Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INSURANCE CODE
(P.D. 1460, as amended)
2. Aleatory
3. Voluntary
4. Executory
6. Compensatory
5. Personal
Insurance is a contract of Uberrima Fides, or of perfect good faith, because the parties are
required to disclose any material fact which the applicant knows or ought to know.
General Rule: Only a future event can be covered by and insurance contract.
Exception: In marine insurance, even a past event can be covered, provided that the loss of
the vessel in the past could not have been known by ordinary means of communication. (Sec.
109)
Most of the terms of the contract do not result from mutual negotiations between the parties as
they are prescribed by the insurer in printed form to which the insured can “adhere to” if he so
chooses but the terms of which he cannot change. Hence, in case of doubt, the contract shall
be construed strictly against the insured and liberally in favor of the insured.
ELEMENTS OF INSURANCE
Principle of Risk Distribution. The device of Insurance serves to distribute the risk of
economic loss among as many as possible of those who are subject to the same kind of risk. By
contributing a pre-determined amount to a general fund, each member contributes to a small
degree towards compensating for losses suffered by any member of the group.
The Right of Subrogation has its roots in equity. It is designed to promote and accomplish
justice and is the mode equity adopts to compel the ultimate payment of a debt by one who in
justice and good conscience ought to pay. It does not depend upon any privity of contract or
assignment of claim. It accrues simply upon payment by the insurance company of the
insurance claim. Consequently, payment made by the insurer to the insured operates as an
equitable assignment to the insurer of all the remedies the insured may have against the obligor.
(PHILAMGEN vs. CA, 273 SCRA 262)
2. Where insurer pays without notifying the carrier, which in good faith, has already paid the
insured;
3. Where the insurer pays for a loss not among the risks insured against by the policy
1. LIFE
b. Group Life (Sec. 50, and the last par. of Sec. 228)
3. The BENEFICIARY is the person designated to receive the proceeds of the policy when
the risk attaches.
EXCEPTION: Article 739 of the NCC on forbidden donations. Hence a married man
cannot assign as beneficiary his concubine or a married woman her paramour. Under
the said article, the action to annul the designation can be proven by preponderance of
evidence. In one case a married man’s designation of his adulterous children as
beneficiaries was held valid.
In LIFE insurance:
Every person has an insurable interest in the life and health: (a) Of himself, of his spouse and of
his children; (b) Of any person on whom he depends wholly or in part for education or support,
or in whom he has a pecuniary interest; (c) Of any person under a legal obligation to him for the
payment of money, or respecting property or services, of which death or illness might delay or
prevent the performance; and (d) Of any person upon whose life any estate or interest vested in
him depends. (Sec. 10)
In PROPERTY insurance:
(b) An inchoate interest founded on an existing interest (i.e. carrier on a cargo of freightage);
or
(c) An expectancy, coupled with an existing interest in that out of which the expectancy arises.
(i.e. growing crops)
(Sec. 14)
In life insurance, the general rule is no limit on the amount of insurable interest. The exception is
an insurance taken by the creditor on the life of his debtor. In which case, the insurable
interest is limited only to the extent of the debt. (Sec. 10)
Consent of insurer is necessary only when the seller assigns the policy in connection with
the transfer of ownership of the property such that the seller wants to assign his rights as an
insured, to the buyer.
Mr. X wants to borrow P200 million from a bank and offers his building as collateral. If Mr. X
already has an existing policy at the time of the loan application, the policy could be assigned to
the bank. The consent of insurer is not necessary because what is assigned is not the policy
itself but only the proceeds.
DEAN’S TIP: If the problem is an assignment of policy involving collateral, the insured remains
a party to the insurance contract since only the proceeds are assigned to the mortgagee and
therefore, the consent of the insurer is not required.
GENERAL RULE: The effect of a change of interest in any part of a thing insured
unaccompanied by a corresponding change in interest in the insurance, suspends the
insurance to an equivalent extent, until the interest in the thing and the interest in the insurance
are vested in the same person. (Sec. 20)
(If the transfer is to a third person other than partner, joint-owner or co-owner, the
exception will not apply)
1. Warranties, whereby parties stipulate that certain circumstances did or did not exist;
2. Exceptions, which is an expressed enumeration of excluded risks which otherwise
would have been included; and
3. Conditions, whereby parties stipulate that the contract would be voidable if certain
circumstances were found to exist.
1. Concealment
2. Misrepresentation
3. Breach of Warranty
CONCEALMENT is the neglect to communicate that which a party knows and ought to
communicate. (Sec. 26)
Each party to a contract of insurance must communicate to the other, in good faith, all facts
within his knowledge which are material to the contract, and which the other has not the means
of ascertaining, and as to which he makes no warranty. (Sec. 28). The test is: If the applicant is
aware of the existence of some circumstances which he knows would influence the insurer in
acting upon his application, good faith requires him to disclose that circumstance, though
unasked.
Facts: Bacani procured a life insurance providing for double indemnity in case of accidental
death and appointed his mother as beneficiary. Subsequently, he died in a plane crash and his
mother sought to recover the indemnity. The insurer refused to pay on the ground that Bacani
failed to disclose his confinement in the Lung Center for renal failure.
Held: The mother is not entitled to receive payment. The insured need not die of the disease he
had failed to disclose to the insurer; it is sufficient that his non-disclosure misled the
insurer in forming his estimates of the risks of the proposed insurance policy or in making
inquiries. (Sunlife Assurance vs. CA, 245 SCRA 268)
If the policy was procured through fraudulent representations, the contract of insurance was
never legally existent. It can be assumed that had the true facts been disclosed by the insured,
the insurance would never have been granted. (Argente vs. West Coast Life, 51 Phil. 725)
The injured party is entitled to rescind from the time when the representation becomes false.
However, the right of the insurer to rescind is waived by acceptance of premium despite
knowledge of the ground for rescission. (Sec. 45)
1. Refer to the same subject matter and both take place before the
contract is entered.
2. Concealment or Misrepresentation prior loss or death gives rise
to the same remedy: Cancellation by the insurer of the policy.
(Secs. 27 and 45)
3. The test of materiality is the same. (Secs. 31 and 46)
4. The rules of concealment and representation is the same with
life and non-life insurance.
1. Non-payment of premiums;
2. Violation of condition—re: military/naval service in time of war;
3. No insurable interest;
4. Cause of death was excepted or not covered;
5. Fraud of a vicious type;
6. Proof of death was not given.
1. He must not have accepted premiums despite knowledge of rescission; (Sec. 45)
2. He cannot rescind if he has already commenced any action on the contract; (Sec. 48,
par. 1)
3. In life insurance, defenses which may be raised as grounds for rescission are available
during the first two years of the life insurance policy. (Sec. 48, par. 2)
PURPOSE OF WARRANTY
It eliminates the potentially increasing hazards which may either be due to the acts of the
insured or to the change to the condition of the property.
TYPES OF WARRANTY
1. Express
EXCEPTION: When the policy expressly declares that a violation thereof will
avoid it. (Sec. 75)
ILLUSTRATION:
An “Other Insurance Clause” is a condition in the policy requiring the insured to inform
the insurer of any other insurance coverage of the property. A violation of the clause by
the insured will not constitute a breach unless there is an additional provision stating
that the violation thereof will avoid the policy.
WARRANTY
REPRESENTATION
1. Policy—It is a written instrument in which a contract of insurance is set forth. (Sec. 49)
Kinds of Policies:
A Rider is a printed stipulation usually attached to the policy because they constitute
additional stipulations between the parties.
The Insurer may, upon notice to the insured, stating grounds for cancellation, and stating
further that it can prove the ground should the insured require it, unilaterally cancel the policy.
1. Non-payment of premium;
Prescriptive Period
The Insurer may provide in the policy that unless the insured brings an action within one (1)
year from time cause of action accrues, the action shall be barred. (Sec. 63)
The one (1) year period is computed from the date the cause of action accrues, which is the
denial of the claim and not upon the happening of the loss.
