You are on page 1of 11

302 Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 33(3) Fall 2003

 2003 The American Association of Suicidology

Suicidal Ideation and Attempts


in Norwegian Police
ANNE MARIE BERG, MA, ERLEND HEM, MD, BJØRN LAU, PHD,
MITCHELL LOEB, MSC, AND ØIVIND EKEBERG, MD

Studies on suicide among police show inconsistent results, thereby contrib-


uting to considerable speculation regarding why police officers commit suicide.
The present paper is the first nationwide study on suicidal ideation and attempts
among police. 3,272 Norwegian police completed Paykel’s Suicidal Feelings in the
General Population questionnaire. Lifetime prevalence of specific questionnaire
items ranged from 24% for the feeling that life was not worth living, 6.4% for
having seriously considered suicide, and 0.7% for attempted suicide. Independent
predictors of serious suicidal ideation were marital status, subjective health com-
plaints, reality weakness, anxiety, and depression. Serious suicidal ideation was
mainly attributed to personal and family problems.

Suicide in police has been described as an ep- has not been documented (Hem, Berg, &
idemic (Loo, 2001; Violanti, 1996). It has Ekeberg, 2001). A particular problem of
been claimed that the suicide rate of law en- previous research has been methodological
forcement personnel is between two and three flaws.
times that of the general population (Mohan- There has been considerable specula-
die & Hatcher, 1999; Slovenko, 1999). Re- tion regarding why police officers commit
cently, we published the first systematic re- suicide, and numerous theories have been
view of suicide in police in which strict proposed (Violanti, 1996). It is argued that
methodological inclusion criteria were ap- policing is one of the most dangerous, stress-
plied to original studies. The review con- ful, and health-threatening occupations, with
cluded that an elevated suicide rate in police high levels of stress, alcoholism, divorce, sui-
cide, and so forth associated with this profes-
sion (Hill & Clawson, 1988). However, the
ANNE MARIE BERG is with the National suggestions have been highly speculative, and
Police Academy in Oslo, Norway. ERLEND HEM, there has been a call for studies examining
BJØRN LAU, and ØIVIND EKEBERG are with the causal factors of police suicide (Loo, 1986).
Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Police officers are prone to sudden and unex-
Faculty of Medicine at the University of Oslo. pected situations, violence, and the potential
MITCHELL LOEB is with SINTEF Unimed, Health
Services Research in Oslo. death of both others and themselves. This
Funding for this project was provided by threat may have psychological consequences,
the Norwegian Department of Justice and the such as posttraumatic stress disorder or burn-
Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabili- out, which are often assumed to contribute
tation. to suicidal behavior (Schmidtke, Fricke, &
Address correspondence to Anne Marie Berg,
The National Police Academy, P.O. Box 5027 Lester, 1999). Shift work, the public’s anti-
Majorstua, NO-0301 Oslo, Norway; E-mail: police sentiments, and access to firearms are
anne.m.berg@politihs.no also mentioned as potential explanations.
BERG ET AL. 303

