Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annotations:
1. The Raven Boys by Maggie Stiefvater
This book follows Blue and a group of four boys from a prestigious academy as they search for
the burial site of a fabled Welsh King. I chose this book for my patron because it focuses on a
mythical quest, similar to At the Water’s Edge. While this book is slow-building, it is very
character-centered. The Raven Boys is the first book on The Raven Cycle quartet, so the reader
can watch as the characters develop over the series.
2. Dread Nation by Justina Ireland
Jane McKeene must battle racism and zombies in this novel set in an alternate Civil War era.
This book is historical fiction, so the setting is important. It is also very fast-paced, so it doesn’t
take long for the reader to get hooked. These are two factors my patron specifically mentioned.
In addition, it focuses on racial issues, similar to Angie Thomas’s books, which my patron also
mentioned.
Hailey Carrell
P: I think it is possible that I could have selected them. The plots and the setting of the books are
something I would have picked out.
H: Do you think you really will read any of these books?
P: Yes, I think I will. They sound really interesting and I want to know what happens!
H: Of the five books, which one sounds most appealing and why?
P: Oh, that’s tough. I would say The Name of the Star is the most appealing to me. I like how the
plot features an old classic brought into the present. It has a lot of elements I find interesting
blended into one book.
H: That’s great. Finally, what are your thoughts on this overall experience? Do you feel like
these selections were tailored towards your interests?
P: Yes, and I honestly do like getting personalized recommendations from peers. Sometimes it
even leads me to get interested in something I didn't even know I would be interested in.
H: Great! Thank you so much for being my patron. I hope that if you do read any of these you
enjoy them!
P: Thank you! I will let you know if I do and what I think!
H: Great!
Hailey Carrell
Assessment:
Based on my patron’s reaction, I think that I did well in this project. I think that I was
able to take the elements that appeal to them and find a decent selection that represented those
elements. Though I did choose some books that I have previously read, I did so simply because I
was better able to pinpoint the appeal factors. I believe this familiarity allowed me to better
match books to my patron.
However, there are a few things that I know I could have done better. Normally, when I
am doing reader’s advisory, my mind goes blank. I lose all the questions I wanted to ask. For this
assignment, I tried to make sure I had all of my questions written down, so I wouldn’t have that
problem. Unfortunately, this had me more focused on the list and less on a more organic
interview experience. I had my list and then I felt like I ran out of questions. It also meant my
interview was shorter than intended. After the fact, especially as I was picking out the five
books, I thought of other questions I should have asked. I think the questions I did ask were
helpful, but I could have gone much deeper.
One thing that helped me in this case was that I am acquainted with this person. Because
of that, I was able to tailor the choices a little more personally than I would have if it were a
stranger who walked into the library. For example, I know that this person enjoys travelling to
London, so books set in London stood out more to me. Despite the advantage I may have had,
this was good practice. It helped me test out questions and see what worked and what didn’t.
As for the books I selected, I am still pleased with them. Of course, since they didn’t care
for The Raven Boys I would swap it out with something different, but that is the only one I would
change. I am surprised that they liked so many of the books, but that is great!
In the end, I think this was a successful reader’s advisory interview. I was able to match
the patron with books that they found appealing, which is what is most important. I was able to
recognize my weaknesses in the process and I will work on those areas. I need to find a good
balance of having a script of go-to questions and letting the conversation flow more naturally. I
know that this is something that will come to me with time, and I’m ready to give it another shot!