You are on page 1of 6

CRITERIA RESTRUCTURING REENGINEERING

Concern for Who? • Restructuring is concerned primarily with • Reengineering is concerned more w
shareholder well-being rather than employee and customer well-being th
employee well-being. shareholder well-being.

Other Names • Restructuring—also called downsizing, • Reengineering—also called proc


rightsizing, or delayering— management, process innovation, or proc
redesign—

Process • Involves reducing the size of the firm in • Involves reconfiguring or redesigning wo
terms of number of employees, number of jobs, and processes for the purpose
divisions or units, and number of improving cost, quality, service, and speed.
hierarchical levels in the firm’s
organizational structure. • The focus of reengineering is changing t
way work is actually carried out.
• This reduction in size is intended to
improve both efficiency and effectiveness. Example

• Recall that benchmarking simply involves • Developed by Motorola in 1986 and ma


comparing a firm against the best firms in famous by CEO Jack Welch at General Elect
the industry on a wide variety of and more recently by Robert Nardelli, form
performance related criteria. CEO of Home Depot, Six Sigma is a quali
boosting process improvement techniq
• Some benchmarking ratios commonly that entails training several key persons
used in rationalizing the need for the firm in the techniques to monit
restructuring are headcount-to-sales- measure, and improve processes a
volume, or corporate-staff-to-operating- eliminate defects.
employees, or span-of-control figures.
• Six Sigma has been widely applied acro
Example industries from retailing to financial service

• Recessionary economic conditions have • CEO Dave Cote at Honeywell and CEO J
forced many European companies to Immelt at General Electric spurr
downsize, laying off managers and acceptance of Six Sigma, which aims
employees. improve work processes and eliminate wa
by training “select” employees who are giv
• This was almost unheard of prior to the judo titles such as Master Black Belts, Bla
mid-1990s because European labor unions Belts, and Green Belts.
and laws required lengthy negotiations or
huge severance checks before workers • Six Sigma was criticized in a 2007 Wall Stre
could be terminated. Journal article that cited many example fir
whose stock price fell for a number of ye
• In contrast to the United States, labor after adoption of Six Sigma.
union executives of large European firms
sit on most boards of directors. • The technique’s reliance on the special gro
of trained employees is problematic and
• Job security in European companies is use within retail firms such as Home Dep
slowly moving toward a U.S. scenario, in has not been as successful as
which firms lay off almost at will. manufacturing firms.

• From banks in Milan to factories in


Mannheim, European employers are
starting to show people the door in an
effort to streamline operations, increase
efficiency, and compete against already
slim and trim U.S. firms.

• Massive U.S.-style layoffs are still rare in


Europe, but unemployment rates
throughout the continent are rising quite
rapidly.

• European firms still prefer to downsize by


attrition and retirement rather than by
blanket layoffs because of culture, laws,
and unions.
Organizational • Restructuring is concerned with • Reengineering does not usually affect t
structure eliminating or establishing, shrinking or organizational structure or chart, nor does
enlarging, and moving organizational imply job loss or employee layoffs.
departments and divisions.
• The argument for a firm engaging in
reengineering usually goes as follows : Man
companies historically have been organized
vertically by business function.

• This arrangement has led over time to


managers’ and employees’ mind-sets being
defined by their particular functions rather
than by overall customer service, product
quality, or corporate performance.

• The logic is that all firms tend to


bureaucratize over time.

• As routines become entrenched, turf


becomes delineated and defended, and
politics takes precedence over performance
• Walls that exist in the physical workplace ca
be reflections of “mental” walls.
Duration • Restructuring is characterized by strategic • Reengineering is characterized by ma
(long-term, affecting all business tactical (short-term, business-functio
functions) decisions. specific) decisions.

Implementation • Firms often employ restructuring when • In reengineering, a firm uses information
various ratios appear out of line with technology to break down functional barrie
competitors as determined through and create a work system based on busines
benchmarking exercises. processes, products, or outputs rather than
on functions or inputs.

• Cornerstones of reengineering are


decentralization, reciprocal interdependenc
and information sharing.

• The Wall Street Journal noted that


reengineering today must go beyond
knocking down internal walls that keep par
of a company from cooperating effectively.

• It must also knock down the external walls


that prohibit or discourage cooperation wit
other firms—even rival firms.

Example

• A firm that exemplifies complete informatio


sharing is Springfield Remanufacturing
Corporation, which provides to all employe
a weekly income statement of the firm, as
well as extensive information on other
companies’ performances.
Benefits • The primary benefit sought from • A benefit of reengineering is that it offers
restructuring is cost reduction. For some employees the opportunity to see more
highly bureaucratic firms, restructuring clearly how their particular jobs affect the
can actually rescue the firm from global final product or service being marketed by
competition and demise. the firm.

