You are on page 1of 3

Point 002.

Affiant has no record or evidence that Affiant does not hold Right of Claim to
execute Waiver of Tort upon Libellees as just recompense for injuries sustained, as per
EXHIBIT 002 - NOTICE OF RIGHT TO WAIVER OF TORT.

ADMIT - Libellees admit Affiant's Right of Claim to execute Waiver of Tort upon
Libellees.

EXHIBIT 002 Affidavit of Right to Waiver of Tort

According to Black's Law Dictionary 1st Edition and Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed.,
Page 1418, "WAIVER OF TORT" - Quote. The election, by an injured party, for purposes
of redress, to treat the facts as establishing an implied contract, which he may enforce,
instead of an injury by fraud or wrong, for the committing of which he may demand
damages, compensatory or exemplary. 1 Hun, 630. And, according to End of Quote.

Note that it is solely the option (election) of the injured party whether to apply this
option. The injuring party has nothing to say concerning "Waiver of Tort".

In the "Doctrine of Contributions", certain terms are associated with Principals of Law,
such as; tort feaser, joint tort feasor, tontine scheme, insurance, joint venture, liability,
contribution, restitution, surety, guarantor, rights of subrogation, etc.

Note that "restitution" is one of those terms associated with "Principals of Law". Note
that Waiver of Tort is under Restitution.

The Doctrine of Contributions, with information taken from the Military Law Review,
developed during the Civil War, and according to the doctrine, the power conducting a
war would have the right to require the subjects of the enemy to contribute towards its
costs of conducting the war. In exchange for such contributions, they would be protected
against pillage,and the country would be preserved.

"In traditional terms, the apportionment of loss between multiple tortfeasors has been
thought to present a question of contribution; indemnity, by contrast, has traditionally
been viewed as concerned solely with whether a loss should be entirely shifted from one
tortfeasor to another, rather than whether the loss should be shared between the two."
(American Motorcycle Ass'n. v. Superior Court, supra, 20 Cal.3d at p. 591, citation
omitted.)

There are 3 (three) types of tortfeasors.

Joint tortfeasors - those who have acted intentionally or in concert to injure a third party.
See Hammond v. Kansas, O & G Ry. Co., 109 Okl. 72, 234 P. 731, 732.
Concurrent tortfeasors - those whose independent, negligent acts combined or concurred
at one point in time to injure a third party. See W. Prosser, Law of Torts § 52 (1971);
Comment, supra at 94.
Successive tortfeasors - those whose independent, negligent acts, although severable in
point of time, caused injury to the same third party. See, e.g., Gertz v. Campbell, supra;
Comment, supra at 94.
WAIVER OF TORT and NOTICE TO ALL TRESPASSERS
Acceptance of said Oath constitutes your open and binding offer of contract to
form a firm and binding, private contract between the Affiant and the public
official or their employees or agents, this implied contract comes into full force
by the chooses in action on your part to trespass upon my rights and freedoms
you have openly sworn to protect. The Constitution of the united states of
America, 1787, clearly states at Article 1, section 10, "No state shall...... pass
any......Law, impairing the Obligation of Contracts" which has been upheld in
the united States supreme Court case of Hale v. Henkel 201 U.S. 43 at 89 (1906)
over 1600 times.

By your offer and my acceptance we mutually willingly and intentionally agree to the
terms of this implied contract:

NOTICE TO ALL TRESPASSERS

Trespass upon either the binding Private Bond Instrument, referenced herein; any
violation of an Oath of office; or acting under color of law outside the accepted
forum is deemed a $2,000,000.00 tort for each occurrence and a corresponding lien
granted by agreement and consent of the parties, by their conduct and by this public
notice. Performance is acceptance.

ALL PERSONS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND OFFICERS OPERATING UNDER


ORDERS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES
SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF MISSOURI
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ALL MUNICIPAL COURTS, DOUGLAS COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ?st JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT DOUGLAS COUNTY,
MISSOURI, MISSOURI STATE PATROL, DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFFS
DEPARTMENT, AND DOUGLAS COUNTY COURT who commit injury by trespass
upon the living man, Douglas-Mac: Duff,under color of law without evidence of a signed
contract or damaged party, or lawful order and verified assessment will cause attachment
of this Waiver of Tort. Continued proceeding in trespass shows acceptance of this
Contract and provides evidence of your intent to implement the terms Waiver of Tort and
affix said lien(s).

Affiant reserves the right to amend in order that the truth be assertained and justly
determined.
Verified Affidavit
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, [Your Name], Sui Juris, solemnly affirm and verify that I
have read the foregoing, and know its contents to be true to the best of my knowledge,
except as to the matters which are therein stated on my information or belief, and as to
those matters, I believe them to be true. This instrument is submitted upon good faith
effort that is grounded in fact, warranted by existing law for the modification or reversal
of existing law and submitted for proper purposes, and not to cause harassment and
unnecessary delay or costs, so help me God. See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws
and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).
I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the Republic of Xxxxxxxx, that the
foregoing is true and correct.
by___________________________________authorized representative L.S.
[Your Name], Sui Juris

You might also like