Conversion dT/dt= 5K/min dT/dt= 10K/min

0 0 0
0.1 0.1 0.3
0.2 0.05 0.2
0.3 0.8 1.4
0.4 1.2 2
0.5 1.5 2.4
0.6 1.7 2.7
0.7 1.5 2.4
0.8 1.2 2
0.9 0.8 1.4
1 0 0

Specific Heat Capacity vt= 5K/min vt= 5K/min

0 2.2 2.2
0.1 2 2.1
0.2 0.4 2.05
0.3 0.3 1.4
0.4 0.3 0.4
0.5 0.25 0.25
0.6 0.2 0.2
0.7 0.15 0.15
0.8 0.1 0.1
0.9 0.05 0.05
1 0 0

Time (hrs) Temperature, C

0 13
4 55
5 60
9 55
10 65
14 155
 15 160
25 172
30 172

Time (hrs) Average Conversion

0 0
5 0.4
10 0.65
15 0.95
20 1
25 1
30 1

Time in minutes Viscosity of composite at 50 C

0 0
2 0
4 1.5
5 10
6
8
10
11
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28 Strain-Stress Curve fo
3500

3000
Strain (μe) Stress (Mpa)
0 0 2500
Strain (μe)

2000

1500

1000
 3500

3000

2500
5000 500

Strain (μe)
2000
7500 1000
1500
10000 1500
12500 2000 1000

15000 2500 500

20000 3000 0
20000 2700 0 5000 10000
22000 2850 Stres
22000 2250
23500 2500
23500 1000
dT/dt= 20K/min The kinetic curves
0 6

Conversion Rate (1/s)

0.8 5
0.5 4
3
2
2
3
1
4 0
5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

4.5 Conversion
3.2
dT/dt= 5K/mi n dT/dt= 10K/mi n dT/dt= 20K/mi n
2
0

vt= 5K/min
2.2 Specific Heat vs Conversion
Specifi Heat 10^3 (J/kg-K)

2.2 2.5
2.1 2
2 1.5
1.7 1
0.5
1.4
0
0.3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.15
Conversion
0.1
0.05 vt= 5K/mi n vt= 5K/mi n vt= 5K/mi n
0

Heating Temperature Optimization

200
180
160
140
Temperature, C

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
 180
160
140

Temperature, C
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, hrs

Averaged chart of time conversion

1.2

1
Averaged Conversion

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, hrs

Viscosity of composite at 60 C Viscosity of composite at 70 C Viscosity of composite at 80 C

0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0.5 0.5
2 0.7 0.6
10 2 0.9
7 1
10 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Strain-Stress Curve for Tensile Modulus 11
3500

3000

2500
Strain (μe)

2000

1500

1000
 3500

3000

2500
Strain (μe)

2000

1500

1000

500

0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Stress (Mpa)
 REFERENCES
etic curves Anand, Y. &. (2013). Testing of Composites: A Review. Int
Caba, S. &. (2016). Modeling the viscosity development of
I.M. Daniel, R. L. (1980). New Method for Testing Compo
Ishikawa, T. a. (1982). Stiffness and Strength Behavior of W
Koorevaar, A. F. (2002). Reliable 3D Reactive RTM Simul
N. Kiuna, C. J. (2002). A model for resin viscosity during c
R. Aboulaich, S. B. (2004). A numerical analysis of resin tr
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Sierakowski, R. N. (1971). Dynamic Compressive Strength
Conversion Y. Duan, F. S. (2007). Rheological behavior of a bismaleim

dt= 10K/mi n dT/dt= 20K/mi n

at vs Conversion

0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Conversion

vt= 5K/mi n vt= 5K/mi n

n
 25 30 35

25 30 35

Viscosity Curves
12

10

8
Viscosity (Pa.s)

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Vi s cosi ty of compos i te at 50 C Vi s cosi ty of compos i te at 60 C
Vi s cosi ty of compos i te at 70 C Vi s cosi ty of compos i te at 80 C
 3). Testing of Composites: A Review. International Journal of Advanced Materials Manufacturing & Characterization, 359-364
). Modeling the viscosity development of epoxy resins during injection of the RTM process. PROCEEDINGS OF THE REGION
(1980). New Method for Testing Composites at very high strain rates. Fourth SESA International Congress on Experimentation
982). Stiffness and Strength Behavior of Woven Fabric Composites,. J. Mat. Sci, 3211-3200.
2002). Reliable 3D Reactive RTM Simulation. Proc. on the ISCM. Vollenhove, Nedherland, (p. 12).
002). A model for resin viscosity during cure in the resin transfer moulding process,. Composites Part A, 33.
B. (2004). A numerical analysis of resin transfer molding. J. Condensed Matter, 3-10.
. (1971). Dynamic Compressive Strength and Failure of Steel Reinforced Epoxy Composites. J. Comp. Mat'ls, 362-377.
07). Rheological behavior of a bismaleimide resin system for RTM process. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica.
25 30
e at 60 C
e at 80 C
 & Characterization, 359-364.
CEEDINGS OF THE REGIONAL CONFERENCE GRAZ 2015 .
Congress on Experimentation Mechanics.

omp. Mat'ls, 362-377.

sitae Sinica.