Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-versus-
PETITION
PARTIES
FACTS
3.2. Some time ago, the petitioner bought the land through a deed
of sale attached herein as Annex “C.”
3.3 When the Title subject of this case was turned over to herein
petitioner (buyer) by the seller, the same was kept in one of the drawers in
their house.
2
3.5. That time, when the petitioner searched for and discovered that
the last page of the Owner’s Duplicate Copy of TCT No. 042-2013013544 was
missing, petitioner was with his son, herein attorney-in-fact.
3.6. For all legal intents and purposes, the petitioner considered the
Owner’s Duplicate Copy of TCT No. 042-2013013544 as lost.
3.8. A copy of the Affidavit of Loss was then sent to the Register of
Deeds for the Province of Pampanga in order to notify it of the facts
surrounding the loss of the Owner’s Duplicate Copy of TCT No. 042-
2013013544, as evidenced by the corresponding stamped mark found on the
affidavit.
3.9. The Affidavit of Loss was then annotated on the portion for the
Memorandum of Encumbrances found in TCT No. 042-2013013544, the
relevant contents of which are reproduced below for ready reference:
“MEMORANDUM OF ENCUMBRANCES
“LORNA M. SALANGSANG-DEE
“Register of Deeds IV”
3.10. The real property taxes due on the parcel of land, covered by
TCT No. 042-2013013544, have already been fully paid, as evidenced by the
corresponding Official Receipt, Tax Clearance and Tax Declaration of Real
Property, copies of which are attached as Annexes “E,” “F,” and “G,”
respectively.
RELIEF
3
Owner’s Duplicate Copy of TCT No. 042-2013013544 in favor of the petitioner,
through her son and attorney-in-fact, John Paul Macaraig Velasquez.
Such other relief and remedies as may be deemed just and equitable
under the premises are likewise prayed for.
By: