Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
1 Department of Physiology,
Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Background: Pulmonary function assessment has achieved a lot
Andhra Pradesh, India of importance nowadays owing to a steep rise in air pollution.
Lung function parameters tend to have a relationship with
2 Department of Community lifestyle such as regular exercise and non-exercise. Hence the
Medicine, Navodaya Medical present study was under taken to assess the effects of exercise in
College, Raichur, Karnataka, India athletes on respiratory system and compared with sedentary
group.
Correspondence to:
ShobhaRani Vedala Aims & Objective: To compare the differences in pulmonary
(shobha_niranjan@rediffmail.com) function test among the athletes and sedentary group.
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology | 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 | 118 – 123
ShobhaRani Vedala et al. PFT among Athletic and Sedentary Groups
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology | 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 | 118 – 123
ShobhaRani Vedala et al. PFT among Athletic and Sedentary Groups
were two-tailed, and results were considered 2. Percentage of Forced expiratory volume in 1st
significant at p < 0.05. second (% FEV1)
3. Percentage of Forced expiratory volume in
RESULTS three seconds (% FEV3)
4. Percentage of peak of expiratory flow rate (%
The study population consisted of total 152 PEFR)
members included in two different categories 5. Percentage of FEV1/FVC ratio
namely sedentary group (76 members) and
Athletes (76 members). The mean age and mean Percent of predicted FVC (%FVC), FEV1
anthropometric measurements of both groups (%FEV1), FEV3 (%FEV3), percent of predicted
have been depicted in table 1. These findings PEFR (%PEFR), and FEV1/ FVC ratio were
suggest that both the groups did not differ analyzed for both athletic and sedentary group.
significantly and were comparable. The sex-wise Values for all measurements are expressed as
distribution of subjects is shown graphically that mean (%) ± SD. The results are shown in table 2.
showed equal representation of both sexes in Mean percent of predicted FVC of athletes was
each group as shown in fig 1. higher compared to sedentary subjects and the
difference was found statistically significant. The
Table-1: Baseline Characteristics of Participants result is shown in figure 2. Similarly it was found
(N=76) that mean of % FEV1 of athletes (86.8 ± 22.0)
Groups was significantly higher than that of sedentary
Variables t value p value
Athletes Sedentary
group (72.0 ± 27.8) as shown in figure 3.
Age (years) 26.0 (5.0) 25.8 (4.5) 0.99 >0.05 NS
Weight (kg) 54.3 (8.5) 56.2 (8.6) 1.32 >0.05 NS Statistically significant difference was observed
Height (cm) 163.4 (7.0) 162.5 (8.3) 1.18 >0.05 NS in the mean percent of predicted FEV1 values of
BMI 24.02 (1.6) 25.82 (2.2) 1.08 >0.05 NS both athletes and sedentary group.
Values in parenthesis are standard deviation; NS: Not
Significant
Table-2: Pulmonary Function Test Parameters
between the Two Groups
Groups
Variables t value p value
Athletes Sedentary
FVC 88.0 (12.8) 79.8 (21.5) 2.84 < 0.01**
FEV1 86.8 (22.0) 72.0 (27.8) 3.63 < 0.01**
FEV3 86.5 (13.7) 75.3 (17.9) 4.33 < 0.01**
PEFR 93.0 (12.8) 86.4 (15.2) 2.88 < 0.01**
FEV1/FVC 92.1 (4.4) 81.1 (7.3) 11.10 < 0.01**
Values in parenthesis are standard deviation; ** Highly
Significant
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology | 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 | 118 – 123
ShobhaRani Vedala et al. PFT among Athletic and Sedentary Groups
DISCUSSION
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology | 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 | 118 – 123
ShobhaRani Vedala et al. PFT among Athletic and Sedentary Groups
were much higher than the control group. exercise produces a positive effect on the lung by
Nagarathna R and Nagendra HR[19] in their study increasing the pulmonary capacities. The present
found improvement in the peak flow rate after study suggests that regular exercise training has
Yoga training for 2 weeks. an important role to play in determining and
improving lung volumes. It also has thrown some
The FEV1/FVC ratio when coupled with other light on the need for pulmonary function tests as
parameters could be used as a predictor of a screening method to identify subjects who may
obstructive and restrictive patterns of lung be prone for respiratory disorders. The
disorders. In the present study, the mean of the knowledge so gained of the respiratory functions
percentage of predicted value of FEV1/FVC for through spirometry can be utilized for the
Sedentary subjects was lower (81.1) than betterment of the population by bringing in a
Athletes (92.1). Some previous studies[20-22] have modification in their life styles.
observed no significant differences in vital
capacity in athletes when compared with non- REFERENCES
athletes. The conflicting findings may be due to
genetic and ethnic factors. 1. Wassreman K, Gitt A, Weyde I, Eckel HE. Lung
function changes and exercise-induced ventilatory
responses to external restive loads in normal
Vital capacity is determined by the lung subjects. Respiration 1995;62(4):177-84.
dimensions, compliance and respiratory muscle 2. Twick IW, Staal BJ, Brinknian MN, Kemper HC,
power whereas PEFR is determined mainly by Van Mechelen W. Tracking of lung function
parameters and the longitudinal relationship with
airway caliber, alveolar elastic recoil and lifestyle. Eur Resp J 1998;12(3):627-34.
respiratory muscle effort. The period of exercise 3. Boutellier U, Büchel R, Kundert A, Spengler C. The
to bring improvement in PFT varied from 1 respiratory system as an exercise limiting factor
month to 8 months reported by various in normal trained subjects. European Journal of
Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
researchers in India.[23,24] The possible 1992;65(4):347-353.
explanation is that regular forceful inspiration 4. Harms CA, Wetter TJ, St Croix CM, Pegelow DF,
and expiration during exercise leads to Dempsey JA. Effects of respiratory muscle work
strengthening of the respiratory muscles which on exercise performance. Journal of Applied
Physiology 2000;89(1):131-138.
in turn help the lungs to inflate and deflate 5. Cotes JE. Lung Function, assessment and
maximally. This maximum inflation and deflation application in medicine, 4th Ed. Oxford: Blackwell
is an important physiological stimulus for the Scientific publications; 1979.
