Cyber-bullying via social media seen as crime

By: DJ Yap - Reporter / @deejayapINQ

Philippine Daily Inquirer / 07:16 PM May 25, 2015

PICKING on someone on Facebook may soon become a crime.

A bill has been filed at the House of Representatives defining and penalizing
“cyber-bullying,” or the act of posting rude, offensive or insulting messages
against the victim on the Internet.
ADVERTISEMENT

“By penalizing acts of cyber-bullying, people are encouraged to become

responsible netizens and make them accountable for their cyber-actions,” the
author, Camarines Sur Rep. Rolando Andaya Jr., said in an explanatory note.

Cyber-bullying, he said, would refer to “acts of cruelty committed using the

Internet or any form of electronic media or technology that has the effect of
stripping one’s dignity or causing reasonable fear or physical or emotional harm.”

Offensive acts include the following:

a) Repeatedly sending offensive, rude and insulting message;

b) Distributing derogatory information about the victim;

MORE STORIES
EU lawmakers push for cybersecurity, data audit of Facebook

Destroy the selfie competition with upcoming 100-megapixel shooter

'You pick,' 'no, you pick,' - now Google can help pick with new Maps feature

c) Posting or sending offensive photos of the victim, whether these are digitally
altered or not, or were taken with or without consent, with the intention to
humiliate and embarrass the victim;

d) Breaking into an email, social networking or any electronic account and using
the victim’s virtual identity to send, upload or distribute embarrassing materials
to or about others;

e) Sharing the victim’s personal information or any embarrassing information, or

tricking the victim into revealing personal or embarrassing information and
sharing it to others; and
f) Repeatedly sending messages that include threats of harm or engaging in online
activities that cause fear on the victim’s safety.
ADVERTISEMENT

“Cyber-bullying is one such problem that the advancement in technology and

social media has generated. It can potentially affect not only school-aged children,
but also any individual who has access to a mobile phone or the internet,” Andaya
said.

Under House Bill 5718, or the proposed “Anti Cyber-Bullying Act of 2015,” cyber-
bullies shall face a penalty of fines ranging from P50,000 to P100,000, or
imprisonment between six months and six years, or both, at the discretion of the
court.

“The onset of the Internet has shattered world barriers empowering users with
immense information and allowed them to be socially connected to virtually
anybody around the globe in the comfort of their own homes,” Andaya said.

“Because of the anonymity that the Internet gives, social and moral norms are
easily switched off and users are emboldened to just say or post anything online
without accountability,” he added.

As a result, “Internet bashing” has become a culture among Internet users and
even spawned problems that involve hostility and aggression, Andaya said.

The measure provides that the Commission on Information and Communications

Technology (CICT), Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Department of Interior
and Local Government (DILG) shall jointly formulate the necessary rules and
regulations within 90 days of passage.

HB 5718 has been referred to the information communication technology

committee chaired by Rizal Rep. Joel Roy Duavit. SFM/ABC

Bullying on social media: The Philippines’ current legal platform

Cyndy P. dela Cruz
February 01, 2017

The pen is mightier than the sword or so the adage goes.

When this was once said, it was to highlight the power of thought and idea over brute force and
violence as a way to effect change.
Today, the pen can very well be a “tap” of a button, as social media has reinvented our way of life
anew -- for good or for bad. Regardless of political affiliation or social philosophy, it is undeniable
how the power of social media has shaped recent events.

In the Philippines, many attribute President Duterte’s electoral victory to a strong social media
presence and awareness from supporters and detractors alike. Similarly, in the United States,
President Trump’s astounding victory may not have been predictable on the basis on old measures
of popularity, but perhaps to a more subtle, even subliminal influence, perhaps attributable to
social media as well.

Unfortunately, when people log into their social media accounts, some tend to shed normal
sensibilities or even basic civility. This is the same phenomenon that perhaps gives rise to the
anomaly of Philippine vehicular traffic, where the polite and non-confrontational is shed for
disrespectful and sometimes barbaric behavior leading to the Gordian knot that is Philippine
traffic.

