CONTEMPORARY
CAMBODIAN
GRAMMATICAL
SKETCH
Department of the Army, United
States of America.
By
MADELINE E. EHRMAN
with the assistance of KEM SOS
FOREIGN SERVICE INSTITUTE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1972
DEPARTMENT OF STATEFOREIGN SERVICE INSTITUTE
BASIC COURSE SERIES
Edited by
AUGUSTUS A. KOSKI
DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 8631
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
‘Washington, D.C. 20402 ~ Price $1.25
“PREFACE
This is the first of seven interrelated volumes comprising Contemporary Cambodian.
The other six will be Introductory Lessons, four topic-oriented textbooks, and a com-
prehensive Cambodian-English English-Cambodian glossary. It is appropriate that this
volume bearing the subtitle Grammatical Sketch should be the first module to appear
since all the others are to be cross-referenced to it
Contemporary Cambodian, of which the Grammatical Sketch is a central part, is not
projected as a series. The topic-oriented modules are to be co-equal elements in an
array of materials from which the course director can choose according to the interests
of his students.
Earl W, Stevick, in Adopting ond Writing Language Lessons (Superintendent of Docu-
ments, Washington, D.C. 1971), says, “The modular principle suggests that the several
components be designed so that they may be rearranged to suit the convictions of var
ious hinds of user, and so that the individual components may be replaced with mini~
mum disturbance to the rest.” He cites earlier examples of the modular approach in the
work of language textbook writers at the Foreign Service Institute and elsewhere. In
the plan for Contemporary Cambodian, Miss Ehrman adopts the modular principle and
applies it at the intermediate level.
The Grammatical Sketch is essentially a companion-piece to the other volumes. How-
ever, language scholars may also find it useful in its own right as a brief description
of the Cambodian language.
The seven modules of Contemporary Cambodian, projected, in preparation, or com-
pleted, have been made possible by support from the Defense Language Institute and
by the cooperation and encouragement of Dr. Roy F. Fallis, Jr., Chief of the DLI Sys-
tems Development Agency, and Colonel Roy M. Kessler, Director of the Defense Lan-
guage Institute.
James R. Frith, Dean
School of Language Studies
Foreign Service Institute
iat