6. Singh HD. Ventilatory Function tests, Normal
release of surfactant as stated by Hildebrean and
Standards in Male Adults. Ind J Med Prof
et al.[25] The findings of the present study can also 1959;5:2483-2486.
be explained on the basis of better functions of 7. Jain SK, Ramaiah TJ. Normal Standard of
respiratory muscle strength, improved thoracic Pulmonary Function Tests for healthy Indians 15-
40 years old, comparison of different prediction
mobility and the balance between lung and chest
equations. Ind J Med Res 1969;57:1433-1466.
elasticity which the athletes may have gained 8. Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Chaganti S, Jindal SK.
from regular exercise. Hence regular physical Diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow in
activity causes many desirable physiological, healthy young adults. The Indian J Chest Dis &
Allied Sci 2000;42:15 – 19.
psychological and physical changes in the 9. Gupta P, Gupta L, Ajmer RL. Lung Functions in
individual. Rajasthan Subjects. Ind J. Physiol. Pharmacol
1979;23(1):9-14.
10. De AK, Dasgupta PK, Panda BK, Bhattacharya AK.
CONCLUSION
Physical efficiency test on Indian male Kabbadi
Inter University Players. Brit J Sports Med
The study revealed that the sedentary subject’s 1982;16(1):33-36.
performance on PFT was poorer when compared 11. Malhotra MS, Ramaswamy SS, Joseph NT, Sen
Gupta J. Functional capacities and body
with Athletes. This emphasizes the need to compositions of Indian Athletes. Ind. J. Physiol
change their life style and adopt measures like Pharmacol 1972; 6: 55-62.
exercises to improve their wellbeing. Regular
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology | 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 | 118 – 123
ShobhaRani Vedala et al. PFT among Athletic and Sedentary Groups
12. Ghosh AK, Ahuja A, Khanna GL. Pulmonary 20. Lakhera SC, Kain TC. Comparison of pulmonary
capacities of different groups of sportsmen in function amongst Ladakhi, Delhi, Vanvasi and
India. Brit J Sports Med 1985;19(4):232-234. Siddi boy athletes. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol
13. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, 1996;39(3):255-258.
Casaburi R, Coates A et al. Standardization of 21. Adegoke OA, Arogundade O. The effect of chronic
spirometry series “ATS/ERS Task Force”: exercise on lung function and basal metabolic rate
Standardization of Lung Function Testing. in some Nigerian athletes. African Journal of
European Respiratory Journal; 26 (2): 321. Biomedical. Research 2002; 5: 9- 11.
14. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, 22. Hagberg JM. Pulmonary function in young and
Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardization of older athletes and untrained men. J. Appl. Physiol
spirometry Series “ATS/ERS Task Force”: 1988;65:101-104.
Standardization of Lung Function Testing; 23. Pansare MS, Pradhan SG, Kher JR, Aundhkar UG,
European Respiratory Journal; 26 (2): 326. Joshi AR. Study of effect of exercise on physical
15. Prakash S, Meshram S, Ramlekkar U. Athletes, fitness tests and pulmonary function tests in tribal
Yogis and individuals with sedentary life styles, girls of Maharashtra. Netaji Subhas National
Do their lung functions differ? Indian J. Physiol Institute of Sports Edition 1994;3(4):39-43.
Pharmacol 2007; 51 (1): 76-80. 24. Shashikala L, Ravipathi S. Effects of exercise on
16. Stuart D, Collings WD. Comparison of vital pulmonary function test. Indian Journal of
capacity and maximum breathing capacity of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences
athletes and non athletes. Journal of Applied 2011;1(3):230-231.
Physiology 1959; 14 (4): 507-509. 25. Hildebrean JN, Georice I, Clements JA. Surfactant
17. Makwana K, Khirwadkar N, Gupta HC. Effect of release in exercised rat lung stimulated by air
short term Yoga Practice on ventilatory function inflation. Journal of Applied Physiology
tests; Indian J Physiol. Pharmacol 1988;32(3): 1981;51:905-910.
202-8.
18. Khanam AA, Sachideva U, Gulesia R, Deepak KK. Cite this article as: Vedala S, Paul N, Mane AB.
Study of Pulmonary and Autonomic functions of Differences in pulmonary function test among the
Asthma Patients after Yoga Training. Indian J. athletic and sedentary population. Natl J Physiol
Phsiol Pharmacol 1996; 40 (4) 318-324. Pharm Pharmacol 2013; 3:118-123.
19. Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR. Yoga for Bronchial Source of Support: Nil
Asthma: a controlled study. British Medical Conflict of interest: None declared
Journal 1985; 291:1077.
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology | 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 | 118 – 123