Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jane Wahlman
Table of Contents
Table of Figures
Abstract
Contextual factors were considered while establishing appropriate learning goals for the
kindergarten class at Bowman Elementary school. The learning goal of retelling a story in the
content area of English Language Arts was chosen to pre-assess. After the pre-assessment was
scored, an instructional design was created to teach the learning goal. After some practice, it was
clear certain students needed modifications for the learning goal assessment. These students
included but were not limited to mono-lingual students. After said modifications were made to
the instructional design, the students finished the unit and the post-assessment was completed. An
analysis of student learning was conducted from the results of the post-assessment to demonstrate
a learning gain score of 76%. Females performed higher than males on both the pre and post
Professional development will include emphasis on English Language Learners and Bilingual
education.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 5
Anchorage School District educates more than 48,000 students, encompasses almost 2,000
square miles (larger than the state of Rhode Island), and has more than 130 schools and
programs. Anchorage has the most diverse schools nationwide in all levels. Minority students
comprise more than 50 percent of the student population: African American 6%, Alaska
Native/American Indian 9%, Asian 10%, Biracial/Multiracial 15%, Hispanic 11%, Native
While 80% of students speak English as their first language, the following five languages are
categorized from greatest to least spoken at ASD: Spanish (1394), Samoan (1238), Hmong
number of paths to success, which include students participating in an Open Optional, traditional
Neighborhood, or Structured Learning environment. The school also includes three Pre-K
Special Education classrooms for students with individualized needs. The Neighborhood
Program serves more than 250 students in 11 traditional classrooms. These classrooms focus on
meeting all students’ academic needs through the use of the Common Core Standards. Teachers
in these classes use the district adopted curriculum of the National Geographic Reading Program,
Houghton Mifflin Reading Program and Go Math! The Open Optional Program serves 175
cooperation, small and large group participation, community service, goal-setting, leadership and
family involvement. The highly Structured Learning Classroom (SLC) incorporates a variety of
evidence-based teaching strategies and curricula to facilitate communication and social skills
while teaching grade-level expectations. Students may require adaptive living skill instruction.
The early childhood special education program provides and oversees services for children ages
3 to 5 who experience developmental delays or other disabilities. Please see the following link
http://bowman.asdk12.org/media/anchorage/schoolsites/bowman/Bowman%20Brochure.pdf
The dimensions of the classroom are quite large and include a coat area large enough to
accommodate backpacks on one side and outdoor gear including boots on the opposite side. The
gear is organized with one crate per child to house boots and one basket to house shoes. This
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 7
minimizes confusion, maximizes efficiency and promotes safety. Students are grouped by table
and frequently meet together as a group on the carpet, situated at the front of the room, each
assigned a carpet “square” for their space. The classroom routines are well-established and
include: removing and putting on snow gear at their seat area rather than in the coat area, ‘stop’,
‘look’, and ‘listen’ at the sound of the chime, and ‘hugs’ and ‘bubbles’(signaling hands to
oneself and quiet) while in line. The classroom houses 7 large screen apple computers primarily
used for students to increase their time on Lexia and a cart of 25 I Pads shared with three other
classes. The room has a Smart Board which is used to conduct 30% of the whole group
instruction and a document camera which is utilized as another tool for whole group instruction.
The parental involvement is non-existent within the classroom, however we rely heavily on
parental and guardian involvement to complete additional “homework” outside of class which is
Classroom instruction during the morning includes both whole and small group settings.
There is one kindergarten aide scheduled from 9:00-12:30 pm. The schedule of the day also
dictates grouping patterns. Immediately upon entering, once students have their put their items
away (including home folders in their mailbox, lunches on the lunch cart, outside gear hung
up/put away, they get out their supply box (which is organized by drawer with each student’s
name) and begin working on their journal which is at their table. Upon completion of their
journal students meet at the carpet for whole group math instruction. Once the whole group
instruction is complete, they break into three leveled groups and work with their designated
teacher (Mrs. Councell-host teacher, Mrs. Wahlman-student teacher, and Ms. Krista-TA). This
process continues for the phonics lesson and then students break into RTI groups once again.
