Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1200319411
1200319411
edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Draft paper on Chinese temperature trends
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:03:31 -0700
Cc: david.parker@metoffice.gov.uk, Thomas.C.Peterson@noaa.gov, Reinhard Boehm
<Reinhard.Boehm@zamg.ac.at>, Susan Solomon <Susan.Solomon@noaa.gov>, Adrian Simmons
<adrian.simmons@ecmwf.int>
Hi Phil
I'll read it more thoroughly later. My quick impression, more from the abstract
than the
main text, is that you are defensive and it almost seems that there is a denial
of the UHI
in part. Yet later in the abstract and nicely in the first two sentences of the
conclusions, you recognize that the UHI is real and the climate is different in
cities.
The point is that the homogenization takes care of this wrt the larger scale
record and
that UHI is essentially constant at many sites so that it does not alter trends.
So I urge
you to redo the abstract and be especially careful of the wording.
You might even start with:
The Urban Heat Island (UHI) is a real phenomenon in urban settings that
generally makes
cities warmer than surrounding rural areas. However, UHIs are evident at both
London and
Vienna, but do not contribute to the warming trends over the 20th century
because the city
influences have not changed much over that time. Similarly, ...
Regards
Kevin
Phil Jones wrote:
Dear All,
References
1. mailto:p.jones@uea.ac.uk
2. mailto:trenbert@ucar.edu
3. http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/trenbert.html