Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Available online 24 October 2017 A two-dimensional Finite Difference (FD) model of the thermal history of parts manufactured in powder
bed fusion Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes is presented. The temperature of the part is calculated
in each time-step taking into account the moving laser heat source, the melting phase change and
Keywords: functions of both temperature and porosity are used for the material thermal properties. Also, an
Additive Manufacturing algorithm for node birth and distance adaptation over time is utilized, minimizing computational time
Modeling and memory. A validation of the results of the model is included.
Simulation © 2017 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
Thermal
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Finite Differences
Adaptive Mesh
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: pstavr@lms.mech.upatras.gr (P. Stavropoulos).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.09.007
1755-5817/© 2017 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83 67
Fig. 1. Modeling in Additive Manufacturing: part quality, cost and production rate.
addition, different thermal properties are used for the unmelted are presented and in Appendix sections a comparison is presented
powder and the fully dense part (porosity of the powder is taken between the adaptive meshing algorithm and the non-adaptive
into account). Moreover, the latent heat of the solid–liquid phase conventional one concerning the accuracy of the results and the
change is also taken into consideration, utilizing the apparent heat required calculation time.
capacity method [22]. The combination of the aforementioned
actions lead to a highly integrable model, which can also be used Modeling approach
for machine control, because it keeps simulation time, memory
and cost to a minimum, while maintaining highly accurate results, The thermal model developed in this study calculates the
which have also been verified with the use of data from Ref. [9]. In temperature of a part under construction over time. A 2D space has
this study, the modeling of the first level KPIs, as presented in Fig. 1, been used for the modeling of the part. Moreover, the material
takes place, whereas, the remaining aspects will be the subject of thermal properties (conductivity, heat capacity) and density are
future work. functions of temperature and not constant values. In addition, the
Power Bed Fusion (PBF) is one of the biggest groups of AM difference in the material properties, due to the porosity of the
processes, encompassing Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Selective unheated powder, has been taken into account. The thermal
Laser Melting (SLM) and Electron Beam Melting (EBM) [23]. In the analysis starts at the point when the first layer of powder is laid
PBF processes, fine powder, which has been spread on a building upon the machine table and the laser head begins to offer energy to
table, is heated by a laser beam (an electron beam in EBM) so as to the powder. The analysis continues over time, by simulating the
allow the grains to fuse together. Different powder consolidation movement of the laser scanner head. This is achieved by moving
mechanisms are used in each process [24] and the unused material the heating boundary condition across the top layer over time.
powder may be cleaned away and recycled [25,26]. The heat When the laser head has completed the scanning of the entire top
energy absorbed by the top layers is conducted to the rest of the layer the addition of an extra layer of powder is simulated, as well
part’s mass, mainly perpendicularly to the heated surface, starting as the time required for the roller to spread it. Then, the reverse
from the laser heated top, the temperature of which is the highest, movement of the moving heat source is modelled. In this way, the
to the bottom of the part that is in contact with the machine table. creation of a wall of material (2D part) is simulated. A reduction of
Furthermore, conduction occurs in the horizontal axis to the all the used units has been made in order for them to correspond to
surface; however, the significance of this phenomenon diminishes the 2D approach. The nodal temperature is calculated in each time
in the lower region of the part. Thermal losses occur in the form of step and it is stored, calculating in this way the temperature history
radiation or convection to the air and conduction to the machine of the part. The model uses as input the part dimensions and the
table. The model that has been developed in this study has been material, laser and machine properties, as well as certain
calibrated for the full melting of the powder particles, which is a environmental conditions data. A flowchart of the modeling
characteristic of the SLM process [27], but it can be easily adapted approach can be seen in Fig. 2.
to other PBF processes as well. The differential equation of heat conduction through an
In the following sections, the problem and the approach that is isotropic material, in 2D Cartesian coordinates, has been used:
followed are defined and the equations that describe the
@T
phenomenon in hand are stated, both in their analytical and r2 kT ¼ rc ð1Þ
discretized form, as well as the assumptions that were made. There
@t
is a description of the meshing (uniform and non-uniform), as well
as the apparent heat capacity method (simulation of melting) and
@2 T @2 T @T
the temperature/powder-density material functions of the thermal k þ k 2 ¼ rc ð2Þ
properties. Finally, the discussion of the results and the conclusion @x 2 @z @t
P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83 69
The assumptions that have been made in this study are the The metal’s vaporization is not taken into account, as it is
following: negligible in the processes at hand.
