Professional Documents
Culture Documents
26 09 19
Notes
SL. THE HINDU
TOPICS
NO. PAGE NO.
Personal
Notes
P
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
Title 2. Modi Pitches for India’s NSG entry (The Hindu, Page 01)
Syllabus Mains: GS Paper II – International Relations
Theme Groupings
Highlights Context: Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a pitch for India’s membership of the Nuclear Suppliers
Group (NSG) at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum where he delivered the keynote address. PM
highlighted that because India is not a member of NSG, it becomes very difficult for India to get the fuel
for producing nuclear energy.
The Problem: The NSG controls most of the world’s nuclear trade. While the U.S. and other countries
support India’s entry into the NSG, China has opposed it saying India has not signed the Nuclear Non
Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Non-Proliferation Treaty
• The NPT is a multilateral treaty aimed at limiting the spread of nuclear weapons including three
elements: (1) non-proliferation, (2) disarmament, and (3) peaceful use of nuclear energy.
• These elements constitute a “grand bargain” between the five nuclear weapon states and the non-
nuclear weapon states.
1. States without nuclear weapons will not acquire them
2. States with nuclear weapons will pursue disarmament
3. All states can access nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, under safeguards.
• Nuclear & Non-Nuclear Weapon States - The Treaty defines nuclear weapon states (NWS) as
those that had manufactured and detonated a nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January 1967.
All the other states are therefore considered non-nuclear weapon states (NNWS). The five
nuclear weapon states are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
• Non-Proliferation - (Articles I, II, III): Nuclear weapon states are not to transfer to any recipient
whatsoever nuclear weapons and not to assist, encourage, or induce any NNWS to manufacture
or otherwise acquire them. Non-nuclear weapons states are not to receive nuclear weapons from
any transferor, and are not to manufacture or acquire them. NNWS must accept the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards on all nuclear materials on their territories or under
their control.
• Disarmament - (Articles VI): All Parties must pursue negotiations in good faith on effective
measures relating to the cessation of the nuclear arms race and to nuclear disarmament, and on a
treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.
• The Treaty entered into force in 1970. P5 are also members of NPT.
• To further the goal of non-proliferation and as a confidence-building measure between States
parties, the Treaty establishes a safeguards system under the responsibility of the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Safeguards are used to verify compliance with the Treaty
through inspections conducted by the IAEA. The Treaty promotes cooperation in the field of
peaceful nuclear technology and equal access to this technology for all States parties, while
safeguards prevent the diversion of fissile material for weapons use.
• Despite 191 states joining NPT, India, Israel and Pakistan have not signed NPT of which all have
nuclear weapons.
Why India did sign NPT?
• India refused to sign NPT because India believes that NPT discriminates between nuclear
weapon states and non-nuclear weapon states.
• The NPT defines “nuclear weapons states” as those that tested devices before 1967, which means
India cannot be a nuclear weapon states as per NPT.
• No fixed timelines have been mentioned for disarmament even for nucleared weapon states.
• NPT is unfair treaty as nuclear weapon states have no obligation to give them up while non-
nuclear states are not allowed to have them.
About Nuclear Supplier Group
• The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a group of nuclear supplier countries (“NSG Participating
Governments”) that seeks to contribute to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons through the
implementation of two sets of guidelines for their nuclear exports and nuclear-related exports.
• The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) was created following the explosion in 1974 of a nuclear
device by a non-nuclear-weapon State, which demonstrated that nuclear technology transferred
for peaceful purposes could be misused.
• The NSG Guidelines also contain the so-called “Non-Proliferation Principle,” adopted in 1994,
whereby a supplier, notwithstanding other provisions in the NSG Guidelines, authorises a
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
transfer only when satisfied that the transfer would not contribute to the proliferation of nuclear
weapons. A non-NPT state cannot be a member of NSG.
NSG Participant
• This term is interchangeable with “NSG Participating Government” (PG), i.e. a government that
participates in the NSG. Since the NSG is not a treaty-based organisation, the use of “member”
or “Member State” is not used in the NSG.
• There are currently 48 Participating Governments (PGs) of the NSG. The European Commission
and the Chair of the Zangger Committee participate as observers.
NSG Guidelines – Part 1 & 2
• The NSG Part 1 Guidelines govern the export of items that are especially designed or prepared
for nuclear use. These include: (i) nuclear material; (ii) nuclear reactors and equipment therefor;
(iii) non-nuclear material for reactors; (iv) plants and equipment for the reprocessing, enrichment
and conversion of nuclear material and for fuel fabrication and heavy water production; and (v)
technology (including software) associated with each of the above items. These items are known
as Trigger List Items as the transfer of an item triggers safeguards.
• The NSG Part 2 Guidelines govern the export of nuclear-related dual-use items and technologies,
that is, items that can make a major contribution to an unsafeguarded nuclear fuel cycle or
nuclear explosive activity; but that have non-nuclear uses as well, for example in industry. These
items are known as Dual-Use Items.
