P J R M I

J O T
R R ´
G S
A
M O R G A N A To: House of Commons
B
I T ´ S A B O U T B A L A N C E London
U SW1A 0AA
T

B
A To: Jacob Rees-Mogg MP.
L
A
N
Regarding: Brexit Brief.
C
E Tuesday, 11 June 2019.

Prior to the United Kingdom's referendum to withdraw from the European Union there was a
failure by the European Commission to disclose the correct national debt figures across the
European Union, which led to the Euro Crisis. This would provide a legal avenue to pursue
suing the European Council and to withdraw from the European Union, it may also provide a
threat of legal action to strengthen the United Kingdom's position in Brexit negotiations.

The threat of suing the European Council is only one of the options available. If early or
quick withdrawal is required but the terms or agreements are not approved there is another
opportunity. There is no specification of how to negotiate the withdrawal agreement, a
request to the president of the European Council to pursue a legally determined agreement
based on existing legislation through the European Court of Justice might be a viable option.

Legal process would follow the statutory framework the European Commission set and will
avoid the risk of compensation claims arising from clashing with existing laws. If the
negotiations are not put through legal discourse the rights of many citizens of both parties
may be infringed. Legal process will be favourable for the United Kingdom and the European
Union as the current withdrawal agreement is likely to impede upon existing legal provisions.

Economic targets set by the European Commission and the European Central Bank in
particular will be difficult to attain with the offered trade deal, this may be illegal under the
European Commission's own law and could damage its own economy. This is the area the
European Commission failed in previously, which led to the Euro Crisis. If the same failure
occurs again it could cause another economic crisis or extend the ongoing Euro Crisis further.

Legal determination of a new withdrawal agreement would be better for both parties. The
threat of suing the European Commission for its failure in economic governance could push
the European Council into a position of having to go through legal process to get a better,
'Cleaner', deal for the United Kingdom. It would also be better for the European Commission
through being a legally compliant process reducing other legal disputes and payout costs.

Kind Regards.

Peter James Rhys Morgan.

Website: morganisteconomics.blogspot.co.uk
Copyright © 2019 Peter James Rhys Morgan.