You are on page 1of 2

The Enron scandal in early 2001 forever changed the face of business.

Enron, the once high flying energy


trading company, was exposed as being little more than a slowly unraveling multi-billion dollar financial
scheme. Eventually Enron cost employees and investors billions of dollars after the company was
exposed and forced to go into bankruptcy.

But what made the Enron scandal so compelling was the fact that it brought down accounting giant
Arthur Andersen too. It was a truly amazing situation, a conflation of corporate wrongdoing which would
change the accounting world forever.

Arthur Andersen’s Role in the Enron Scandal

Due to the sometimes complex nature of financial matters, many may not be familiar with the details of
Enron case or Arthur Andersen’s role. While Arthur Andersen was not implicated in directly assisting
Enron in cooking its books, the company was found to have been woefully negligent in its role of
overseeing and auditing Enron’s financials.

See also: Economic Collapse Status Report It's Still Not Time

Additionally, Andersen was found guilty of obstruction of justice because it shredded documents related
to its audits of Enron. When the scandal broke, the world was shocked that not only could a Fortune 500
company pull off such massive fraud, but one of the world’s largest accounting firms looked the other
way during the audacious crimes.

Sarbanes Oxley and Management Responsibility

In July 2002 the U.S. Congress enacted the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
Act, also known as Sarbanes Oxley. By that point there had been a stunning number of corporate
accounting scandals, including Enron, WorldCom, and a developing scandal involving Tyco.
Because many top managers of these companies claimed they had been unaware of the accounting
discrepancies, Sarbanes Oxley required corporate leaders to personally certify the accuracy of their
company’s financials.

Other Important Components of Sarbanes Oxley

To address the potential conflicts of interest which can arise, Sarbanes Oxley established a variety of
requirements which govern auditing and accounting firms. Some of the notable requirements include
auditor reporting duties and a restriction which prohibits auditing firms from providing non-audit related
services to companies which they audit. Provisions were also put in place to prevent corporate analysts
from benefiting from conflicts of interest, including the public disclosure of any potential conflicts of
interest.

The Legacy of a Scandal

The legacy of Enron and Arthur Andersen will live long after the public has forgotten about the scandal.
Especially in light of the 2007-2009 financial crisis, lawmakers are likely to continue to keep companies
on a relatively short leash. And in the case that enforcement becomes lax, and the public forgets the
lessons learned, there will surely be another giant corporate scandal to remind us all to remain vigilant.

You might also like