Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Maltese Courts Filed Only Three Preliminary References To The EU Court of Justice in 15 Years

    Uploaded by

    Transparency Malta
    116 views1 page
    Maltese Courts Only Filed Three Preliminary References To The EU Court of Justice In 15 Years. The preliminary ruling procedure set out in Article 267 TFEU is regarded as the “jewel in the Crown” of the CJEU‘s jurisdiction and has proved to be a vital tool through which the CJEU could develop EU law. Even though its importance is widely recognised, Malta made use of this tool only three times. In this document you can see for which cases.

    Original Title

    Maltese Courts Filed Only Three Preliminary References To The EU Court of Justice In 15 Years

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Maltese Courts Only Filed Three Preliminary References To The EU Court of Justice In 15 Years. The preliminary ruling procedure set out in Article 267 TFEU is regarded as the “jewel in the Crown” of the CJEU‘s jurisdiction and has proved to be a vital tool through which the CJEU could develop EU law. Even though its importance is widely recognised, Malta made use of this tool only three times. In this document you can see for which cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    116 views1 page

    Maltese Courts Filed Only Three Preliminary References To The EU Court of Justice in 15 Years

    Uploaded by

    Transparency Malta
    Maltese Courts Only Filed Three Preliminary References To The EU Court of Justice In 15 Years. The preliminary ruling procedure set out in Article 267 TFEU is regarded as the “jewel in the Crown” of the CJEU‘s jurisdiction and has proved to be a vital tool through which the CJEU could develop EU law. Even though its importance is widely recognised, Malta made use of this tool only three times. In this document you can see for which cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1
    TITRE PUB-JO TITRE PUB-JO TITRE PUB-JO file://D:/Users/Ihe/Documents/Maltese References_files/mainright. Visualisation Domaine : JUR Document 1/3 de la liste résultat Sél doc Arrét de Ja Cour (deuxigme chambre) du 17 mars 2011 AJD Tuna Lid contre Direttur tal-Agrikoltura u s-Sajd et Avukat Generali Demande de décision préjudicielle: Prim’ Awla tal-Qorti Civili - Malte. Réglement (CE) n° 530/2008 - Validité - Politique commune de la péche - Conservation des ressources - Reconstitution des stocks de thon rouge dans I’ Atlantique Est et dans la Méditerranée. Affaire C-221/09. Demande: JO n. C 205 du 29 aoat 2009 p. 23 Arrét: JO n. C 139 du 7 mai 2011 p. 2 JM-PUB 201103C0044 UR Document 2/3 de la liste résultat Sé1 doc Arrét de la Cour (troisigme chambre) du 27 juin 2013. Vodafone Malta ltd. et Mobisle Communications ltd. contre Avukat Generali et autres. Demande de décision préjudicielle: Qorti Kostituzzjonali - Malte, Réseaux et services de communications électroniques - Directive 2002/20/CE - Articles 12 et 13 - Taxes administratives et redevances pour les droits d’utilisation - Redevance applicable aux opérateurs de téléphonie mobile - Législation nationale - Méthode de calcul de la redevance - Pourcentage sur les frais acquittés par les utilisateurs. Affaire C-71/12. Demande: JO n, C 118 du 21 avril 2012 p. 16 Arrét: JO n. C 225 du 3 aotit 2013 p. 27 Visualisation Domaine JM-PUB 201306C0156 Visualisation Domaine : JUR Document 3/3 de la liste résultat Sél doc Arrét de la Cour (troisiéme chambre) du 21 septembre 2017 Malta Dental Technologists Association et John Salomone Reynaud contre Superintendent tas-Sahha Pubblika et Kunsill tal-Professjonijiet Kumplimentari ghall- Medi¢ina Demande de décision préjudiciclle, introduite par la Prim’ Awla tal-Qorti Civili Renvoi préjudiciel - Directive 2005/36/CE - Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles - Prothésistes dentaires - Conditions d’exercice de la profession dans PEtat membre Exigence de I'intermédiation obligatoire d’un praticien de Part dentaire - Application de cette exigence 4 I’égard des prothésistes dentaires cliniques exergant leur profession dans I’Etat membre d’origine - Article 49 TFUE - Liberté d’établissement - Restriction - Justification - Objectif d’intérét général d’assurer la protection de la santé publique - Proportionnalité Affaire C-125/16 Arrét : JO n, C 392 du 20 novembre 2017 p. 7 Demande : JO n. C 191 du 30 mai 2016 p. 11 NUM-PUB 201709C 121201601250 7103/2019 12:25

    You might also like