Four students leave the classroom for small group instruction in SPED. After lunch and recess
students receive whole group writing instruction minus three students who return to SPED for
individualized instruction.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 8
There are 24 students in the kindergarten class and it is one of two neighborhood
kindergarten classes. Additionally, there is one kindergarten class in the Bowman Open
Optional Program. There are three distinct groupings of students within the class: high achievers
that can and should be pushed to keep them interested and engaged in the learning process, a
middle group which includes both a higher and lower level, and a lower development group that
is pulled twice daily for individualized and small group instruction in a special education
classroom. About 50% of the students are Caucasian with the remainder a mixture of various
ethnicities including Alaska Native, Filipino, Samoan, African American, Korean and Russian.
There are two mono-linguistic students, one Korean and the other Russian, with very limited
understanding and speaking ability of the English language. The lower group is comprised of
three students. One student utilizes hearing aides and has an IEP for both her hearing disability
that was recently modified to include a behavior plan for defiance and not following directions.
This particular student has suffered severe early childhood trauma and is making progress in
small group instruction, but does not seem to benefit from whole group instruction. She did not
start school until October and continues to have frequent absences. Her recent assessments show
no measurable growth, other than concepts covered in small group, and her test scores show a
flat line. Another student has a scheduled IEP meeting for the upcoming week and the classroom
teacher will request full time TA support as he is developmentally at age 3, thus his ability to
follow directions is hampered and severely below the level of the other children in class.
Another student is currently undergoing the mandatory 6 weeks of intervention necessary to set
up an IEP meeting (he started at Bowman prior to the holiday break after moving to Anchorage
from a village near Barrow). While the three students mentioned above are currently pulled out
of the general education classroom twice a day for 30 minutes each session to receive small
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 9
instruction must be modified when they are present in the general education classroom.
Activities that are developmentally appropriate for the majority of the students are not for
certain students, thus we utilize the presence of the three adults in the morning to provide small
group instruction tailored to each of the three groups in both math and phonics to differentiate
and teach to the level of the students in each small group. Activities and instruction are modified
slightly during whole group instruction to teach to and include all students regardless of their
development and/or command of the English language. This said, whole group instruction
includes many visual displays and kinesthetic opportunities in addition to auditory instruction to
encourage learning. In the afternoon, students in the lower development group and ELLs have
the opportunity to work on Lexia to increase basic literacy skills, while the remainder of the
group works at learning stations to increase independence and foster good study skills.
Instructional development and assessment will need to focus on ensuring that students
receive appropriate developmental instruction meant to challenge them at their individual level,
appropriately scaffolded to bring them to the next level. Instruction in small groups is most
beneficial for the varying levels of student abilities and types of learning. Alternative
opportunities for differentiation in whole group instruction will also benefit students in this class,
thus I will attempt to offer differentiation when I plan my unit with auditory, visual, kinesthetic
and auditory approaches to instruction to reach the various types of learners. Differentiation
through instruction with various levels of materials will encourage students to excel at their
Goal
Formative Record the threes: Head, Students with limited English
#1 shoulders, knees – Touch will be able to hold up an
Assessment your head and tell a detail illustration while touching
of the story in the head, shoulders, and knees to
beginning, touch your correct identify events as they
Retell a story shoulders and tell a detail occur in the story
of the story in the middle
of the story, touch your
knees and tell a detail of
the story at the end.