The machine building platform is considered as a heat sink (its
The part created is situated in a 2D space and its shape is heat capacity is infinite) and as a result, its temperature remains
rectangular and continuous. constant (equal to Tb).
Since this study focuses on the Additive Manufacturing of metals, Each new layer of powder is spread in one iteration, and has a
which are heat conductors, the heat transfer through radiation is temperature of Tpre; its spreading is simulated by introducing a
negligible in comparison to that due to conduction. time delay to the heating source.
The thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and density Changes in dimensions due to temperature induced differences
properties that have been used in this study, are temperature in density or the powder/solid state of the material, have been
dependent. Any other material properties used are constant and neglected.
not temperature dependent.
70 P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83
Fig. 3. Constant mesh of two layers. The boundary conditions can also be seen. Heat conduction takes place in the stencil nodes (big black circles).
boundary conditions are applied are not constant over time. More needed for the spreading process is calculated by:
specifically, the convection boundary condition is applied to all the
ts
top nodes and in some of them the heating convection is also applied. ns ¼ ð13Þ
Dt
The group of the top nodes, to which the heating boundary
condition is applied, depends on the time-step of the simulation. where, ts is the amount of time required for the machine to lay out
As a result, at any given time step, the top layer of nodes is divided the new layer of powder, which is user defined. After the ns time-
into two groups: (a) those that are heated (heating and convection steps have passed, the heating boundary condition is applied to the
boundary condition) and (b) those the temperature of which drops first group of Nl nodes of the new layer. Those nodes are situated in
because of convective heat transfer to the environmental air the left or right end of the top side (new layer), according to the
(convection boundary condition). The laser spot travels over time direction the laser scanner head had been moving during the
with a speed equal to that of the laser scan head and this is heating of the previous layer. More specifically, when simulation
simulated by changing accordingly the group to which the top starts, the laser scanner head starts moving from the left to the
nodes belong. This procedure is repeated until the laser scanner right of the top side, heating the corresponding nodes as it moves.
head has completed traversing the full length of the part and as a Upon the completion of the heating of the whole length of the top
result, all the top layer nodes have been heated. Upon the side, the laser scanner head will be situated on the right end of the
completion of the heating of all the top nodes, a new set of NL layers top side of the part. When the new layer is added, the first group of
of nodes are added above the previous top one, in order to simulate heated nodes will be a number of Nl nodes situated on the right end
the new layer of powder. of the top side of the new layer of the part. As a result, the scanner’s
A delay of ns time-steps is introduced in order to simulate the speed direction changes after each layer has been completed. The
time needed for the spreading of the powder, for the duration of above procedure is repeated as many times as it is required for the
which no nodes are heated and the convection boundary condition entire part’s construction to be simulated or up to when the
is applied to all the top layer nodes. The number of time-steps, ns, maximum user specified time-step is reached.
72 P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83
Fig. 4. Graphical representation of the algorithm. The temperatures of the stencil nodes of the “t+1” time-step are calculated using as input the temperature of the highlighted
node of the “t” time-step.
(namely thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and density) the specific heat of the porous medium:
that have been used in this model are functions of temperature and
cpr ¼ ð1 f Þcm þ f ca ð20Þ
porosity. The thermal conductivity and density of the porous
material are calculated by the Maxwell model [29]: However, the term ca cannot be ignored here, as the specific heat of
km air is in the same order of magnitude as that of aluminum. In Fig. 7,
kpr ¼ ;0 f < 1 ð17Þ the function of the specific heat capacity of air versus temperature,
1 0:75f
which has been used for the calculation of the specific heat of the
where, f is the volumetric fraction of porosity, with f = 0 referring to porous medium, can be seen.
a material with zero porosity. Concerning the change of density, The thermal properties of the material also depend on its phase.
due to porosity, the following equation, from Ref. [30], is used: Experimental data [32,33,34] have been utilized for the creation of
rpr ¼ ð1 f Þrm þ f ra ð18Þ analytical functions of property-temperature, using polynomials,
for both the solid and liquid phase of each property. Two different
Due to a difference of three orders of magnitude between ra and polynomials have been created for each property: one for the solid
rm, the previous equation can be written as: and one for the liquid phase of the material. As a result, there is a
loss in the continuity of the property-temperature function when
rpr ¼ ð1 f Þrm ð19Þ
the temperature is equal to that of the phase change. A third
The above equations can be used for the calculation of the thermal function has been created for each property, leading to the smooth
conductivity and the porosity of the powder by using as inputs the transition (no continuity loss) between the liquid and the solid
volumetric fraction of porosity and the properties of the fully dense property-temperature functions, ensuring their numerical stabili-
material. The same type of equation is used for the calculation of ty and solution convergence. This function is used in a temperature
74 P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83
Fig. 7. Specific heat capacity of air as a function of temperature. Experimental data Fig. 9. Density of aluminum as a function of temperature and phase (solid–liquid).
from Ref. [31]. Experimental data from Ref. [34].
