Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD 9978
First edition
1992-02-l 5
Reference number
IS0 9978: 1992(E)
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
Contents
Page
1 Scope ..... ... ... ..... ... ... .... ...... ... ....-......................................................... 1
2 Normative reference . .... .... ... .. ... ... .... .... ... ...... ....... ..... .... ... ... ....-......... 1
3 Definitions . .... ..... ... ..... .... .... ... .... .... ..m............. ...... .. ... .... .... ..... .. ..... ... .. . I
4 Requirements . .... ..... ..... ... ... .... ... .... ....f..........~.............................. 2
5 Test methods by radioactive means .... ....... ...... ... .... ... .... .... ...~.. 4
Annexes
B Bibliography .............................................................................. 10
6 IS0 1992
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without
permission in writing from the publisher.
International Organization for Standardization
Case Postaie 56 l CH-1211 Genhve 20 * Switzerland
Printed in Switzerland
ii
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
Foreword /I
...
III
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
Introduction
The use of sealed radioactive sources has become so widespread that
standards to guide the user, manufacturer and regulatory agency are
necessary. When establishing these standards, radiation protection is
the prime consideration.
Leakage test methods for sealed radioactive sources were published in
ISO/TR 4826’) and the experience acquired since this date has permitted
the elaboration of this International Standard.
iv
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
It is emphasized, however, that insofar as pro- 3.3 capsule: Protective envelope, usually made of
duction, use, storage and transport of sealed radio- metal, used to prevent leakage of radioactive mate-
active sources are concerned, compliance with this rial.
International Standard is no substitute for complying
with the requirements of the relevant IAEA regu- 3.4 dummy sealed source: Facsimile of a sealed
lations and other relevant national regulations. source, the capsule of which has the same con-
struction and is made with exactly the same ma-
terials as those of the sealed source that it
2 Normative reference represents but containing, in place of the radioactive
material, a substance resembling it as closely as
The following standard contains provisions which, possible in physical and chemical properties.
through reference in this text, constitute provisions
of this International Standard. At the time of publi- 35 simulated sealed source: Facsimile of a sealed
cation, the edition indicated was valid. All standards source, the capsule of which has the same con-
are subject to revision, and parties to agreements struction and is made with exactly the same ma-
based on this International Standard are encour- terials as those of the sealed source that it
1
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
2
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
Table 1 - Threshold detection vaiues and limiting valules for different test methods
Limiting value
Threshold
Test method Sub-clause
detection value Non-leachable Leachable or
con tent gaseous content
Activity, Bq km
1) Unsuitable.
2) These detection limits are applicable only to single leaks under favourable visual conditions.
3) Not sensitive enough.
Prior to any testing, except in the case of recurrent - proportionality factor between the volume of the
inspections, the sealed source shall be thoroughly sealed source and the volume of the test en-
cleaned and shall undergo a thorough visual exam- closure used for certain tests, as well as the
ination. volume of liquid used to cover the sealed source
to be tested.
All equipment used for tests shall be suitably main-
tained and calibrated periodically. The wipe test should not be considered as a leakage
test, except for some specific types of sources (e.g.
Where applicable, the following parameters should sources with thin windows), for recurrent in-
be specified, whenever possible: spections and in cases where no other test is more
suitable.
- pressure, Wipe tests or liquid immersion test samples should,
wherever possible, be checked immediately on
- temperature, basic contamination measuring equipment; for ex-
3
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
ample, a Geiger counter to establish whether there is considered effective for removal of all traces of
is any gross contamination prior to final measure- radioactive materials present.
ment on more sophisticated calibrated equipment.
Immerse the sealed source in a liquid at room tem-
perature 293 K + 5 K (20 “C + 5 “C) and maintain it
5 Test methods by radioactive means at this temperature for 24 h_ Remove the sealed
source and measure the activity of the liquid.
51.1 Immersion test (hot liquid) The sealed source is considered to be leaktight if
the activity detected does not exceed 0,2 kBq
immerse the sealed source in a liquid which does (w 5 nCi).
not attack the material of the outer surfaces of this
source and which, under the conditions of this test, 5.2 Gaseous emanation tests
is considered effective for removal of all traces of
radioactive materials present. Examples of such liq-
uids include distilled water and weak detergent sol- 5.2.1 Gaseous emanation test by absorption (for
utions or chelation agents and also slightly alkaline radium-226 sealed sources)
or acid solutions with concentrations of about 5 %.