Earlier studies among police have main- population in Norway. Studies have been con-
ly focused on suicide. The motivation for re- ducted among adolescents, medical students,
search on suicidal ideation and attempts is and physicians (Hem, Grønvold, Aasland, &
that attempted suicide is both one of the Ekeberg, 2000; Tyssen, Vaglum, Grønvold, &
strongest predictors of completed suicide and Ekeberg, 2001; Wichstrøm & Rossow, 2002).
an important indicator of extreme emotional The aims of the present study are to
distress and psychological suffering. More- investigate: (1) the prevalence of suicidal ide-
over, identification of both the risk of suicide, ation and suicide attempts in a nationwide
and prevention of suicide based on risk fac- study of Norwegian police, (2) predictors of
tors, have proven to be difficult. Thus it has serious suicidal ideation, and (3) the factors
been proposed that risk factors for morbidity to which police attribute their serious sui-
preceding suicide, especially depressive mood, cidal ideation.
suicidal ideation, and attempted suicide should
be studied. It is hoped that a better under-
standing of the pathways that lead to suicide TERMINOLOGY
as well as the early identification and treat-
ment of suicidal ideation may reduce rates of There is no consistent terminology in
both attempted and completed suicide (Hin- the area of suicidal problems, leading to a
tikka, Viinamäki, Tanskanen, Kontula, & Kos- somewhat bewildering situation (Renberg,
kela, 1998). To our knowledge, only one pre- 2001). In this study, the terms suicidal ideation
vious paper has studied suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts are used. Suicidal ide-
among police (Lennings, 1995). This was a ation is described by the first four questions
small pilot study from Queensland, Australia, in Paykel’s Suicidal Feelings in the General
investigating suicidal ideation among a group Population questionnaire (see the discussion
of students and police officers (N = 118). under Methods), while a suicidal attempt is
Only 30 of the participants were police offi- described in the last question in this ques-
cers. Suicidal ideation was measured on the tionnaire (Paykel, Myers, Lindenthal, & Tan-
Suicide Ideation Scale (total scores can range ner, 1974).
from 10 to 50). In this study, the mean sui- This study includes not only police of-
cidal ideation score was 12.4 in both groups. ficers, but also middle managers and manag-
There are few national surveys of the ers in the police force. Hence, the term police
prevalence of suicidal ideation; however, Weiss- is used to describe the general sample.
man et al. (1999) recently reported data from
nine countries. The rates of suicide ideation
varied widely by country, while the rates of METHODS
suicide attempts were more consistent across
most countries. In the U.S. National Comor- Participants
bidity Survey, the lifetime prevalence of sui-
cidal ideation was 13.5%, suicidal planning On a worldwide basis, police in Nor-
3.9%, and suicidal attempt 4.6% (Kessler, way are well educated. Until 1992, a person
Borges, & Walters, 1999). The lack of uni- had to undertake 2 years of training to be-
form methodology makes comparisons diffi- come a Norwegian police officer. After 1992
cult. Prevalence rates in different studies vary the training expanded to 3 years of unpaid
widely due to the different settings, popu- full-time study at The National Police Acad-
lations, age groups, definitions of suicidal emy, which is governed by The Department
ideation, assessment instruments, and retro- of Justice. The police in this study are all
spective timeframe for presence of suicidal members of the largest police organization
ideation (Burless & De Leo, 2001). Unfortu- in Norway—The Norwegian Police Union.
nately, there is no nationwide data of suicidal Approximately 95% of all police officers are
ideation and suicide attempts in the general members of this organization.
304 SUICIDAL IDEATION IN NORWEGIAN POLICE

In December 2000 a questionnaire was to the letter, which was a response rate of
distributed by the organization, presumably 70%. The results showed that 26% never re-
to all the 6,398 members who were trained ceived the questionnaire. Based on this fig-
police officers. The questionnaire included 396 ure, the true response rate would be 51/74 ×
questions on background information, physi- 100 = 69%. Since this is an indirect measure,
cal and mental health, working condition, job we will not be too conclusive about this fig-
dissatisfaction, burnout, coping, personality, ure; however, we are sure that the true re-
and suicidal ideation. It was an anonymous sponse rate is closer to 69% than to 51%. Of
questionnaire, and it was distributed once. those who originally received the question-
Several reminders were distributed through naire there is reason to believe that approxi-
trade union representatives, and the internal mately two-thirds have answered the ques-
data system within the police force (G-mail). tionnaire.
At the same time it became clear that many Of the police who responded to the
members had not received the questionnaire. questionnaire, 16% were female, which is
It is unclear whether this was due to chance an accurate reflection of the distribution of
or systematic mistakes. Thus, the final re- women in the police force (17.9%, informa-
sponse rate was 51%, which represents a to- tion collected from The Department of Jus-
tal of 3,272 persons who completed and re- tice). A total of 79 persons did not answer the
turned the questionnaire (see Table 1). question about gender, 51 persons did not
Due to the problems in distributing answer the question regarding civil status,
the questionnaire, the project manager dis- and 14 persons did not answer the question
tributed 680 letters to randomly selected po- about position; these individuals were ex-
lice in November 2001. The letters included cluded from the analyses. The age of partici-
two questions: first, “Did you receive the pants ranged from 20 to 66 years of age, with
questionnaire?”, and second, “If you received a mean age of 38.9 years (SD = 8.7); the
it, did you answer it?”. The responses were mean age of men was 39.7 (SD = 7.0), and for
yes and no. A total of 475 persons responded women 34.0 years (SD = 8.7) (p < .001). The
mean age of all members of the Norwegian
Police Union is 40.2; with males and females
TABLE 1
having a mean age of 41 and 35 years, respec-
Description of Sample
tively. The sample in this study is about 1
Frequency Percent year younger than the whole population ac-
cording to the mean age. Officers are over-
Gender represented in the study in proportion to the
Women 501 15.7 general police population (65.3% vs. 56.1%),
Men 2,692 84.3 while managers are underrepresented (2.9%
Age (years) vs. 9.6%).
20–29 509 16.1
30–39 1,175 37.1
40–49 1,047 33.0
Suicidal Behavior
50–59 430 13.6
60–69 9 0.3 The prevalence of suicidal ideation and
Civil status attempts was assessed by a modified question-
Single 342 10.6 naire, originally introduced by Paykel et al.
Married/cohabitant 2,715 84.0 (1974). Paykel’s Suicidal Feelings in the Gen-
Separated/divorced 164 5.1 eral Population questionnaire contains five
Widow(er) 11 0.3 questions:
Occupational level
Manager 96 2.9 1. Have you ever felt that life was not
Middle manager 1,034 31.7
worth living?
Officer 2,128 65.3
2. Have you ever wished you were dead
BERG ET AL. 305