P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83 75
Fig. 11. Specific heat capacity of aluminum as a function of temperature and phase.
Data used from Ref. [32]. Use of the apparent heat capacity method for the
simulation of the latent heat of the phase change. (For interpretation of the
Fig. 10. Specific heat capacity of aluminum as a function of temperature and phase. references to color in the text, the reader is referred to the web version of this
Data from Ref. [32]. article.)
capacity over the temperature range of the “mushy area”. The in order to assume that convergence has been achieved when
function used in this study for the apparent heat capacity is the NL = 6. However, NL = 9 is used in order to ensure the convergence of
squared cosine with an argument of half a period: the numerical scheme when the adaptive meshing strategy is used,
in which the distance between the nodes is increased to simulate
T Tm
cap ¼ Acos2 P ð22Þ the addition of new layers. The high temperature drops of the
T2 T1
bottom right graph are completely normal and take place because
where, A is calculated by the following equation: of the addition of new layers, the temperature of which is Tpre,
which are modeled using the same nodes. As a result, the
ZT 2 ZT 2
T Tm temperature of the top nodes which represent the current top layer
L¼ cap dT ¼ Acos2 p dT
T2 T1 changes when a new layer is added (adaptive meshing strategy,
T1 T1
described in previous section).
ZT 2
T Tm AðT 2 T 1 Þ The convergence analysis for the determination of Nl and nh has
¼A cos2 p dT ¼ ð23Þ been conducted via the same procedure. The difference in the
T2 T1 2
T1 results between Nl = 5 and Nl = 10 was small enough to assume
Solving for A: convergence for Nl = 5; for the same reasons, nh = 5 has been
selected between nh = 5 and nh = 10.
2L The use of a 2D space instead of a 3D one brings about the
A¼ ð24Þ
T2 T1 following issue: in the 3D space, the heat of the laser is offered to
Subsequently, the sum of cn and cap constitutes the heat an area of the part (laser spot area), while in the 2D one, it is offered
capacity function that is used in the entire temperature range: to a line segment (spot diameter). The procedure followed for the
calculation of a correction factor (as aforementioned in
ct ¼ cn þ cap ð25Þ Section “Modeling approach”) is the following: a simulation of
In Fig. 11 can be seen the total specific heat capacity over the thermal history of the same part, using common process
temperature, in which both the standard heat capacity of the parameters and boundary conditions, has been conducted both in a
material and the apparent heat capacity are included. The 3D part, using FEM, and in the 2D model that has been developed in
artificially enhanced value, which simulates the latent heat of this study. In this way, a power correction factor that allows the 2D
the phase change, can be seen in the “mushy area” temperature FD model to produce equivalent results to those of a 3D FEM one,
range in red color.
Table 1
Implementation Parameters used in all the convergence analysis tests.
Part dimensions in m
A convergence analysis has been conducted in order to x-axis 0.004 m
determine the values of NL, Nl and nh. The part dimensions used z-axis 0.012 m
for this analysis, as well as the laser and model parameters, can be Process parameters
seen in Table 1. The central nodes of the x-axis of the top four part Spot size 0.0005 m
Scanner head speed 0.004 m/s
layers (the first, in z-axis, node in each layer) of the part will be
Layer thickness 0.001 m
used for the test at hand. With reference to the first convergence Material: aluminum
analysis, for the determination of NL, three different simulations Thermal properties Figs. 8,9 and 11
have been conducted: one using NL = 6, another one using NL = 9 Reflectivity 82% [35]
and one using NL = 12, the results of which can be seen in Fig. 12–14 Model parameters
Material layers described by non-adaptive mesh 2
respectively. It can be observed that the difference between the
Material layers described by adaptive mesh 2
results of the simulations that use NL = 6 and NL = 9 is small enough
76 P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83
has been calculated. The parameters of the analysis can be seen in calculated and validated by the two aforementioned comparisons,
Table 2. The results of the 3D FEM and the 2D FD model can be seen minimizes the accuracy loss caused by the 2D space, which now is
in Fig. 15. Important to be mentioned is that the thickness of the on a par with that of an equivalent 3D one, when referring to thin-
part is much smaller compared to its length. The convection walled parts. Moreover, the correction factor addresses shape-
boundary condition has been used for all the surfaces. The material dimension dependent properties and also constitutes a first,
properties that have been used are the ones presented in this numerical validation of the developed model.
