Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matlab Simulativ Study of Sepic Converter: Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1 (1) 45-67
Matlab Simulativ Study of Sepic Converter: Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1 (1) 45-67
International Journal
Panacea i Journal of
PJET Engineering and
Panacea Research Library Technology
Journal Homepage: www.prlpublisher.com/pjet
ISSN: Applied
Available online: 5th Sept. 2015 classical SEPIC.circuit, obtaining new.operation characteristics as low-
(SEPIC) step up the input voltage 220 Vdc to 1200 Vdc with the switching
These authors have no frequency of 24 kHz. For close loop operation of single-ended primary
conflict of interest to declare.
inductance converter (SEPIC) with PI controller that uses to control the
Copyright © 2012,
behaviors of the system in linear .This arrangement#has close*loop#system.
45
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
Circuits run best with a steady and*specific that*moderately rated# (for example 30 V
input*Controlling the input to#specific#sub to 100 V range) MOSFETs. may be se
circuits is crucial for full filling
design*requirements.*AC to AC • Can*operate*at moderate*duty*cycles
dc*conversion*is*not*as*simple.
• Are true switchers without*the
•*Can deliver high boost*ratio er from a high amount input current ripple
with*minimum voltage and current stress this ripple can create harmonic in many
46
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
power factor*(PF)*and reduce the order to increase the static gain with
can be*reduced*mainly in the lowest input because the*output voltage must be*higher
important because the thermal design and HPF rectifier#in order to#obtain high
Many works were#develope in order classical boost converter (Vo = 400 V).
47
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
50
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
52
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
53
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
The voltage in all diodes and the power 2.6 PWM AND TRANSISTORS
switch is equal to the capacitor CM voltage.
PWM is the main part in designing a buck
The output voltage is equal to the sum of
converter. By using pulse-width
the Cs and Cm capacitors voltages. The
modulation (PWM) control controlling of
average L1 inductor current is equal to the
output voltage is achieved by varying the
input current and the average L2 inductor
duty cycle of the switch. Duty cycle intends
current is equal to the output current.
to ratio of the period where power
54
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
semiconductor is kept ON to the cycle switch is the most important thing of the
period. Pulse width modulation (PWM) is a switched supply and controls the power
powerful technique for controlling analog delivered to the load. And also Power
circuits with a processor's digital MOSFET’s are more suitable than BJT at
outputs.PWM is operating in a wide variety power output of the order of 50 W. when
of applications starts from measurement selecting a transistor also must consider its
and communications to power control and fast switching times and able to withstand
conversion Control of PWM is usually the voltage spikes produced by the
effected by an IC is necessary for inductor
controlling the output. The transistor
fig.
2.5 Graph of Triangle wave and Sinusoidal control wave
The amount that the SEPIC converters step In theory the larger the inductors are the
up or down the voltage depends primarily better the circuit will operate and reduce
on the Duty Cycle and the parasitic the ripple.
elements in the circuit. The output of an
However, larger inductors are more
ideal SEPIC converter is
expensive and have a larger internal
resistance. This greater internal resistance
will make the converter less efficient.
However this does not account for losses Creating the best converter requires
due to parasitic elements such as the diode choosing inductors that are just large
drop VD. These make the equation enough to keep the voltage and current
ripple at an acceptable amount.
= 3 mH
This becomes
inductors with low internal resistance and
around 3mH will be ideal for both of the
inductors in the circuit.
The maximum Duty Cycle will occur when
the input voltage is at the minimum. If GENERAL
VD=.5V the
Simulation has*become a very
powerful*tool on the industry*application
≈ .91
as well*as in ac ademi Cs nowadays.
The minimum duty cycle will occur when This*is now essential*for an
58
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
59
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
60
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
By performing simulation with the help of MATLAB 13. It is cleared that by giving an input
voltage of 220 V and the output is 1200 V.
61
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
By performing simulation with the help of MATLAB 13. It is shown that L1 goes up to 245
Amp and L2 goes up to 60 Amp.
62
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
63
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
64
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
Fig. 3.7
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
[1] H. Cheng, K. Smedley, and A. Abramovitz, “Wide input wide output (WIWO)dc–dc
converter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 25, no. 2, Feb 2010.
[2] D. Maksimovic and S. Cuk, “Switching converter with wide dc conversion range,” IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 151–157, Jan. 1991.
[3] K. Yao, M. Ye, M. Xu, and F. C. Lee, “Tapped-inductor buck converter for high-step-down
dc–dc conversion,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 775–780, Jul. 2005.
[4] J.-H. Park and B.-H. Cho, “Nonisolation soft-switching buck converter with tapped-
inductor for wide-input extreme step-down applications,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg.
Papers, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1809–1818,Aug. 2007.
[5] K. Yao, Y. Ren, J. Wei, M. Xu, and F. Lee, “A family of buck type dc–dc converters with
autotransformers,” in Proc. Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo. (APEC 2003), pp. 114–120.
[6] K. Nishijima, K. Abe, D. Ishida, T. Nakano, T. Nabeshima, T. Sato, and K. Harada, “A novel
tapped-inductor buck converter for divided power distribution system,” in Proc. IEEE PESC
Conf. (PESC 2006), Jun., 18–22, pp. 1–6.
[7] G. Spiazzi and S. Buso, “Power factor preregulator based on modified tapped-inductor
buck converter,” in Proc. IEEE PESC Conf., 1998, vol. 2, pp. 873–879.
[8] F. L. Luo and H. Ye, “Positive output cascade boost converters,” Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng.
Electr. Power Appl., vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 590–606, Sep.2004.
66
Panacea International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015:1(1);45-67
International Journal
[9] Q. Zhao and F. C. Lee, “High efficiency, high step-up dc–dc converters,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 65–73, Jan. 2003.
[10] N. Vazquez, L. Estrada, C. Hernandez, and E. Rodriguez, “The tapped- inductor boost
converter,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron., Jun.,4–7, 2007, pp. 538–543.
67