University of California, Los Angeles 405 Hilgard Avenue backdirt Box 951510 annual review of the cotsen institute of archaeology at ucla Los Angeles, CA 90095-1510 2013 www.ioa.ucla.edu
cotsen institute of archaeology at u c l a
Celebrating 40 Years of Discovery Figure 1. Excavations in the main sunken court at Cerro del Gentil.
Excavations and Survey in
Chincha, Peru Our work in the upper Chincha Valley, Peru, contin- ued in 2013 with some truly spectacular finds from our excavations in the main platform mound of Cerro del Gentil (see Backdirt 2012). We excavated in the center of a partially-looted sunken court on one of the three platforms (Fig. 1). Our excavations soon revealed the remains of plaster walls (seen in the upper left side of the excavation in Fig. 1). We found pieces of painted plaster indicating that the walls were covered in designs of at least black and white. These walls defined a squarish sunken court that is over 1 meter deep and over 7 meters on a side. What we have learned is that the platform mound was built in stages beginning at least by Figure 2. Lab specialists prepare and examine one of the several the middle or late Paracas, ca. 400–100 B.C.E. It Paracas mummies found in excavations. may be earlier: we will find out next season. As the mound was rebuilt several times, the sunken court was also rebuilt. On the floor of the court, we found lavish offerings of textiles, mummies, pottery, gourds, baskets, and wooden objects (Figs. 2–6). What we still do not know is if the offerings were placed in an open court over many years and then paved over to build a new one, or if the court was kept clean for ceremony and then closed with a
152 | backdirt 2013
research in action
Figure 3. Examples of Paracas baskets left as offerings.
lavish offering just prior to building a new one. Our
work next year will help us resolve this question, as we will be able to date the offerings in each of the floor levels. This is a very important discovery for Paracas archaeology. There is an extensive literature on the culture but we still do not know if there was a “core” political center or if the artistic style was widespread and shared over many valleys. Given the fact that Chincha is the only valley with substantial Paracas monumental architecture, our research hints at the possibility that it was the Paracas political center, at least in its later phases. Only more research will Figure 4. Detail of basket left as an offering. answer these intriguing questions. —Henry Tantaleán, Charles Stanish, and Benjamin Nigra, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA. —Michiel Zegarra and Kelita Pérez, Proyecto Chincha.
Figure 5. Engraved Paracas gourd left as an offering.
Figure 6. Pottery vessel left as an offering. All photos by John Cody.