Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rubrics - SL - 2016-17
Rubrics - SL - 2016-17
Applicable POs /PSOs (2nd Stage) PO3, PO10b, PSO1 Name of Examiner (2nd Review) Dr. ANANDATHIRTA B. GUDI
PO1, PO3, PO4, PO5, PO8, PO9,
Applicable POs / PSOs (Final Stage) Name of Examiner (Final Review) Dr. ANANDATHIRTA B. GUDI
PO10a, PO10b, PO12, PSO1, PSO2
Total Marks 85
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Problem Analysis (PO2)
(Preferably for First Review)
Problem Makes use of reviewed literature and Makes use of reviewed literature and Not able to identify the gaps.
Identification identifies the gap accurately. identifies the gap with minor ambiguities.
5 5 5 25
(5)
Problem Problem clearly stated and well- Problem statement is mostly clear and fairly Problem statement is unclear
formulation defined; concepts and ideas are well-defined; concepts and ideas are or poorly defined; concepts
clearly articulated and formulated formulated with minor error and ideas are poorly 5 5 5 25
(5) articulated and formulated
Total Marks 95
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Design & Development of solutions (PO3)
(Preferably for Second Review)
Knows the constraints and accounts Knows the constraints and accounts for Does not know about the constraints
for them in developing design them in developing design strategy with OR Does not account for them in
Constraints
strategy—Economical, ethical, minor errors or ignores one or two— design strategy OR ignores more than
5 5 5 40
social, cultural and environmental Economical, ethical, social, cultural and two-- Economical, ethical, social,
(8)
environmental. cultural and environmental.
Final Design Design meets and exceeds desired Design meets desired objectives. Barely capable of achieving desired
objectives. objectives. 4 4 4 16
(4)
Total Marks 96
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Final Review
Knows the constraints and accounts Knows the constraints and accounts for Does not know about the constraints
for them in developing design them in developing design strategy with OR Does not account for them in
Constraints
strategy—Economical, ethical, minor errors or ignores one or two— design strategy OR ignores more than
5 5 5 40
social, cultural and environmental Economical, ethical, social, cultural and two-- Economical, ethical, social,
(8)
environmental. cultural and environmental.
Final Design Design meets and exceeds desired Design meets desired objectives. Barely capable of achieving desired
objectives. objectives. 4 4 4 16
(4)
Total Marks 96
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Conduct investigation of complex problem (PO4)
(Preferably for Final Review)
Results and discussion well focused Missed some important points. Analyzed only the most basic
Focus of Results and
points. 5 5 5 20
Discussion
(4)
Interpretation of Insightful, supported conclusions and Reasonable conclusions reached based Deficiencies in support for
recommendations. on achieved results. stated conclusions. 3 3 3 24
Results
(8)
Total Marks 94
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Modern Tool Usage (PO5)
(Preferably for Final Review)
Total Marks 94
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Environment and sustainability (PO7)
(Preferably for First Review)
Total Marks 95
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Ethics (PO8)
(Preferably for Final Review)
Demonstrates ethical behavior among Does not model ethical behavior among peers and Student has been caught
Behavior peers and faculty faculty cheating or plagiarizing the 5 5 5 40
(8) work of others
Takes personal responsibility for Does not recognize the need to take personal Blames others for own
Responsibility his/her actions responsibility for his/her actions issues and problems 3.75 3.75 3.75 15
(4)
Total Marks 95
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Individual & Team Work (PO9)
(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for Final Review)
Utilizes technical strengths of each team Some leadership, planning and Deficiencies in leadership,
member to full advantage leading to interaction is evident. cooperation and/or interaction.
Teamwork (5)
productive interaction. End result may suffer to some
3 3 3 15
degree.
Total Marks 80
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
CHAITHANYA K GOWDA
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Individual & Team Work (PO9)
(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for Final Review)
LAKSHMEESHA T R
Utilizes technical strengths of each team Some leadership, planning and Deficiencies in leadership,
member to full advantage leading to interaction is evident. cooperation and/or interaction.
Teamwork (5)
productive interaction. End result may suffer to some
2.4 2.4 2.4 12
degree.
Total Marks 62
Utilizes technical strengths of each team Some leadership, planning and Deficiencies in leadership,
member to full advantage leading to interaction is evident. cooperation and/or interaction.
Teamwork (5)
productive interaction. End result may suffer to some
4.6 4.6 4.6 23
degree.
Total Marks 98
BALAJI T S
Utilizes technical strengths of each team Some leadership, planning and Deficiencies in leadership,
member to full advantage leading to interaction is evident. cooperation and/or interaction.
Teamwork (5)
productive interaction. End result may suffer to some
2.4 2.4 2.4 12
degree.
Total Marks 62
KIRAN KUMAR
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
CHAITHANYA K GOWDA
Format/ Accurate and proper use of figures, Proper use of figures, tables and captions, Inappropriate use of figures, 5 5 5 20
Style tables and captions, references and references and bibliography, and appendices tables and captions,
(4) bibliography, and appendices. with minor error. references and bibliography,
and appendices with major
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
errors.
