Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tabel Penetapan Indikator Prioritas

    Uploaded by

    Fitri Cii Ceria
    9 views2 pages
    This document outlines criteria and scoring for prioritizing projects. It lists four criteria: problem prone in organization, relates to patient satisfaction, high volume event, and related to accreditation standards. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 9, with higher numbers indicating greater importance. It then provides examples of two potential projects, "yang boleh menyimpan elektrolit pekat di ruangan" and "Ketidakpatuhan penyimpanan elektrolit pekat oleh perawat", and scores them based on the criteria. The total priority scores are then calculated, with the second project scoring higher.

    Original Description:

    CONTOH TABEL PENETAPAN INDIKATOR

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines criteria and scoring for prioritizing projects. It lists four criteria: problem prone in organization, relates to patient satisfaction, high volume event, and related to accreditation standards. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 9, with higher numbers indicating greater importance. It then provides examples of two potential projects, "yang boleh menyimpan elektrolit pekat di ruangan" and "Ketidakpatuhan penyimpanan elektrolit pekat oleh perawat", and scores them based on the criteria. The total priority scores are then calculated, with the second project scoring higher.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Tabel Penetapan Indikator Prioritas

    Uploaded by

    Fitri Cii Ceria
    This document outlines criteria and scoring for prioritizing projects. It lists four criteria: problem prone in organization, relates to patient satisfaction, high volume event, and related to accreditation standards. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 9, with higher numbers indicating greater importance. It then provides examples of two potential projects, "yang boleh menyimpan elektrolit pekat di ruangan" and "Ketidakpatuhan penyimpanan elektrolit pekat oleh perawat", and scores them based on the criteria. The total priority scores are then calculated, with the second project scoring higher.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    June 20, 2008

    Project
    Criteria

    1 = Low or no problems
    Problem Prone in 3 = Medium or moderate problems
    Organization=10
    9 = High or frequent problems

    1 = Low or no relationship
    Relates to patient 3 = Moderate relationship
    satisfaction=8
    9 = High relationship

    1 = Low volume
    High volume event 3 = Moderate Volume
    =9
    9 = High Volume
    Project Prioritization Matrix

    1 = Low or not related


    Related to a
    standard required 3 = Moderately related
    for accreditation=7
    9 = Directly related; element of performance

    9 = Low or eacy to measure

    Easy to Measure=6 3 = Moderately difficult to measure


    1 =Difficult to measure

    Priority Score
    1
    June 20, 2008
    Project

    yang boleh menyimpan


    Criteria

    elektrolit pekat di ruangan

    elektrolit pekat oleh perawat


    Kesesuaian cara pemberian
    Ketidakpatuhan penyimpanan

    1 = Low or no problems
    Problem Prone in 3 = Medium or moderate problems
    10
    30

    Organization=10
    9 = High or frequent problems

    1 = Low or no relationship
    Relates to patient 3 = Moderate relationship
    72
    24

    satisfaction=8
    9 = High relationship

    1 = Low volume
    High volume event 3 = Moderate Volume
    27
    27

    =9
    9 = High Volume
    Project Prioritization Matrix

    1 = Low or not related


    Related to a
    standard required 3 = Moderately related
    63
    63

    for accreditation=7
    9 = Directly related; element of performance

    9 = Low or eacy to measure


    6

    Easy to Measure=6 3 = Moderately difficult to measure


    54

    1 =Difficult to measure
    0
    0

    Priority Score
    178
    198

    You might also like