Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: The present study reports the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of the stir zone (SZ) in friction
Reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steel stir welding (FSW) reduced activation ferritic/martensitic (RAFM) steel. The effects of the grain size, retained
Friction stir welding austenite (RA), and precipitates on the SZ tensile properties and impact toughness are discussed. The SZ of the
Stir zone weld exhibits a good balance of strength and ductility at 600 °C temperatures and a slightly decrease of impact
Microstructures
toughness comparing with the base metal (BM). The RA plays a critical role in effecting the ductility and impact
Tensile properties
Impact toughness
toughness of SZ. The influence of RA to the ductility of SZ becomes more effective as the carbon concentration of
RA is increased to 1% or above where the thermal and mechanical stabilities are improved. The highly dispersed
and refined MX carbonitrides and M3C carbides during FSW are good for the ductility and impact toughness of
SZ as well. It indicates the SZ of FSW RAFM steel weld has the potential to have good mechanical properties.
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: leicui@tju.edu.cn (L. Cui).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.043
Received 28 January 2018; Received in revised form 9 April 2018; Accepted 12 May 2018
Available online 14 May 2018
0921-5093/ © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
3. Mathematical model Ar
Si = [(1−δ ) ητ + δμf PN ](ωr − U1sinθ)
V (6)
3.1. Governing equations where Ar is any small area on the tool–base metal interface. r is the
radial distance of the center of the area from the axis. V is the control-
The conservation of the momentum equation in index form is ex- volume enclosing the area. θ is the angle with the negative x-axis in the
pressed as follows [23]: counter-clockwise direction. η is the mechanical efficiency which is
assumed to be 0.5 guided by the range of the previous work in FSW
Fig. 1. Dimensions and positions of tensile and impact toughness testing samples in the weld.
258
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
Table 2
Thermo-physical properties of the RAFM steel [27].
Temperature/K 298 373 473 573 673 773 873
−1 −1
Specific heat capacity/J kg K 430 478 520 561 625 689 776
Thermal conductivity/W m−1 K−1 26.3 26.2 26.2 25.8 25.6 25.0 24.6
Table 3
Properties and parameters used in the simulation.
Properties and Parameters Value
process [28,29]. δ is the fractional slip between the tool and the base In this model, the heat flux was added to FLUENT by the user-de-
metal interface. μf represents the coefficient of friction. ω is the angular fined-functions (UDF). The walls of the filled hole were set as the
velocity of tool and PN is the normal pressure on the surface. The ve- coupling walls and the other walls were all assumed to be the no-slip
locity (ωr −U1sinθ ) represents the local velocity of a point on the tool boundary condition. The simulation was started when the tool reached
with the origin fixed at the tool axis. a valued of 4.7 mm. Before this, a temperature field had formed. This
The heat generated at the interface between the vertical and hor- temperature field obtained from a steady calculation was considered as
izontal surfaces of the tool and the base metal, Si, may be defined as an initialization for later calculations.
heat flux, q1, and can be expressed as: Heat exchange occurred both at the top and at the side surfaces of
the base metal outlet. The thermal boundary conditions including the
q1 = [(1−δ ) ητ + δμf PN ](ωr − U1sinθ) (in the range of r < Rp) (7) heat convection and radiation were expressed by the following equa-
tions:
where RP is the pin radius. At the shoulder–base metal interface, a
∂T
significant amount of heat will be transported to the tool material. −k |top = σε (T 4 − Ta4 ) + ht (T − Ta)
∂z (9)
Thus, the rate of heat generation due to friction and plastic work at the
shoulder–base metal interface, q2, may be written as:
∂T
JB −k |side = σε (T 4 − Ta4 ) + hs (T − Ta)
q2 = (in the range of Rp < r < Rs ) ∂z (10)
JB + JT (8)
where σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, ε is the external emissivity,
where J represents the transported extent of heat generated at the as shown in Table 3, and hs and ht are the heat transfer coefficient of
shoulder–base metal interface or the effusivity of the material. The 30 W m−2 K−1. At the bottom surface, the heat transfer coefficient hb of
subscripts B and T denote the base metal and the tool, respectively. 50 W m−2 K−1 was used:
Fig. 2. The computed temperature profiles on the top surface of the workpiece under different conditions: (a) SZ-200, (b) SZ-300 and (c) SZ-400.
259
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
Fig. 4. The SEM observations of microstructure in BM and SZ: (a)-(d) BM, SZ-200, SZ-300 and SZ-400, respectively.
Fig. 5. The TEM observations of microstructure in BM and SZ: (a)-(d) are for BM, SZ-200, SZ-300 and SZ-400, respectively.
260
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
4. Results
261
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
Fig. 8. TEM observations of retained austenite (RA) in BM and SZ samples in bright-field and dark-field modes: (a) the morphology of RA in BM, (b) the corre-
sponding diffraction pattern of RA, (c)-(d) for the RA in sample SZ-200, (e)-(f) for the RA in sample SZ-300, and (g)-(h) for the RA in SZ-400, respectively.
