Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
Steam power plants are widely utilized throughout the world for electricity
generation, and coal is often used to fuel these plants. Although the world’s
existing coal reserves are sufficient for about two centuries, the technology largely
used today to produce electricity from coal causes a significant negative
environmental impact. To utilize coal more effectively, efficiently, and cleanly in
electricity generation processes, efforts are often expended to improve the
efficiency and performance of existing plants through modifications and retrofits,
and to develop advanced coal utilization technologies.
Today, many electrical generating utilities are striving to improve the efficiency
(or heat rate) at their existing thermal electric generating stations, many of which
are over 25 years old. Often, a heat rate improvement of only a few percent appears
desirable as it is thought that the costs and complexity of such measures may be
more manageable than more expensive options.
To assist in improving the efficiencies of coal-to-electricity technologies, their
thermodynamic performances are usually investigated. In general, energy
technologies are normally examined using energy analysis. A better understanding
is attained when a more complete thermodynamic view is taken, which uses the
Second Law of Thermodynamics in conjunction with energy analysis, via exergy
methods.
Of the analysis techniques available, exergy analysis is perhaps the most important
because it is a useful, convenient, and straightforward method for assessing and
improving thermal generating stations. The insights gained with exergy analysis
into plant performance are informative (e.g., efficiencies are determined that
measure the approach to ideality, and the causes and locations of losses in
efficiency and electricity generation potential are accurately pinpointed). Exergy
analysis results can aid efforts to improve the efficiency, and possibly the
economic and environmental performance, of thermal generating stations.
Improvement, design, and optimization efforts are likely to be more rational and
comprehensive if exergy factors are considered. One reason is that exergy methods
can prioritize the parts of a plant in terms of greatest margin for improvement by
focusing on plant components responsible for the largest exergy losses. For
example, the authors previously showed that efficiency-improvement efforts for
coal-fired electrical generation should focus on the steam generator (where large
RJ CLARIDAD 1
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
losses occur from combustion and heat transfer across large temperature
differences), the turbines, the electrical generator, and the transformer. In addition,
however, other components should be considered where economically beneficial
improvements can be identified, even if they are small.
In most countries, numerous steam power plants driven by fossil fuels like oil,
coal, and natural gas or by other energy resources like uranium are in service
today. During the past decade, many power-generation companies have paid
attention to process improvement in steam power plants by taking measures to
improve the plant efficiencies and to minimize the environmental impact (e.g., by
reducing the emissions of major air pollutants such as CO2, SO2, and NOx). Exergy
analysis is a useful tool in such efforts.
In this chapter, energy and exergy analyses are utilized to examine and better
understand the performance of steam power plants and to identify and evaluate
possible process modifications to improve the plant efficiencies. Some alternative
process configurations are then proposed. Exergy is useful for providing a detailed
breakdown of the losses, in terms of waste exergy emissions and irreversibilities,
for the overall plants and their components. Some illustrative examples are
presented to demonstrate the importance of exergy in performance improvement of
the steam power plants.
RJ CLARIDAD 2
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
the Red Sea, geothermal gradients of about 6°C / 100 m can be found, which
allows economically viable use of deep geothermal systems.
This vast geothermal energy reservoir can be exploited with the aid of suitable
methods. Therefore, the assignment of geothermal engineers is to explore these
areas and develop them for use to cool / heat buildings and generate electricity.
In Germany, no high-enthalpy reservoirs exist. To use the given low-enthalpy
potential and generate geothermal power efficiently, technological improvements
must be made. For this reason, research programs and pilot projects are already
being performed. Outstanding shallow and deep geothermal projects in Germany
are discussed in this paper to aid in the understanding of geothermal development.
Geothermal power plants are used in order to generate electricity by the use of
geothermal energy (the Earth's internal thermal energy). They essentially work the
same as a coal or nuclear power plant, the main difference being the heat source.
With geothermal, the Earth's heat replaces the boiler of a coal plant or the reactor
of a nuclear plant.
Hot water or steam is extracted from the Earth through a series of wells and feeds
the power plant. In most geothermal plants the water pulled up from the ground is
returned back to the subsurface. The rate of water used is often larger than the rate
of water returned, so make-up water supplies are generally needed.
Geothermal power plants use heat deep in the earth to generate steam, which in
turn powers generator to generate electricity.
These systems don’t generate electricity. Rather, they use the fact that at a depth of
10 feet or so the earth’s temperature is stable between 50 and 60 degrees. The heat
pump transfers heat from the ground to reduce the energy needed to heat a
building.
Geothermal power plants use hydrothermal resources that have both water (hydro)
and heat (thermal). Geothermal power plants require high-temperature (300°F to
700°F) hydrothermal resources that come from either dry steam wells or from hot
water wells. People use these resources by drilling wells into the earth and then
piping steam or hot water to the surface. The hot water or steam powers a turbine
that generates electricity. Some geothermal wells are as much as two miles deep.
