Armenia

■ 5,000 years of mining

■ World-class deposits of molybdenum, copper and gold
■ Excellent technical expertise
■ Favourable business environment
■ Attractive legal basis for mining and exploration
■ Significant potential for new investments

SPECIAL PUBLICATION
ARMENIA

Contents Mining developments

A message from the
Minister of Trade and
Economic Development 2
regain momentum
A cultural, commercial and
geographical crossroads 3
Expanding the country’s
economic base 3
Investment drives GDP growth 4
Comparative sectoral
contributions 4
Business environment,
investment policy
and incentives 5
A message from
A liberal trade regime 5
the Minister
Geology and mineral resources 6 of Trade and
Today’s mining industry 7 Economic
The legal framework for
mineral-sector administration 7
Development
ACP: reviving copper smelting 8
ZCMC: before and
after privatisation 9

I
AGRC: Armenia’s leading T IS my honour to draw to your attention to
gold producer 10 this Mining Journal special supplement, which
Global Gold expands focuses on the current state and development
perspectives of the mining industry in the
its operations 11 Republic of Armenia
Key contacts 12 Armenia’s industrial-scale metal production
began in the early 19th century with the opening
of the Alaverdy and Kapan copper mines. Follow-
ing that, the country’s economy began to focus
more closely on mining in the early 1950s with the
This supplement is sponsored by the Ministry of development of the Zangezur Copper Molybdenum
Trade and Economic Development of the Republic Combine, which operates the world-class Kajaran
of Armenia within the framework of efforts to deposit (among the ten biggest in the world), and
attract foreign investment into the mining sector, which produces around 3% of the world’s annual
and to demonstrate the favourable conditions that molybdenum output.
exist for doing business in Armenia, particularly in Several decades of sustainable development
the mining sector. within the industry were interrupted by the dissolu-
tion of the Soviet Union, coupled with the decline
Published by: in commodity prices on the world’s metal markets.
Mining Communications Ltd Armenia’s minerals sector also faced other chal-
Albert House lenges in terms of its development, being hindered
1 Singer Street by factors such as its geographical location and
London EC2A 4BQ unhelpful conditions for transporting its products to
Tel: +44 (0)20 7216 6060 the world market.
Fax: +44 ( 0)20 7216 6050 The industry was also crippled technologically,
E-mail: editorial@mining-journal.com and this, together with a poor legal and regulatory
www.mining-journal.com framework that lagged behind world best practice,
provided the main challenges when the government
Supplement editors: Simon Walker and Roger Ellis began its efforts to attract foreign investment for
Design and production: Keith Baldock Armenia’s mining companies.
The chain of reform-orientated work that began
Printed by Stephens & George, Merthyr Tydfil, UK in early 2000 with the revision of the regulatory
© Mining Communications Ltd 2005 framework, then continued with the liberalisation of
contractual mechanisms and the restructuring of the
The cover shows the 1st century Garni temple built major mining companies. This was achieved through
by King Tiridates a series of international tenders for the privatisa-
tion of these combines. In the meantime, Armenia
received the Outstanding Achievement Award at the
‘Mines and Money’ conference in London in 2003
for the way in which it had introduced the current,
highly competitive investment environment for the
minerals sector.
Today, Armenia’s mining sector presents a com-
pletely different picture, a situation that has not just
resulted from better market prices for metals. Differ-
ent issues are now on the agenda for the govern-
ment and the industry’s management alike. Country
image-building, portraying Armenia as being a place
with favourable conditions for doing business gener-
ally and for the mining sector in particular, is the key
pillar in our efforts to attract foreign investment for
numerous promising business opportunities.
And, of course, we have activities planned within
the framework of this year’s ‘Mines and Money’
conference, as we know that this type of event can
contribute greatly to Armenia’s aims in this area.
I would therefore like to take this opportunity to
invite you to the Special Country Focus Seminar on
November 22 at 4.30pm, as well as to the Armenian
exhibit, which will also serve as a meeting point for
those who are interested in doing mining business
with Armenian companies. Needless to say, all mem-
bers of the Armenian delegation, which consists of
senior government officials, top mining-company
managers and prominent experts in the field, includ-
ing myself, will be at your disposal on both days of
the event, should you wish to contact us.
I look forward to seeing all of you in London at
‘Mines and Money’.
With regards
Karen Chshmarityan
Minister of Trade and Economic Development
of the Republic of Armenia