• Part 2 guidelines were created in 1991and 1992 after it became apparent that export control
provisions then in force had not prevented one state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons (NPT) from pursuing a clandestine nuclear weapons programme. A large part of
this clandestine nuclear weapons programme effort had been to acquire dual-use items not covered
by the NSG Guidelines and then use these items to build Trigger List items.
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
Personal
Notes
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
Quality of Human Resources: Unlike the IT Sector, the Biotechnology sector in India has failed to create
sufficient amount of employment opportunities. This is inspite of having large English speaking workforce,
low wages and large institutional base.
Most of the jobs in biotech sector are filled by experienced and skilled scientists leaving the demand for
young and inexperienced ones low. Further, the biotech sector requires a disciplined work culture and
documentation practice due to regulatory and intellectual property filing requirement. This has in turn
hindered the biotech sector from attracting young talent. It is to be noted that China has been able to attract
a large number of youths towards the biotech sector by creating a conducive ecosystem. It has built a large
number of high quality labs supported by more number of skilled human resources trained in regimental
work culture and documentation.
India needs to learn from Boston and Silicon Valley in USA which have emerged as hotbeds in the field of
Biotechnology. Apart from availability of funds, infrastructure and skilled workforce, the presence of top
notch research institutions and universities in the vicinity make these two places attractive locations for
biotech startup companies.
The Government has to realise that the culture of innovation cannot be improved without focussing on
research and development in the universities. The R&D within the Indian Universities can be improved in
the following manner:
• Allow scientists from universities to incubate start-up companies in their labs. This ensures that
the technology is incubated, refined and tested for years in the academic labs before it is released
in the market.
• Allow scientists to take unpaid leave to join Industry for a fixed period. Appoint researchers from
Industry to be appointed as Faculties in the Universities. Both these steps would improve Industry-
Academia collaboration.
Way forward
As stated before, the Biotechnology sector can well solve some of the most pressing problems of our society.
It would be a mistake on our part to look at this sector only through the lens of employment creation. Moving
forward, the need for AI and Big Data in the field of Biology would enable India to leverage its strength in
IT and provide greater thrust to the biotech sector.
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
Personal
Notes
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
Title 4. New IPCC Report Warns of Dire Threat to Oceans – (The Hindu, Page 09)
Syllabus Mains: GS Paper III: Environment and Ecology
Theme Climate Change (Global Warming and Ocean Acidification)
Highlights IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate
The IPCC Special Report is a key scientific input for world leaders gathering in forthcoming climate and
environment negotiations, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference
(COP25) in Chile in December
The ocean and the cryosphere – the frozen parts of the planet – play a critical role for life on Earth. A total
of 670 million people in high mountain regions and 680 million people in low-lying coastal zones depend
directly on these systems. Four million people live permanently in the Arctic region, and small island
developing states are home to 65 million people
The report provides new evidence for the benefits of limiting global warming to the lowest possible level
– in line with the goal that governments set themselves in the 2015 Paris Agreement. Urgently reducing
greenhouse gas emissions limits the scale of ocean and cryosphere changes. Ecosystems and the
livelihoods that depend on them can be preserved.
• People in mountain regions are increasingly exposed to hazards and changes in water availability,
• Glaciers, snow, ice and permafrost are declining and will continue to do so. This is projected to
increase hazards for people, for example through landslides, avalanches, rockfalls and floods.
• As mountain glaciers retreat, they are also altering water availability and quality downstream,
with implications for many sectors such as agriculture and hydropower.
• Sea level will continue to rise for centuries. It could reach around 30-60 cm by 2100 even if
greenhouse gas emissions are sharply reduced and global warming is limited to well below 2°C,
but around 60-110 cm if greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase strongly.
• Increases in tropical cyclone winds and rainfall are exacerbating extreme sea level events and
coastal hazards.
• Hazards will be further be intensified by an increase in the average intensity, magnitude of storm
surge and precipitation rates of tropical cyclones, especially if greenhouse gas emissions remain
high.
• Warming and changes in ocean chemistry are already disrupting species throughout the ocean
food web, with impacts on marine ecosystems and people that depend on them
• Ocean warming reduces mixing between water layers and, as a consequence, the supply of
oxygen and nutrients for marine life.
• Marine heatwaves have doubled in frequency since 1982 and are increasing in intensity. They are
projected to further increase in frequency, duration, extent and intensity.
• Their frequency will be 20 times higher at 2°C warming, compared to pre-industrial levels. They
would occur 50 times more often if emissions continue to increase strongly.
• The ocean has taken up between 20 to 30% of human-induced carbon dioxide emissions since the
1980s, causing ocean acidification. Continued carbon uptake by the ocean by 2100 will
exacerbate ocean acidification.
• Ocean warming and acidification, loss of oxygen and changes in nutrient supplies, are already
affecting the distribution and abundance of marine life in coastal areas, in the open ocean and at
the sea floor
• Shifts in the distribution of fish populations have reduced the global catch potential. In the future,
some regions, notably tropical oceans, will see further decreases, but there will be increases in
others, such as the Arctic. Communities that depend highly on seafood may face risks to
nutritional health and food security.
Personal
Notes
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes
Personal Notes
Dated: 26.Sep.2019 DNS Notes