Post-
Assessment Cut, paste and organize Students write and/or dictate
illustrations in the story flow details of the story in the
map according to the story map according to the
beginning, middle, and end of beginning, middle, and end
the story
Story Map
Name: Date:
1. Beginning
2. Middle
3. End
Goal
Formative T-Chart on smartboard:
#2 Write/draw details of each
Assessment story; circle the details both Students add details by writing or
Compare and stores have in common dictation and/or add illustrations to
Contrast Two enhance details
Stories
Goal 1 -
For the first learning goal, pre-requisite knowledge includes the ability to listen to a story
using the support of the pictures to understand the events. In this class we have been practicing
“the eagle eye”, which looks for pictures to support understanding. For the ELL students and the
student with hearing loss the pictures of the story will function to tell the events without the
necessity of oral language. Students should be able to retell or rephrase (summarize) the story
using oral language and either writing the events or drawing pictures of the events in a graphic
organizer such as a story map. Students understand and have practice in recalling key details,
and summarizing them, which is the process of rephrasing events in one’s own words. Students
also have the pre-requisite knowledge and skills to identify the beginning, the middle and the end
of the story (order of events) and be able to recognize and fill out a story map. Some students
who are developmentally able to retell the story verbally may not be able to retell the story in
writing, thus, it is necessary to allow for differentiation in this situation. Retelling the story by
drawing pictures/images on the story map may be more developmentally appropriate and thus
allowable. Those students who are developmentally equipped to write the events on a story map
Goal 2 -
The second goal requires that students have the pre-requisite knowledge of identifying
similarities and differences in informational text. Students with oral language capabilities will be
able to verbally identify details of two different texts; students lacking oral language skills
should be able to point to details/diagrams in the text and/or draw details to compare and contrast
two texts. Students will have pre-requisite knowledge of the use of Venn Diagrams to compare
and contrast similarities and differences of two texts. Categorizing images, such as diagrams
from the text to identify similarities and differences, will be most developmentally appropriate
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 16
for some students, including the ELL learners. Students who can write the similarities and
Retell a Story
12
10
Number of Students
0
Elements of a Story Retold by a Student
Learning Goal #1
Results:
Blue – indicates those students can retell a story with beginning, middle and end.
Orange – indicates those students who can retell at least the beginning, middle, or end of the
story.
Grey – indicates those students who did not retell the beginning, middle or end of the story.
10 students can retell a story, 9 can retell one part of the story and 5 students cannot retell
a story. The five students who cannot retell the story are the two with IEPs, the two mono-
linguistic students, and one child who is easily distracted and off-task often. For the two students
with IEPs and mono-linguistic students it may be necessary to modify the task to include a sort
or a picture choice to circle. For the 9 students who can retell at least one part of the story, more
modeling and practice is necessary for them to retell the beginning, middle and end of the story.
It will be most beneficial to the students to relate the learning goal of Retelling a Story to a more
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 18
familiar practice, that of a familiar routine, and utilize the schema in place to scaffold their
learning.
Routine and identify the steps involved in a specific classroom routine, recall the steps from
beginning to end and say/see the steps from beginning to end. This relates to my instructional
goals because it uses a strategy to assist in retelling a story; retelling the events of a familiar
routine give students the opportunity to recall and retell familiar events in context, assisting them
in the process of the recall and retell process. Naming a familiar routine will assist those
students who were able to retell one event in the story, but unable to tell the beginning (first),
middle (second), and end (third) sequentially. The familiar routine makes retelling events more
relatable as it is in a context they understand thus they can recall the events more readily. I will
use the document camera to project the three steps on the smartboard in pictures: 1. Picture of
child getting jacket and backpack 2. Picture of child taking papers out of their mailbox 3. Child
putting their papers in their mailbox and putting their jacket on. This final piece will assist those
students who need visual cues in addition to the auditory cues. This will further help when they
do there own retelling with pictures. For the auditory piece I will say:
With each step I will identify what order that step comes in:
1. First (in the beginning), I get my jacket and backpack (show students)
2. Second (in the middle), I empty my mailbox
3. Third (in the end), I put my papers in my backpack and put on my jacket Say: Think
aloud. Show: Model.
I will ask one of my IEP students and then one of my ELL learners to act out the routine and ask
them to repeat “first”, “second”, and “third” after each step to ensure they understand the process
of retelling events in order. This activity will be especially helpful for these learners as the
verbal message is often missed, thus the kinesthetic motion or acting out and visual cues will
In this lesson students will create a mini-book and identify the beginning, middle and end
of the story The Bus is For Us. With drawing and/or writing they will identify the beginning on
the first page, the middle on the second page, and the end on the third page. This will assist
those students who can recall and retell more readily by numbers: 1, 2, and 3 or first, second, and
third. The page numbers function as an accommodation and will communicate specifically to
those ELLs and students who may still have difficulty understanding beginning, middle, and end.