2 Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005

ARMENIA

S A cultural, commercial and

ITUATED on the southern side
of the Caucasus massif, Armenia
lies at the crossroads of Europe
and Asia. A landlocked country
situated between the Black and
Caspian Seas, it is bordered by Turkey to
the west, Georgia to the north, Azerbaijan
to the east and southwest, and Iran to the
geographical crossroads
southeast.
Armenia first emerged into history Mt Aragats: the highest
around 800 BC as part of the Kingdom peak in Armenia at 4,090 m
of Urartu or Van, which flourished in the
Caucasus and eastern Asia Minor until
600 BC. After the destruction of the
Seleucid Empire, the first Armenian state
was founded in 190 BC. At its zenith, from
95-65 BC, Armenia extended its rule over
the entire Caucasus and the area that is
now eastern Turkey, Syria and Lebanon.
For a time, Armenia was the strongest
state in the Roman East. It became part
of the Roman Empire in 64 BC, later
adopting a Western political, philosophi-
cal and religious orientation.
In 301 AD, Armenia became the first
nation to adopt Christianity as a state
religion, establishing a church that still
exists independently of both the Roman
Catholic and the Eastern Orthodox
churches. During its later political
eclipses, Armenia depended on the conquered and ruled by Persians, Byzantines, Arabs, with the rest of the world, and on land connections
church to preserve and protect its unique identity. Mongols and Turks, among others. For a brief period through Georgia and Iran. The nearest sea port is at
From around 1100-1350, the focus of Armenian na- from 1918-20, it was an independent republic. In late Poti in Georgia, through which Armenia gets access
tionalism moved south, and the Armenian Kingdom 1920, however, a communist regime came to power to the countries of the Black Sea region.
of Cilicia, which had close ties to European Crusader following an invasion by Russia’s Red Army. In 1922 Armenia has a well-developed road network,
states, flourished in southeast Asia Minor until Armenia became part of the Trans-Caucasian Soviet serving all areas of the country’s economy, with a
conquered by Muslim states. Socialist Republic, and in 1936 it became the Arme- road density of 3,360 km per 1,000 km2. The network
Between the 4th and 19th centuries, Armenia was nian Soviet Socialist Republic. Armenia declared its consists of 7,700 km of interstate, inter-republican
independence from the Soviet (regional) and local roads. More than US$100 million
Union on September 21, 1991. has recently been invested in the reconstruction
Armenia has a highland of the country’s transport infrastructure with the
continental climate with hot assistance of the World Bank, the European Union’s
summers and cold winters. Transport Corridor Europe Central Asia, the United
In terms of land utilisation, Nations, and the Armenian diaspora.
the countryside comprises
37.2% mountain terrain, 29.8%
pasture, 21% arable land and Expanding the
12% woodland. The country’s
highest peak is Mt Aragats, at country’s
4,090 m.
Mineral resources include
economic base
iron, molybdenum, gold, lead, ARMENIA is the second most-densely populated of
silver, clay and limestone, as the former Soviet republics. Up until independence,
well as semi-precious and the country’s economy was based largely on indus-
ornamental stones. try – chemicals, electronic products, machinery, pro-
The country is also rich in cessed food, synthetic rubber and textiles – and was
natural mineral waters, with highly dependent on outside resources. Agriculture
hundreds of natural sources accounted for only 20% of the net material product
throughout the country. and 10% of overall employment before the break-up
There are ten natural lakes, of the Soviet Union in 1991.
five canyons and numerous The vast majority of the country’s energy is
springs and streams. With an produced using imported fuel. Russia remains the
area of 1,400 km2, Lake Sevan principal source of natural gas and nuclear fuel
is the world’s largest highland (for Armenia’s sole nuclear power plant); the main
freshwater lake. domestic energy source is hydroelectricity.
Armenia relies mainly on Like other newly independent states of the former
aviation links to connect it Soviet Union, Armenia’s economy suffers from the

Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005 3

ARMENIA
legacy of a centrally-planned economy and the
breakdown of former Soviet trading patterns. In
addition, the effects of the 1988 earthquake, which
killed more than 25,000 people and made 500,000
homeless, are still being felt.
The closure of both the Azerbaijani and Turkish
borders has been a major hindrance to economic
development, because of Armenia’s dependence on
outside supplies of energy and most raw materials.
With land routes through Azerbaijan and Turkey
closed, Armenia has to rely on inadequate and
unreliable routes through Georgia and Iran. In 1992-
93, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) fell
by nearly 60% from its 1989 level, and the national
currency, the dram, suffered hyperinflation for the
first few years after its introduction in 1993.
Nevertheless, the Armenian Government has
been able to carry out wide-ranging economic
reforms that have paid off in terms of dramatically
lower inflation and steady growth. Armenia has
registered strong economic growth since 1995,
building on the turnaround that began the year
before, and inflation has been negligible for the past
several years.
4 Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005
Noravank monastery near Amaghu in
Yeghegnadzor district was founded by
Bishop Hovhannes in 1205
New sectors, such as precious-stone process-
ing and jewellery manufacture, information and
communication technology, and even tourism, are
beginning to supplement more traditional sectors of
the economy, such as agriculture.
This steady economic progress has earned Arme-
nia increasing support from the major international
institutions. The International Monetary Fund, World
Bank and European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development, as well as other international financial
institutions and foreign countries, have made
substantial grants and loans available, with the total
amount loaned to Armenia since 1993 exceeding
US$1.1 billion. These loans are aimed at reducing the
budget deficit, stabilising the local currency, devel-
oping private businesses, the energy, agricultural,
food-processing, transport and health and education
sectors, and continuing rehabilitation work in the
earthquake zone.
Continued progress will depend on the
government’s ability to strengthen its macroeco-
nomic management, including increasing revenue
collection, further improving the investment climate,
and making strides against corruption.
Investment
drives GDP growth
ARMENIA’S recent performance has been impressive
on many fronts, and the country now has one of the
fastest-growing economies in the world. Annual
GDP growth has averaged double-digit levels over
the past three years, including 10.1% in 2004, so that
over the past ten years Armenia’s GDP has more than
doubled.
According to the CIS Statistical Committee,
Armenian GDP in 2003 exceeded the pre-independ-
ence level by 8%. By comparison, in neighbouring
Georgia, GDP was 42% below its pre-independence
level. In addition, Armenian consumer price inflation
is mild, despite an increase to 7% last year, a rise
that was caused mainly by a jump in agricultural
producer prices.
Rapid GDP growth has been driven by the ac-
celerating expansion of fixed capital investment.
Gross fixed investment has increased markedly in
Armenia over the past five years, both in absolute
terms and relative to GDP. In 2003, the gross fixed
investment-to-GDP ratio reached 24%. This is above
the benchmarks for both the region and Armenia’s
income group, as well as that achieved in Georgia,
and is comparable to the level of investment in high-
performing Croatia, for example.
The principal challenge for Armenia is to sustain
these high growth rates in order to continue reduc-
ing its high levels of poverty and unemployment,
and to maintain good performance on health,
education and the other social indicators neces-
sary for a competitive workforce. Although foreign
transfers currently play a major role in maintaining
strong growth, Armenia needs to diversify its sources
of financing and reduce the role of foreign aid in
sustaining economic expansion.
Comparative
sectoral contributions
THE unprecedented double-digit economic growth
rate of the past four to five years (around 12% as an
annual average) was maintained in 2004, with GDP
growing by 10.1% to US$3,549 million. Unlike previ-
ous years, when growth tended to reflect achieve-
ments in only certain sectors of the economy,
growth last year was more broadly based.
During 2001-03, the major factors were increased
foreign investment, primarily in the construction sec-
tor, and higher exports, whereas economic growth in
2004 was generated mainly by the agricultural and
service sectors, as well as by locally-funded construc-
tion activities.
Taken as a year-on-year comparison with 2003,
the value added in the construction sector increased
by 13.4% in 2004, representing around 2.1% of the
country’s GDP growth. Both public and private-
sector investment contributed to the growth in con-
struction, and the buoyancy of the sector also had a
positive impact on the demand for, and production
of, construction materials.
By contrast, the contribution of the industrial
sector to GDP growth was insignificant last year, at
ARMENIA
just 0.4%. This largely reflected the decline of the
diamond-processing industry. Meanwhile, produc-
tion volumes grew by 54% in the chemicals industry,
by 8.7% in mining, and by 9.9% in the production
and distribution of electricity, gas and water.
The value added in the agriculture sector in 2004
increased by 14%, being attributed mainly to a 20%
increase in the output of farm products and an 8%
increase in cattle breeding. In addition, the impact
of the service sector on GDP growth was significant,
with a 4.3% contribution.
By sector, construction contributed 15.3% of
GDP, agriculture 22.5%, services 34.1% and industry
19.7%. Per capita GDP in nominal terms amounted
to US$1,104, a significant increase from the US$873
recorded in 2003.
Exports increased by 4.3% in 2004 and imports
grew by 5.6%. Both exports and imports were affect-
ed significantly by the decline in diamond-cutting.
The appreciation of the local currency against the US
dollar also had an impact.
Although the value of exports of non-precious
metals benefited from high world commodity prices,
a significant increase in fuel imports (attributed to
the high level of investment activity in the economy)
made an important contribution to the growth in
imports overall.
Foreign investment rose by 33% in 2004, to
US$305.6 million, with foreign direct investment
(FDI) increasing by 47.7% to US$226.7 million. Some
US$70 million of the FDI reported was attracted
through privatisation deals. The mining sector’s
share of FDI inflow was 17.4%, being mainly attribut-
able to payments for shares in Armenia’s largest
mining company, Zangezur Copper Molybdenum
Combine.
Business environment,
investment policy
and incentives
ACCORDING to the World Bank’s annual report,
Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs, the Republic
of Armenia is in 46th place in the world rankings
in terms of the ease of doing business. The ‘Ease of
Doing Business Index’, which ranks economies from
1 to 155, is calculated as the ranking on the simple
average of country percentile rankings on each of
ten topics covered by Doing Business in 2006.
Other indicators are also quite positive for Arme-
nia, especially in comparison with other countries
of the same income level. For example, the cost of
starting a business is 7% of per capita gross national
income, more than five times lower than the average
cost reported for lower-middle-income countries.
International organisations consider that Arme-
nia’s investment and trade policies are the most
open in the CIS. Foreign companies are encour-
aged to invest and are entitled by law to the same
treatment as local companies; moreover, they have
certain advantages.
The country’s investment climate is continuously
improving with a strong government commitment
to attracting foreign direct investment (FDI), includ-
ing refining the legislative framework. The Law on
Foreign Investment, adopted in July 1994, regulates
Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005 5
The town of Meghri
in southeast Armenia
foreign investment in Armenia. It provides guaran-
tees to foreign investors and protects investors from
changes in business-related laws for five years.
Foreign investments in Armenia cannot be
nationalised or alienated. Expropriation may be
allowed only as an extreme measure in the case
of an emergency declared in accordance with the
legislation of the Republic of Armenia, and may be
applied only upon the decision of a court and with
full compensation. Investors must also be compen-
sated for any damage or loss of profit resulting from
illegal actions by state bodies or officials. Compensa-
tion would be paid at current market prices or prices
determined by independent auditors, either in the
currency invested or in any other currency mutually
agreed upon by the parties.
Foreign investors can make investments in
Armenia through the establishment of fully foreign-
owned companies (including representatives,
affiliates and branches), the purchase of existing
companies and securities, or the establishment of
joint ventures. The company registration process
takes about a week.
There are no limitations on the volume and
type of foreign ownership, the number of foreign
employees or access to financial sources. Neither are
there any restrictions on the conversion or repatria-
tion of capital and earnings, including branch profits,
dividends, interest, royalties or management/techni-
cal-service fees. There are no limits on hard-currency
imports, and while cash exports are limited to
US$10,000 or its equivalent, there are no limitations
on wire transfers. Funds may be converted and
transferred through all domestic banks.
ARMENIA
A liberal trade regime
A MEMBER of the World Trade Organisation since
February 2003, Armenia has one of the world’s most
open tariff regimes, with a simple two-band import-