• Managers today manage more people


spread over different locations, travel
more, manage diverse functions, and are
change agents even when they have
nothing to do with the creation of the plan
or disagree with its approach.

Downsides • But the downside of restructuring can be, Reengineering can also raise manager and
reduced employee commitment, employee anxiety, which, unless calmed, ca
creativity, and innovation that lead to corporate trauma.
accompanies the uncertainty and trauma
associated with pending and actual
employee layoffs.

• Another downside of restructuring is that


many people today do not aspire to
become managers, and many present-day
managers are trying to get off the
management track.

• Restructuring in many firms has made a


manager’s job an invisible, thankless role.

• Managing others historically led to


enhanced career mobility, financial
rewards, and executive perks.

• In today’s global, more competitive,


restructured arena, managerial jobs
demand more hours and headaches with
fewer financial rewards.

Example

• Sentiment against joining management


ranks is higher today than ever.

• About 80 percent of employees say they


want nothing to do with management, a
major shift from just a decade ago when
60 to 70 percent hoped to become
managers.

• More workers today are self-managed,


entrepreneurs, interpreneurs, or team-
managed.

• Managers today need to be counselors,


motivators, financial advisors, and
psychologists.

• They also run the risk of becoming


technologically behind in their areas of
expertise.

• Employers today are looking for people


who can do things, not for people who
make other people do things.
Imagery • “Dilbert” cartoons commonly portray • A maker of disposable diapers echoes this
managers as enemies or as morons. need differently when it says that to be
successful “cooperation at the firm must
stretch from stump to rump.”
Example From • Avon Products restructured in 2011 partly • Hewlett Packard is a good example of a
Textbook due to corruption investigation in its company that has knocked down the extern
Russia and Brazil operations. barriers to cooperation and practices mode
• The company reduced its six commercial reengineering.
business units down to - (1) Developed • The HP of today shares its forecast with all
Market and (2) Developing Market – in its supply-chain partners.
essence going to a divisional by • Shares other critical information with its
geographic region type structure. distributors and other stakeholders.
• Avon has been reporting lower sales and • HP Does all the buying of resin for its many
profits amid missteps in key markets. manufacturers, giving it a volume discount
• CEO Andrea Jung is installing five new up to 5 percent.
regional heads and new presidents in • HP has established many alliances and
Avon’s U.S and Russia markets. cooperative agreement.
Example From Adidas From Textbook Other Source

• ADIDAS-Salomon Group (2005) Example 1


 ADIDAS sell Salomon to Amer • The Adidas product line includes more
Sports in 2005 but keeping the than 20,000 items, from soccer and inli
Taylor-Made brand as it is the skates to outdoor jackets and
only stable part of Salomon. snowboards, with thousands of produc
 Decision for this restructuring as variations.
the group has lacked the scale to • To keep up with market demand and
make a big push into the winter competition, the company changes its
sports market during a global product range twice a year.
decline in demand for ski • The change in the product range depen
equipment. more often on the availability of the ne
 The France-based Salomon group technologies and the also on the produ
also been hit by the rising value of range and technology of the competitio
the Euro. The first-quarter • Adidas also designs product for local,
operating losses widened from vertical and niche markets.
€16m in previous year to €25m.
 Adidas CEO, Herbet Hainer said,
“Now is the time to focus even Example 2
more on our core strength in the  Over the past 15 years, Adidas-Salomon
athletic sportswear and apparel transformed itself from a manufacturin
market as well as the growing golf organization to a global sports brand
category”. manager with 14,000 employees locate
 The restructuring involves the loss around the world.
of 160 French jobs.  Previously, Adidas-Salomon operated in
decentralized manner, and each
Other Sources operating unit chose software that suit
• Taylor Made-Adidas Golf (2014) its geography and internal preferences.
 Taylor Made-Adidas Golf s’ CEO, Ben  The company believed that implementi
Sharpe announced a restructuring of and creating common processes,
the company’s product teams (Taylor especially in its sales organization, wou
Made and Adams brands). help it establish global direction,
 Part of new strategy called “Playbook streamline and automate its business.
3.0”  Operations thereby improving flexibility
 This strategy is focused on making the scalability, and visibility across the
company more efficient. extended enterprise.
 Move Adams from Plano, TX to
Carlsbad, CA.
 Adidas realigned the resources to
ensure innovation was at the core for
all new products.
 Sean Toulon, Executive VP of Product
Creation team, will oversee all
product design for Taylor Made and
Adams.
 George Talge, VP of Global Product
Strategy, will manage all strategy and
product lines.

You might also like