Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communicated by C. M. DAFERMOS
Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
I. Compactness in BV, BD and HB Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
1. Survey of known properties and notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
2. Compactness when S is the gradient or the strain tensor operator . . . . . 127
3. Compactness when S is ~7N in R N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
II. Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
1. Application to the calculus of variations, capillarity theory and antiplane
shear in plasticity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
2. Application to perfect plasticity (Hencky's law) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
3. Application to the theory of elastic-perfectly plastic plates . . . . . . . . 153
Introduction
This article presents certain results on variational problems that arise in differ-
ent areas o f mechanics and, especially, in plasticity. The c o m m o n mathematical
feature o f these problems is that they involve energies that are coercive on non-
reflexive spaces o f the type L ~, so the solutions, when they exist, lie in generalized
spaces such as
BV(32) = (u E La(32), Vu E M1(/2, RN)),
open questions that are important in the applications to mechanics. To fix ideas,
let us consider the problem of limit analysis for antiplane shear in plasticity, name-
ly
Lu inf
u~BV(O) /f + /lof
~fu+ I Fu=l
where f E LN(~Q) is the body force and FC L~176 is the traction on the bound-
ary. The methods of the calculus of variations guarantee that a minimizing se-
quence contains a subsequence (un) which converges, weakly in BV(12), to a mini-
mizer u E BV(O). However, this does not allow us to conclude that u satisfies
the work condition Lu = 1 since we do not know, for instance, that unlr--~ u]F
in any sense.
Questions o f this type have motivated the first part of this article which seeks
to establish sufficient conditions for compactness of the known injections BV(S2)
LN/N--I(Q), BD ~-~LN/N--I(~2),yo(BV) ~ LI(I'), yo(BD) ~, LI(/'), HB ~-~ C(O).
These injections, which are of course continuous in the strong topologies
may be continuous in other, intermediate, topologies which are induced by con-
vex functions of a measure defined by R. T~MAM and the author in [8]. To be pre-
cise, when ~p is a convex lower semi-continuous proper and non-negative function
which is linear at infinity, we may define on Xs = (u E LI(~), Su E MI(~)} the
distance
It is shown in [8] that for # in the space MI(Y2, Y) of bounded measures with values
in Y we may define a bounded measure W~) which coincides with ~po g when
# = g dx in an ordinary sense. We recall a proposition established in [8].
Lemma 1.1. Let (txj) be a sequence in M1( ~2, Y) which converges weakly (vaguely)
to a measure # and let ~ be a convex function as above; then for a subsequence still
denoted (#j), ~p(~uj) converges weakly to a measure v in Ml(f2) and
~v(~) :< v. (1.9)
Lemma 1.2. For every i~ in Ml(f2, Y), there is a sequence o f functions (uj) in
cg~(T2, Y) such that for every convex function ~o satisfying (1.1) and (1.2):
~o(uj) -+ ~(t~) tightly on Q,
i.e.
f w(u) 9 -~ f w@) ~ for every ~ in (g(~).
Remark 1.1. This result easily enables us to extend the inequality (1.2) to bounded
measures on z9. In other words, for each # in M*(~9, Y), we have
c0(]#l -- 1) =< ~o(#) ~ c,([/z [ + 1). (1.10)
126 F. DEMENGEL
f o r all qJ in ~(f2). Then there are a positive constant Co, a sequence (xj) o f distinct
points in f2 and a sequence rj o f non-negative numbers such that
where IIi denotes the L 1 norm and I [ r denotes the total variation. We m a y also
endow X with its weak topology which we define by the following family of semi-
distances 9
and [ 8 x - ' ~ J belongs to LI(Xx = 0). Then for given 6 > 0 we may choose r > 0
such that
/I f~N l'll
t~x~ U idx'l < ~.
Moreover, Su is a bounded measure on D A {XN > 0} and on -(2/~ {XN < 0}.