tariff structure on goods classified pursuant to the
international Harmonised Commodity Description
and Coding System (at 0% and 10% in ad valorem
terms and levied on cif values). There are no taxes
on exports, and no quantitative trade restrictions.
Import, export and domestic production licences are
required only for health, security and environmental
reasons.
No customs tariffs are levied on goods imported
temporarily under customs control and under an
appropriate customs regime. Foreigners who tem-
porarily enter Armenia can bring one vehicle with
its trailer duty-free, on the condition that it must be
taken with them when they leave. If the foreigner
does not re-export the car, all proper duties must
be paid.
6 Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005
Commercial disputes may be settled either in
state courts or through alternative dispute-resolu-
tion mechanisms. Commercial or property-related
disputes may be settled out of court through
institutional or ad hoc panels of experts (for example,
chambers of commerce or bank associations). Arme-
nian courts are independent.
Armenia is a signatory to the international
convention on investment disputes and is a member
of the International Center for Investment Disputes
Settlement.
Geology and
mineral resources
ARMENIA lies within a tectonically active zone, at
the point of incidence of the Arabian and Eurasian
tectonic plates. The continuing northwards
movement of the Arabian Plate, and its impact with
the southern flank of the Eurasian Plate, has resulted
in the creation of the Caucasus Mountains at the
region’s northern border, with general structural
trends throughout the region corresponding to the
direction of these geotectonic forces.
The Caucasus region as a whole can be divided
geologically into three principal terranes: Greater
Caucasus, Transcaucasus and Lesser Caucasus, which
in turn comprise sub-terranes that accreted together
at various stages since Middle Cenozoic times.
Armenia lies principally within the Lesser Caucasus,
which extends into both Georgia and Azerbaijan,
thus ensuring continuity in the distribution of its
mineral potential across current national boundaries.
In most cases, it would appear that sub-terrane
accretion took place before major terrane units were
bonded on to the Eurasian Plate with, at all times,
the active front being at the north end of the mobile
belt, while the southern edge remained passive.
The general WNW-ESE trend of these zones is
reflected in the direction of a number of major
faults that can be traced across much of the
country. Economic copper, molybdenum and gold
mineralisation has been found to be associated
with this regional-scale faulting, thus providing
an indicator of potential target areas for future
exploration.
Within Armenia, the Lesser Caucasus is divided
into two parts by the Sevan-Akera ophiolitic zone,
a narrow strip containing ultrabasic intrusive rocks
of Cretaceous-Eocene age. Outcropping mainly
along the north shore of Lake Sevan, this zone
can be traced further to the northwest, although
for much of this distance it is hidden beneath
volcano-sedimentary rocks related to the extensive
vulcanism that subsequently affected the region.
The Lesser Caucasus can be divided into five
metallogenic zones. The northernmost, the
Somheto-Karabakh sub-zone, which consists mainly
of rocks of Jurassic and Cretaceous age, hosts skarn
deposits, porphyry copper and vein-type deposits
associated with Late Cretaceous to Palaeogene
intrusives. In the Sevan-Akera sub-zone, there are
small-scale chromite and gold occurrences, and
the Kapan sub-zone hosts vein-type copper and
volcanogenic polymetallic sulphide deposits.
Younger again, and further south and west, the
Ankaban-Zangezur sub-zone contains the country’s
principal copper-molybdenum porphyry deposits
associated with Tertiary intrusives, together with
vein systems containing both silver-gold and
polymetallic mineralisation. The most recent of
the sub-zones to be accreted within the regional
structure, the Peri-Araks sub-zone, is known to host
at least one small-scale copper-lead-zinc-mercury
deposit.
Taken on a commodity-by-commodity basis,
Armenia’s copper resources are hosted in three
types of deposit: porphyries (with molybdenum
and some gold), pyritic vein-type deposits and
polymetallic orebodies. Two main areas of copper
mineralisation occur; the Alaverdy district in the
north of the country and the Siunik district in the far
south, close to the border with Iran and Azerbaijan.
Of Palaeogene age, the country’s copper-bearing
porphyry deposits are relatively low-grade and
contain less gold than comparable orebodies in, for
example, the Pacific Rim.
ARMENIA
The Alaverdy district contains the Alaverdy
and Shamloukh copper-pyrite vein-type deposits,
the Akhtala polymetallic vein-type deposit and
the Teghout copper-molybdenum porphyry. The
southern ore field hosts the Kajaran and Agarak
copper-molybdenum porphyries, both of which
are in production, and the Aygedzor and Lichk
porphyries. In addition, the Kapan vein-type
deposits have been worked since the mid-1800s; the
nearby Shahumyan polymetallic orebody has been
developed more recently.
In terms of resources, Kajaran contains around
60% of the country’s copper, with a resource
estimated at 4.3 Mt of copper metal at a grade
of 0.27% Cu. The undeveloped Teghout deposit
contains a further 1.6 Mt of copper at a grade of
0.35%, and Agarak contains 206,000 t of copper
in ore averaging 0.46% Cu. Kapan – a vein-type
deposit, not a porphyry – is higher grade at 0.99%
Cu, and has reserves estimated to contain 209,000 t
of copper.
Gold occurrences are widespread throughout
Armenia, and consist of two principal types: quartz
veins containing both gold and silver, found mainly
in the north of the country, and gold-bearing
polymetallic deposits, which occur mainly in the
south. Most gold vein deposits, with the exception
of Zod (to the east of Lake Sevan), are relatively
small-scale, and are associated with Palaeogene-
Neogene volcanic activity. Southern Armenian
polymetallic deposits are also of Palaeogene age,
but are associated with intrusive activity rather than
vulcanism.
According to current information, the geological
setting in which most of Armenia’s gold occurrences
are found makes it unlikely that larger deposits
remain to be discovered, although it has to be borne
in mind that Soviet-era exploration here focused
almost exclusively on large-scale mineralisation,
and that even medium-sized deposits may not have
been considered worthwhile in evaluations carried
out at that time.
Current estimates of the national gold resource
inventory stand at around 190 t in quartz vein
deposits, and 117 t in polymetallic zones,
with a further 72 t in porphyry-type deposits
in association with copper and molybdenum.
Typical gold grades range from 2.5 g/t at
Shahumyan (polymetallic) to 8 g/t at Zod and
15.9 g/t at Meghradzor (both vein-type).
Other opportunities for investors exist
in deposits of industrial minerals, including
dimension stone, and in mineral-water
resources, for which both domestic and
regional markets exist, with a number of
currently untapped sources. Armenia was
the largest producer of perlite in the former
Soviet Union. It also has some 300 Mt of
undeveloped iron-ore resources.
Today’s
mining industry
ARMENIA has significant deposits of copper,
molybdenum and gold, as well as smaller
deposits of zinc, lead and silver. Some
copper-molybdenum and polymetallic ore deposits
are rich in elements such as bismuth, tellurium,
selenium, gallium, indium, thallium, rhenium and
germanium. Armenia also has significant deposits
of construction materials, such as granite, basalt,
travertine, gypsum, diatomaceous earth, limestone
and raw materials for cement production.
There are currently 17 major mining and
metallurgical companies in operation, mainly
concentrated in two provinces, most of them either
extracting and processing copper and molybdenum
ores, or extracting gold from tailings. The production
of aluminium foil began quite recently, based on
raw materials imported from Russia. The total value
of metal and minerals production in 2004 was
US$180 million, or approximately 5% of GDP.
The legal framework
for mineral-sector
administration
THE Armenian Government is reforming the
administration of the country’s minerals sector with
revisions to the legislative framework that govern
the sector. The process of drafting a new Concession
Law and new Mining Code began in 2001, with the
involvement of international expertise. The new
legislation was adopted in late 2002, with Armenia
winning an Outstanding Achievement Award at the
inaugural ‘Mines and Money’ conference in London
the following year for its success in creating this
greatly improved investment environment.
The Concession Law prescribes the following
types of licences:
Prospecting licence: This entitles the holder to carry
out sub-surface prospecting operations, and is
granted for a period not exceeding three years.
Special prospecting licence: This also entitles
the holder to carry out sub-surface prospecting
operations, and is granted for a period of more
than three but not exceeding five years. It
entitles the holder to conclude, upon application,
Views of Republic
Square in Yerevan
Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005 7
a stabilising contract as established by the
Concession Law.
Mining licence: This entitles the holder to carry out
mining operations and is granted for a period not
exceeding 12 years.
Special mining licence: Also entitling the holder to
carry out mining operations, this is granted for a
period of more than 12 years but not exceeding
25 years, and entitles the holder to conclude, upon
application, a concession contract as stipulated by
the Concession Law.
A concession contract is a written agreement
between the Republic of Armenia and the
special mining licensee that regulates the parties’
obligations as established by the Concession Law. A
concession contract comes into force simultaneously
with the corresponding special mining licence and