Part of this is the cloak of perceived anonymity that social media brings. We therefore sometimes
see posts or commentaries meant to embarrass competence and intelligence, gender, or just plain
rumor-mongering.

However, even when done behind the cloak of a social media platform may have legal implications
under our present laws.

THE ANTI-BULLYING ACT OF 2013 (RA 10627)

This law finds applicability in school-related bullying incidents which cover those uttered on social
media platforms. “Bullying” under this law refers to any severe, or repeated use by one or more
students of a written, verbal or electronic expression, or a physical act or gesture, or any
combination thereof, directed at another student that has the effect of actually causing or placing
the latter in reasonable fear of physical or emotional harm or damage to his property; creating a
hostile environment at school; infringing on the rights of another student at school; or materially
or substantially disrupting the education process. (Sec. 2, RA 10627) When done through the use
of the Internet, the law categorizes the same as “cyber-bullying.” (Sec. 2-D, RA 10627) This covers
social bullying aiming to belittle another individual or group or gender-based bullying which
humiliates another on the basis of perceived or actual sexual orientation and gender identity. (Sec.
3, B-1, RA 10627, Implementing Rules). However, this law only addresses student-student bullying.
Hence, a teacher who belittles a student in Facebook or any other social media account, on
account of grades or class performance, social standing or gender may not be held liable under
this law.

THE REVISED PENAL CODE AND THE CYBERCRIME PREVENTION ACT

One who publicly or maliciously imputes to another a crime, vice, defect, real or imaginary, or any
act, omission, condition, status or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit or
contempt of a natural or juridical person, or blacken the memory of one who is dead may be liable
for libel under the Revised Penal Code. (Art. 353, RPC) These acts, when done in social media, will
be punished more severely in addition to the civil action for damages which may be brought by
the offended party. (Sec. 4 (c-4), RA 10175)

Cyberlibel holds liable only the original author of the post (Sec. 5 (3), Implementing Rules of RA
10175) hence, if you are one of those who are fond of liking or reacting to a post of this character,
cyberlibel is not the crime for you.

Slander may also be applicable to one who, in heat of anger, utters statements that are highly
defamatory in character. (Art. 358, RPC)

Intriguing Against Honor may also find applicability when the principal purpose is to blemish the
honor or reputation of a person. (Art. 364, RPC) However, the requirement is that the post be
directed to a specific person. Hence, a blind item is not as actionable as a named-post in social
media.

THE CIVIL CODE ON DAMAGES

One who is aggrieved by a defamatory post in social media may nonetheless find refuge in the
provisions of the Civil Code on Damages. (Art. 2176, Civil Code) One who posts in social media,
causing damage to the reputation of another may be liable to the subject for damages and this
can be a valid cause of action under the law. Such post must tend to pry to the privacy and peace
of mind of another, meddle or disturb the private life or family relations of another, intrigue to
cause another to be alienated from his friends or vex or humiliate another on account of his
religious beliefs, lowly station in life, place of birth, physical defect or other personal condition.
(Art. 26, Civil Code)

The recent popular posts in Facebook featuring over-weight people who are victims of body-
shaming may rely on the Civil Code for an action for damages.

THE LABOR CODE ON JUST CAUSES FOR TERMINATION

An employee who spreads rumors or intrigues against a coworker or his superior or vice versa, or
who does any act similar to cyberlibel, slander, intriguing against honor or even prying into the
privacy of another may be a just cause for his termination if embodied in the company policy in
addition to all other causes of action available to him under the laws mentioned. (Sec. 5.2 (g), D.O
147-15)

However, all the laws mentioned will only be a valid cause of action to one who is the subject of
the post and who is aware of the post directed to him. Those who simply react and call foul
because a post imputes to another an act which tarnishes one’s reputation without them being the
subject of the same has no remedy under any of our present laws.

Social media is a powerful tool. It is always best to set a limit on which issues to react to or which
people direct a post to.

While freedom of speech is well-enshrined in our Constitution, this right is not without any
limitations.
In the end, it is always best to devote the stroke of our fingers and the clicks of our mouse to
intellectual discourse rather than risk being held liable under our present laws. After all, the power
of our minds should be mightier than any sword there is.