Thus we may choose r > 0 such that
For some positive constant c, by passing to the limit and using u,. -+ u in L ~
strongly, we get
( f l ~ t N" da) ';N* =< c(fl~ I,,) + 0
which implies
,, = ~ vj ~ , . $
for some x i and ~9
]
and then
= lul N ' + Z ~ % .
i
fuo%<=Cj,,o,iuli N , i I/N* 1
V vQ
N X
\ l/N*
= f
B(X i,•)
lul N') IVeI~N.
Since u belongs to L N*, this last expression tends to zero when ~ ~ 0. We finally
obtain
/* > 1 vN* ~x,.
= C t
Now, as with Vd, we see that for N => 2, {f) ],(u) I = 0 and using
we obtain
Proof. Let us suppose that vd(Sun) tends to a measure/z which has no atoms.
Then by (1.21) vj = 0 for all j E Ig and lunl N" converges vaguely to Iul"'.
We note that for all open Y2' relatively compact in [2,
This property and the weak* convergence in L N* are sufficient to ensure the
strong convergence in LN*(gT). Let us now suppose that y(Sum) tends tightly to
~p(Su) on Y2, and show that Um ---~U in LN*(f2). Suppose for a while that this is
true when S = V or e. Then, if d > 1 and ~Tdum is bounded in MI(~2, E),
V d-1 Urn is bounded in BV. The result for d = 1 implies that U d - i u m tends
to V d 1 u in L N/N-l, then Um ---~U in W d-1'N/N-1, and finally Urn--->U in L N/N-d.
Assume now that S = V or e. Use of L e m m a A.4 in the appendix of [26], Part 4,
provides for every e :> 0 given a compact set K in .q such that
for almost every 8, so there exists N E N such that for m > N, f lure -- u I < e.
Fd
Compactness Theorems and Plasticity 131
We now define Urn t o be equal to Um in g2n and to u in $2 \ g2o. /~m belongs to X(O)
and
Sffl m = S u m / i f 2 ~ - ~ ( u m - - u ) f f 81,,3 if S = V,
4o) f [~m -- u I
t2
c(f2) 9 3e.
All these inequalities imply that f [Um [U*~ c(.Q')e and using Lemma (A.4)
of [261 Part 4, we finally conclude that lure IN* converges tightly to l u lN*.
We wish now to prove that if S = e or V and Um tends to u in Ll(f2), ~p(Sum)
-+ ~p(Su) tightly on /2, then
um -+ u in Ll(~f2). 1
Let us remark to begin with that according to Lemma A.4 in the appendix of
[26], Part 4, for every ~ > 0 there is a compact set K in f2 such that for every
m E N, f ~p(Sum) < ~1. This implies by (1.2) that
D\K
f [Sum [ < Co~ + meas (~2 \ K). (1.22)
O~K
For t~ > 0 we define once more the open set .Q~ = {x E f2, d(x, 8f2) < t~} and
set F 6 = t~f2a\~f2. We may choose ~ > 0 such that ~ 2 ~ ( . Q \ K and
f ISu] < ~. By Fubini's theorem, Um ---~ U in Ll(f'o), for almost every ~, so
f2t~
we may choose M E N , such that for m ~ M
f lure- - U] < W, (1.24)
Um - - U
We apply the above lemma with F m - - [U m - - U ] " Let us then consider am
which satisfies o"m n = F m and
~
by virtue of (1.24)-(1.27). []
for some ~j in R+, and yy in ~Q. O f course we m a y replace (xj) and (yj) by their
union and reindex in order to have ~ = Z'~yl~xj}, v = Z'_~i l~xj~. Let us now
note that
<F, + IvNu[
Urn,, ~ U ~- X ~i l{xi)
with
~fl(gum,, ) --~ ~ ~ ~)(Su) -~ c ~ ]~'i [ (~xi 9 []
Now let ~ be a positive number such that ~ < inf (d(Kt, ~/2~), d(K2, 8/22)) and
let Y = ( Y ~ , Y 2 ) be such that ] x t - Y a l < ~, Ix~-Y~I < ~. We define the
sets
B(xl, x2) = ]inf (xt, Xz), sup (xx, Xz)[•
f
( B(x , ,x 2)k.SBty , ,ya))A
1~..,21 < 2e.
