30 Major Doctrines in Remedial Law to remember always - http://www.projectjurisprudence.

com/

See - Lawyers NEVER Forget 30 Major Doctrines in Remedial Law -

http://www.projectjurisprudence.com/2017/12/lawyers-never-forget-30-major-doctrines.html

"x x x.

The following are basic doctrines, principles, rules and theories in remedial law that all law students and
bar candidates should remember.

[1] AUTER ACTION PENDANT: It refers to the situation where two actions are pending between the same
parties for the same cause of action, so that one of them becomes unnecessary and vexatious. It is
based on the policy against multiplicity of suits.

[2] BERRY RULE: Filing of motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence which cannot be
produced in court despite exercise of due diligence, and if considered would probably alter the outcome
of the case.

[3] BUBBLE BURST THEORY: The rule on presumption of law shall not apply in case there is evidence to
the contrary.

----[4] CHAIN OF CUSTODY: Is "the duly recorded authorized movements and custody of seized drugs or
controlled chemicals or plant sources of dangerous drugs or laboratory equipment of each stage, from
the time of seizure/confiscation to receipt in the forensic laboratory to safekeeping to presentation in
court for destruction." (see also: People vs. Alivio, G.R. No. 177771, May 30, 2011). ok

-----[5] CONTINUING THREAT: In order that writ of amparo can be issued, the threat on the right to life
liberty or security must be actual and continuing and not merely imaginary, thereby depriving the
petitioner of his said right from the inception up to the termination of the case. ok

[6] FALSA DEMONSTRATIO NON NOCET: It is a rule which states that where there are two descriptions in
a deed, the one as it were, super added to the other, and one description being complete and sufficient
in itself, and the other which is subordinate and super added is incorrect, the incorrect description or
feature or circumstance of the description is rejected as a surplusage, and the complete and correct
description is allowed to stand alone. (Please see: Myers vs. Ladd, 26 Ill, 515, 417)

------[7] FRESH PERIOD: It is a procedural law as it prescribes a fresh period of 15 days within which an
appeal may be made in the event that the motion for reconsideration is denied by the lower court.
Following the rule on retroactivity of procedural laws, the “fresh period rule” should be applied to
pending actions, such as the present case. (Priscilla Alma Jose vs. Ramon Javellana, et al., G.R. No.
158239, January 25, 2012) ok
-----[8] FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE: The warrant issued by the judge did not comply with the
requisites of the law, and therefore, void, or when the search made without warrant is unjustifiable,
whether it is found or discovered afterwards, cannot be used as evidence against the suspect. The items
or articles obtained are the “fruits of a poisoned tree.”(People vs. Burgos, 144 SCRA 1; People vs.
Montilla, 285 SCRA 703; Manalili vs. CA, 280 SCRA 400) ok

----[9] HYPOTHETICAL ADMISSION or PRESUMPTION OF TRUTH: When a motion to dismiss is filed, the
material allegations of the complaint are deemed to be hypothetically admitted. This hypothetical
admission, extends not only from the relevant and material facts well pleaded in the complaint, but also
to inferences that may be fairly deduced from them. (The Municipality of Hagonoy, Bulcan, et al. vs.
Hon. Simeon Dumdum, Jr., G.R. No. 168289, March 22, 2010) ok

-----[10] IMMUTABILITY OF JUDGMENT: Once the judgment becomes final and executory, it can no
longer be amended, set aside, or disturbed ok

[11] INDEPENDENT RELEVANT STATEMENT: Regardless of the truth or falsity of a statement, when what
is relevant is the fact that such statement has been made, the hearsay rule does not apply and the
statement may be shown. (Jose Espinelia.k.aDaniloEspineli vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No.
179535, June 9, 2014)

-----[12] INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were independently
made without collusion, are identical with each other in their material respects and confirmatory of the
other. They are, therefore, also admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused
implicated therein to show the probability of the latter’s actual participation in the commission of the
crime. ok

[13] JUDICIAL COURTESY: “[d]ue respect for the Supreme Court and practical and ethical considerations
should have prompted the appellate court wait for the final determination of the petition [for certiorari]
before taking cognizance of the case and trying to render moot exactly what was before this [C]ourt.”
The principle of judicial courtesy applies only “if there is a strong probability that the issues before the
higher court would be rendered moot and moribund as a result of the continuation of the proceedings
in the lower court.”(Juan Trajano aka Johnny vs. Uniwide Sales Warehouse ClubG.R. 190253, June 11,
2014)

-----[14] LAW OF THE CASE: It has been defined as the opinion delivered on a former appeal, and means,
more specifically, that whatever is once irrevocably established as the controlling legal rule of decision
between the same parties in the same case continues to be the law of the case, whether correct on
general principles or not, so long as the facts on which such decision was predicated continue to be the
facts of the case before the court. ok

[15] MATERIAL DATES: Under the material dates rule, a petition must alleged three (3) material dates
which is necessary which are as follows: 1) The date when the judgment or final order or resolution was
received; 2) The date when the motion for reconsideration or new trial was filed; and 3) The date when
the notice of the denial thereof was received. (Great Southern Maritime Services Corporation vs. Acuna,
452 SCRA 422, February 28, 2005)

[16] NON-PROSEQUITUR: Once a case is dismissed for failure to prosecute, the dismissal has the effect
of an adjudication on the merits and is understood to be with prejudice to the filing of another action
unless otherwise provided in the order of dismissal.