paper’s main body (Figs. 8–11). In addition, zero reflectivity has
been assumed for those tests only. Results and discussion
In order to prove that this calibration is not geometry-
dependent, a second simulation has been conducted on a part The thermal history results and the melt pool dimensions of the
of different dimensions. The results derived from the analysis of 2D FD model that has been developed in this paper have also been
the two different parts, using the 3D FEM and the 2D FD model, can validated with the help of the experimentally validated model of
be seen in Fig. 16. This 2D power correction factor that has been Ref. [9], which has the same inputs and outputs to the model of this
P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83 77
Fig. 14. Temperature over time of nodes of different layers for NL = 12.
Fig. 15. Power Calibration factor calculation (left: FEM, right: developed model).
study, allowing for a direct comparison. Most of the models that comparisons are more extensive in terms of space and a further
use experimental data for validation, utilize microstructure data analysis is required in order to provide the necessary correlation
for indirect comparison, as melt pool dimensions have a direct between the different KPIs (melt pool and thermal history
impact on the resulting microstructure [36]. However, such microstructure). The specific study focuses on the presentation
of a modeling approach that will render possible the calculation of
Table 2 the entire thermal history of a part’s manufacturing, by minimizing
Parameters used in power correction analysis tests.
the computational time and memory without a noticeable
Part 1 dimensions accuracy loss; a procedure that requires an extensive presentation.
x-axis 0.03 m Consequently, a lengthy correlation section of indirect experimen-
z-axis 0.005 m tal data with the thermal history and melt pool dimensions results
Part 2 dimensions
x-axis 0.002 m
of the model would be out of the scope of this study and as a result,
z-axis 0.001 m the utilization of an easily comparable experimentally validated
Process parameters model has been preferred instead. The input data that have been
Spot size 0.0005 m used (common in both models) are presented in Tables 3 and 4, in
Power 1666.66 W
which the most important similarities and differences of the two
FD model parameters
Dx, Dz 0.000125 m modeling approaches can be seen. In Fig. 17 there is a depiction of
Dt 0.0002 s the temperature variation over time of a node, at the center of the
FE model parameters first layer, as it has been calculated by both models, whereas in
Element size 0.00006 m Figs. 18 and 19 the simulation results of the melt pool dimensions
Dt 0.000006 s
can be seen. A comparison between the results of the two models
78 P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83
Fig. 16. Power Calibration factor verification (left: FEM, right: developed model).
Table 3
Common analysis parameters used by the model of this study and that of Ref. [9].
Table 4
Similarities and differences between the model of this study and that of Ref. [9].
Fig. 19. Temperature profile on the cross-section of the molten pool (model developed in this study).
Table 5
Comparison of results.
The idea behind this paper is the creation of a model capable of Acknowledgement
accurately simulating and storing in memory the full temperature
history of a 2D component (or a thin walled 3D part) manufactured This work was supported by the EU Project Borealis [grant
in a powder bed AM process. This was made possible by the number 636992] of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research
utilization of an adaptive meshing strategy, which dramatically and innovation program.
decreases the computational time and the necessary memory for
the simulation. The thermal properties (namely thermal conduc- Appendix.
tivity, specific heat and density) used in this model are a function of
temperature and porosity. The combination of these actions a) Adaptive and non-adaptive mesh: accuracy of results and
constitutes the model not only a fast but also an accurate tool, calculation time comparison
P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83 81
Fig. 22. Temperature over time of nodes of different layers using the non-adaptive mesh.
82 P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83
Fig. 23. Temperature over time of nodes of different layers using the adaptive mesh.
temperatures in the new positions of the nodes (change in their z calculated by utilizing the spline regression, which is under
coordinate), has been performed in this section. This regression validation, having as input the x and z of the green-star set of points
calculates the temperature value each node should have when and the new x values, which were previously calculated via
moved to a new position, based on the existing solution of nodal Eq. (15). The new set of points created is depicted in red-circles. At
temperatures of the current time-step. A procedure like the one this point, the reverse procedure will be followed: using as input
used in the changing of the node position, in the z direction, will for the spline regression a x set of values, equal to those of the
take place and then its results will be validated, by conducting the green-star set of points and the x and z values of the red-circle set
reverse procedure (Fig. 26). More specifically: starting from the of points, the black-X set of points is created. It can be observed in
initial, green-star set of points and with the use of Eq. (15), which is Fig. 26 that those points coincide almost perfectly with the original
also used for the adaptive meshing, the x-values of a new set of green-star set of points, thus validating the accuracy of this
points are calculated. The z-values of this new set of points is regression. Taking into account the way that the temperature
Fig. 24. Colour-map plot of the part under construction at t = 19 s using the non- Fig. 25. Colour-map plot of the part under construction at t = 19 s using the adaptive
adaptive mesh. mesh.