Heat the liquid to 323 K rt_5 K (50 “C 5 5 “C) and Place the sealed source in a small gas-tight con-
maintain it at that temperature for at least 4 h. Re- tainer with a suitable absorbent, for example acti-
move the sealed source and measure the activity of vated carbon, cotton or polyethylene, and leave it for
the liquid. at least 3 h. Remove the source and close the con-
tainer. Immediately measure the activity of the ab-
NOTE 3 An ultrasonic cleaning method can also be sorbent.
used. in this case, the immersion time in the liquid at
343 K +
- 5 K (70 “C + - 5 “C) can be reduced to approxi- 52.2 Gaseous emanation test by immersion with a
mately 30 min.
liquid scintillator (for radium-226 sealed sources)
5.1.2 Immersion test (boiling liquid) Follow the procedure described in 5.1.3.
Immerse the sealed source in a liquid which does 5.2.3 Gaseous emanation test (for krypton-85
not attack the material of the outer surfaces of the sealed sources)
source and which, under the conditions of this test,
is considered effective for removal of all traces of Maintain the sealed source under reduced pressure
radioactive materials present. Boil for 10 min, allow for 24 h. Analyse the content of the chamber for
to cool, then rinse the sealed source in a fresh batch krypton-85 by a plastic scintillation counting tech-
of liquid. Repeat these operations twice, re- nique. Repeat the test after at least 7 days.
immersing the source in the original liquid. Remove
the sealed source and measure the activity of the
liquid. 5.2.4 Other gaseous emanation tests
2) This test may be useful where hot liquid tests are not practical, however the latter are recomm ended wh enever possible
since th eir u se has been widely recognized for many years and also because they may be more effective.
4
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited. IS0 9978:1992(E)
5.3 Wipe tests The data given in this International Standard for the
relationship between volumetric leakage rates and
If a wipe test is used to determine leak tightness af- ioss of radioactive material are based on values
ter mechanical or thermal prototype testing, the published in IAEA documents and, although they
sealed sources to be tested shall be cleaned (de- have not been conftrmed absolutely by experimental
contaminated) prior to the tests. work, volumetric leakage test methods have been
used for many years and experience shows that they
When the wipe test is a means of leakage testing can be accepted as valid test methods.
carried out at the manufacturing stage, the sealed
source shall be cleaned prior to the test and a ‘I-day Before conducting any of the tests described in 6.1
waiting period shall be observed before the test. to 6.3, the sealed source should be thoroughly
cleaned and dried.
In the case of the wipe test methods, it is necessary
to take into account the technique used, the instru- For sealed sources with leachable or gaseous con-
mentation and the pressure applied, because the tent, the helium test described in 6.1 can be used.
method used may not give sufficiently accurate
reproducibility guarantees. Ensure that there are no gross defects which might
invalidate the results of the described test, for ex-
ample by visual inspection or by a method less
5.3.1 Wet wipe test
sensitive than that of the described test. For these
tests to be valid, except that described in 6.3, the
Wipe all the external surfaces of the sealed source
free volume inside the sealed source shall be
thoroughly with a swab of filter paper or another
greater than 0,l cm3. If this test is used for sealed
suitable highly absorbant material, moistened with
sources with a free volume of less than 0,l cm3, the
a liquid which will not attack the material of which
user shall be able to demonstrate the validity of the
the external surfaces of the sealed source are made
testPI.
and which, under the conditions of this test, has
been demonstrated to be effective in removing any Because of their lower detection limit, only those
radioactive material present. Measure the activity tests using helium (6.1) are applicable to sealed
of the swab. sources with leachable or gaseous contents.
5.3.2 Dry wipe test 6.1 Helium mass spectrometer leakage tests
This test can be used in situations where it may not 6.1.1 Helium test
be appropriate to use a wet swab, for example for
high activity cobalt-60 sources or in some recurrent Place the sealed source containing helium in a suit-
inspections. able vacuum chamber, which is subsequently
To carry out the test, thoroughly rub all the external evacuated through a helium mass spectrometer.
surfaces of the sealed source with a dry swab of fil- Evaluate the actual helium leakage rate in accord-
ter paper and measure the activity of the swab. ance with the recommendations of the manufacturer
of the leakage test equipment.