1. When all the conditions precedent stated in the offer have been satisfied; and
2. When delivered.
2 Types of Delivery
2. Constructive—
a. By mail: If policy was mailed already and premium was paid and nothing is left to be done by
the insured, the policy is considered constructively delivered if insured died before receiving the
policy.
b. By agent: If delivered to the agent of the insurer, whose duty is ministerial, or delivered to the
agent of the insured, the policy is considered constructively delivered.
Only the insurer or its authorized officer signs the policy. The policy is not the contract itself but
merely sets forth what has been agreed upon. The signature of the insured is needed only when
there is a rider or endorsement for countersigning purposes. (par. 3 of Sec. 50)
Premium is the consideration paid an insurer for undertaking to indemnify the insured against a
specific peril.
1. If thing insured was never exposed to the risks insured against (Sec. 79);
2. If contract was voidable due to fraud or misrepresentation of insurer (Sec. 81) ; and
3. If insurer never incurred liability
1. If the risk has already attached and the risk is entire and indivisible;
2. In life policies;
3. If contract is void ab initio because of fraud by the insured;
4. If contract is illegal and the parties are in pari delicto
EXCEPTIONS:
Statutory Jurisprudential
1. In life or industrial life 1. When the insured and the
policy whenever grace insurer have agreed to the
period is applicable (Sec. 77)payment of premium by
installments and partial payment
has been made at the time of
loss. (Makati Tuscany
Condominium Corp. vs. CA, 1992)
2. Written acknowledgment 2. When public interest so
by the insurer of receipt of requires, as determined by the
premium, which the law Insurance Commissioner.
declares to be conclusive
evidence of payment so as to (Example: In Compulsory Motor
make the policy binding and Vehicle insurance, if the policy was
the insurer liable, without issued without payment of
prejudice to the right of the premium by the vehicle owner, the
insurer to collect insurer will still be held liable. To
corresponding premium. (Sec. rule otherwise would prejudice the
78) 3rd party victim.
Loss is the injury or damage sustained by insured from perils insured against.
PROXIMATE CAUSE is the active efficient cause which sets to motion a train of events which
in turn brings about a result without intervention of any force operating and working actively from
a new and independent force.
Simple negligence as a defense will not exonerate the insurer from liability as most loss or
damage arises from negligence. However, defense of gross or willful negligence (amounting
to bad faith) is a valid defense.
In other types of insurance, unless a stipulation in the policy requires the insured to give
notice, such failure will not exonerate insurer from liability.
Double Insurance exists where the same person is insured by several insurers separately in
respect to the same subject and interest. (Sec. 93)
Double insurance is not prohibited by law. A person may therefore procure two or more
insurances to cover his property. However, the insurer may insert an “Other Insurance
Clause” which will prohibit double insurance. The rationale is to prevent the danger that
the insured will over insure his property.
Reinsurance is one by which an insurer procures a third person to insure him against loss or
liability by reason of such original insurance (Sec. 95)
PURPOSE: To distribute the risk, when the insurer finds a single risk so great that the
happening of the peril insured against would render him insolvent, it is customary to reinsure
such risk with one or more insurers.
MARINE INSURANCE is insurance against risks connected with navigation, to which a ship,
cargo, freightage, profits or other insurable interest in movable property, may be exposed during
a certain voyage or fixed period of time. (Sec. 99)
If hypothecated by bottomry, the interest is only the excess of the value of the
vessel over the loan. (Sec. 101)
voyage.
RULE: Marine insurance covers only perils of the sea and not perils of the ship.
EXCEPTION: The stipulation of an All-Risks Clause, which covers all losses during the voyage
whether arising from a marine peril or not. However, it does not cover loss through willful or
fraudulent act of the insured.
BARRATRY is the willful misconduct on the part of the master or crew in pursuance of some
unlawful or fraudulent purpose without consent of owners and to the prejudice of owner’s
interest.