(for instance, that you could get to naire, previously referred to as the Ursin
sleep and not wake up)? Health Inventory (UHI). This questionnaire
3. Have you ever thought of taking consists of questions examining the occur-
your life, even if you would not re- rence, extroversion, and duration of pain in
ally do it? [These three questions the neck, back, feet, arms and shoulders; pain
had the four following response cat- in the chest; migraine and headache; diges-
egories: often, sometimes, hardly ever, tive problems; and vertigo for the last 30 days
never. Before the statistical analyses, (Eriksen, Ihlebæk, & Ursin, 1999; Ursin, En-
the responses were dichotomized into dresen, & Ursin, 1988). The items are scored
never (0) and any frequency (1), ac- on a 4-point rating scale ranging from no
cording to Paykel’s original work.] complaints (0) to serious complaints (3). In the
4. Have you ever reached the point present study, the SHC sum score was trans-
where you seriously considered tak- formed to a dichotomous variable. Consis-
ing your life, or perhaps made plans tent with a previous study (Aasland, Olff, Fal-
how you would go about doing it? kum, Schweder, & Ursin, 1997), those who
[This question contained six re- had a response of 2 or 3 on at least one of
sponse possibilities: never, once, 2–3 the ten items were scored as “cases.” Accord-
times, 4–5 times, 6–9 times, and at ing to this procedure, 40.7% (women: 46.2%;
least 10 times.] men: 39.7%) were considered a case.
5. Have you ever made an attempt to
take your life? [This question had four Anxiety and depression
response possibilities: never, once,
twice, and three times or more. Re- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression
sponses to the last two questions were Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983) in-
dichotomized into never (0) and any cludes 14 questions, divided into two sub-
frequency (1) prior to statistical anal- scales: an anxiety subscale and a depression
yses.] subscale. Each subscale contains seven items,
and is scored on a 4-point scale. HADS has
Questions four and five contained an addi- been found to perform well in assessing the
tional subquestion: “To what extent do you prevalence and symptom severity of anxiety
think the following factors influenced you to disorders and depression in both somatic,
consider taking your life?” with the follow- psychiatric, and primary care patients, as well
ing response categories: personal problems, as in the general population (Bjelland, Dahl,
family problems, social problems, problems Haug, & Neckelmann, 2002). As indicated in
connected with police profession, and other Table 2, female police had higher mean scores
problems. The responses could be indicated on the anxiety subscale, but lower scores on
as: not at all, a little, somewhat, quite a lot, the depression subscale.
and very much. In the multivariate analyses,
“ever seriously considered taking your life” Personality
was used as the dependent variable. The ques-
tionnaire has been applied in several other The personality inventory used in this
studies, including Norway (Hem et al., 2000; study was the Basic Character Inventory (BCI),
Tyssen et al., 2001) and Sweden (Renberg, which is based on an original questionnaire
2001). constructed by Lazare, Klerman, and Armor
(1966) and modified by Torgersen (1980).
Somatic Health Complaints This instrument contains 36 items that mea-
sure four different dimensions of personality:
The subjective experience of health neuroticism, extroversion, control/compul-
was assessed by a 10-item version of the Sub- siveness, and reality weakness. BCI is based
jective Health Complaint (SHC) question- on the “big three” personality dimensions
306 SUICIDAL IDEATION IN NORWEGIAN POLICE

TABLE 2
Descriptive Statistics for Independent Variables and t-Statistics for Gender Differences

All Women Men


t-statistics
M SD M SD M SD p

Job Satisfaction Scale (JSS) 44.27 9.25 43.54 8.83 44.38 9.33 .60
Emotional exhaustion (MBI) 2.23 0.69 2.14 0.64 2.25 0.70 .002**
Depersonalization (MBI) 2.24 0.75 2.12 0.68 2.26 0.76 .000***
Personal accomplishment (MBI) 2.43 0.41 2.48 0.42 2.42 0.41 .003**
Anxiety subscale (HADS) 1.54 0.42 1.59 0.42 1.53 0.42 .001**
Depression subscale (HADS) 1.42 0.41 1.34 0.36 1.44 0.42 .000***
Subjective Health Complaint (SHC) 0.41 0.49 0.46 0.50 0.40 0.49 .008**
Neuroticism (BCI) 0.28 0.23 0.39 0.25 0.26 0.23 .000***
Extroversion (BCI) 0.58 0.27 0.66 0.25 0.57 0.27 .000***
Control/compulsiveness (BCI) 0.48 0.24 0.49 0.25 0.48 0.24 .328
Reality weakness (BCI) 0.14 0.17 0.15 0.19 0.13 0.17 .018*

Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

(neuroticism, extroversion, and control/com- 1 (extremely satisfied) to 7 (extremely dissatis-


pulsiveness), with an additional fourth di- fied) and summed to provide an overall score
mension (reality weakness). The neuroticism ranging from 10 (high satisfaction) to 70 (low
factor closely resembles the classic neuroti- satisfaction). There were no differences in score
cism scales, the extroversion scale measures between males and females (see Table 2).
extroversion/introversion, the control/compul-
siveness dimension assesses the degree of Burnout
compulsiveness, and reality weakness measures
chronic illusions, paranoid traits, and prob- Burnout was measured with a 22-item
lems with identity-insecurity and relations— version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory
traits that are associated with severe person- (MBI). MBI has been shown to provide reli-
ality disorders (Torgersen & Alnæs, 1989). able data and valid findings and is generally
Each dimension is based on nine questions considered the gold standard measure for
with a dichotomous response (0 = not apply, burnout (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001).
1 = apply), allowing each dimension a range The inventory contains questions regarding
of scores between 0 (low) and 1 (high). Female three factors that specify burnout: emotional
police had higher mean scores on neuroti- exhaustion, depersonalization (cynicism), and
cism, extroversion, and reality weakness. No personal accomplishment. The items are scored
significant gender differences were found on on a 5-point scale. Male police were found to
the control/compulsiveness dimension (see Ta- have higher mean scores on the dimensions
ble 2 for details). of emotional exhaustion and depersonaliza-
tion, while female police scored higher on
Job Dissatisfaction personal accomplishment.

The Job Satisfaction Scale ( JSS) con- Statistics


sists of ten questions examining various as-
pects of working conditions and stressors (re- The χ2 test was used to examine group
sponsibility, variation, collaboration, salary, differences, and the t-test was used to test
working hours, etc.) (Warr, Cook, & Wall, differences on continuous data. Simultaneous
1979). All items are scored on a scale from effects were analyzed through logistic regres-
BERG ET AL. 307

sion models. The level of significance was set subjective health complaints, the personality
at 0.05. trait of reality weakness, anxiety and depres-
sion, and personal accomplishment remained
significant. The other variables that were sig-
RESULTS nificant in the bivariate analyses became non-
significant in the adjusted model because of
As can be seen in Table 3, 24% of the high intercorrelations, especially for anxiety
police had, on one or more occasions, felt and depression. That the burnout compo-
that life was not worth living; 6.4% had seri- nent of personal accomplishment and the
ously considered suicide; and 0.7% had at- civil status category became significant pre-
tempted suicide. Compared to men, signifi- dictors in the adjusted model implicates that
cantly more female police had once or more these variables were statistically repressed in
“felt that life was not worth living” (χ2 = 5.6; the bivariate model. However, we were not
p < .02), “wished you were dead” (χ2 = 7.2; p < able to identify single variables responsible
.01), and “made a suicide attempt” (χ2 = 10.6; for these effects.
p = .001). There were no gender differences In another analysis, all independent
in “thoughts of taking my life” and “seriously variables were entered in a logistic regression
considered taking my life.” Furthermore, there analysis to predict suicidal attempt. Despite
were no gender differences in suicidal ide- a low number (n = 22), and hence, wide con-
ation during the previous year. fidence intervals, the model showed four sig-
As can be seen from Table 4, serious sui- nificant independent predictors: being female
cidal ideation was bivariately associated with (OR = 3.27, 95% CI = 1.19–8.95), separated/
separated/divorced marital status, age above divorced civil status (OR = 6.43, 95% CI =
40 years, job dissatisfaction, subjective health 2.02–20.51), anxiety (OR = 4.15, 95% CI =
complaints, three personality traits, anxiety, de- 1.09–15.82), and the burnout dimension per-
pression, and burnout. All independent vari- sonal accomplishment (OR = 0.23, 95% CI =
ables were entered in a logistic regression 0.09–0.59).
analysis to predict serious suicidal ideation. As can be seen in Figure 1, female
In this adjusted model, only marital status, police related their serious suicidal ideation