P. Foteinopoulos et al. / NULL 20 (2018) 66–83 83
[14] Loh, L.-E., Chua, C.-K., Yeong, W.-Y., Song, J., Mapar, M., Sing, S.-L., Liu, Z.-H.,
Zhang, D.-Q., 2015, Numerical investigation and an effective modelling on the
selective laser melting (SLM) process with aluminium alloy 6061. Int J Heat
Mass Transf, 80:288–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstrans-
fer.2014.09.014.
[15] Ganeriwala, R., Zohdi, T.I., 2014, Multiphysics modeling and simulation of
selective laser sintering manufacturing processes. Procedia CIRP, 14:299–304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.015.
[16] Paul, R., Anand, S., 2012, Process energy analysis and optimization in selective
laser sintering. J Manuf Syst, 31:429–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
jmsy.2012.07.004.
[17] Kovaleva, I., Kovalev, O., Smurov, I., 2014, Model of heat and mass transfer in
random packing layer of powder particles in selective laser melting. Phys
Procedia, 56:400–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.143.
[18] Mohanty, S., Hattel, J.H., 2014, Numerical model based reliability estimation of
selective laser melting process. Phys Procedia, 56:379–389. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.135.
[19] Dai, D., Gu, D., 2014, Thermal behavior and densification mechanism during
selective laser melting of copper matrix composites: simulation and experi-
ments. Mater Des, 55:482–491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
matdes.2013.10.006.
Fig. 26. Validation of the accuracy of the spline regression that is used for the [20] Gürtler, F.-J., Karg, M., Leitz, K.-H., Schmidt, M., 2013, Simulation of laser beam
calculation of the temperature value of the nodes, when their position changes in melting of steel powders using the three-dimensional volume of fluid method.
the z direction in the context of adaptive meshing. (For interpretation of the Phys Procedia, 41:881–886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.162.
references to color in the text, the reader is referred to the web version of this [21] Pastras, G., Fysikopoulos, A., Giannoulis, C., Chryssolouris, G., 2015, A numeri-
cal approach to modeling keyhole laser welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol,
article.)
78:723–736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6674-x.
[22] Hu, H., Argyropoulos, S.A., 1996, Mathematical modelling of solidification and
melting: a review. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng, 4:371. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1088/0965-0393/4/4/004.
[23] Monzón, M.D., Ortega, Z., Martínez, A., Ortega, F., 2015, Standardization in
function changes over time, the spline regression is suitable for the additive manufacturing: activities carried out by international organizations
task in hand and will maintain its accuracy. and projects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 76:1111–1121. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1007/s00170-014-6334-1.
[24] Kruth, J.-P., Levy, G., Klocke, F., Childs, T.H.C., 2007, Consolidation phenomena
References in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf
Technol, 56:730–759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004.
[1] ISO/ASTM52921-13. 2013, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing- [25] Chryssolouris, G., 2006, Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed.
coordinate Systems and Test Methodologies.ASTM International, West Con- Springer, New York.
shohocken, PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/ISOASTM52921-13. [26] Schleifenbaum, H., Meiners, W., Wissenbach, K., Hinke, C., 2010, Individualized
[2] Hopkinson NN., Hague RR.J.M.JM, Dickens PP.M.M, (Eds.) (2006), Rapid production by means of high power selective laser melting. CIRP J Manuf Sci
Manufacturing: An Industrial Revolution for the Digital age. John Wiley & Technol, 2:161–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.005.