Therefore, employing the explicit expression of ~n(x, y) and ~:n(z, t) given in [7],
we get
f le.,,= I < 2e
(B(x,y)WO(y,t))nt~
Definition. /2 has the square cone property i f it can be covered with a finite
collection {(0i), i E I} o f open sets with the following property: for each i there is
an open cone C i o f right angle and vertex 0 such that
Proposition 1.1. L e t us suppose /2 has the square cone property. Then if (~.)
converges weakly to $ in VNB and t$.,12[ converges tightly to a measure t z which
has no mass on lines parallels to the coordinate axes, then ( ~ ) converges uniformly
to ~ in ~2.
Proof. We assume once again that N = 2. To begin with, we note that the
computation of $(x) in terms of $.12 given in [7] may be extended to the x's in 8~
when O has the square cone property: indeed suppose xE aD and let ( ~ , ~2)
be an orthonormal basis of R 2 such that C is the cone
C : (2el + ~e2, 2 ~ 0, ~ ~ 0}
with ((x~, x2) -[- C) A B ( f2, where B is a bounded set centered at (x~, x2) = x.
By choosing r in ~(B), ~ = 1 on (xl, x2), it is easy to show, following the proof
of Theorem 3.3 of [7], that
Yl Y2
is continuous on B/q /2 and coincides with ~$ for almost every y = (Yl, Y2)
in /2.
The remainder of the proof is merely a straightforward modification of the
arguments used in the proof of Theorem 2.4. [ ]
Corollary 1.2. L e t [2 verify (1.37) and assume that 1~e,,121--~ 15,121 tightly on [2.
Then Sn converges uniformly to $ on /2.
(VV$)I r -~-
) e i | e, ~r
a(~x-~x
hence t$,121/r ~ O. The assertion of the corollary now follows by Proposi-
tion 1.1. []
l us - u I~o(~2,b =< ( F s , us -
t
u) + ~, F~ (us -
I
u) ~'(~) ~ ( G . , u s - - u ) +~
(1.41)
and
[es[~o(W2,b. ~ 1, IGslo. ~ 1.
N o w we use L e m m a A.2 in the Appendix of [26] to provide a sequence M s
in L ~ ( O , E) 1, with V 9 VMs E L~176 such as to satisfy bo(Ms) = Fnlr, bl(Mn)
= Gnlr,, and [Mn [oo + [V. V . M~ [~ ~ c{[Fsl 7o(W2") * + ]G~ [Z~(r)} =< 2C.
By the generalized Green's formula (of [6]) we obtain
J J
128 ~8
1 We denote by )'o(W2'l) * the dual space ofTo(W 2,1) endowed with the induced topoi-
ogy of W 23, i.e. lUlvo(W23)= inf IIv[Iw2,a.
v=ulF
2 For every M in L~(12, E), V 9 q 9M E L~(s we defined in [6] bo(M) and b l ( M )
0
as elements of Vo(W23) * •176176 They coincide with div (M. n) -1- ~ s ( M - n" t) and
M" n 9n when M is sufficiently regular, and are such that the following Green's formula
holds:
gu
fVVu: M -- V . V . M u = f b , ( M ) -if-fin-- (bo(M), u),
for every u in W23(t2).
138 F. DEMENGEL
and then, using (1.39) --~ (1.41) and the convergence in L~(/2), we get for some N
and for every n > N
Moreover, inf(2.1) : sup (2.2). The existence of a minimizer for (2.1) has been
studied in [23], [21]. It is natural to consider the space BV(-Q)= (uELa($2),
VuE Mz(O, RN)}, and to extend Problem (2.1) to a relaxed problem defined by
and
= (~ E L2(D, RN), a(x) 6 K a.e.}.
In order to determine the set of a's such that div ~ + 2f---- 0, a- n -----2F,
TI~MAM introduced in [23] the limit analysis problem
Therefore a condition necessary and sufficient that ~ff A Se~ not be empty is
Moreover it may be shown, as in [23], [21], that if --2 < 2 < 2, all the minimizing
w
sequences of Problem (2.1) or (2.3) with L replaced by ;tL, are bounded in BV(.Q).