TABLE 3
Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation and Attempts in Norwegian Police

Total respondents Ever N (%) Last year N (%)

All Women Men All Women Men All Women Men

Felt life was not worth living 3,142 493 2,649 755 139* 616* 279 44 235
(24.0) (28.2) (23.3) (8.9) (8.9) (8.9)
Wished you were dead 2,795 437 2,358 489 96** 393** 198 31 167
(17.5) (22.0) (16.7) (7.1) (7.1) (7.1)
Thought of taking your life 3,075 484 2,591 694 118 576 230 40 190
(22.6) (24.4) (22.2) (7.5) (8.3) (7.3)
Seriously considered taking 3,046 483 2,563 194 38 156 52 4 48
your life (6.4) (7.9) (6.1) (1.7) (0.8) (1.9)
Attempted suicide 3,057 482 2,575 22 9** 13** 2 0 2
(0.7) (1.9) (0.5) (0.1) (—) (0.1)

Note. Gender differences are marked with an asterisk (*).


*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
308 SUICIDAL IDEATION IN NORWEGIAN POLICE

TABLE 4
Predictors of Serious Suicidal Ideation in Norwegian Police

Adjusted model (n = 2,751)


Crude (bivariate) (multivariate)

OR 95% CI OR 95% CI

Gender
Men —
Women 1.31 0.91 1.89 1.08 0.69 1.69
Age
20–29 —
30–39 1.42 0.87 2.32 1.24 0.71 2.16
40–49 1.77* 1.09 2.88 1.57 0.85 2.90
50–59 1.82* 1.04 3.20 1.81 0.86 3.80
Civil status1
Married/cohabitant —
Single 1.47 0.96 2.26 2.08* 1.24 3.50
Separated/divorced 2.76** 1.72 4.43 2.46** 1.43 4.25
Occupational level
Officer —
Manager 0.80 0.32 2.00 0.73 0.27 1.99
Middle manager 0.84 0.61 1.16 0.67 0.44 1.02
Job Satisfaction Scale (JSS)+ 1.87*** 1.38 2.54 0.94 0.66 1.33
Emotional exhaustion (MBI)+ 3.06*** 2.20 4.27 1.41 0.93 2.16
Depersonalization (MBI)+ 1.93*** 1.42 2.63 1.10 0.77 1.58
Personal accomplishment (MBI)+ 0.95 0.71 1.27 0.67* 0.48 0.93
Anxiety (HADS)+ 4.02*** 2.89 5.60 1.77** 1.20 2.62
Depression (HADS)+ 4.34*** 3.09 6.10 2.08*** 1.38 3.12
Subjective Health Complaint (SHC) 2.57*** 1.91 3.47 1.59** 1.13 2.25
Vulnerability (BCI)+ 2.57*** 1.91 3.47 1.31 0.91 1.86
Intensity (BCI)+ .83 .62 1.11 1.08 0.78 1.50
Control (BCI)+ 1.40* 1.05 1.86 1.01 0.74 1.39
Reality weakness (BCI)+ 3.88*** 2.70 5.56 2.07** 1.38 3.12

Note. 1Widow(er) was omitted from the analyses due to the low number.
+
These scores were transformed into z-scores and dichotomized at the 50th percentile.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

mainly to personal problems (82.9%), fol- DISCUSSION


lowed by family problems (63.9%), social
problems (31.3%), and work problems (6.7%). The results in this study show a low
Male police related serious suicidal ideation prevalence of serious suicidal ideation and
to personal problems (52.4%) and family prob- attempts among police. When compared to
lems (47.5%), and considered work problems Norwegian physicians, the findings show that
to be of significantly higher importance than physicians have about 50% more serious sui-
females. More female police considered per- cidal ideation (10.4%) and attempts (1.6%)
sonal and social problems as important im- than police (Hem et al., 2000). There were
pacting factors on serious suicidal ideation; significantly more women who reported hav-
however, female police on average present- ing ever attempted suicide, although there
ed 2.2 attributions, compared to 1.7 among were no gender differences in serious suicidal
male police. ideation during the previous year.
BERG ET AL. 309

Note. Gender differences marked with an asterisk (*)


*p < .05
Figure 1. Impacting factors on serious suicidal ideation in Norwegian police (n = 194).