SEAWORTHINESS is a relative term depending upon the nature of the ship, nature of
the voyage, nature of the service. In general, a vessel is seaworthy if it is fit to perform
the service and to encounter the ordinary perils of the voyage contemplated by the
parties to the policy. (Sec. 114)
It becomes the obligation of a cargo owner to look for a reliable common carrier which keeps its
vessels in seaworthy conditions. The shipper may have no control over the vessel but he has
control in the choice of the common carrier that will transport his goods. (PHILAMGEN vs. CA,
273 SCRA 262)
DEVIATION is a departure from the course of the voyage insured, or an unreasonable delay in
pursuing the voyage or the commencement of an entirely different voyage. (Sec. 123)
RULE: Improper or unjustified deviation bars recovery and releases the insurer from
liability.
Deviation to save goods belonging to a ship in distress is proper only if incidental to the
prime purpose of saving human life.
ABANDONMENT in marine insurance is the act of the insured by which, after a constructive
total loss, he declares the relinquishment to the insurer of his interest in the thing insured. (Sec.
138)
1. Actual relinquishment by the insured of his interest in thing insured (Sec. 138)
2. Constructive total loss (Sec. 139)
3. Abandonment must not be partial or conditional (Sec. 140)
4. Must be made within reasonable time after receipt of reliable information of the loss
(Sec. 141)
5. Must be made by giving notice to the insurer either orally or in writing (Sec. 143) and
6. Notice of abandonment must be explicit and specify the particular cause of the
abandonment (Sec. 144)
C0-INSURANCE is a relative division of the risk between the insurer and the insured dependent
upon the relative amount of the policy and the actual value of the property insured, taking effect
only if the actual loss is partial and less than the amount in the policy.
Mr. X owns a vessel worth P300,000. He insures it for only P200,000. Mr. X is considered a co-
insurer of the vessel to the extent of P100,000 or 1/3 of the vessel’s value. Hence, if there is a
loss of P90,000, the insurer is liable for only P60,000. If Mr. X was not a co-insurer, the insurer
would be liable for P90,000. Of course, if a total loss occurred, the insurer would be liable for the
entire amount of P300,000, because co-insurance takes place only in case of a partial loss.
Rationale: To encourage the insured to insure the full value of the vessel considering that
maritime ventures are full of many risks.
FIRE INSURANCE is a contract by which the insurer for a consideration agrees to indemnify the
insured against loss of or damage by fire, lightning, windstorm, tornado or earthquake and other
allied risks (FLEW-AT), when such risks are covered by extension to fire insurance policies or
under separate policies. (Sec. 167)
FALL OF BUILDING CLAUSE is a clause in fire insurance policy that if the building or any part
thereof falls, except as a result of fire, all insurance by the policy shall immediately cease.
Alteration results in rescission if—the alteration violates the contract and increases the risk.
1. alteration in the use or condition from that which is limited in the policy
2. increasing the risk
3. made without consent of insurer
4. means within control of insured (Sec. 168)
—the alteration does not violate the contract but increases the risk (Sec. 170);
OPTION TO REBUILD CLAUSE gives the insurer the option to rebuild the destroyed property
instead of paying the indemnity. This clause serves to protect the insurer against unfair
appraisals friendly to the insured. This clause is sanctioned and recognized under the last
sentence of Sec. 172.
Accident or accidental have been taken to mean that which happens by chance or fortuitously,
without intention or design, which is unexpected, unusual or unforeseen. (Pan Malayan
Insurance Corp. vs. CA, 184 SCRA 54)
Insured was a boxer. During a bout, he was hit in the face and fell backwards, hitting a post.
HELD: Accident (De la Cruz vs. Capital Insurance, 64 O.G. 760)
Accused charged with robbery with homicide. The intent was to rob. Insured was killed by
accident.