This hypothesis (called the safe load condition) is sufficient to show that a generalized
solution for (2.3) exists. In what follows, we use Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 of the first
chapter to improve this existence theorem: for instance, the minimizing sequences
converge in a topology stronger than the weak topology of BV(/2). Another
more interesting application concerns the limit analysis problem: we will show
that, unless 2 is a special number ~ which will be determined later, the relaxed
problem of limit analysis
inf { J ~b~(Vv)+
v~BV(O)
f +~(-v)~}
~9o
(2.8)
LV= 1
Then ~ belongs to BV(Do), and applying Green's formula for BV(Do) we obtain
Proposition 2.1. For any u in BV(D) andany ~ in LN(/2, R N) with div tr E LN(Q),
let (~r, Vu) denote the distribution on Q defined for 99E c~~ by
f o r each q~ in c~l(12).
=- fudiv~+
D
f~'nuo+ f~.nu
I't 1"o
which implies that we may write Problem (2.8) in the following form:
inf
u~BV(~o)
{f~p(V~)- f v~.~r +
..Q
f~'nuo}.
Fo
(2.15)
u=u01t2,
Theorem 2.1. Assume there is a minimizing sequence (Um) for Problem (2.3)
that is bounded in BV(/2o). Then we may extract from it a subsequence, likewise
denoted by (urn), such that fin tends to u, u E BV(/2), in the following sense:
tim ~ u in L1(/2o),
Vf m ~ VU vaguely in /20,
w(Vf,n) ~ ~(Vu) vaguely in /2o,
Um ~ U in L~/~N-1(/2o).
Moreover u is a solution of Problem (2.15).
Now, for given e > 0 we may choose ~ > 0 sufficiently small that
f W*(~)< e, (2.16)
supI~
f w(Vh)- f Vfi:,
/~kJI'o .OW/'o
which implies both that u is a solution for Problem (2.3) and that w(Vfi) : #.
It suffices then to apply Theorem 1.1 in Part I to conclude that Um-+ U in
L~/ff-' (f2o).
We now present a sharper form of Theorem 2.1.
Um -+ U in L NIN- 1(Qo),
R e m a r k 2.1. Theorem 2.2 improves Theorem 2.1 mainly in showing U m l r , --> u/I',
because, in general, weak convergence in BV(f2o) does not imply convergence of
the traces on /'. Let us now see an important consequence of Theorem (2.2). We
consider the problem
(2.20)
u~BV(~o) (~L//~o
u =uo/~,
Compactness Theorems and Plasticity 143
It is obvious that 2 =< ~, --2 ~> --4. It may easily be seen that the strict
Corollary 2.1. I f 0 <_ 2 <_ ~ < ~ (respectively --4 < --2 <-- 2 ~ O) and if
there is a minimizing sequence (urn)for Problem (2.15) (or (2.8)) which is bounded
in BV(~20), then
/rim --->" /~ in BV(Oo) weakly,
~(V~m)-+ 7)(Vh) tightly on ~o
and
Um/r, --~ U/F1. (2.25)
Moreover u is a solution of Problem (2.8).
Now, writing
f ~(Vu) - 2Lu
~Fo
=~[aWfVo~(Uu)--2'Lu]+(1----~) fFo~~
Now let ~ be the solution of the dual problem of (2.15). According to Lemma (7.8)
of [24], ~?(Uhm) -- Vfim : ~ ~ --~O*(~) on ,(2 LJ Fo, and since (urn) is a minimizing
sequence,
f ~)(V(/~m) ) -- V ( ~ / m ) ~ -[- ~/J*(~) ~ O.
.Ok) Fo
Thus
~0(V(Um)) -- V(Um) :b + ~0*(b) -+ 0 tightly on .Q W Fo.
Moreover, Theorem 2.1 asserts that u is a generalized solution, i.e.
~0(Vh) -- Vh : ~ = --~o*(b) on ~2 W/'o.
