Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FIL-ESTATE PROPERTIES V SPOUSES GO Should be noted that the respondents sent a demand letter Aug 8, 1999 asking
GR NO 165164 the return of the amount they paid.
Where petitioner did not comply favorably.
FACTS:
Petitioner Fil-Estate entered in a contract to sell a condominium unit with the Petitioners are entitled to:
respondent Spouses Go for 3M P3,439,000.07 at 6% interest starting August 4, 1999 until full payment, and
Hence, the petitioner failed to develop the condominium project on time, to pay respondents P100,000.00 attorneys fees.
which should have been in 1997 as stipulated in the contract.
The spouses then demanded for a refund plus interest, but the respondent did
not refund the spouses.
The spouses then filed a complaint before the Housing and Land Use
Regulatory Board (HLURB) for reimbursement of the lump sum amount they
paid plus attorney’s fees.
Office of the President and the Court of Appeals, affirmed the decision of HLURB:
CA added that the rights of the respondents is provided for in PD 957
ISSUE: WON the Asian Financial crisis can be considered a fortuitous event.
HELD:
The court cannot agree that the Asian Financial crisis that happened in 1997
was unforeseeable and beyond the control of the corporation.
Being a real estate enterprise engaged in selling condominiums they are to be
considered as masters in the projections on commodities, currency
movements and business risks.
The fluctuations of the Philippine peso is an everyday happening therefore it
cannot constitute a caso fortuito or fortuitous event.