Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mediation Argumen by Ahscbc PDF
Mediation Argumen by Ahscbc PDF
Prabhas and Rana were brothers. They were partners in a partnership firm that
was involved in running a restaurant. The business was profitable and the profits were
shared equally among the brothers. Prabhas was entrusted with the administration
whereas Rana took care of public relations and marketing. Rana alleges Prabhas for
make deposits in the common bank account. Additionally, in a separate raid conducted
by the CBI on the premises of one of their relatives, an amount of Rs. 100000 was
On these grounds, a suit for permanent injunction was put in place meaning to
Prabhas moved an application under Section 8 of the Act, raising an objection to the
maintainability of the suit on the basis that the partnership deed contains an arbitration
clause to settle disputes relating to the business that arises between the parties. Rana
PROBLEM 02
Zeus owns copyright of several feature films. They produce, distribute and
exhibit feature films through various media. Cinemax offered a sum of Rs. 1.5 Crores
distribution rights. They entered into a term sheet with Cinemax for granting content
marketing and distribution rights in respect of films. The term sheet contemplated the
executed between the parties and yet Cinemax proceeded with distribution.
claiming that Cinemax was not entitled to exploit and deal with such content before
execution of the Copyright license agreement. To counter the suit, Cinemax filed an
application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act stating that all disputes (including
under the present suit) between Zeus and Cinemax be referred to arbitration in view of
PROBLEM 03
The Trichy Development Board entered into a contract with Southern builders
has 100 middle income and 50 low income houses. The contract required completion
of these houses within a year. The total cost for the said construction was noted as Rs.
99,00,000/-. However, even after 34 months, only 98 middle income houses and 39
expenditure and demanded refund for the same. The builders hold the board
responsible for causing the delay due to untimely release of funds. The builders had to
maintain tools & plants, scaffolding etc, during the prolongation of the contract
Whereas the Development Board demands compensation for delay from the
builders. One of the facts noted negligence on part of the builders regarding
electrification work and the same caused hire charges. The contract between the board
and builders contain an arbitration clause requiring them to settle any dispute