You are on page 1of 10

JENIS_KELAMIN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid LAKI-LAKI 2 8.0 8.0 8.0

PEREMPUAN 23 92.0 92.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

UMUR_CODE

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 20 - 30 Th 14 56.0 56.0 56.0

> 30 Th 11 44.0 44.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

PENDIDIKAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid SPK 1 4.0 4.0 4.0

DIII KEP. 23 92.0 92.0 96.0

S1 1 4.0 4.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

STATUS_PERNIKAHAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid MENIKAH 17 68.0 68.0 68.0

BELUM MENIKAH 8 32.0 32.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

LAMA KERJA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid KURANG 5 THN 9 36.0 36.0 36.0

LEBIH DARI 5 THN 16 64.0 64.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0


BEBAN_KERJA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid BERAT 11 44.0 44.0 44.0

RINGAN 14 56.0 56.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

SITUASI_MONOTON

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid BOSAN 11 44.0 44.0 44.0

TIDAK BOSAN 14 56.0 56.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

PHISICAL_DANGER

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid TIDAK AMAN 17 68.0 68.0 68.0

AMAN 8 32.0 32.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSONAL

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid BURUK 15 60.0 60.0 60.0

BAIK 10 40.0 40.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0

stres kerja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid RINGAN 14 56.0 56.0 56.0

SEDANG 11 44.0 44.0 100.0

Total 25 100.0 100.0


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

JENIS_KELAMIN * stres
25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%
kerja

JENIS_KELAMIN * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total

JENIS_KELAMIN LAKI-LAKI Count 1 1 2

Expected Count 1.1 .9 2.0

% within JENIS_KELAMIN 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 7.1% 9.1% 8.0%

% of Total 4.0% 4.0% 8.0%

PEREMPUAN Count 13 10 23

Expected Count 12.9 10.1 23.0

% within JENIS_KELAMIN 56.5% 43.5% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 92.9% 90.9% 92.0%

% of Total 52.0% 40.0% 92.0%

Total Count 14 11 25

Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0

% within JENIS_KELAMIN 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .032a 1 .859

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .032 1 .859

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .697

Linear-by-Linear Association .030 1 .861

N of Valid Casesb 25

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,88.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

UMUR_CODE * stres kerja 25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%

UMUR_CODE * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total

UMUR_CODE 20 - 30 Th Count 7 7 14

Expected Count 7.8 6.2 14.0

% within UMUR_CODE 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 50.0% 63.6% 56.0%

% of Total 28.0% 28.0% 56.0%

> 30 Th Count 7 4 11

Expected Count 6.2 4.8 11.0

% within UMUR_CODE 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 50.0% 36.4% 44.0%

% of Total 28.0% 16.0% 44.0%

Total Count 14 11 25

Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0

% within UMUR_CODE 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .465a 1 .495

Continuity Correctionb .076 1 .783

Likelihood Ratio .468 1 .494

Fisher's Exact Test .689 .393

Linear-by-Linear Association .446 1 .504

N of Valid Casesb 25

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,84.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

PENDIDIKAN * stres kerja 25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%

PENDIDIKAN * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total

PENDIDIKAN SPK Count 0 1 1

Expected Count .6 .4 1.0

% within PENDIDIKAN .0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja .0% 9.1% 4.0%

% of Total .0% 4.0% 4.0%

DIII KEP. Count 13 10 23

Expected Count 12.9 10.1 23.0

% within PENDIDIKAN 56.5% 43.5% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 92.9% 90.9% 92.0%

% of Total 52.0% 40.0% 92.0%

S1 Count 1 0 1

Expected Count .6 .4 1.0

% within PENDIDIKAN 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 7.1% .0% 4.0%

% of Total 4.0% .0% 4.0%

Total Count 14 11 25

Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0

% within PENDIDIKAN 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.061a 2 .357

Likelihood Ratio 2.804 2 .246

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.948 1 .163

N of Valid Cases 25

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is ,44.
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

BEBAN_KERJA * stres kerja 25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%

BEBAN_KERJA * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total

BEBAN_KERJA BERAT Count 3 8 11

Expected Count 6.2 4.8 11.0

% within BEBAN_KERJA 27.3% 72.7% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 21.4% 72.7% 44.0%

% of Total 12.0% 32.0% 44.0%

RINGAN Count 11 3 14

Expected Count 7.8 6.2 14.0

% within BEBAN_KERJA 78.6% 21.4% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 78.6% 27.3% 56.0%

% of Total 44.0% 12.0% 56.0%

Total Count 14 11 25

Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0

% within BEBAN_KERJA 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.579a 1 .010

Continuity Correctionb 4.662 1 .031

Likelihood Ratio 6.857 1 .009

Fisher's Exact Test .017 .015

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.316 1 .012

N of Valid Casesb 25

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,84.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

SITUASI_MONOTON * stres
25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%
kerja

SITUASI_MONOTON * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total

SITUASI_MONOTON BOSAN Count 9 2 11

Expected Count 6.2 4.8 11.0

% within
81.8% 18.2% 100.0%
SITUASI_MONOTON

% within stres kerja 64.3% 18.2% 44.0%

% of Total 36.0% 8.0% 44.0%

TIDAK BOSAN Count 5 9 14

Expected Count 7.8 6.2 14.0

% within
35.7% 64.3% 100.0%
SITUASI_MONOTON

% within stres kerja 35.7% 81.8% 56.0%

% of Total 20.0% 36.0% 56.0%

Total Count 14 11 25

Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0

% within
56.0% 44.0% 100.0%
SITUASI_MONOTON

% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.314a 1 .021

Continuity Correctionb 3.608 1 .058

Likelihood Ratio 5.616 1 .018

Fisher's Exact Test .042 .027

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.101 1 .024

N of Valid Casesb 25

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,84.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

PHISICAL_DANGER * stres
25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%
kerja

PHISICAL_DANGER * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total

PHISICAL_DANGER TIDAK AMAN Count 11 6 17

Expected Count 9.5 7.5 17.0

% within
64.7% 35.3% 100.0%
PHISICAL_DANGER

% within stres kerja 78.6% 54.5% 68.0%

% of Total 44.0% 24.0% 68.0%

AMAN Count 3 5 8

Expected Count 4.5 3.5 8.0

% within
37.5% 62.5% 100.0%
PHISICAL_DANGER

% within stres kerja 21.4% 45.5% 32.0%

% of Total 12.0% 20.0% 32.0%

Total Count 14 11 25

Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0

% within
56.0% 44.0% 100.0%
PHISICAL_DANGER

% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.634a 1 .201

Continuity Correctionb .716 1 .397

Likelihood Ratio 1.637 1 .201

Fisher's Exact Test .389 .199

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.569 1 .210

N of Valid Casesb 25

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,52.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSO
25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%
NAL * stres kerja

HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSONAL * stres kerja Crosstabulation

stres kerja

RINGAN SEDANG Total


HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSO BURUK Count 12 3 15
NAL
Expected Count 8.4 6.6 15.0
% within
HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSO 80.0% 20.0% 100.0%
NAL
% within stres kerja 85.7% 27.3% 60.0%
% of Total 48.0% 12.0% 60.0%
BAIK Count 2 8 10
Expected Count 5.6 4.4 10.0
% within
HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSO 20.0% 80.0% 100.0%
NAL
% within stres kerja 14.3% 72.7% 40.0%
% of Total 8.0% 32.0% 40.0%
Total Count 14 11 25
Expected Count 14.0 11.0 25.0
% within
HUBUNGAN_INTERPERSO 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%
NAL
% within stres kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 56.0% 44.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.766a 1 .003
Continuity Correctionb 6.500 1 .011
Likelihood Ratio 9.276 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .005 .005
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.416 1 .004
N of Valid Casesb 25

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,40.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

You might also like