RJ CLARIDAD 3
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 4
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 5
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
In late 1980s, it was found that the flow of steam across the geothermal field had
reduced and the reservoir was not recharging quickly enough to meet the required
steam supply. As a result, inefficient power plants were shut down.
The Geysers geothermal reservoir is now recharged by injecting recycled
wastewater from the city of Santa Rosa and the Lake County sewage treatment
plants. Now, 18 million gallons of treated wastewater is supplied to The Geysers
each day.
2. Larderello Geothermal Complex, Italy
RJ CLARIDAD 6
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
The first Larderello power plant had a generating capacity of 250kW comprising of
a turbine designed and built by Tosi Electromechanical Company. The geothermal
plants at the field were rebuilt after they were destroyed during World War II.
History
The world’s first Geothermal power station was built in 1911 in Larderello, in
Southern Tuscany, Italy. Since Roman times steam and hot water springs emerging
from this geologically active ground has been used for hot water and for bathing.
In 1904 emerging steam was used to turn a small turbine which in turn powered
five light bulbs – the first ever demonstration of geothermal electricity generation.
In 1911 the Valle del Diavolo (Devil’s Valley) was chosen as the site of what
would remain the world’s only geothermal power station for almost half a century.
By 1913 a 250kW power station had been built which provided power for the
Italian electric railway system.
Cold water is pumped down to super hot granite rocks located close to the surface.
High pressure 200+ degree celcius steam is returned which turns turbines and
generates electricity. Currently around one million homes are powered by
geothermal electricity from Landerello – almost 5,000 GWh per year, or 10% of
the world’s total geothermal electricity production.
Although geothermal is a renewable energy source, eventually the hot rocks below
the surface will cool. Since the 1950’s the steam pressure from the Valle del
Diavolo site has falled by 30%.
3. Cerro Prieto Geothermal Power Station, Mexico
RJ CLARIDAD 7
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 8
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
CalEnergy Generation, the operator of the field, has a 50% interest in the facilities,
while the remaining 50% is held by MidAmerican Geothermal. The generated
power is supplied to Southern California Edison Company.
Unit 1 with an output capacity of 10MW was the first to come online in 1982. It
was built by a joint venture comprising of Union Oil Company and Southern
California Edison. The 10th field came online in 2000. CalEnergy Generation is
currently developing new projects in the area, including the Black Rock Project,
which will consist of three new 50MW geothermal plants.
5. Hellisheidi Geothermal Power Plant, Iceland
Hellisheidi geothermal power plant is a flash steam, combined heat and power
plant (CHP) located at Mount Hengill, approximately 20km east of the capital city
of Reykjavik. The plant has a production capacity of 303MW of electric energy
and 400MW of thermal energy.
The sixth largest geothermal power plant is owned by Orkuveita Reykjavikur. It
was constructed by Mannvit Engineering and Verkís Engineering. Power generated
from the plant is supplied primarily to the nearby aluminum refineries.
RJ CLARIDAD 9
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
The power plant was commissioned in five phases from 2006-2011. It covers an
area of approximately 13,000m². Six high pressure (HP) turbines for the plant were
supplied by Mitsubishi, while a low pressure (LP) turbine was supplied by
Toshiba.
Hellisheidi Power Plant Development
Orkuveita Reykjavikur decided to build the geothermal power plant in 2002, based
on the conclusions of research drilling that was completed in 2001. The first phase
of the project included installation of two high-pressure 45MW turbines and
commenced production in 2006. A low-pressure steam turbine of 33MW capacity
was added to the plant in 2007, as part of the second phase of development.
The third phase, commissioned in 2008, involved the installation of two more
high-pressure turbines of 45MW capacity each. Steam from Skarðsmýrarfjall
Mountain is used for power generation in the third phase.
The geothermal plant started producing hot water in its fourth phase of
development which was completed in 2010. A hot water main pipeline for district
heating purpose was also installed in this phase.
The fifth and final stage of development comprised of the installation of two
45MW turbines in 2011.
Hellisheidi Power Plant Make Up
The Hellisheidi geothermal power plant was developed in an area of 13,000m2
near Mount Hengill in the Hengill geothermal area, one of the largest high
temperature geothermal fields in Iceland covering an area of 110km2. Power is
generated using a combination of six high-pressure and one low-pressure steam
turbines.
Hot fluid is extracted through 30 wells at a depth of 2,000m to 3,000m. The
extracted fluid passes through steam and mist separators. The separated hot steam
propels the turbines for electricity generation. The plant uses about 500kg/s of
geothermal steam at 180°C for producing electricity.
The electrical system of each generating unit of the power station comprises of a
50MVA generator, a 50MVA/220kV step-up transformer, and an 11/11 kV
transformer for connection to the 11kV station service system.
RJ CLARIDAD 10
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
The power generated from the plant is transmitted to the national grid’s substation
located 1km away from the power plant.
Hellisheidi Hot Water Production and Supply
Fresh ground water is heated to 50°C with the steam from the turbines. The water
is heated again by heat exchange up to 83°C.
The reheated water is pumped to a 950m3 capacity hot water storage tank at the
plant site via a 1m wide and 360m long pipe. The hot water is further supplied to
the Reykjavík city via a 19.5km long pre-insulated underground pipe line with
diameter of 0.9m to 1m.
Construction of the Hellisheidi hot water main pipeline started in 2008. The
pipeline was brought into service towards the end of 2010 and has a maximum
flow rate of 2,250l/s.
Contractors / suppliers involved with the Hellisheidi Power Plant
Development
The Hellisheidi power plant design and construction contract was awarded to
Mannvit Engineering.
Verkís Engineering was awarded the design and construction contract for the
Hellisheidi hot water main pipeline.
Mitsubishi supplied six 45MW high-pressure steam turbines and Toshiba provided
one 33 MW low-pressure steam turbine for the power plant.
The counter-flow wet cooling system used at the power plant was supplied by SPX
Cooling Technologies. Siemens supplied control and protection system for the
power plant.
RJ CLARIDAD 11
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 12
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 13
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 14
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 15
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
The structural setting of the Macolod corridor is complex, but the earth’s crust in
this area is “stretching” or extending due to the influence of regional strike-slip
faults at its northern and southern margins. Within the Macolod corridor, the major
features are NE-trending normal faults that have produced horst and graben
structures and NW-trending left-lateral strike-slip faults that may bound them.
There is also some evidence for older E-W directed structures. Alignment of scoria
cones and maars in some areas, and andesite to dacite domes in others, also
indicates that recent magmas most commonly reached the surface through NE-
directed extensional structures.
The hydrothermal system developed at Bulalo is associated with two dacitic domes
(Mt. Bulalo and Mt. Olila) present on the SE flank of Mt. Makiling. Mt. Makiling
is a larger Quaternary volcanic complex consisting of overlapping andesitic to
dacitic stratocones and domes. Bulalo and Olila domes have been dated by the
40Ar/39Ar method at <20 thousand years old, providing evidence for sustained
silicic magma intrusion into the upper crust, which is the ultimate heat source of
the Bulalo hydrothermal system. A NE-trending line connecting these domes has
the same trend as the dominant fault and fracture directions revealed by surface
and subsurface geology. The spatial association of the highly permeable and
productive portion of the Bulalo reservoir with the Mt. Bulalo dacite dome
suggests that permeability is related to intersections of faults with its deep conduit
system. The resistivity anomaly roughly coincides with the current production area
but extends about 6 km to the north along the eastern flank of Mt. Makiling.
The Reservoir
The Bulalo reservoir is a liquid-dominated, fracture-controlled hydrothermal
system. The productive reservoir contains hot two-phase fluid and is approximately
7 km2 in area. It is roughly circular in plan view, and is bounded by hot, lower-
permeability rocks to the NW and SE, and by lower temperature rocks to the NE
and SW. Partially open boundaries or deep outflows have been identified on the N,
E and W; the NW boundary of the resource appears to be the Cabulugan fault. The
top of the reservoir occurs between 100 m (328’) and 1,250 m (4,100’) below sea
level. It is shallowest near the field’s center, deepening gradually to the west and
north, and deepening abruptly to the east and south. Upflow occurs in the central
and SE portions of the reservoir. Relatively porous volcanic tuff units provide
important fluid flowpaths at the reservoir top, especially on the western side of the
RJ CLARIDAD 16
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
main production zone. The bottom of the reservoir is unknown, but appears to be
deeper than 3,050 m (10,000’) bsl beneath the central production area.
The reservoir fluid is a neutral-pH sodium chloride liquid with low total dissolved
solids and low gas content relative to other geothermal systems in the Philippines,
making it especially attractive as an alternative energy source to fossil fuels. The
fluid salinity is also low, with an average Cl concentration of 2800 mg/kg. The
average reservoir temperature is 280°C, and the maximum temperature is around
300°C in the SE sector of the field.
Performance
Bulalo is the largest geothermal facility in the Philippines with 425.73 megawatts
of installed generating capacity. Since commercial operations began in 1979 and
up until December 2002, the Makiling-Banahaw (Mak-Ban) andTiwi geothermal
operations have combined to produce 88,500 Gigawatt-hours (GWH) in gross
cumulative generation. Over this 23-year period, it is estimated that power
generated from Mak-Ban and Tiwi displaced 152.6 million barrels of oil thus
saving the country an estimated US$ 3.21 billion in terms of foreign exchange.
