Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sec. 12-22
SEC. 12
(1) Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be
informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel
preferably of his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of the counsel, he must
be provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of
counsel.
(2) No torture, violence, threat, intimidation or any other means which vitiate the free will shall
be used against him. Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado or other similar forms
of detention are prohibited.
(3) Any confession or admission obtained violation of this section 17 hereof shall be inadmissible
in evidence against him.
(4) The law shall provide for penal and civil sanctions for violation of this section as well as
compensation to the rehabilitation of the victims of torture or similar practices and their
families.
Rights of person under investigation
1. To be informed of his right to remain silent.
2. To have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice or to be provided
with one.
3. Against the use of torture, violence, threat, intimidation or any other means which vitiates the
free will.
4. Against being held in secret, incommunicado, or similar forms of solitary detention.
Effect of violation of the rights
When rights can be invoked.
Waiver of right of remain silent and to counsel.
SEC. 13
(1) All persons, except those charged with offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when
evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction, be bail able sufficient sureties, or be
released on recognizance as may be provided by law. The right to bail shall be impaired even
when the privilege of the writ of the habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail shall not be
inquired.
MEANING OF BAIL- is the security required by a court and given to the provisional or temporary
release of a person who is in the custody of the law condition upon his appearance before any court
as required under conditions specified.
The writ is the proper remedy court to release each and every case of detention without legal
cause or authority. It’s principal purpose then is to set the individual liberty.
SEC. 16
(1) All person shall have the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-
judicial, or administrative bodies.
Right to speedy disposition of cases
(1) The above provision upholds the time-honored tradition of speedy justice for as stated in the
old dictum-“justice delayed is justice denied” it express inclusion was in response to the
common charge against the perennial delay in the administration of justice which in the past has
plagued our judicial system.
(2) The right to a speedy disposition of cases can be invoked only after the termination of trial or
hearing case.
(3) Under the present constitution, the supreme court, all lowers delegate courts and all other
lower courts are required to decide or resolve cases within a certain period of time.
(4) The provision contemplates the disposition of cases involving private interest not only before
judicial bodies, but also before quasi-judicial.
SEC. 17
Right against self-incrimination
No person shall be compelled to be witness against himself. This is a protection against self-
incrimination which may expose a person to a criminal liability. It is founded on grounds of:
(1) Public policy, because if the party is thus require to testify he would be placed under the
strongest temptation to commit the crime of perjury; and
(2) Humanity, because it prevents the extortion of confession by duress.
The constitutional guarantee protects as well the right of the accused to silence, and his silence,
meaning , his failure or refusal to testify may not be used as presumption of guilt or taken as
evidence against him.
Scope of guarantee
The right against self-incrimination applies incriminal cases as well as in civil, administrative, and
legislative proceeding where the fact asked for is a criminal one. It protects one whether he is a party or
a witness.
SEC. 18
(1) No person shall be detained solely by reason of his political beliefs and aspirations.
(2) No involuntary servitude in any exist except as a punishment for a crime whereof the
party shall have been convicted.
1. FREEDOM
Section 18 (1), authored by Commissioner Jose Nolledo, comes from supervision of the French
Constitution which says "No man is to be interfered with because of his opinion, provided his
avowal of them does not disturb public order or establish law"
2. INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE
An interesting note of wounded dignity came to the surface during the debates on the
involuntary servitude at the constitutional connection of 1934. The proposed provision read:
"Involuntary servitude shall not exist in the Philippines except as punishment for crime where of
the patty shall have been duly convicted
MEANING OF INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE- A condition of enforce, compulsory service of one
another
SEC. 19
(1) Excessive fine shall be imposed, nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted.
Neither shall death penalty be imposed, unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous crime, the
Congress hereafter provide for it. Any death penalty already imposed shall be reduced to reclusion
perpetual
(2) The employment of physical, psychological, or degrading punishment against any prisoner
of detainee or the use of substandard or inadequate penal facilities under subhuman condition shall
be dealt with by law.
Sec. 20
Closely related to imprisonment for debt is imprisonment for non-payment of poll tax.
Poll taxes (cedula) - is a tax of a fixed amount impose on individuals residing within a specified
territory, whether citizens or not, without regard to their property of the occupation in which
they may be engaged.
Sec. 21
No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. If an act is
punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to
another prosecution for the same act.
A person should not be punished twice for the same crime. However, a question comes
in when the person was acquitted for lack of evidence but, later, some incriminating
evidence was found. No matter how strong the evidence may be, it will be rendered
insignificant as the suspect holds the right against double jeopardy.
SEC. 22
(a) Which makes an action done before the passing of the law and which was innocent
when done criminal, and punishes such action; or
(b) Which aggravates a crime or make it greater than when it was committed; or
(c) Which changes the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law
annexed to the crime when it was committed;
(d) Which alters the legal rule of evidence and receives less or different testimony than
the law required at the time of the commission of their offense in order to convict
the defendant.
The definition of ex post facto laws formulated by Chief Justice Chase in early case of Calder v.
Bull. In re Kay Villegas Kami adds two other characterization to the original list: (e) assumes to regulate
civil rights and remedies only but in effect of opposes a penalty of deprivation of the rights which when
done was lawful; (f) deprives a person accused of a crime of some lawful protection to which he has
become entitled, such as the protection of a former conviction or acquittal or proclamation of amnesty
Bill of attainder – is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial. If the
punishment be less than death, the act is termed a bill of pains and penalties.” (Cummings v. Missouri)