Using the fact that f (Urn -- U) div (~ -- ~) -~ 0 and Green's formula (2.14) on
D
-QUFo we get
f (~ -- z)" nu ~ lirn f (~ -- 7:). nUm,
Ft F1
(2.26)
-O f ru ~ - lira ~ f Fum.
1"1 Ft
=lira f V~m:~.
-OL/Fo
= f w(vi,)- f f u - f Fu
.QkJFo D F~
Compactness Theorems and Plasticity 145
we obtain
Then ~p(Vfim) tends to ~p(Vu) tightly on -(20, and Theorem 1.2 in Part I ensures
that (tim) tends to u in LNIN--I(f20) and (urn) tends to u in Lx(Pl).
Let us now see how the conclusions in Part I may be used to interpret limit
analysis for previous problems. Let us recall the statement of the relaxed limit
analysis problem introduced in Part II, (2.8),
/"
inf
uEBV(-O) / $ ' ~
,t,~o(Vu)+ /~of 4,oo(-u)h']*' ' (2.28)
Lu= 1
[I
u~BV(~o) q.Ok)/'o
~b~(gfi)}. (2.29)
u=Olf~"
Lu = 1
sup {4} = L
3a~LN( D,IC),divcr +,~f~LN
a.n = ~F/ FI
B
~=2.
We now state the existence of solutions of the relaxed analysis problem.
{t m --~ U in BV(f2o),
~boo(V~m) -+ ~boo(Vu) tightly on ~2o,
= 2--2Lu,,,
=0.
This implies, as in the p r o o f of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, that $oo(Vu) = V u : ~
on ~QL//10, so we immediately see that if V u ~ 0 , Lu= f Vu:5=
D U Fo
f $oo(Vu) ~ 0, and since ~oo is homogeneous, that u/Lu is a solution of (2.29).
DU/'o
In fact we will show that under the assumption 2 < ~, we cannot have u -~ 0,
because Lu --- lim Lum = 1. To that end, we proceed as in the proof of Theorem 2.2.
Since ). < ~, let ~ be in ]2, 5[ and z be in LN(Q), with z(x) E K almost everywhere,
with respect to the Lebesgue measure clx. Since T belongs to K, $oo(Vu) - - Vu : r
- - $ * ( z ) = 0, and by lower semi-continuity of the total variation of the positive
measure $o~(Vu) -- Vu : z on the open set -Qo, we deduce
f q,o~(Vu)- f Vu: ~ __<lirn f (q,~(vh,,) - Vhm : ~)
-QUI'o DL/Fo DkJ/'o
f Fu =>lim f rUm.
1"1 F1
On the other hand
f
f2U Fo
Vu : ~ = f
9.QL)To
q,oo(Vu)
= 2LUre
= f VUm:b
DU/'o
lim f F u m = fFu
m-'~"+ co l~i l~i
and so
1 = L u m --->L u .
Returning to the preceding inequalities, we find, in addition, that
lim f ffo~(Vfim)= f ~o~(Vu),
m - + + oo .QL/Fo .Ok/Fo
which means that ~bo~(~Tfi,,)converges tightly to ~b~(Vu) on -Qo,and that Um/r1~ u/I'L,
by virtue of Theorem 1.2. [ ]
if(u) - A ~ : ~ - - ~) < O.
with
c o ( l ~ D [ - l) --< ~ ( ~ o ) ___ c1(1~] + 1), (2.32)
f o r some positive constants Co, cl. The equations (2.30) may be formulated under
o n e of the weaker variational forms 2
v~H'(-Q)inf
or L D ( O ) {/~f ( ~ D ( s -~- f (divv) 2 --
-]- K f f f ' v - - f gv} (2.33)
divv~L2(t2)
V=Uo/ I" o
A necessary and sufficient condition for 6e~ f~ ~ not to be empty is that -- 2_ :<
2 ~ 3.. Moreover, if --2 < 2 < ~. then every minimizing sequence of Problem
(2.33), with L replaced by 2L, is bounded in BD(52). For that case KOHN & T~MAM
showed in [12] that a generalized solution for a relaxed form of (2.33) exists.
