIP)


PB9: FRONT PUSH BUTTON
51P1T: PHASE TIME OC ELEMENT
51G1T: GROUND TIME OC ELEMENT
LT6: TAGGING IS IN NORMAL MODE
LT7: TAGGING IS IN WORK MODE
50P2/50P3: PHASE INSTANTANEOUS OC ELEMENT
50G2/50G3: GROUND INSTANTANEOUS OC ELEMENT
SH1: RECLOSING SHOT #1 (FIRST RECLOSE ATTEMPT)

CTR = 600.0
INSTANTANEOUS ENABLED ONLY AFTER FIRST RECLOSE ATTEMPT
50P2P = 2.5 (1500 AMPS PRIMARY)
50G2P = 1.6
1 6 (960 AMPS PRIMARY)

INSTANTANEOUS ENABLED ONLY DURING WORK/HOT LINE TAG


50P3P = 1.35 (810 AMPS PRIMARY)
50G3P = 0
0.50
50 (300 AMPS PRIMARY) – NORMAL UNBALANCE GROUND CURRENT ~20 TO 30 AMPS

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 54


IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 55
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 56
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 57
SEL-351S
History Summary (HIS Command)

Sample output:

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 58


SEL-351S
Sequence of Events Recording (SER)

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 59


SEL-351S
Metering Data (MET Command)
Sample output - Metering Data (MET):

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 60


SEL-351S
Metering Data (MET Command)

Sample output - Metering Demand (MET D):

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 61


SEL-351S
Metering Data (MET Command)

Sample output - Metering Energy (MET E):

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 62


SEL-351S
Metering Data (MET Command)

Sample output - Metering Max/Min (MET M):

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 63


Differential Relays
Protection of a Delta‐Wye Transformer
Ia‐IIb Ia‐IIb Ia
A a
Ia‐Ib Ia Ia Ia I
Ib‐Ic Ib‐Ic b
B 52 52 b
Ib‐Ic Ib Ib Ib I
Ic‐Ia Ic‐Ia c
C c
Ic‐Ia Ic Ic Ic

Ia‐Ib

OP
Ia‐Ib Ia‐Ib
R R

OP
Ib‐Ic Ib‐Ic Ib‐IIc
R R

Ic‐Ia OP Ic‐Ia Ic‐Ia


R R

Power System Protection -64- Ralph Fehr, Ph.D., P.E. – October 28, 2013
Distance Relays
y
Protection Features

– Four zones of distance protection
– Pilot schemes
– Phase/Neutral/Ground TOCs
– Phase/Neutral/Ground IOCs
Phase/Neutral/Ground IOCs

Power System Protection -65- Ralph Fehr, Ph.D., P.E. – October 28, 2013
Distance Relays
y
Protection Features ‐ continued

– Negative sequence TOC
– Negative sequence IOC
– Phase directional OCs
– Neutral directional OC
– Negative sequence directional OC
– Phase under‐ and overvoltage
– Power swing blocking
– Out of step tripping

Power System Protection -66- Ralph Fehr, Ph.D., P.E. – October 28, 2013
Distance Relays
Control Features
Control Features

– Breaker Failure (phase/neutral amps)
B k F il ( h / t l )
– Synchrocheck
– Autoreclosing

Power System Protection -67- Ralph Fehr, Ph.D., P.E. – October 28, 2013
Distance Relays
Metering Features
Metering Features

− Fault Locator
F lt L t
− Oscillography
− Event Recorder
− Data Logger
− Phasors / true RMS / active, reactive   
and apparent power, power factor
and apparent power, power factor

Power System Protection -68- Ralph Fehr, Ph.D., P.E. – October 28, 2013
Distance Relays
Zones of Protection Zone 2
Zone 2
X
3 Zone 1
Line Impedance (Line A)
Line Impedance (Line A) 2 1
Zone 2 A1 Line A A2
1 Z
Zone 3
3 4 3
Bus 1 Bus 2
Zone 1
2 Normal Load
Normal Load
R
Distance Relay
at Bus 1 Zone 1 – fastest (80% of line)
to protect Line A Zone 2 – slower (120% of line)
4 Zone 3 –(backwards Use in Pilot
Zone 3 Protection for current
Reversal logic)
Power System Protection -69- Ralph Fehr, Ph.D., P.E. – October 28, 2013
Zone of Protection Zone 3
Zone 2 ∆t Zone 2
∆t
Zone 1 ∆t Zone 1