Content Demonstration of full knowledge of the At ease with content and able to elaborate and Uncomfortable with content.
subject with explanations and explain to some degree. Only basic concepts are
& Knowledge 3 3 3 18
(6) elaboration demonstrated and interpreted.
Reference section complete and Minor inadequacies in references. Inadequate list of references
References comprehensive. Consistent referencing system. or references in text.
(2) Consistent and logical referencing Inconsistent or illogical
5 5 5 10
system. referencing system.
Total Marks 80
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Communication (Oral) for (PO10b)
(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for ALL Reviews)
Accurate and proper use of figures, Proper use of figures, tables and captions, Inappropriate use of figures,
Format/ tables and captions, references and references and bibliography, and appendices tables and captions,
Style bibliography, and appendices. with minor error. references and bibliography, 3 3 3 12
(4) and appendices with major
errors.
Content Demonstration of full knowledge of the At ease with content and able to elaborate and Uncomfortable with content.
subject with explanations and explain to some degree. Only basic concepts are
& Knowledge 2 2 2 12
(6) elaboration demonstrated and interpreted.
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Reference section complete and Minor inadequacies in references. Inadequate list of references
References comprehensive. Consistent referencing system. or references in text.
(2) Consistent and logical referencing Inconsistent or illogical
3 3 3 6
system. referencing system.
Total Marks 62
LAKSHMEESHA T R
LAKSHMEESHA T R
Visual aides (2) Uses visual aides effectively. Uses visual aides with minor error. Uses visual aides poorly 4 4 4 8
Listening to and Carefully listens to questions and Listens to questions and responds Misunderstands questions and provides
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 3 3 3 9
questions (3)
Total Marks 62
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Communication (Written) (PO10 a)
(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for Final Review)
BALAJI T S
Accurate and proper use of figures, Proper use of figures, tables and captions, Inappropriate use of figures,
Format/ tables and captions, references and references and bibliography, and appendices tables and captions,
Style bibliography, and appendices. with minor error. references and bibliography, 5 5 5 20
(4) and appendices with major
errors.
Content Demonstration of full knowledge of the At ease with content and able to elaborate and Uncomfortable with content.
subject with explanations and explain to some degree. Only basic concepts are
& Knowledge 5 5 5 30
(6) elaboration demonstrated and interpreted.
Reference section complete and Minor inadequacies in references. Inadequate list of references
References comprehensive. Consistent referencing system. or references in text.
(2) Consistent and logical referencing Inconsistent or illogical
4 4 4 8
system. referencing system.
Total Marks 98
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
BALAJI T S
Visual aides (2) Uses visual aides effectively. Uses visual aides with minor error. Uses visual aides poorly 5 5 5 10
Listening to and Carefully listens to questions and Listens to questions and responds Misunderstands questions and provides
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 5 5 5 15
questions (3)
Total Marks 98
Accurate and proper use of figures, Proper use of figures, tables and captions, Inappropriate use of figures,
Format/ tables and captions, references and references and bibliography, and appendices tables and captions,
Style bibliography, and appendices. with minor error. references and bibliography, 3 3 3 12
(4) and appendices with major
errors.
Content Demonstration of full knowledge of the At ease with content and able to elaborate and Uncomfortable with content.
subject with explanations and explain to some degree. Only basic concepts are
& Knowledge 2 2 2 12
(6) elaboration demonstrated and interpreted.
Reference section complete and Minor inadequacies in references. Inadequate list of references
References comprehensive. Consistent referencing system. or references in text.
(2) Consistent and logical referencing Inconsistent or illogical
3 3 3 6
system. referencing system.
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Total Marks 62
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
KIRAN KUMAR
Visual aides (2) Uses visual aides effectively. Uses visual aides with minor error. Uses visual aides poorly 4 4 4 8
Listening to and Carefully listens to questions and Listens to questions and responds Misunderstands questions and provides
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 3 3 3 9
questions (3)
Total Marks 62
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Project Management & Finance (PO11)
(Preferably for First Review)
Proposes an
Budget (2) Proposes an optimal budget Proposes a budget which not optimal incomplete 5 5 5 10
budget
Total Marks 96
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation - Life Long Learning (PO12)
(Preferably for Final Review)
Total Marks 94
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Total Marks 95
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Final Review)
Total Marks 95
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Project Evaluation – Exhibit technical skills necessary to choose careers in the Design, Implement and Testing, Management
and Operation of Electronics and Communication Circuits and Systems (PSO2).
(Preferably for Final Review)
Average
PO1
USN Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 (Total
1
Marks)
Chaithanya K
1GA13EC023
Gowda
85 95 96 94 96 94 95 95 80 80 96 94 95 92 92
Lakshmeesha
1GA13EC042
TR
85 95 96 94 96 94 95 95 62 62 96 94 95 92 89
1GA14EC403 Balaji T S 85 95 96 94 96 94 95 95 98 98 96 94 95 92 95
85 95 96 95 94 95 94 96 80 80 96 94 95 92
PO Mapping Strength 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2
PO Attainment
85 95 96 63 63 61 63 96 80 53 64 31 61 61
[(Avg*Strength)/3]
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Academic Year 2016-17 Department ECE
GSM based multifunctional device for
Title of Project fuel and vehicle theft detection
Guide SUMALATHA E