Students have the option to draw, write or draw and write in their books. For those students who
struggle with adequately expressing their ideas in writing, they have the option to draw.
Students will also be given the opportunity to dictate their ideas to the teacher as they “read their
book”. This differentiated approach gives all students the opportunity to display their learning in
a way that aligns with their abilities and level of understanding and is also in line with the
standards which state that students can draw, write or dictate key details.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 21
Use of Technology
Other than the use of the smartboard for a You Tube read aloud and use of projection,
there is minimal use of technology in this unit. This unit focuses on hearing and seeing through
retelling and replaying, thus the use of technology is not widely necessary. I chose to have the
final story read aloud via You Tube as I have found students are extremely engaged and attentive
during You Tube read alouds, thus this approach will ideally transfer into a higher retention of
details resulting in recalling and retelling the story with greater ease.
Learning Goal #2
Finally, my second learning goal is to compare and contrast two texts, however a
completely separate unit is necessary to compare and contrast two texts, thus see the notes below
as I foresee it will be confusing for students to try to master “Retelling a Story” in conjunction
14
12
10
Number of Students
0
Compare/Constrast two texts
After reviewing the data it is quite apparent that many students need instruction in
comparing and contrasting two texts. Modification of the learning goals may be necessary to
include comparing and contrasting non-fiction vs. fiction rather than two informative or non-
fiction texts. At this point I don’t see how to best include this learning goal in the current unit,
thus will work to modify the learning goal and/or write up a separate unit to target this learning
TWS Lesson 1
Candidate Name: Janey Wahlman Host Teacher Name: Brenda Councell
Supervisor: Katy Spangler
School: Bowman Elementary Grade Level: K # of Students: 24
Date & Time of Lesson: Length of Lesson: (day or days) 1 day – 15
minutes
Topic of Lesson: Content Area: Language Arts
Name a Familiar Routine
(Unit - Retell a Story)
Materials:
Smartboard
2. With prompting and support, retell familiar stories, using key details.
In this lesson we’ll use a strategy to assist in retelling events. We’ll talk about a Familiar
Routine and identify the steps involved in a specific classroom routine, recall the steps from
beginning to end and say/see the steps from beginning to end. This relates to my instructional goals
because it uses a strategy to assist in retelling a story; retelling the events of a familiar routine give
students the opportunity to recall and retell familiar events in context, assisting them in the process of
the recall and retell process. Naming a familiar routine will assist those students who were able to
retell one event in the story, but unable to tell the beginning (first), middle (second), and end (third)
sequentially. The familiar routine makes retelling events more relatable as it is in a context they
understand thus they can recall the events more readily. I will use the document camera to project
the three steps on the smartboard in pictures: 1. Picture of child getting jacket and backpack 2.
Picture of child taking papers out of their mailbox 3. Child putting their papers in their mailbox and
putting their jacket on. This final piece will assist those students who need visual cues in addition to
the auditory cues. This will further help when they do their own retelling with pictures. For the
Closure: These three basic steps will help students to remember and then think forward to retell.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 25
TWS Lesson 2
Candidate Name: Janey Wahlman Host Teacher Name: Brenda Councell
Supervisor: Katy Spangler
School: Bowman Elementary Grade Level: K # of Students: 24
Date & Time of Lesson: Length of Lesson: (day or days) 1 day – 15
minutes
Topic of Lesson: Content Area: Language Arts
Model a Familiar Routine
Retell a Story
2. With prompting and support, retell familiar stories, using key details.
Modeling is an effective method of instruction. How can modeling a routine illustrate the
concept of retelling a story?
In this activity I will model the Familiar Routine of getting ready at the end of the day. With
each step I will identify what order that step comes in:
4. First (in the beginning), I get my jacket and backpack (show students)
5. Second (in the middle), I empty my mailbox
6. Third (in the end), I put my papers in my backpack and put on my jacket Say: Think aloud.
Show: Model.
