You are on page 1of 2
‘TORTS AND DAMAGES LTORTS 1. Etymology and Usage of Term ». Difficulty in defining the term ¢. Sources of Obligation; Article 1157-1162 NCC 4. Classifications: 1. Negligence; Articles 2176-2194 NCC 2. Intentional torts; Articles 19-35 NCC 3. Strict liability torts; Articles 694-707; 2183. e. Distinguished from a Crime 1. Artiles 100-113; and 365 RPC 2. Rule I1, Section 1, Rules of Court 3. Civil Liability Arising from a Crime Barredo ¥. Garcia Eleano v. Hill -Virata v. Ochoa Banal v. Tadeo -Occena v, leamina -Pacis v. Morales -Casupanan y. Laroya 4. Reservation of Civil Action People v. Amistad -Sarantilla v. Court of Appeals. “Hun Hyung Park v. Eung Won Choi Salazar v, People Safeguard Security Agency v. Tangeo 5. Extinetion'Survival of Civil Liability Ex-Delicto Rule 120, Section 2, Rules of Court People v. Navoa People v. Badeo People v. Bayotas -Calang and Philtranco v. People £. Distinguished from a Contract; “Articles 1172-1173; 1314 NCC -Cangeo v. Manila Railroad Co, “Air France v. Carrascoso -Singson v. BPI -LRTA v. Navidad American Express v. Cordero” So Ping Bun v. Court of Appeals “Consolidated Bank & Trust Co. v. La -Crisostomo v. Court of Appeals I, QUASI-DELICTS, a Elements; Articles 2176-2194 b. Negligence “Concept, Test and Degrees; Article 1173, -Picartv. Smith -Smith Bell v, Borja -Delsan Transport Lines v. C&A Construction standard of Care -Burden of proof -Ong v. Metropolitan Water District “Marikina Auto Line and Suelto v. People -Exceptions: Articles 284-2185; and 2188 Common carriers; Arts. 1732-33; and 1755-63 -Res ipsa loquitur Spouses Africa v. Caltex Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals -FGU Insurance v. G.P Sarmiento Trucking -Perla Compania de Seguros v. Sarangaya IIL -Respondeat superior -Ramos v. Pepsi Cola Negligence of professionals -Batiquin v. Court of Appeals, -Garcia-Rueda v. Pascasio -Ramos v. Court of Appeals Nogales v. Capitol Medical Center Professional Services, Ine. v. Natividad Negligence of Attomeys -Del Mar v. Court of Appeals «6, Causation -Proximate Cause; Immediate Cause Vda, De Bataclan v, Medina -Phoenix Construction v. JAC -Ramos v. C.0.L Realty -Belarmino v. ECC Fernando v. Court of Appeals -Unmali v, Bacani -Concurrence of Efficient Causes “Tests of Causation “Causation in Fact Substantial Factor “But For” or “Sine Qua Non” -Forseeability Cause and Condition Natural and Probable Consequences -Intervening Cause Rakes v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co Taylor v. Manila Electric Co. “Teague v, Fernandez -MeKee v. IAC d. Persons Liable Tortfeasor/Joint tortfeasor -Construction Development Corp. v. Estrella . Vicarious Liability; Article 2180 -Parents/Guardians -Exconde v. Capuno “Cuda v. Montfort -Employers Gutierrez v. Court of Appeals -Phil, Rabbit Lines Ine. v. Phil. Am. Forwarders -Pleyto, et al. v. Lomboy, et al. -YHT Realty Corporation v. CA -Macalino v, Ong, -Mereury Drug v. Huang, State “Meritt v. Government of PL -Republic v. Palacios “National Irigation Adm. v. Fontanilla -Quezon City Govt. v. Dacara Municipality of San Juan v. CA -Teachers/Heads of Establishments “Mercado ¥, Court of Appeals -Palisoe v. Brillantes -Ylarde v. Aquino “Salvosa v. IAC “Amadorav. Court of Appeals “Schools, Pasco v. CFI-Bulacan, 160 SCRA 784 -St. Mary's Academy v. Carpitanos Child Learning Center et.al. v. Tagario -Saludaga v. Court of Appeals Si. Francis High School v. CA -PSBA v. Court of Appeals Soliman v. Tuazon -Owner of Vehicle Proprietor of Building or Structure Local Government Units £ Defenses; Total and Partial Plaintiffs Own Negligence Exceptions Theory of Implied Invitation Doctrine of Attractive Nuisance “Contributory Negligence “Cabardo v. CA Negros Navigation v. CA Exceptions; Conclusive presumption Assumption of Risk Nikko Hotel v. Roberto Reyes -Cebu Country Club v. Elizagaque Doctrine of Last Clear Chance Picartv. Smith -LADECO v. Angala -PLDT ¥. Court of Appeals -Achevara v. Ramos, -Fortuitous Event Cipriano v. CA -Servando v. Phil Steam Navigation Schmitz: Transport v. Transport Venture Exceptions; McKee v. IAC Prescription; Article 1146, NCC Diligence of Good Father of a Family -Res Judieata “Waiver IIL, INTENTIONAL TORTS 1, Antcles 20-34; 309, NCC b. Individual rights and family relations ©. Abuse of Rights; Article 19, Poy. Pe Valenzuela v. CA -Globe Mackay v. CA University of the East v. Jader Contra Bonus Mores; Art. 21. NCC -Breach of Promise to Marry Tanjanco v. CA ¢, Deprivation of Property/Ri “Manila Gas v. CA F. Public Humiliation Patricio v. Hon, Oscar Leviste American Express v. Cordero £. Right to Privacy Socorro Ramirez v. Court of Appeals, hy, Imterference with Family and Other relations ~Tenchavez v. Escaflo, -Lagon v. Court of Appeals i, Sexual Harassment -Villarama v. NLRC and Golden Donuts |. Public officials

You might also like