Following the study made in the previous section, we strengthen this existence
result (Theorem 2.4). Moreover, we will see that if3. is less than a positive number
which will be defined later, the relaxed problem of limit analysis, viz.,
(2.40) t
~BD(D) Fo
Lv= 1
v'n:01/'o
divv = 0
= flu + f F u + f .n.uo.
rl 11o
- ~f
.0
(div u) a q- f,r" nuo}.
1'o
Theorem 2.4. Assume that there is a minimizing sequence (h,,) for Problem (2.41)
which is bounded in BD(.Qo), and that div (Urn) is bounded in Lz(o). Then we may
extract f r o m it is a subsequence, still denoted (~,,), such that
=infPq- f v. nuo
Fo
g 12k;/'o
f #,(e(u))- OWfFo e(u):v.
Then we obtain
# = lim ~b(e(u,,,))
= cb(e(u)), on .(2 W Fo
and u is a solution for (2.34). This easily implies that (div u) 2 = lim (div u,,) z
vaguely, and e~ ---~e~ vaguely.The conclusion follows by Theorem 1.1. [ ]
R e m a r k 2.2. The Theorem 2.2 improves Theorem 2.1 mainly in that Um tends to
u in L I ( F I ) , because weak convergence in BD(s does not generally imply con-
vergence of the trace on the boundary.
,,,,
u'EBD(t~o)
divu~L2(t2o)
S,u,
.Q
sF.,,}
/',
(2.42)
U=Uolf2,
and
2 ---- sup {--2}
= =lo,aDEKD, diva~L N
a.n=F/F~
~. < ~ implies that there are ~ > 0 and a E L N ~ , ~ such that div ~ E L N
Corollary 2.3. Assume that 0 ~ 2 <~ 2 <-- ~ (respectively - - 2 < --2 <-- 2 <-- O)
and that there is a minimizing sequence (Urn) f o r Problem (2.42) that is bounded in
Remark 2.3. When 2E ]--2_, 2[, it is shown in [17] that every minimizing sequence
of (2.42) is bounded in BD([2o), and as in Remark 2.2 we can give a simpler proof
of Corollary (2.3).
Thus if (7 is the solution of the dual problem (2.37), we get by Theorem 2.5
4(E(~'/m) ) - - 8(/~m) : t7 -->" - - 4 * ( ( 7 ) : 4(E(U)) - - 8(U) : (7 on [2 k) F o .
Therefore
f (4@@)/- ~(.1: ~)
-QWFo
=<lim f E(Um) : ((7 - - "K) -]- f (4(E(lim)) - - E(Um) : (7);
DLJF o ~2tJ/'o
which implies
f Fu <: lim f Fum.
F1 F1
Let us now see how the conclusions in Part I may be applied to limit analysis
in plasticity.
We begin by recalling the relaxed form of the problem for perfect plasticity:
v~BD(-Q)
{ .O
+ Fo
Lv = 1
divv = O,v'n ~ O~Fo
= sup
3a,aD~K D
diva~LN
(a'n) =,iF
Theorem 2.6. Let us suppose that 2 < ~. Then Problem (2.43) has a solution u
in BD($-2) with div u E L2(52). More precisely, i f (~tm) is a minimizing sequence for
Problem (2.43) we may extract from it a subsequence (~tm) such that
Proof. The p r o o f is similar to the proofs of Theorems 2.3 and 2.5. If (~m)
is a minimizing sequence for Problem (2.42), eD(~m) is bounded in M1($2), and
since div Um ---- 0, we may extract from ~,~ a subsequence, also denoted by (urn),
such that
Um ---> U in BD(Oo) weakly.