Comparisons with other studies of sui- phasize the question about serious suicidal
cidal behavior are difficult, because most gen- ideation, because this is a very important
eral population studies have developed their clinical point in the questionnaire (i.e., ex-
own questions to measure suicidality (Bur- pression of some kind of suicidal planning),
less & De Leo, 2001). Moreover, Paykel’s and the relatively large number of respon-
classic work was based on interviews, while dents is necessary to employ multivariate an-
the present study is a postal survey. A rele- alytic techniques.
vant comparison with the present study is a
study in a general population in Sweden,
Predictors of Serious Suicidal Ideation
comparing results from Paykel’s question-
naire between 1986 and 1996. The lifetime
prevalence of serious suicidal ideation was Predictors of suicidal ideation are not
10.4% and 13.1%, respectively (Renberg, quite the same as predictors of suicide; how-
2001). Among Norwegian medical students ever, data suggest that suicidal ideation is the
and physicians, the corresponding figures best predictor of suicidal acts (Ahrens, Lin-
were 8.4% and 10.4%, respectively (Hem et den, Zäske, & Berzewski, 2000). Further, sui-
al., 2000; Tyssen et al., 2001). All these fig- cidal attempts and suicide are two overlap-
ures from comparable studies are higher than ping phenomena with a very similar pattern
in the present police sample (6.4%). of risk factors (Beautrais, 2001). Some of the
The clinical significance of fleeting present results represent expected predictors,
thoughts that life is not worth living is still such as marital status, anxiety, and depres-
not sufficiently explored. Therefore, we em- sion. These findings have been replicated in
310 SUICIDAL IDEATION IN NORWEGIAN POLICE

a large number of studies, both for suicidal lum, Grønvold, & Ekeberg, 2002). Reality
ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide. weakness might represent a risk factor for
We found job dissatisfaction to predict suicidal behavior because it is related to se-
suicidal ideation bivariately, although this was vere personality disorders. Consequently, re-
not the case in the model that controlled for ality weakness is an important personality trait
other factors (see Table 4). That job dissat- to be considered in further studies of suicid-
isfaction became nonsignificant in the mul- ality. The personality factors of neuroticism
tivariate model was mainly due to its as- and control/compulsiveness were found to be
sociation with anxiety and depression. This significant predictors of suicidal ideation in
implies that low job dissatisfaction increases the bivariate analyses, but not in the adjusted
the risk of suicidal ideation through an in- model. Neuroticism dropped out because of
creased level of anxiety and depression. In its association with anxiety and depression,
other words, those who are dissatisfied with while no single variable was responsible for
their job in the police without being de- control/compulsiveness not being a signifi-
pressed or anxious do not have an elevated cant contributor in the adjusted model. A
risk of suicidal ideation. vulnerable police officer appears to have more
In accordance with the findings in the suicidal ideation because he or she is more
study of Norwegian physicians (Hem et al., often depressed and anxious.
2000), subjective health complaints were found We found that the burnout compo-
to be a predictor of suicidal ideation. The nents of emotional exhaustion and deperson-
current literature addressing the issue of an alization (cynicism) predicted suicidal ide-
association between subjective health com- ation in the bivariate analyses, but failed to
plaints and suicidal ideation remains limited do so in the adjusted model. This was partly
(Nakao, Yamanaka, & Kuboki, 2002). In a re- due to their correlations with depression and
cent study from a psychosomatic clinic in anxiety. Some of the discussion about burn-
Japan, suicidal ideation was statistically and out has focused on issues of discriminant
independently associated with 15 major so- validity. Is burnout truly a distinctly different
matic symptoms (Nakao et al., 2002). Our re- phenomenon from depression? The present
sults are in accordance with this study, show- view is that burnout is a problem that is
ing a relationship between suicidal ideation specific to the work context, which contrasts
and subjective health complaints, when con- with depression, which tends to pervade ev-
trolled for well-known predictors like anxiety ery domain of a person’s life (Maslach et al.,
and depression. This indicates that for some 2001). Although burnout and depression are
persons, suicidal ideation occurs without an considered distinct constructs, our results in-
accompanying subjective experience of anxi- dicate that the burnout components of emo-
ety or depression, but is associated with so- tional exhaustion and depersonalization only
matic complaints. Our findings show that the predict suicidal ideation through depression
subjective health condition is of importance; and anxiety. The finding that personal ac-
alternatively, it demonstrates that this condi- complishment was a significant predictor in
tion is all part of a general distress syndrome. the multivariate analyses both for serious sui-
Consequently, somatic complaints should be cidal ideation and suicidal attempt could not
taken seriously in the police population, also be explained by any single variables. This is a
with respect to potential suicidality. surprising finding, and may represent an arti-
In the present sample, the personal- fact. However, this remains to be investigated
ity factor of reality weakness was a significant more thoroughly in future studies.
predictor in the multivariate model. This per- There are some gender differences in
sonality factor was also important in an ear- the pattern of factors that led to suicidal ide-
lier study among Norwegian physicians, where ation in the police population. Both female
it was found to predict the transition from and male police consider personal problems
suicidal thoughts to plans (Tyssen, Hem, Vag- as the most important factor in suicidal ide-
BERG ET AL. 311