1 2 3 4

Zone 1 Zone 1

Zone 2 Zone 2

Zone 3
Zone 1: Under reaches the remote line end Typically 0.7 Z1L to 0.9 Z1L
With no intentional time delay.
Zone 2:
Z 2 Over
O reaches
h the
th remote
t line
li end
d Typically
T i ll 1.21 2 Z1L
with definite time delay.

Zone 3: Over reaches the longest adjacent line


with
i h definite
d fi i time
i d
delay
l greater than
h Z Zone2.
2
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 70
Unconventional Zone 2 & Zone 3 Settings

Zone 2
∆t
Zone 1

Long Line Short Line

Be Mindful when Applying General Rules

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 71


Step Distance Relay Coordination Exercise

Setting the relay at breaker 3 protecting Circuit 2.


Set the Zones of Protection.

The maximum expected load is about 600A.

CTR = 1200:5 or 240:1 PTR = 600:1

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 72


Distance Relay Coordination Exercise

Circuit 2 & Circuit 5 Impedances Circuit 3 & Circuit 6 Impedances

Z1 = 35.11 83.97˚ Ω primary Z1 = 17.56 83.72˚ Ω primary


Z0 = 111.58 81.46˚ Ω primary Z0 = 53.89 81.56˚ Ω primary

Circuit 1& Circuit 4 Impedances

Z1 = 35.21 83.72˚ Ω primary


Z0 = 187.80 81.56˚ Ω primary
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 73
Distance Relay Coordination Exercise

Zone 1 Reach = 0.8 * (35.11 83.97˚) Ω primary Zone 1 Reach = 28.09 83.97˚) Ω primary

Z
Zone 2R
Reach
h=1
1.2
2 * (35.11
35 11 83.97˚)
83 97˚) Ω primary
i Z
Zone 2R
Reach
h = 42.13
42 13 83.97˚)
83 97˚) Ω primary
i

Check Zone 2 reach does not overreach = Circuit 2 Impedance + (Zone 1 of Circuit 3) or (Zone 1of Circuit 6).

General rule = p
protected Circuit Impedance
p + Zone 1 of the Shortest Circuit p
past the p
protected circuit.

Check for Zone 2 Overreach = 35.11. + (0.8 * 17.56) = 49.16 Ω primary


Zone 2 Reach = 42.13 < 49.16 no overreach

Zone 4 Reach = (35.11 83.97˚) + (17.56 83.72˚) ( Ω primary) Zone 4 Reach = 52.55 83.35˚) Ω primary
IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 74
Primary / Secondary Impedance
Relay Input

75
Relay Input

Zone 1 Reach = 28.09 Ω x 240 = 11.24 Ω secondary


600

Zone 2 Reach = 42.43 Ω x 240 = 16.97 Ω secondary


600

Zone 4 Reach = 28.09 Ω x 240 = 21.02 Ω secondary


600

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 76


Overcurrent Supervision Setting Criteria

Zone 1 Phase Fault detector:

1) Find the lowest Ø – Ø fault seen by relay 3 Set above (maximum load) and 60% of min fault.
for a remote end bus (4
(4, 10
10, 5
5, 11)
11).

Zone 2 Phase Fault detector:


1) Find the lowest Ø – Ø fault seen by relay 3 Set above (maximum load) and 60% of min fault.
for a remote end bus ((6,, 12).
)

Zone 4 Fault detector same as Zone 2

Repeat same process for Ground Fault detector.

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 77


Current Infeed
IL =0.5 A IR =1 A
ZL =2 Ω ZR =1 Ω

IT =0.5 A
ZT =1 Ω
Actual Impedance from L to the Fault is 3Ω

Apparent Impedance = EL
IL

Apparent Impedance = ( IL x ZL) + (IR x ZR) Apparent Impedance = 4Ω


IL

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 78


Thank You

IEEE/ FECA Protection Coordination June 2014 Serge Beauzile 79

You might also like