Intentional as used in an accident policy excepting intentional injuries inflicted by the insured or
any other person implies the exercise of the reasoning faculties, consciousness and
volition. Where a provision of the policy excludes intentional injury, it is the intention if the
person inflicting the injury that is controlling. If the injuries suffered by the insured clearly
resulted from the intentional act of the third person, the insurer is relieved from liability
as stipulated. (Biagtan vs., Insular Life, 44 SCRA 58)
1. Solidary;
The insurer acts as a surety and not a guarantor. A guarantor, unlike a surety, has the right of
exhaustion not available to a contract of suretyship.
The rule on payment of premium is the same as ordinary insurance. Pay first before the contract
becomes effective. EXCEPTION: If the surety bond is accepted by the obligee irrespective of
payment of premium, the contract of suretyship is binding upon the insurer. (Sec. 177)
2. Limited Payment—insured pays premium for a limited period. If he dies within the
period, his beneficiary is paid; if he outlives the period, he does not get anything.
3. Endowment—insured pays a premium for a specified period. If he outlives the period,
the face value of the policy is paid to him; if not, his beneficiaries receive the benefit.
4. Term Insurance—insured pays once only, and he is insured for a specified period. If he
dies within the period, his beneficiaries benefit. If he outlives the period, no person
benefits from the insurance.
5. Industrial Life—life insurance entitling the insured to pay premiums weekly, or where
premiums are payable monthly or oftener; and
6. Variable Contract—any policy or contract on either a group or individual basis issued
by an insurance company providing for benefits or other contractual payments or values
thereunder to vary so as to reflect investment results of any segregated portfolio of
investment.
After the policy has been in force for a period of two years from its date of issue or last
reinstatement, the insurer is liable for suicide committed by the insured.
If suicide was committed before the lapse of the two year period, the insurer is not liable.
If suicide was committed in the state of insanity, date of commission is immaterial. The insurer
is always liable. (Sec. 180-A)
If you are the owner of a motor vehicle, whether public or private, you must secure a
compulsory motor vehicle insurance, which is a requisite before you can register your vehicle.
Purpose: To give immediate financial assistance to victims of motor vehicle accidents and/or
their dependents, especially if they are poor regardless of financial capability of motor vehicle
owners or operators responsible for the accident sustained.
Passenger is any fare paying person being transported and conveyed in and by a motor vehicle
for transportation of passengers for compensation, including persons expressly authorized by
law or by the vehicle's operator or his agents to ride without fare.
Third-Party is any person other than a passenger as defined in this section and shall also
exclude a member of the household, or a member of the family within the second degree of
consanguinity or affinity, of a motor vehicle owner or land transportation operator, as likewise
defined herein, or his employee in respect of death, bodily injury, or damage to property arising
out of and in the course of employment. (Sec. 373 pars. (c) and (d))
“NO FAULT” CLAUSE provides that any claim for death or injury to any passenger or third
party shall be paid without necessity of proving fault or negligence provided the indemnity with
respect to any one person does not exceed P5,000.00 provided the following proofs of loss
under oath are submitted:
If more than P5,000.00 is sought, negligence which is the basis of the award must be
proven in court.
1. Passenger, file claim against insurer of the vehicle he was a passenger of. (Sec. 378
(iii))
2. Pedestrian, file claim against insurer of the directly offending vehicle.
The claimant is not free to choose from which insurer he will claim the “no fault indemnity” as
the law makes it mandatory that the claim shall lie against the insurer of the vehicle in which the
AUTHORIZED DRIVER CLAUSE indemnifies the insured owner against loss or damage to the
car but limits the use of the insured vehicle to the insured himself or any person who drives on
his order or with his permission.
Where a car is admittedly and wrongfully taken without the knowledge and consent of the owner,
such taking constitutes “theft” and it is the theft clause, not the authorized driver clause which
should apply. (Perla Compania vs. CA, 208 SCRA 487)
COOPERATION CLAUSE is a clause in automobile insurance policy which provides that the
insured shall give all such information and assistance as the insurer may require, usually
including attendance at trials or hearings.