= on w _re.
f----- g + ~V'/f/i ~i
154 F. DEMENGEL
where /z,.E ll(R) 1, Oi is the Dirac measure on (xi) and g E L2(~c~), the xi's having
only a finite number of cluster points on every compact subset of [2. In consequence
of the study made in [6], the variational problem for elastic-perfectly plastic plates
may be written in the form
inf /
uEHB(12) [ .Q
fv~(VVu)-jfu} (2.45)
Theorem 2.7. Assume that (f, p~ = 0 for all p in ~1 2, and suppose that
there is a minimizing sequence (urn)for Problem (2.45) which is bounded in HB([2)/~ 1-
Then there is a subsequence, likewise denoted by (Urn), and a sequence (Pm) in ~ l ,
such that
Um - - P m "-+ U in HB([2) weakly,
W(~7~Tu,,)~ v2(VVu) vaguely on [2 \ k) {xi}.
Proof. Let us note first that by virtue of the generalized Green's formula in
Proposition 2.3, we may write
8u
fVVu:M= ffu+ fb~(M)-~n--/bo(M)u= fSu,
J2 D 21 s
for M in ~ad and u in HB([2). Therefore, Problem (2.45) may be written in the
form
f ~0(VVu)- f VVu: M.
~2 g2
Now let (urn) be a minimizing sequence for Problem (2.45), which is bounded
in HB([2). We may extract from it a subsequence, again denoted by (Urn), and take
Pm E ~ such that
Um -- Pm-+ U in WI'I([2) (strongly),
VVum ~ VVu in Ml([2, E) vaguely,
(cf. [71, [61). We fix e > 0. Then we select a positive number 6 and we denote by
I2n the open set
f2a = {x E R N, d(x, 1") < ~}.
We construct ~0~ in N ( [ 2 e ) , q% = 1 o n / ' , 0 G 99a ~ 1, and we set g6 = 1 - - q)e.
We choose ~ > 0 so small that
f IVV~l< ~, (2.47)
t/6
Let now ha be (goo with compact support in k.J B(xj, 6l) kJ B(xj, ~2), ha = 1
J~Ja j~ [ 1 , N ]
By lower semi-continuity,
f w(VVu) ga(1 -- ha) _--<li__m f w(VVum) ga(1 -- ha),
t2 12
=<c, f tVVul
supptq~akJsupptha
+ f @p*(M))
IjeJ a j= 1
Compactness Theorems and Plasticity 157
Theorem 2.8. Assume that 2 < ~ and that there is a minimizing sequence
(urn)for (2.54) which is bounded in HB. Then we may extract from it a subsequence
such that
Um ~ u in HB weakly
and
Um is pointwise convergent to u in 22.
158 F. DEMENGEL
Proof. Taking 2' E [2, ~[, and M in L~(O, K) such that V 9 V 9 M -- 2' Z # i 3i
E LI(.Q), we have, following the proof of Theorem 2.1,
f Qp(VVu) -- VVu : M) ~ lirn f (~o(VVum) -- (VV/./m : M))
/2 /2
which implies that Qp(VVum)) converges tightly to ~p(VVu) and that (urn) is point-
wise convergent to u in O (by Corollary 1.1). [ ]
Remark 2.6. We could have treated the more general case where the plate is sub-
jected to boundary conditions
U ~ UO/FoWF t
~u
~--~= ul/ro
b,(M) = Dx/I'2 V F~
bo(M) = D~
Compactness Theorems and Plasticity 159
Theorem 2.9. Assume that 2 < ~. Then a solution u o f Problem (2.55) exists.
Moreover every minimizing sequence converges pointwise to u.
Proof of Theorem 2.9. Let us take a minimizing sequence (Urn)for Problem (2.55);
(Urn) is bounded in HB/p, so there are a (p,,) in P~ and a subsequence, also de-
noted by (urn), such that
um -- P,n --> u in HB weakly.
We may take Lum = I. Let us now consider M such that 2M E K, for some
2 > 1, and V . V . M - - z ~ , t z i t g i E L 1. We have
f ~0oo(VVu) -- f VVu: ;tM =< lim f ~3oo(~VUm) -- f VVUm'. 2 M
K2 12 .Q 12
where M is a solution for the dual problem (2.52). Following the proof of Theo-
rem 2.8, we get Wo~(gVu) = VVu : a7 and then
References
Math6matiques
Universit6 Paris-Sud
Orsay, France