I will ask one of my IEP students and then one of my ELL learners to act out the routine and ask
them to repeat “first”, “second”, and “third” after each step to ensure they understand the process of
retelling events in order. This activity will be especially helpful for these learners as the verbal
message is often missed, thus the kinesthetic motion or acting out and visual cues will establish a
TWS Lesson 14
Candidate Name: Janey Wahlman Host Teacher Name: Brenda Councell
Supervisor: Katy Spangler
School: Bowman Elementary Grade Level: K # of Students: 24
Date & Time of Lesson: Length of Lesson: (day or days) 1 day – 15
minutes
Topic of Lesson: Content Area: Language Arts
Name a Familiar Routine
Retell a Story
2. With prompting and support, retell familiar stories, using key details.
.
STAGE 1 – Essential Questions and Enduring Understandings (Meaning)
Enduring Understanding(s): Essential Questions to be Considered:
Retelling is synonymous with summarizing. How can students effectively summarize a
story?
In this lesson students will create a mini-book and identify the beginning, middle and end of
the story The Bus is For Us. With drawing and/or writing they will identify the beginning
on the first page, the middle on the second page, and the end on the third page. This will
assist those students who can recall and retell more readily by numbers: 1, 2, and 3 or first,
second, and third. The page numbers function as an accommodation and will communicate
specifically to those ELLs and students who may still have difficulty understanding
beginning, middle, and end. Students have the option to draw, write or draw and write in
their books. For those students who struggle with adequately expressing their ideas in
writing, they have the option to draw. Students will also be given the opportunity to dictate
their ideas to the teacher as they “read their book”. This differentiated approach gives all
students the opportunity to display their learning in a way that aligns with their abilities and
level of understanding and is also in line with the standards which state that students can
draw, write or dictate key details.
*Retelling a story is common with folk tales and fairy tales. While everyone retells stories
slightly differently, the beginning, middle and the end are usually similar (the same).
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 29
1st Modification:
During Week 2, it became apparent that some students were having difficulty following
along while I wrote words or drew pictures on the Anchor Chart (Tuesday), thus an instructional
change I felt necessary to implement was to provide access to illustrations reminiscent of those
in the story and include a teaching opportunity such that students could retell the story with the
use of those same illustrations. I felt a story board with corresponding pictures would give
certain students immediate visual representation of the story. This allowed students to more
readily recall: 1. The story read and 2. Events during the story. I modeled a situation that
provided students an opportunity to draw upon their own schema. Upon revision of my
approach, I immediately noticed certain students, specifically the monolingual students, actively
participated because they not only recognized the story, they could more readily organize the
story with the provided pictures. Because of the effectiveness of this approach, I modified the
following days plan for partner work and provided certain pairs with pictures to categorize rather
than requiring them to draw or write their own. By providing another tool for certain partner
opportunity to contribute to the pair. This promoted group work between the ‘higher’ and ‘lower’
students rather than the higher students completing the task in their pair.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 30
2nd Modification:
I assumed because of the modification in the prior paragraph, students would be prepared
for the final lesson on Friday which would serve as a formative assessment (fill out a story map
for the Three Little Pigs with drawing and/or writing to identify the beginning, middle and end or
1,2,3). Using this information, I made an instructional decision to create pictures that specific
students could sort to retell the story. This approach assisted the mono-lingual students and
those students with developmental delays. This modification provided a context for the
assignment. Students could draw on their prior learning and use the provided illustrations to
retell (or reconstruct) the story rather than coming up with their own. In addition, this allowed
those students with little to no communication capability in the English language to demonstrate
their learning without dictating. These modifications are in line with the standards and
subsequent learning goals as the standards specify that children are to retell a story with
“prompting and support”, thus the provided changes are just that.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 31
Potential
Pre- Post- Gain
Assessment Assessment Score,
Raw Score, Raw Score, Pre- Post- Actual Top Learning
Students Top Top Assessment Assessment Gain Possible Gain
N= Possible = Possible = Percentage Percentage Score = Score
23 6 6 100%
Addison 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Aaliyah 2 6 33% 100% 67% 67% 100%
Abigail 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Aaron 2 6 33% 100% 67% 67% 100%
Blake 0 6 0% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Corrina 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Rhema 0 6 0% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Evan 2 5 33% 83% 50% 67% 75%
Adrien 2 6 33% 100% 67% 67% 100%
Jaxon L 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Ian 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Michael 2 4 33% 67% 33% 67% 50%
Scarlett 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Jaxon M 6 6 100% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Mikayla 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Maleiah 4 4 67% 67% 0% 33% 0%
Dima 6 6 100% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Joshua 2 4 33% 67% 33% 67% 50%
Kylie 6 6 100% 100% 0% 0% 0%
Kylin 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Zack 0 4 0% 67% 67% 100% 67%
Payton 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Andre 4 6 67% 100% 33% 33% 100%
Average Overall Learning Gain Score 76%
The above chart demonstrates that several students met the criteria for learning goal 1.
Two students, Blake and Rhema, made significant progress starting with 0 points on the pre-
assessment and earning 6 points on the post-assessment. Three students, Kylie, Dima and Jaxon
M. scored the same on the post-assessment as the pre-assessment, thus their learning gain score
was 0%, yet these students are in the high groups, and could form an independent group in
reading and phonics instruction due to their high level of understanding. While the monolingual
students did not receive full points, the graph demonstrates that, with accommodations in place,
they too are able to retell at least two parts of the story. Overall, it is clear that the class is well
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Boy Average Girl Average
The above graph displays the well-documented reality that girls score higher than boys
on tests of reading ability and have for quite some time. Even prior to attending school, young
boys evidence more difficulty in learning to read than girls, thus the findings on this chart
demonstrate this to be true. The sexes may indeed be hard-wired differently for literacy.
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 34
I reviewed familiar routines with students to begin the unit thus it gave students a context by
which they could make a connection with what they were learning to something familiar. When
students practiced modeling a familiar routine such as “getting ready at the end of the day”, they
could identify the steps involved in that routine. After they modeled the routine, they were able
to retell the routine (aside from a few students limited by communication who continued to
“model” the routine). The students were then able to connect retelling a familiar routine with
retelling a familiar story. I have learned with kindergarten it is of utmost importance to model
expectations with regards to learning goals and not to assume prior understanding. For many
students this is their first formal introduction to school. Beginning with a familiar routine gave
children a context for the content they were being introduced to. When children were allowed to
act out a familiar routine, they could first recognize the steps or sequence of events which
allowed them to more readily recall and retell those events when asked to. I found that “retelling
a familiar story”, such as The Three Little Pigs, through words and pictures was the most
effective manner to teach the concept of “retelling” as it related to literature because it was
indeed a familiar story to many students, thus they could apply this concept more readily to a
new story. This in turn allowed children to build upon the skill of retelling by applying this
concept to retelling a new or unfamiliar story. The partner work was also beneficial to students
as I paired students with a stronger skill set in this area with those who were still in the beginning
I found that designing an assessment that would adequately and fairly test the knowledge
of all students proved most difficult, thus it was the least successful component of the TWS.
With a class comprised of high students, ELLs, and children with development delays I wanted
to create an assessment that would assess the learning goal of “retelling a story” for all students.
In this manner the assessment I created was overly simplified for some students and did not test
their knowledge to the level they were capable of. Thus, going forward, I would utilize a rubric,
rather than a mere point system measuring content to score the assessments. This system of
scoring would allow for more points for those students who include more details (drawing,
dictating or writing) and less for those students who could still retell the story, yet did not include
as many details.
Professional Development
seek my ELL/ESL endorsement to specialize in teaching English Language Learners. This TWS
illuminated the fact that I can more effectively hone my instructional strategies and assessments
to reach monolingual and bilingual children. One book I plan to read is Foundations of Bilingual
Education and Bilingualism by Colin Baker. I also plan to become a member of the NABE
(National Association for Bilingual Education) which supports the education of English
Language Learners. This association believes that by using native and second languages in
everyday life, we not only develop intercultural understanding, but we also show by example that
we respect and can effectively cross cultural and linguistic borders. This association offers
yearly conferences and symposiums in the field of bilingual education. I would like to attend
organization also publishes Perspectives which is published four times a year on a quarterly basis
TEACHER WORK SAMPLE 36
and is available to read via their website: http://nabe.org/publications. I have started reading this