Q.1 Should company managers in Saudi Arabic abide by Saudi norms governing the treatment of women? Should they accept the culture’s refusal to recognize human rights or should they try to initiate reform? Why? Ans: Every company could set their own culture rules as long as it is still inside the company. But the company also has to considered about the culture outside their territory. They must respect to the Arab culture because they will meet and cooperate with Arabian people. As for the treatment to woman, they should make rules that combined their western perspective and Arab perspective. The company cannot enforce things, which they think is right. Q.2 Should company managers raise objections to those practices that appeared highly immoral to them or should they quietly go along with these practices? Ans: Combine the practices within American company with practices that exist in Saudi Arabia. The company should negotiate the acceptable moral standard with the Arabians to avoid any damages that will be felt by the company and Saudi Arabia society. Q.3 Does the case support ethical relativism or does it suggest that there are certain things that are wrong no matter what, or neither of these positions? Ans: Ethical relativism is the theory that, because different societies have different ethical beliefs, there is no rational way of determining whether people of this or that society believe it is morally right or wrong. No, that are wrong no matter what.