is valid for the whole period that the licence remains
in force.
A stabilisation contract, meanwhile, is a written
agreement between the Republic of Armenia and
a special prospecting licensee that regulates the
parties’ obligations as established by the Concession
Law. If a stabilisation contract is concluded, the
special prospecting licensee, if desired, is provided
with protection and reimbursement for additional
costs in compliance with the procedures set by the
Concession Law. A stabilisation contract comes into
force simultaneously with the corresponding special
prospecting licence and is valid for no more than 12
years from the start of mining the mineral.
Holders of mining licences and special mining
licences are required to pay royalties of 1% of
the aggregate net-back value of sales of metallic
minerals, together with an additional royalty. This
is levied at an incremental rate of 0.1% up to a
maximum of 0.8% where an operation’s profitability
index exceeds 25%.
The profitability index is calculated by the simple
formula (R–C)/R, where R is the aggregate net-back
value of the sales of extracted metallic minerals in
any royalty-payment period, and C represents the
operating costs incurred during mineral extraction
within the same period.
 ARMENIA
ACP: reviving
copper smelting
ARMENIA’S copper resources are sufficient
to support mining at current rates for
another 300 years, allowing the country
to continue a tradition of copper production that was
established more than 6,000 years ago. Armenian Cop-
per Programme (ACP), a closed joint stock company, is
one of the key players in the country’s copper industry,
operating the only copper smelter in the entire region,
and thus positioned to process most of the concentrate
produced in Armenia.
Armenian Copper Programme (formerly Manes yev
Vallex) started operating in 1997, with the acquisition
of the remains of what had once been a metallurgical
giant – the Alaverdy copper smelter. After its shutdown
in 1989, the smelter went through a process of decom-
missioning that lasted several years and resulted in the
destruction of most of the vital production units and
supporting infrastructure. Despite that, the new owners common business practice. All its financial statements
subsequently managed to resume smelting opera-
tions there, using a newly commissioned reverberatory
furnace.
However, the operation faced some major problems
during its first few years, largely related to delays in
refunding value-added tax to the company, and in
ensuring stable supplies of primary raw materials. It was partners, both suppliers and customers. Ever since
not until 2003 that the smelter managed to achieve full
production-capacity utilisation, which in turn allowed
the company to report a profit for the year, compared
with its previous losses.
This turnaround resulted mainly because at the
beginning of 2003, after extensive negotiations with the towards further co-operation between the main copper assay laboratory at the Mining and Metallurgy Institute
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development,
ACP secured a working-capital financing facility from
the bank, enabling the company to meet its payment
obligations against deliveries from its main supplier,
Zangezur Copper Molybdenum Combine (ZCMC).
The success of this facility led to it being extended by
another year in 2004, with the EBRD later syndicating
part of the increased loan to Raiffeisen Zentralbank
(RZB) in response to a request from ACP to
attract co-financiers to the project.
At the moment, discussions are continu-
ing with both the EBRD and RZB to expand
the facility beyond mere working-capital
financing, with preliminary agreement hav-
ing been reached to include a longer-term
environmental-improvement component in
the new project now being negotiated.
The company’s performance has been
further boosted by the launch of a greenfield
copper-gold mining project by an affiliated
company, Base Metals Ltd. Increasing tonnages
of copper-gold concentrates have meant that
the supply of raw materials for the Alaverdy
copper smelter has been secured, at the same time
increasing the value of its product with higher gold
grades in the feed material.
That the company was able to develop this new
mining project successfully reflected both the experi-
ence of ACP’s engineering and construction personnel
and the essential contribution made by the Mining and
Metallurgy Institute, now part of the same group of
companies. The institute undertook the design and led
the construction of all of the current mining projects
and enterprises in Armenia, as well as several others in
neighbouring countries.
With the added expertise of the institute after its
privatisation in 2003, ACP and its affiliates now have a
unique capacity within the region to carry out geologi-
8 Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005
cal exploration over poten-
tial areas of interest, identify
mineral resources and re-
serves, prepare technical
prefeasibility studies, design
open-pit or underground
mines and processing plants, and to undertake the
construction of all the production units and supporting
infrastructure needed for new developments. Thus,
ACP and its affiliates are now key contributors to the
development of the mining and metallurgy sectors in
Armenia, with a combined staff of about 2,000.
ACP provides full transparency in its operations,
irrespective of current legislative requirements or
are regularly audited by an independent auditor (KPMG
Armenia has been the company’s auditor for a number
of years), and are publicly available on its corporate
website.
The gradual expansion of its business has enabled
ACP to strengthen its relations with its most important
the resumption of operations at the Alaverdy copper
smelter, the main concentrate supplier has been ZCMC,
which produces over two-thirds of Armenia’s copper.
With the recent privatisation of ZCMC, the largest
mining company in Armenia, there is renewed impetus
miner and the country’s only copper smelter.
On the sales side, ACP’s principal customer has
been Norddeutche Affinerie AG, the largest integrated
European copper producer. Blister copper is sold to
Norddeutche Affinerie with direct annual or biennial
off-take agreements that cover most of the company’s
planned production.
Copper and molybdenum reserves in Armenia
Mo
600 99
(’000 t)
Cu
4.00 1.61
(’000 Mt)
Kajaran Teghout Others (10)
EXPLORATION AND
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
ACP and its affiliates are exploring a number of
prospects and deposits in Armenia to identify the most
viable mining projects, the company’s aim being to
develop its mining activities in the country as well as to
provide the Alaverdy smelter with a sufficient volume of confident the company has sufficient capacity for suc-
feed to support an expansion in its capacity.
The projects now under evaluation include several
relatively small ones, requiring correspondingly low
levels of investment and thus presenting a good op-
portunity for entry by a potential partner. Nonetheless,
ACP’s main target within its portfolio of mining projects
is the development of one of the largest deposits in
Armenia – the Teghout copper-molybdenum deposit,
for which the company holds a 25-year mining licence.
In terms of its resources, the Teghout deposit is second
only to Kajaran, the focus for ZCMC’s operations.
The Teghout deposit’s reserves were approved dur-
ing the Soviet era in accordance with all the standards
and procedures then in effect, with most of the
Soviet geological and other data being posted on the
project website (www.teghout.com). Nonetheless, the
company realised that attracting large-scale financ-
ing from Western banks and investors would require
a reassessment of the deposit’s reserve potential. In
order to complete this task, ACP invited the Canadian
engineering consultancy, Strathcona Mineral Services,
to advise on any further work that would be needed,
and since the Strathcona’s last visit in late 2004, ACP has
completed initial work on ten drillholes. Accounting
for about 1,800 m in total, all of these have twinned
old drillholes to check the reliability of the Soviet-era
drilling data.
In order to assure the veracity of the newly-collected
data, ACP’s sample-preparation laboratory and the
have both been modernised. The results obtained thus
far from the drilling programme indicate the presence
of a supergene zone of considerable width, resulting
in an overall improvement in the project’s potential
viability. This basically warrants the continuation of
further work at Teghout to prepare a prefeasibility study
and, provided its findings are positive, to move ahead to
a full feasibility study.
Drilling at Teghout resumed in August this
year with new, modern drilling rigs supplied
by Atlas Copco, to satisfy all of the require-
ments that Strathcona defined. In line with
91 the company’s recommendation, the drilling
encompasses twin-drilling ten holes in the
central part of the deposit for a total of 2,500
m, and 6,500 m of in-fill drilling in the western
part of the deposit in 26 holes. This compares
with about 45,000 m drilled in 143 holes that
1.59
were included in the reserve calculations car-
ried out earlier, with some 10,000 core samples
taken and assayed over 20 years up to 1991.
The information available to date has
resulted in ACP considering a phased approach
to developing the deposit. In this case, the first stage
would consist of mining in the supergene zone, with
operations then being expanded into mining in the so-
called ‘little open pit’. This would cover about a quarter
of the deposit’s reserves, located in its upper levels.
Both ACP’s management and shareholders are
cessful implementation of the Teghout project once its
feasibility has been proven.
This confidence is backed, not only by the combined
technical capacity of the affiliated companies, but also
by ACP’s successful track record with major West-
ern banks (including the EBRD and RZB) and, most
importantly, Armenia’s generally favourable business
environment and mining regulations.
 ARMENIA