Sons. [27] Kruth, J.P., Froyen, L., Van Vaerenbergh, J., Mercelis, P., Rombouts, M., Lauwers,
[3] Levy, G.N., Schindel, R., Kruth, J.P., 2003, Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling B., 2004, Selective laser melting of iron-based powder. J Mater Process Technol,
with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future 149:616–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.051.
perspectives. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 52:589–609. http://dx.doi.org/ [28] Sheikhi, M., Malek Ghaini, F., Assadi, H., 2015, Prediction of solidification
10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-6. cracking in pulsed laser welding of 2024 aluminum alloy. Acta Mater,
[4] Adam, G.A.O., Zimmer, D., 2014, Design for additive manufacturing—element 82:491–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.002.
transitions and aggregated structures. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol, 7:20–28. [29] Cernuschi, F., Ahmaniemi, S., Vuoristo, P., Mäntylä, T., 2004, Modelling of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2013.10.001. thermal conductivity of porous materials: application to thick thermal barrier
[5] Childs, T.H.C., Berzins, M., Ryder, G.R., Tontowi, A., 1999, Selective laser sinter- coatings. J Eur Ceram Soc, 24:2657–2667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurcer-
ing of an amorphous polymer—simulations and experiments. Proc Inst Mech amsoc.2003.09.012.
Eng B, 213:333–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1243/0954405991516822. [30] German, R.M., 2009, Handbook of Mathematical Relations in Particulate
[6] Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P., Chryssolouris, G., 2016, Additive manufacturing Materials Processing. John Wiley & Sons.
methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, [31] Lemmon, E.W., Jacobsen, R.T., Penoncello, S.G., Friend, D.G., 2000, Thermody-
83/1–4: 389–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2. namic properties of air and mixtures of nitrogen argon, and oxygen from 60 to
[7] Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., 2014, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 2000 K at pressures to 2000 Mpa. J Phys Chem Ref Data, 29:331–385.
3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing. 2nd ed. [32] Chase, M.W., Davies, C.A., Downey, J.R., Frurip, D.J., McDonald, R.A., Syverud, A.
Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3. N., 1985, Janaf thermochemical tables-2. J Phys Chem Ref Data, 14:927–1856.
[8] Michaleris, P., 2014, Modeling metal deposition in heat transfer analyses of [33] Ho, C.Y., Powell, R.W., Liley, P.E., 1974, Thermal Conductivity of the Elements: A
additive manufacturing processes. Finite Elem Anal Des, 86:51–60. http://dx. Comprehensive Review.the American Chemical Society and the American
doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2014.04.003. Institute of Physics for the National Bureau of Standards, West Lafayette,
[9] Li, Y., Gu, D., 2014, Parametric analysis of thermal behavior during selective Indiana.
laser melting additive manufacturing of aluminum alloy powder. Mater Des, [34] Jensen, J.E., Stewart, R.G., Tuttle, W.A., Brechna, H., 1980, Brookhaven National
63:856–867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.006. Laboratory Selected Cryogenic Data Notebook: Sections I–IX. Brookhaven
[10] Riedlbauer, D., Drexler, M., Drummer, D., Steinmann, P., Mergheim, J., 2014, National Laboratory.
Modelling, simulation and experimental validation of heat transfer in selective [35] Samsonov, G.V., 1968, Handbook of the Physicochemical Properties of the
laser melting of the polymeric material PA12. Comput Mater Sci, 93:239–248. Elements.Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.06.046. [36] Gade, R., Moeslund, T.B., 2014, Thermal cameras and applications: a survey.
[11] Dong, L., Makradi, A., Ahzi, S., Remond, Y., 2009, Three-dimensional transient Mach Vis Appl, 25:245–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00138-013-0570-5.
finite element analysis of the selective laser sintering process. J Mater Process [37] Louvis, E., Fox, P., Sutcliffe, C.J., 2011, Selective laser melting of aluminium
Technol, 209:700–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.040. components. J Mater Process Technol, 211:275–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
[12] Kolossov, S., Boillat, E., Glardon, R., Fischer, P., Locher, M., 2004, 3D FE j.jmatprotec.2010.09.019.
simulation for temperature evolution in the selective laser sintering process. [38] Bunch, J.R., Hopcroft, J.E., 1974, Triangular factorization and inversion by fast
Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 44:117–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmach- matrix multiplication. Math Comput, 28:231–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/
tools.2003.10.019. S0025-5718-1974-0331751-8.
[13] Liu, F.R., Zhang, Q., Zhou, W.P., Zhao, J.J., Chen, J.M., 2012, Micro scale 3D FEM [39] The MathWorks, Inc. 2016, MATLAB Release R2016a.The MathWorks, Inc.,
simulation on thermal evolution within the porous structure in selective laser Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
sintering. J Mater Process Technol, 212:2058–2065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
jmatprotec.2012.05.010.