[17] NON-SUITED: Failure of the plaintiff to appear on the scheduled pre-trial conference would result to
the dismissal of the case with prejudice, unless otherwise ordered by the court to be without prejudice.

[18] PARTY AUTONOMY: Parties have the freedom to expressly stipulate or agree by virtue of written
agreement on how their disputes will be settled by submitting their differences to an arbitrator before
an action may be commenced in court.

[19] PRESUMED IDENTITY APPROACH: Where a foreign law is not pleaded or, even if pleaded, is not
proved, the presumption is that foreign law is the same as ours. (ATCI Overseas Corporation, Amalia G.
Ikdal And Ministry Of Public Health-Kuwait Vs. Ma. JosefaEchin, G.R. No. 178551, October 11, 2010)

------[20] PRIMARY JURISDICTION: When an administrative body is clothed with original and exclusive
jurisdiction, courts are utterly without power and authority to exercise concurrently such jurisdiction.
Accordingly, all the proceedings of the court in violation of that doctrine and all orders and decisions
reached are null and void. (Manolito Agra, et al., vs. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 167807, December
6, 2011) ok

----[21] RECOUPMENT: A compulsory counterclaim arises out of or is connected with the transaction or
occurrence constituting the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim which does not require the
presence of a third person over whom the court cannot acquired jurisdiction; ok

[22] RELAXED ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE : In the proper resolution of the case, the court has the
discretion to admit a rather inadmissible evidence provided it has a relation to other evidence already
presented which is relevant to the fact in issue in the case.

[23] RES JUDICATA IN PRISON GREY: Accused cannot be twice put in jeopardy of an offense, acquittal or
conviction in either one will bar the prosecution for another offense, or his was terminated without the
express consent of the accused.

[24] SET-OFF: A permissive counterclaim does not arise out of and is not connected with the transaction
or occurrence constituting the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim which required the presence
of a third person for its adjudication;
------[25] SEXUAL ABUSE SHIELD: The following evidence is not admissible in any criminal proceeding
involving alleged child sexual abuse: (1) Evidence offered to prove that the alleged victim engaged in
other sexual behavior; and(2) Evidence offered to prove the sexual predisposition of the alleged victim.
(b) Exception.— Evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior by the alleged victim to prove that a
person other than the accused was the source of semen, injury, or other physical evidence shall be
admissible. ok

[26] STATUTE OF NON-CLAIMS: Immediately after granting letters testamentary or administration, the
court shall issue a notice requiring all persons having money claims against the decedent to file them in
the office of the clerk of court which shall state the time of the filing of the claim against estate, which
shall not be more than twelve (12) months but less than six (6) months after the date of first publication
of the notice, but before distribution is entered, upon application of an unpaid creditor who failed to file
his claim, the court on cause shown may allow the claim to be filed within the time not exceeding one
(10 month.

[27] STRONG ARM OF EQUITY: At times referred to as the “Strong Arm of Equity,” [the Court has]
consistently ruled that there is no power the exercise of which is more delicate and which calls for
greater circumspection than the issuance of an injunction. It should only be extended in cases of great
injury where courts of law cannot afford an adequate or commensurate remedy in damages; “in cases of
extreme urgency; where the right is very clear; where considerations of relative inconvenience bear
strongly in complainant’s favor; where there is a willful and unlawful invasion of plaintiff’s right against
his protest and remonstrance, the injury being a continuing one, and where the effect of the mandatory
injunction is rather to re-establish and maintain a pre-existing continuing relation between the parties,
recently and arbitrarily interrupted by the defendant, than to establish a new relation.”(Thunder
Security and Investigation Agency vs. National Food Authority, supra)

-------[28] TRANSCENDENTAL IMPORTANCE: Suspension of the rules of procedure in case the subject
matter of the action is of great importance/involving national interest;ok

[29] TWO-DISMISSAL: When the notice operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a
plaintiff who has once dismissed in a competent court an action based on or including the same claim.

----[30] VIATORY RIGHT OF WITNESS: If the witness resides more than 100 km from the place where he is
to travel by the ordinary course of travel, or if he is a detention prisoner and no permission is obtained
from the court in which his case is pending, then he cannot be compelled to attend the trial. The right is
available only in CIVIL cases. ok

x x x."