You are on page 1of 2

Universidad de La Salle

Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación


Licenciatura en lengua castellana, inglés y francés
Didáctica del Inglés.
Nombres: Miguel Ángel Fonseca Sánchez Grupo: 4 Código: 26171131
Gabriel Alejandro Villamil Carreño 26171050
TABLE.

Strategies /Techniques for age Approach(es) – Design(s) – Case


and proficiency Procedure(s)
level.
On this case we rather to use Total All-girls public
The activities must reinforce their Physical Response method school in
confidence when using the second because according to Richards & Facatativa
language drop by drop, patience is Rodgers (1981) the interaction in / 8 – 10 years old
important not only for the teacher this approach will get control the students /
but also for the students. group of learners. In addition, TPR Minimum
contact with
fits with student’s age and their
Teachers should use activities that English
tendency to get active and
imply the use of the five senses in
order to make each class dynamic. Apart from their little
meaningful. contact with English, Richards &
Rodgers (1981) propose a learning
Grammar must be teached in an design focus in mimesis an it
implicit way and responding to would work. Materials on this case
sequences that are easy to use and are functional and could work as a
learn. support tool for giving a class and
teacher must use them to show
examples about what they are
going to learn.

In this case we must be careful in Case number two reflects that Secondary private
order to take them to the B1 level, because of the principal, a Task- school in
the difficulty must be set to give based language teaching is a Barranquilla / 13 –
them enough confidence in further pertinent approach. If the objective 14 years old
levels, the activities must have in on this class is to get more students
count their senses and their fluency, the task-based approach / A2 level.
feelings.
could help to take it, as Richards
The activities should be variable, in & Rodgers (1981) said, that theory
context, and dynamic in order not to is based in working by the
lose their attention. language usage. Design theory
tells us that cooperative work also
Also, activities that link them to the could give some advantages for
adult life could be useful, at that this case, the students are
age they have many questions demanded to interact each other's
related to the functioning of the with specific tasks. In addition, the
world and the real life. activities must be design for
promoting that interaction and in
It’s also important to monitor their this case the usage materials and
attitudes and the treat among the books could be useful to perform
students, at that age, their care too tasks by identifying the course
much for many things, they can be
necessities.
hurt easily.
According to Richards & Rodgers According to Richards & Rodgers Languages center
(1981) we are facing an adult (1981) the Competency-Based in
audience, because of that our Language Teaching is an a higher education
possibilities to use contents are appropriate approach because we institution in
wider than in other contexts, due to teach the language contextualized Bogota
the lack of “childness” we must be to make sense in the learner, this / 20 – 30 years old
cautious, and create an environment students / B1
case the kind of center and the
that allows them to understand, students.
necessities learners have, are a
produce and learn.
We could give class using rules in benefit for this competency-based
an explicit way but not all the time, approach. Design in this method
every time. is determine by learners needs, it
And it’s essential to create activities develops the objectives for CBLT
that link them to the real life, B1 also needs analysis procedures as
level allows them to do many things interviews, questionnaires,
in a second language. observations and tests.

You might also like