ZCMC: before and

after privatisation
ZANGEZUR Copper Molybdenum Combine (ZCMC)
is located in the southeastern part of Armenia, with
its operations focused on the Kajaran copper-mo-
lybdenum deposit. The deposit comprises a thick
network of veins and disseminated mineralisation in
hydrothermally-altered monzonites. This forms an
elongated stockwork that extends for 3.5 km along its
principal axis, orientated in a roughly northwesterly
direction, with a width of about 1.5 km. The mineralisa-
tion ranges in depth from 50 m to over 500 m, and is
controlled by barren porphyry dykes. The principal ore
minerals are molybdenite and chalcopyrite.
Sequential exploration during the Soviet era in-
volved 168,300 m of drilling in a total of 645 holes, the
ore deposit and the surrounding area being drilled on a
100 x 100 m grid. The reserve estimate then calculated
in the B and C1 categories totalled 1,600 Mt of ore,
containing 620,000 t of molybdenum, 4.1 Mt of copper,
46 t of gold and 2,600 t of silver.
Initial construction of the mining operation at Kara-
jan was completed in 1952, with all of the production
prior to 1958 coming from underground. In 1960, the
operation switched entirely to open-pit mining, with
today’s pit having dimensions of 2 x 2.5 km and reach-
ing a depth of 400 m.
ZCMC’s development has occurred in three stages.
The first involved the construction of the Karajan op-
eration, the start of production at a rate of 1.5 Mt/y, and
the continuing expansion of production through re- the low level of automation of control and the whole gradually resumed, with output increasing by between
equipping to a capacity of 9.2 Mt/y by 1989. During this production-management process. Despite having an 10% and 20% annually during the mid-1990s. One of
time, the government invested considerable amounts adequate production capacity, the plant remains highly the main features of this stage was that it did not take
in the company’s operations which, because of Karajan’s labour-intensive. too long to organise the production of many essential
unique resources, contributed the lion’s share of the The second stage of ZCMC’s development concerned consumables and equipment within Armenia, using
Soviet Union’s metallurgical demand for molybdenum. the production-rehabilitation process after the collapse local expertise. This approach was necessitated by
With a comparatively low production cost, reflecting of the Soviet Union. The operation produced virtually the huge problems being experienced at that time in
the low stripping ratio (0.42-0.44 m3/t) in the pit, and nothing during 1992-93, all contacts with its former ex- importing goods from abroad and their high cost at
the operation’s proximity to major infrastructure such ternal partners and its suppliers of materials, machinery a time of unprecedentedly low world prices for non-
as the rail network, there is good potential for further and spare parts having been lost. ferrous metals.
development at Karajan, and a feasibility study has Nonetheless, ZCMC soon managed to re-establish There was also a major lack of financial invest-
been carried out for increasing ore-processing capacity initial contacts with foreign partners, and production ment for maintenance and production development,
to 20 Mt/y. principally because the enterprise was
By 1989, the re-equipping of the 14
Ore mined Target still under state ownership and any
{

basic production operations was
almost complete, the pit having
been equipped with new EKG-5 and
EKG-8 excavators and a fleet of 40
110 t-capacity BelAZ trucks. SBSh-250
blasthole drills were introduced, and an
explosives-production plant was built.
The ore-transport system from the mine
to the concentrator was changed, the
inefficient ropeway then in use being
replaced by belt conveyors with inter-
mediate three-stage crushing of the ore.
The ore feed to the plant is now crushed
to minus 20 mm.
In the concentrator itself, 16 m3
flotation cells were tested and installed,
adding to the existing 3.2 m3-capacity
cells. However, the major shortcoming
of the entire re-equipment process,
which still applies today, has been
profits were used to meet state needs.
It thus became urgent to attract major
12
investment from foreign companies
by privatising ZCMC, with the aim of
10 developing its production still further.
The third stage of the company’s de-
velopment began on January 1, 2005,
8 after its successful privatisation, with a
Mt
US$200 million investment programme
having already been agreed with the
6
Armenian Government. Since the
March quarter of this year, ZCMC has
4
started re-equipping both its mining
and processing operations, with a new
truck fleet and 25 m3 flotation cells,
2 which have already been procured and
installed. The current aim is to process
9.54 Mt this year, and to increase
0
Karajan’s ore-processing capacity by
50% to 12.5-13 Mt/y by 2008.
51