As of 2003, 109 wells have been drilled throughout the field. Of these, 71 wells
provide current steam requirements, 15 wells are used for brine and condensate re-
injection, while the remaining wells are inactive, plugged and abandoned, or
unproductive. The deepest well has a measured depth of 3,625 m (11,890’) while
the shallowest is 655 m (2,148’). The average well depth is about 1830 m (6000’).
Average steam and brine flow rates are 13 and 14 kg/s (102 and 111 klbs./hr),
respectively from a design pressure of 0.7 MPa (95 psig) down to pressure below
atmospheric (vacuum). Sub-atmospheric pressure at the turbine outlet is
maintained by direct-contact condensation of the expanded steam. This process,
which occurs at the condenser, liberates the non-condensable gases that were
fractionated into the steam phase during the steam/brine separation. To prevent
pressure gas build-up in the condenser, equipment is employed which diminishes
carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide gas present in the steam.
Resource Monitoring
Chevron’s philosophy is to carry out essential reservoir monitoring needed for field
management on a cost-effective basis. We are committed to developing and using
innovative technologies where possible, but most reservoir monitoring techniques
employed by PGI are conventional “tried and true” technologies. These core
RJ CLARIDAD 17
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 18
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
1991. Efforts to integrate more recent gravity survey with reservoir modeling are
currently underway.
Outlook
Bulalo is a mature geothermal field having produced for over two decades. The
field has remained relatively problem free aside from the need to move injection
outward on the western side. PGI, in cooperation with NPC, has responded to
overcome this problem in the early 1990’s. The decision to push through and
accelerate the development of the indigenous resource was most astute and
beneficial to the Philippines at that time. When the NPC-PGI service contract was
signed, oil price was less than US$4/bbl. By the time commercial operation
commenced, prices had quadrupled. A financial study conducted by ELC-
Electroconsult for the Asian Development Bank showed that the net cash flows
including avoided oil cost had paid for the project in 1986.
The center of production will remain the currently developed area, although new
wells will tap deeper sources of steam. PGI’s strategy is now focused on deep
development to maximize the generation potential of the field and ensure its long-
term sustainability. Rehabilitation of the power plants will improve steam usage,
improve reliability and increase capacity. Currently available steam based on
current usage rate of the power plants is equivalent to about 290 MW. Ongoing
projects should increase steam availability to 402 MW at the steam usage rate of
the rehabilitated plants by January 2005.
2. Tiwi Geothermal Complex, Philippines
RJ CLARIDAD 19
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 20
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
The production area of the Tiwi geothermal field is about 13 km2 and is divided
into four geographic areas: Naglagbong (N-Nag), Kapipihan (K-Kap), Matalibong
(M-Mat), and Bariis (B-Bar). Naglagbong is a lowland area in the eastern part of
the field. The Kapipihan area is in the rugged valley to the west. Matalibong and
Bariis areas occupy high ridges to the north and far west of the field, respectively.
Other areas (Joroan, Sadurong, and Tagoytoy) within the contract area were
explored but results were not of commercial value.
Commercial production in the Naglagbong and Kapipihan started in 1979 with the
commissioning of the first 110 MWe power plant (Units 1 and 2). As these areas
suffered encroachment of cool fluids, development was shifted west towards
Matalibong. Most current producers are in the Matalibong and Kapipihan sectors.
Units 3 to 6, each 55 MWe began generating electricity in January, 1980, March
1980, December 1981, and March 1982, respectively.
As of 2003, 156 wells have been drilled throughout the field. Of these, 48 wells
provide current steam requirements and 16 wells are used for brine and condensate
re-injection. The deepest well has a measured depth of 2784 m (9130’) while the
shallowest is 938 m (3078’). The total installed piping in the field is equivalent to
81 km. The brine injection in Tiwi progressed from zero brine re-injection in 1979,
when commercial production began, to 100% brine and plant condensate injection
by 1993.
Performance
Tiwi is the second largest geothermal facility in the Philippines with 275
megawatts of installed generating capacity. Since commercial operations began in
1979 and up until December 2002, Tiwi and the Makiling-Banahaw (Mak-Ban)
geothermal operations have combined to produce 88,500 Gigawatt-hours (GWH)
in gross cumulative generation.
Over this 23-year period, it is estimated that power generated from Tiwi and Mak-
Ban displaced 152.6 million barrels of oil thus saving the country an estimated
US$ 3.21 billion in terms of foreign exchange.
Outlook
Tiwi is a mature geothermal field having produced for over two decades. The field
has experienced every problem common to geothermal reservoirs. PGI, in
cooperation with NPC, has responded to and largely overcome these problems. The
RJ CLARIDAD 21
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 22
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 23
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 24
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 25
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 26
GEOTHERMAL STEAM POWER PLANT
RJ CLARIDAD 27