5.3.3 Approval criteria Ensure that the free volume inside the sealed source
contains a concentration of commercial grade he-
If the activity detected does not exceed 0,2 kBq lium of more than 5 %. The indicated helium
(z 5nCi), the sealed source is considered to be leakage rate according to the previous evaluation
leaktight. divided by the concentration of helium in the free
volume gives the actual standard helium leakage
NOTE 4 The important points concerning the use of rate.
wipe tests on accessible surfaces which are as close as
possible to the sealed source and the need to consider
radiation protection are noted [see clause 3, item b)]. 6.1.2 Helium pressurization test
With the indicated helium leakage rate, Q, the actual completely to a depth of at least 5 cm below the fluid
standard helium leakage rate, L, can be evaluated level. Reduce the absolute pressure in the chamber
by using the equation to between 15 kPa and 25 kPa. Observe any bubbles
emanating from the sealed source for a period of at
least 1 min.
(1)
6.2.2 Hot-liquid bubble test
where p0 = 1,01325.105 Pa.
Ensure that the sealed source is at ambient tem-
NOTES perature. Immerse it at a depth at least 5 cm below
water level in a water bath which is at a temperature
5 With helium pressure, p, in megapascals (in pratice
between 0,5 MPa and 10 MPa) maintained for a con-
between 363 K and 368 K (90 “C and 95 “C).
ditioning time t, in hours, a delay time between Glycerine at 393 K to 423 K (120 “C to 150 ?I) is an
pressurization and measurement of less than 10 min and acceptable alternative to water. Observe any bub-
taking into account the free volume, V, in cubic centi- bles emanating from the sealed source for a period
metres greater than 0,l cm3 inside the sealed source, of at least 1 min; however a minimum period of
convenient test parameters may be chosen and the test 2 min is recommended whenever possible and par-
results evaluated using the following relationship: ticularly when capsules with large thermal mass and
poor thermal conductivity are necessary.
Q = 0,35 4$ . . - (2)
6.2.3 Gas pressurization bubble test
where
6.2 Bubble leakage tests If no bubbles are observed at the end of the tests
described in 62.1 to 6.2.4, the sealed source is con-
Bubble leakage tests rely on an increase in the sidered to have a leakage rate of less than
internal pressure. Then gas from internal voids can I pPa.rn%-‘l and to be leaktight only if the contents
penetrate any leaks and form visible bubbles in a are non-leachable.
liquid bath. For one particular leak, the rate of bub-
bling increases with a decrease in surface tension.
6.3 Water pressurization test
6.2.1 Vacuum bubble test Determine the mass of the sealed source on a bal-
ance. Perform the experimental pressure test with
By using ethylene glycol, isopropyl alcohol, mineral water, wipe the sealed source dry and redetermine
or silicone oil, or water with a wetting agent as a its mass on the same balance.
leakage test fluid in a suitable vacuum chamber,
lower the air content of the fluid by evacuating the If the gain in mass is less than 50 pg, the sealed
chamber for at least 1 min. Re-establish atmos- source is considered to be leaktight but only for
pheric air pressure and submerge the sealed source non-leachable contents.
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
For this test to be valid, the calculated free volume tivity of the mass measuring equipment. This test is
within the sealed source has to be capable of hoid- applicable particularly for evaluating the external
ing at least five times as much water as the sensi- pressure test for classes 3, 4, 5 and 6 of IS0 2919.
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
IS0 9978:1992(E) Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
Annex A
(normative)
Guidance for the choice of the tests to be carried out according to control and sealed
source type
This annex provides a guide to assist in the seiec- A.3 Recurrent inspections
tion of the most suitable tests for carrying out quality
control, production control and recurrent in- It is obviously necessary to test sealed sources at
spections, taking into account the sealed source regular intervals after they have been supplied by a
type (design, characteristics, etc). manufacturer, to check that they have not developed
a leak. In many countries there are statutory regu-
TabieA.1 is not fully comprehensive, however it
lations which specify the frequency of tests. The time
covers a wide range and can act as a guide for
interval between tests may vary according to the
many sealed source designs. it gives the preferred
sealed source type and design and also the working
test and second choice test.
environment.
A.1 Leakage test for the production of These tests are not necessarily the same as those
which are appropriate during manufacture. it is im-
sealed sources
portant to take into account the utilization conditions
of the sealed source and of any specific risks that it
The most appropriate leakage test for the production
might encounter during its working life.
of sealed sources containing a radionuciide can be
determined from tabieA.1, according to their par- Thus, several conditions may be encountered in
ticular source design and technology. practice when considering recurrent tests.