the main reasons for grain refining in SZ when FSW for RAFM steels. involves the recrystallization of ferrite, but non allotropy transforma-
The literatures proposed that, when using different welding para- tions of iron [37]. The previous works and simulation results proved
meters, the peak temperature during FSW for steels may be in a very that when FSW for RAFM steel with a W-Re tool and a relatively low
wide range from lower than the AC1 point to higher than the AC3 point rotational speed (200 rpm in this study), the peak temperature in SZ is
[35–37]. For ferritic steels, an extremely low welding peak temperature more likely to be in a temperature range of AC1~AC3. When applying
below the AC1 point, can be achieved by using a polycrystalline cubic higher rotational speed (300 rpm or above), the peak temperature in SZ
boron nitride tool combined with very low rotational speed. In such may exceed the AC3 point easily [38]. This is believed as the main
situation, the steels could be welded without any phase transformations reason for the difference on grain structures of SZ in different welding
by means of the absence of transformations from α to γ in heating stage parameters.
and from γ to α in cooling stage. It refers to that when the peak tem-
perature is below AC1, the microstructural evolution in SZ merely
262
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
263
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
Fig. 10. The TEM observations of precipitates: (a)&(b) M23C6 and MX in BM, (c) MX in SZ-300, (d)-(f) M3C in SZ-200, SZ-300 and SZ-400, respectively, and (g) EDS
result of M3C.
the impact toughness might be decreased. When FSW with 400 rpm may also lead to an increase of high temperature strength whereas a
rotational speed, the impact toughness of SZ reaches the minimum of decrease of impact absorbed energy.
26.95 J. The above results indicate that the FSW process can reduce the The improved high temperature strength of SZ is associated with the
SZ impact toughness to 90–95% of the BM when using a rotational martensitic transformation during FSW. As is revealed in Fig. 5, instead
speed lower than 300 rpm. A further increase of rotational speed to of tempered martensite in BM, the microstructure in SZ might transform
400 rpm or higher may lead to an obvious reduction of impact tough- to lath martensite substantially after FSW (a volume fraction more than
ness of SZ. 93%). Because the lath martensite is normally harder than tempered
martensite, the SZ could have much higher strength than BM. The in-
5. Discussion crease trend of high temperature strength of SZ samples is also close
related to the fraction of transformed martensite caused by the increase
Table 4 summarizes the main results for tensile and impact prop- of rotational speed. As discussed above, increasing the rotational speed
erties and the key microstructural aspects of the SZ samples obtained in of FSW may increase the welding peak temperature and cooling rate in
this study. Clearly, the obtained SZ properties show obvious correla- SZ. As a result, the difference value between the initial cooling tem-
tions with the microstructural aspects, including the amount of RA, perature and the Ms point is enlarged (T0-Ms), which could enhance the
prior austenite size and martensite size. It is found that, the decrease of driving force of martensitic transformation. Therefore, when the vo-
RA fraction is SZ results in a simultaneous increase of high temperature lume fraction of transformed martensite and internal stress caused by
strength and ductility, but a decrease of impact toughness. Moreover, martensitic transformation and growth are increased, the strength of SZ
the increase of the sizes for martensitic laths and prior austenite grains is consequentially enhanced. In addition, as the fraction of transformed
264
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
Fig. 11. (a) Stress-strain curves and (b) correlation data of tensile properties correlation data test at 600 °C for samples BM, SZ-200, SZ-300 and SZ-400.
265
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
266
C. Zhang et al. Materials Science & Engineering A 729 (2018) 257–267
in quenched and partitioned steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 710 (2018) 181–191. [49] W. Cui, M. Gintalas, P.E.J. Rivera-Diaz-del-Castillo, Stability of retained austenite in
[44] T. Miura, R. Ueji, H. Fujii, H. Komine, J. Yanagimoto, Stabilization of austenite in martensitic high carbon steels. Part II: mechanical stability, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 711
low carbon Cr–Mo steel by high speed deformation during friction stir welding, (2018) 696–703.
Mater. Des. 90 (2016) 915–921. [50] J.S. Yoon, S.-K. Kim, E.H. Lee, H.G. Jin, D.W. Lee, S. Cho, Mechanical properties of
[45] S. Noh, M. Ando, H. Tanigawa, H. Fujii, A. Kimura, Friction stir welding of F82H ARAA steel after electron beam welding, Fusion. Eng. Des. 124 (2017) 774–778.
steel for fusion applications, J. Nucl. Mater. 478 (2016) 1–6. [51] J.J. Vora, V.J. Badheka, Experimental investigation on microstructure and me-
[46] X. Li, L. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Yuan, R.D. Kumar, Misra, Influence of original austenite chanical properties of activated TIG welded reduced activation ferritic/martensitic
grain size on tensile properties of a high-manganese transformation-induced plas- steel joints, J. Manuf. Process. 25 (2017) 85–93.
ticity (TRIP) steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea. [52] C.R. Das, S.K. Albert, S. Sam, P. Mastanaiah, G.M.S.K. Chaitanya, A.K. Bhaduri,
2017.12.107. et al., Mechanical properties of 9Cr–1W reduced activation ferritic martensitic steel
[47] A. Arlazarov, M. Ollat, J.P. Masse, M. Bouzat, Influence of partitioning on me- weldment prepared by electron beam welding process, Fusion. Eng. Des. 89 (2014)
chanical behavior of Q&P steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 661 (2016) 79–86. 2672–2678.
[48] W. Cui, D. San-Martín, P.E.J. Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, Stability of retained austenite [53] V. Thomas Paul, S. Saroja, S.K. Albert, T. Jayakumar, K.E. Rajendra, Microstructural
in martensitic high carbon steels. Part I: thermal stability, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 711 characterization of weld joints of 9Cr reduced activation ferritic martensitic steel
(2018) 683–695. fabricated by different joining methods, Mater. Charact. 96 (2014) 213–224.
267