54

57

60

63

66

69

72

75

78

81

84

87

90

93

96

99

02

05

08
19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20

20

Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005 9

 ARMENIA

AGRC: Armenia’s Below: four views of the Zod operation

leading gold producer

ARARAT Gold Recovery Co LLC (AGRC) is a 100% subsidiary of Sterlite Gold Ltd - a
Canadian company whose strategy is to find, acquire, develop and operate gold
mines in Asia and the former Soviet Union. Sterlite Gold’s strategic focus shifted to
Asia in 1995 in response to recent major international political and economic shifts.
Countries that had previously not allowed
foreign companies to participate in their
gold-mining industries began encour-
aging foreign investment. In addition,
many of these countries had never been
explored with modern technology, and
their existing mines were generally under-
capitalised and, therefore, high cost. These
facts, combined with Asia’s favourable
geology for gold deposits, convinced Sterlite Gold to focus on projects in Asia.
AGRC, a company registered to do business in the Republic of Armenia, mines two
gold deposits, Zod and Meghradzor, and operates a gold-processing plant at Ararat.
Sterlite acquired full ownership its Armenian properties in February 2002 through the
privatisation process.
Gold production began at the new Ararat plant in February 1998, with an output
that was initially forecast at 30,000 oz/y at a cash cost of US$200/oz. This US$12
million facility is believed to have been the first gold plant to be constructed in the
former Soviet Union by a Western company that was completed on budget. The plant
produced 102,960 oz of gold equivalent in calendar 2002, and 59,345 oz in 2003.
The Ararat concentrator lies some 60 km south of Yerevan, close to the border with
Turkey at an elevation of 900 m. The plant currently treats ore from both Zod and
Meghradzor, and is connected to the Zod mine, 235 km away, by part of the state-
owned railway system. Around 300 people are employed at the Ararat facility, which
was constructed in 1976 to treat ore from Zod and the surrounding region. It then
had a design capacity of 1 Mt/y, and by 1997 had produced some 12 Mt of tailings.
In 1997, a CIL plant was constructed at the concentrator to treat this tailings stock-
pile. This exercise has now been completed, although a limited quantity of tailings
from post-1997 mining remains to be treated. Although these are very low grade,
treatment may continue up to the end of 2005.
The Zod mine, in the Vardenis region of eastern Armenia, was first operated under
the previous Soviet regime, and then for a period under Armenian control. Mining
began in 1976 with a total of 7.2 Mt of ore having been transported to Ararat for
treatment. Production involved both open-pit and underground methods, but all
production activity ceased at the mine in 1996, before AGRC’s involvement began.
The main facilities today are located at an elevation of 2,200 m, and the current
mining operations extend to an altitude of 2,500m. The mine is approximately 11 km
from the town of Zod, where most of the mine staff and personnel live. It is some
180 km by road east of Yerevan, a journey that can be driven in about three hours.
Some 550 people currently work at Zod.
Meghradzor is in the Hrazdan region, some 50 km north of Yerevan, and has a
workforce of about 300 people. An underground mine, Meghradzor first operated
between 1986 and 1997. Production recommenced in 2001 with an ore output of
around 100,000 t/y.
A major feasibility study on the combined Zod-Meghradzor-Ararat facility was
completed in 1998 by a joint venture between Kilborn-SNC and CMPS. This defined
a viable resource at Zod and suggested the development of a 160,000 oz/y open-pit
mine there. However, a combination of corporate changes and technical variations
meant that production did not restart there immediately.
In 2002, a small-scale operation began, designated the Test Pit, with all the ore
mined being transported by rail to Ararat. This operation was deemed a success and
production from a Phase II pit began in mid-2003. This Phase II pit was planned to
mine around 2 Mt of ore at a grade of 5.2 g/t gold, and at the time it was anticipated
that production from this pit would be completed by early 2005.
However some significant inconsistencies were subsequently detected in the
geological data, indicating that both the tonnage and grade of ore from this Phase II
pit would be less than expected. As a result, and in order to maintain its overall gold
production as high as possible, Sterlite has been forced to deepen the pit faster than
was originally planned.
The company has recently completed a major diamond-drilling programme to
prove up a major block of inferred resources below and to the west of the current re-
serves. Based on the results of this drilling programme, which are quite encouraging,
a new feasibility study has been prepared for a major expansion into a Phase III pit,
together with an environment impact assessment. AGRC is currently in the process of
obtaining the necessary government approvals and authorisations for implementa-
tion of the Phase III project.

10 Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005

 ARMENIA

Global Gold expands

its operations
US-BASED Global Gold Corp recently acquired the
Toukhmanuk (which means ‘dark child’) gold property
and processing plant adjacent to its Hankavan (‘mine
town’) property and related exploration sites, thereby
establishing a major presence in the major mineralised
belt in north-central Armenia. Replete with ancient
workings, this area was explored systematically during
the Soviet era for gold, copper and molybdenum.
Based in Greenwich, Connecticut, Global Gold has
been active in Armenia for over ten years, with its focus
on this belt of mineralisation adding to its presence in
the country. Planned upgrades to the existing plant and
mining operations at Toukhmanuk mean that Global around Hankavan.
should be complementing its exploration programme The company acquired the Toukhmanuk licence area
in the region with gold production in the near future.
in August 2005. As with all of its Armenian properties,
Global acquired Hankavan in December 2003, and is
the acquisition was made through its subsidiary, Global
currently carrying out a drilling programme to confirm
Gold Mining LLC. Specifically, Global acquired 51% of
the exploration previously undertaken by State Com-the Armenian company, Mego-Gold LLC, and will pay
mittee of Reserves (GKZ), and to focus on a skarn zone
for and acquire the remaining 49% within two years.
that is thought to have higher gold grades than the rest
The Toukhmanuk resource has been estimated at
of the property. 3.3 Mt averaging 6 g/t Au and 15 g/t Ag, containing
The historical GKZ feasibility work projected a 115 Mt
over 700,000 oz of gold and over 1.7 Moz of silver. In ad-
orebody containing 60,000 t of molybdenum at an aver-
dition to the central property, the acquisition includes
age grade of 0.054%, 125,000 t of copper at an average
a 200,000 t/y-capacity plant (which is now being up-
grade of 0.57% and over 1.1 Moz of gold at 1.42 g/t, all
graded) and the Damlik, Mirak, Grebnevaya, Ozyornaya,
in the C1 and C2 categories. Recognising the potential
Emin Yourt, Voskedzor and Dalma exploration sites.
of this region, Global has also expanded its explora- “One of our top goals is to confirm these resources in
tion activities to six other, smaller licence areas in and
accordance with Western standards, at the same time as
we are exploring for new reserves in this region”
Hankavan said Global Gold’s chairman, Drury J Gallagher,
and the company’s president, Van Z Krikorian.
“We are also integrating the initial production
Toukhmanuk from Toukhmanuk into our exploration work,
Hankavan Area Sites which is working well to develop the property.
Toukhmanuk Based on our years of in-country experience, we
Area Sites Meghradzor
have great confidence in Armenia, both in its
mining potential and in the people with whom
Sevan Zod we work.
“We are fortunate to have a strategic
Yerevan κ shareholder in Firebird Management, which has
endorsed this strategy as well as our respect for
maintaining an ethical as well as environmen-
tally and socially responsible operation in the
Ararat Plant Kapan country, and now we are welcoming others who
share that vision. We are also happy to be in
Marjan partnership with Iberian Resources on properties
in southern Armenia, and expect to pursue new
projects in Armenia along with our business in
Tereterasar Chile.”
Litchkvadz-Tei
Global Gold first entered the Armenian mining
industry through a joint venture with the govern-
Armenia Properties ment to develop the Zod and Meghradzor mines,
as well as to reprocess the 12 Mt of tailings that
Additional Hankavan Additional Toukhmanuk had accumulated at the Ararat plant by 1995.
Area Exploration Sites Area Exploration Sites Global partnered with First Dynasty Mines Ltd on
• Sarnaghpyur • Voskedzor that project, with the first gold exports from the
• Tetujour • Grebnevaya new plant being achieved in May 1998.
• Tsetscar • Damlik Global no longer has a stake in First Dynasty,
• Yekatasar • Mirak
• Batsatie Leach which was eventually taken over and renamed
• Emin Yourt
• Aya Pavle • Ozyornaya Sterlite Gold Ltd, except for a 20% right to par-
• Dalma ticipate in any exploration projects undertaken
directly or indirectly by Sterlite Gold or its successors
before the end of 2009. This 20% participation right
was initially limited to exploration other than at Zod
and Meghradzor, but the parties’ initial agreement was
amended in 1998 to remove all limitations.
Since 1995, Global’s representative in Armenia has
been Ashot Boghossian, an attorney and former English
teacher with substantial experience of the Armenian
legal and regulatory framework for foreign investment,
and specifically for mining. Mr Boghossian is now Global
Gold Mining’s regional director, having worked on proj-
ects in other Eurasian countries as well as in Armenia.
On the technical side, Global’s director of mining and
exploration is an Australian, Simon Cleghorn. He came
to Armenia in 1997 to work on the Zod and Meghradzor
joint venture, became fluent in the language, and has
since settled there. Global’s senior geologist is Genrikh
Mkrtchyan, a prominent member of Armenia’s explora-
tion community. The director of business operations
is Frank Pastorino, an MBA with mining-company
experience and a former US Peace Corps volunteer, who
is also fluent in Armenian.
In August, Global Gold and Iberian Resources Ltd
formed a joint venture to develop the Litchkvadz-Tei
and Tereterasar deposits, which are roughly 5 km apart
in southern Armenia. Iberian will own 80% of this
enterprise, and development is proceeding on track.
These gold-copper-silver properties are situated among
several significant past and currently producing mines,
such as the Kajaran, Agarak and Kapan copper mines.
Litchkvadz-Tei and Terterasar were also extensively
explored (to a depth of 300 m) during the Soviet
years through open-cuts, underground workings and
extensive drilling to establish C1 and C2-category gold-
resource estimates in the 700,000 oz range.
At present, Global also owns the licence for, and is
exploring, the Marjan gold-polymetallic property, north
of Litchkvadz-Tei and Tereterasar, but still in southern
Armenia. GKZ C2-category estimates identified the
potential there at 3.5 Mt averaging 3.39 g/t Au and over
70 g/t Ag, with copper, lead and zinc.
To summarise, Global Gold is expanding both in
its focus on the north-central Armenian belt with
Toukhmanuk, Hankavan and its associated exploration
sites, and throughout the country where it feels it can
add value. Its resources have expanded substantially
in the last year and, with its excellent experience in
the country, the company reports that the future looks
bright.

Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005 11

ARMENIA

km

Key contacts
MINISTRY OF TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Armenian Development Agency Zangezur Copper-Molybdenum Combine
Karen Chshmaritian, Minister Vahagn Movsisyan, General Director 18 Lernagortsneri Street
Tel: +374 10 526 134 Tel: (+374 10) 570 170 Kajaran
Fax: +374 10 526 577 Fax: (+374 10) 542 272 Syunik Province
Arthur Ashughyan, Head of Mining Department E-mail: vmovsisyan@ada.am Tel: (374-10) 280-977
Tel: +374 10 526 188 Website: www.ada.am Fax: (374-85) 32-846
Fax: +374 10 526 577 E-mail: zcmc@arminco.com
E-mail: aashughyan@minted.am Armenian Copper Programme Contact: Maxim Hakobyan, managing director
Website: www.minted.am 19 Khanjyan Street
Yerevan-10 Ararat Gold Recovery Co
MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION OF THE RA Tel: (374-10) 540 185 19 Khangyan Street, 375 010, Yerevan, Armenia
Vardan Ayvazyan, Minister Fax: (374-10) 540 186 Tel: (374-10) 545 836
Tel: +374 10 521 099 E-mail: info@acp.am Fax: (374-10) 548 361
Fax: +374 10 585 469 Website: www.acp.am E-mail: agrc@arminco.com
Website: www.mnpiac.am Contact: Gagik Arzumanyan, executive director Contact: Sanjay Dalmia, chief executive

12 Mining Journal special publication, London, November 2005