A.2 Leakage tests for prototype sealed a) The sealed source can only be tested on the site
sources where it is used and it is practical to carry out a
wipe test on the nearest accessible par-t. In this
Leakage tests allowing validation of required tests case, a wipe test (5.3) is chosen. A visual exam-
for determining the classification of a prototype ination of the source should also be carried out
sealed source according to IS0 2919 may be carried if possible.
out on
WI The source can only be tested on the site where
- prototype sealed sources with the nominal it is used but direct access to the source is not
radioactive content, possible or not desirable because of the unjusti-
fied exposure of persons carrying out the test, for
- simulated sealed sources, example high activity teletherapy sources or
other sources in sealed housings. In this case,
- dummy sealed sources. wipe tests should be carried out on the nearest
accessible part.
For the last case, it will clearly be necessary to use
a non-radioactive leakage test method. WARNCNG - If activity is found to be present,
even if below the limiting value of 0,2 kE3q3)
The most appropriate leakage test will depend on (GS 5 nCi), action should be taken to establish
the sealed source technology and design and can whether this arises from source leakage. One
be determined from table A-1. procedure would be to repeat the tests at regular
intervals to determine whether the activity de-
tected is increasina.
-
3) The limiting value of 0,2 kBq is qualified by the statement that further tests shall be carried out if any activity is present.
a
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
IS0 9978:1992(E)
c) Where faciiities are available to test the source used. A visual examination of the sealed source
by other methods, for example in certain hospi- should also be carried out if possible.
tals, by return to the manufacturer or by other
suitable laboratories, the methods recommended WARNING - When carrying out recurrent tests,
for production sources in table A.1 should be it is essential to ensure that radiation exposure
levels are within accepted limits.
A Sealed sources containing Immersion (5.1) Wipe (5.3) fmmersion (5.1) Wipe (5.3)
radioactive material
Al Thin single integral window,
e.g. smoke detectors
A2 Low-activity reference sources,
e.g. encapsulated in plastic
Annex B
.(informative)
Bibliography
[I] MCMASTERS, R.C., ed., Non-destructive Testing [7] BIRAM, J., and BURROWS, B., Bubbles tests for
Handbook, Vol.1, Leak Testing, American Soci- gas tightness, Vacuum, 14(7), 1964, ~~-221-226.
ety for Non-destructive Testing/American So-
ciety for Metals, 2nd ed., 1982. [8] HOWL, D.A., and MANN, CA., The back-
pressurizing technique for leak-testing, Vac-
[2] American National Standard for Radioactive uum, 15(7), 1965, pp.347-352.
Materials, Leakage Tests on Packages for
Shipment, ANSI No.14.5-1987. [9] ASTON, D., BODIMEADE, A.H., HALL, E.G. and
TAYLOR, C.B.G., The specifications and testing
[3] ASTM E 515-74 (Reapproved 1980), Standard of radioactive sources designated as “special
Method of Testing for Leaks Using Bubble form” under the IAEA transport regulations,
Emission Techniques. Report EUR 8053 EN, 1982.
[4] ASTM F 98-72 (Reapproved 1977) Standard [IO] DWIGHT, D-J., A new method for leak-testing
Recommended Practices for Determining sealed sources of radium-226 and thorium-228,
Hermeticity of Electron Devices by a Bubble Report RCC-R 176 (1964) and Addendum
Test. RCC-R 176 (1965).
[5] ASTM F 134-78, Standard Recommended Prac- [I I] IAEA Safety Series No.6, Regulations for the
tices for Determining Hermeticity of Electron safe transport of radioactive materials, Vienna,
Devices with a Helium Mass Spectrometer Leak 1985.
Detector.
[ 121 IAEA Safety Series No.37 Advisory material for
[S] ASTM F 730-81, Standard Test Methods for the application of the IAEA transport regu-
Hermeticity of Electron Devices by a Weight- lations, Vienna, 1987.
gain Test.
10
Licensed to Parts Life Inc / Dmitri Witharana (dmitri@partslifeinc.com)
ISO Store Order: OP-381365 / Downloaded: 2019-07-19
Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
UDC 539.163:621.039.8
Descriptors: radiation protection, radiation sources, sealed sources, tests, determination, leaktightness.