You are on page 1of 6

TEAM NAME: Braincell 2.

DEPARTMENT: Heading VOT


DECISION MATRIX TABLE: Themes
Selection
1 1 1 1 1 5

20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 100%


DECISION CRITERIA
NO STRATEGIES
COMPANY MEMBER TOTAL
URGENCY COST SAVING TIME DURATION
OBJECTIVE CAPABILITY SCORE
Standardize 5S, training program consist of 5S
1 8 7 8 8 8 97.5

Reject down with assist from process engineer


2 6 4 5 1 4 50

By using new machine capacity to reduce man


power (Skilled/unskilled) required.
3 1 1 5 5 8 50

With tooling support and process engineering to


reduce machine setting time.
4 6 3 2 5 3 47.5

SUMMARY OF DECISION
VOTE HIGH-LOW

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Step 1: List strategies as rows
Step 2: Determine important attributes and add/remove columns, as appropriate
Step 3: Assign relative weights to each attribute in row through votes from headcount. (eg. 0-8)
Step 4: Assign objective 0-100 scores for how option satisfies each attribute (best to do this on an attribute-by-attribute basis)
Step 5: Options with the higest scores should be considered

Notes:
an attribute-by-attribute basis)

You might also like