ation, being 82.9% and 52.4% of respondents, moto et al., 2002). Hence, since suicidal be-
respectively. When personal and, partially, havior clearly is a socially undesirable topic,
family problems can be reasonably coped anonymous questionnaires may reduce re-
with, other kinds of stress may be better tol- sponse bias. Another limitation of the study
erated. On the other hand, when problems at is the cross-sectional design, and therefore
home become too overwhelming, the risk of risk estimates cannot be drawn. There re-
suicide may increase. Compared with fe- mains a lack of longitudinal prospective stud-
males, male police more often attributed sui- ies in this field. Moreover, the formulation of
cidal ideation to work problems. In addition, suicidal attempt has been criticized, since it
female police had a higher number of attri- may be interpreted in different ways (Mee-
butions. With respect to gender differences, han, Lamb, Saltzman, & O’Carroll, 1992).
similar attribution was made by physicians, al-
though female physicians are more like male
police (Hem et al., 2000). CONCLUSIONS

Strengths and Limitations This is the first large-scale study of


suicide in police, and it shows that they have
The strength of the study is that it is a a low prevalence of suicidal ideation and
nationwide study, and represents all occupa- suicide attempts. Serious suicidal ideation
tional levels in the police force. In addition, was predicted by marital status, subjective
the large number of respondents makes mul- health complaints, reality weakness, anxiety
tivariate analysis feasible. It remains unclear, and depression, and was mainly attributed to
however, whether the respondents provided personal and family problems. Compared to
honest answers in the questionnaire, which males, female police had a higher number of
includes personal questions on suicidal ide- factors to which they attributed suicidal idea-
ation and attempts (Renberg, 2001). It is rec- tion, identifying personal problems as a great-
ognized that respondents tend toward more er influence. Compared to females, however,
socially desirable responses in interviews than male police attributed suicidal ideation and
with self-administered questionnaires (Oka- attempts more often to work problems.

REFERENCES

AASLAND, O. G., OLFF, M., FALKUM, E., odological issues in community surveys of suicide
SCHWEDER, T., & URSIN, H. (1997). Health ideators and attempters. Crisis, 22, 109–124.
complaints and job stress in Norwegian physi- ERIKSEN, H. R., IHLEBÆK, C., & URSIN,
cians: The use of an overlapping questionnaire H. (1999). A scoring system for subjective health
design. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1615– complaints (SHC). Scandinavian Journal of Public
1629. Health, 27, 63–72.
AHRENS, B., LINDEN, M., ZÄSKE, H., & HEM, E., BERG, A. M., & EKEBERG, Ø.
BERZEWSKI, H. (2000). Suicidal behavior—symp- (2001). Suicide in police: A critical review. Suicide
tom or disorder? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 41, and Life-Threatening Behavior, 31, 224–233.
116–121. HEM, E., GRØNVOLD, N. T., AASLAND,
BEAUTRAIS, A. L. (2001). Suicides and se- O. G., & EKEBERG, Ø. (2000). The prevalence
rious suicide attempts: Two populations or one? of suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts among
Psychological Medicine, 31, 837–845. Norwegian physicians. Results from a cross-sec-
BJELLAND, I., DAHL, A. A., HAUG, tional survey of a nationwide sample. European
T. T., & NECKELMANN, D. (2002). The validity Psychiatry, 15, 183–189.
of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An HILL, K. Q., & CLAWSON, M. (1988). The
updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic health hazards of “street level” bureaucracy: Mor-
Research, 52, 69–77. tality among the police. Journal of Police Science and
BURLESS, C., & DE LEO, D. (2001). Meth- Administration, 16, 243–248.
312 SUICIDAL IDEATION IN NORWEGIAN POLICE

HINTIKKA, J., VIINAMÄKI, H., TANSKA- surveys in the north of Sweden, 1986 and 1996.
NEN, A., KONTULA, O., & KOSKELA, K. (1998). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36,
Suicidal ideation and parasuicide in the Finnish 429–436.
general population. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, SCHMIDTKE, A., FRICKE, S., & LESTER, D.
98, 23–27. (1999). Suicide among German federal and state po-
KESSLER, R. C., BORGES, G., & WAL- lice officers. Psychological Reports, 84, 157–166.
TERS, E. E. (1999). Prevalence of and risk factors SLOVENKO, R. (1999). Police suicide. Med-
for lifetime suicide attempts in the National Co- icine and Law, 18, 149–151.
morbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, TORGERSEN, S. (1980). Hereditary-environ-
56, 617–626. mental differentiation of general neurotic, obsessive,
LAZARE, A., KLERMAN, G. L., & ARMOR, and impulsive hysterical personality traits. Acta Ge-
D. J. (1966). Oral, obsessive, and hysterical per- neticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 29, 193–207.
sonality patterns: An investigation of psychoana- TORGERSEN, S., & ALNÆS, R. (1989). Lo-
lytic concepts by means of factor analysis. Archives calizing DSM-III personality disorders in a three-
of General Psychiatry, 14, 624–630. dimensional structural space. Journal of Personality
LENNINGS, C. J. (1995). Suicide ideation Disorders, 3, 274–281.
and risk factors in police officers and justice stu- TYSSEN, R., HEM, E., VAGLUM, P.,
dents. Police Studies, 18, 39–52. GRØNVOLD, N. T., & EKEBERG, Ø. (2002). The
LOO, R. (1986). Suicide among police in a process of suicidal planning among medical doctors:
federal force. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Predictors in a longitudinal Norwegian sample. Manu-
16, 379–388. script submitted for publication, Journal of Affective
LOO, R. (2001). Effective postvention for Disorders.
police suicide. The Australasian Journal of Disaster TYSSEN, R., VAGLUM, P., GRØNVOLD,
and Trauma Studies (Retrieved June 26, 2002). On- N. T., & EKEBERG, Ø. (2001). Suicidal ideation
line at http://www.massey.ac.nz/⬃trauma/issues/ among medical students and young physicians: A
2001-2/loo.htm nationwide and prospective study of prevalence
MASLACH, C., SCHAUFELI, W. B., & and predictors. Journal of Affective Disorders, 64,
LEITER, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review 69–79.
of Psychology, 52, 397–422. URSIN, H., ENDRESEN, I. M., & URSIN,
MEEHAN, P. J., LAMB, J. A., SALTZMAN, G. (1988). Psychological factors and self-reports
L. E., & O’CARROLL, P. W. (1992). Attempted of muscle pain. European Journal of Applied Physiol-
suicide among young adults: Progress toward a ogy and Occupational Physiology, 57, 282–290.
meaningful estimate of prevalence. American Jour- VIOLANTI, J. M. (1996). Police suicide: Epi-
nal of Psychiatry, 149, 41–44. demic in blue. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.
MOHANDIE, K., & HATCHER, C. (1999). WARR, P., COOK, J., & WALL, T. (1979).
Suicide and violence risk in law enforcement: Prac- Scales for the measurement of some work atti-
tical guidelines for risk assessment, prevention, tudes and aspects of psychological well-being.
and intervention. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129–148.
17, 357–376. WEISSMAN, M. M., BLAND, R. C., CAN-
NAKAO, M., YAMANAKA, G., & KUBOKI, INO, G. J., GREENWALD, S., HWU, H. G., JOYCE,
T. (2002). Suicidal ideation and somatic symptoms P. R., KARAM, E. G., LEE, C. K., LELLOUCH, J.,
of patients with mind/body distress in a Japanese LEPINE, J. P., NEWMAN, S. C., RUBIO-STIPEC,
psychosomatic clinic. Suicide and Life-Threatening M., WELLS, J. E., WICKRAMARATNE, P. J., WITT-
Behavior, 32, 80–90. CHEN, H. U., & YEH, E. K. (1999). Prevalence of
OKAMOTO, K., OHSUKA, K., SHIRAISHI, suicide ideation and suicide attempts in nine
T., HUKAZAWA, E., WAKASUGI, S., & FURUTA, countries. Psychological Medicine, 29, 9–17.
K. (2002). Comparability of epidemiological in- WICHSTRØM, L., & ROSSOW, I. (2002).
formation between self- and interviewer-adminis- Explaining the gender difference in self-reported
tered questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiol- suicide attempts: A nationally representative study
ogy, 55, 505–511. of Norwegian adolescents. Suicide and Life-Threat-
PAYKEL, E. S., MYERS, J. K., LINDEN- ening Behavior, 32, 101–116.
THAL, J. J., & TANNER, J. (1974). Suicidal feelings ZIGMOND, A. S., & SNAITH, R. P. (1983).
in the general population: A prevalence study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta
British Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 460–469. Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.
RENBERG, E. S. (2001). Self-reported life-
weariness, death-wishes, suicidal ideation, suicidal Manuscript Received: July 16, 2002
plans and suicide attempts in general population Revision Accepted: February 28, 2003

You might also like