Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ayyushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantrri Jan Arogy ya Yojana (P PM-JAY) en ndeavors to offer secon ndary and
te
ertiary health
h coverage ofo Rs. 5,00,0000 to more e than 10 cro ore beneficiary families, accounting
g for more
th
han 40 percent of Ind dia’s populaation at em mpaneled ho ospitals. Th
his unprecedented effo ort of the
G
Government of o India is lik mpact on the poor and vu
kely to have a significant positive im ulnerable po
opulation’s
acccess to high quality heaalthcare.
G
Global experiience shows s that integrrity violations
s in health iinsurance programs are e high. Frauud in such
prrograms nott only resultt in financia al losses butt have a mu uch greaterr impact on people’s he ealth. The
ulltimate respo onsibility to effectively prevent,
p dete State Health Agencies
ect, and detter fraud liess with the S
(S
SHA). Strong anti-fraud efforts are important not only fro om the persspective of rreducing the e adverse
im
mpact on sch heme financ ces and for safeguarding
s g beneficiaryy health butt also to mitiigate any re
eputational
rissk faced by the SHA, sta ate and the scheme resulting from ffraud. Hence e, SHA’s antti-fraud efforrts are key
fo
or ensuring effective
e impplementationn of PM-JAY and it is crittical that a “zzero tolerance” approacch to fraud
be e internalize
ed and perme eate all aspe
ects of mana agement of tthe scheme..
W
With this spiriit, the Nation
nal Health Agency
A has previously
p d eveloped An nti-Fraud Gu uidelines, re
eleased by
Hon’ble Healtth Minister on o 29th August 2018 lay ying down th he overall viision and ro oadmap for ccombating
fra
aud and abuse that cou uld be perpeetrated unde
er PM-JAY. To bring un niformity andd consistenccy in anti-
fra
aud actions and build capacity
c in SHAs,
S NHAA is proud to o share the Fraud Invesstigation and Medical
Audit Manual for PM-JAY Y. We sincereely hope tha
at state goveernments pa n PM-JAY will use this
articipating in
m
manual to streengthen the management of anti-fra aud activitiess in their respective statees.
2. Utilization Audits.................................................................................................................................................. 6
A. Pre-Authorization Stage.................................................................................................................................. 6
B. During Hospitalization stage (live audits, before discharge)...................................................................... 7
C. Claims Stage (post-facto audits, after discharge)........................................................................................ 8
3. Mortality Audits.................................................................................................................................................... 9
Process flow for Mortality Audit......................................................................................................................... 9
4. Claims Audits........................................................................................................................................................ 10
Process Flow........................................................................................................................................................ 10
Code of Conduct for Staff handling Field Investigation and Medical Audit . ......................... 11
Thhe NHA has s taken seveeral steps to ensure dete ection, preveention, dete
errence and spreading a awareness
off fraudulent practices at all levels. These
T include e developme ent of the Anti-Fraud Gu uidelines, se
etting up a
ro
obust IT systtem with a proactive
p andd effective frraud control and detectio on capabilityy and conducting anti-
aud capacitty building trainings for State Health Agenciess (SHA). Th
fra he success of these iniitiatives is
deependent on n the effectiiveness and d robustness s of the inveestigation and audit me echanism att the SHA
le
evel to inves stigate fraud, carry out audits
a and necessary
n acction once tthe suspect cases are fflagged by
annti-fraud triggers or by processing
p te
eams.
Frau
ud managem
ment Sttages of im
mplementatio
on
approaches
a s
x Benneficiary ide
entification an
nd verificatio
on
Preventio
on x Pro
ovider empa nelment
x Pre
e-authorisati on
x Cla
aims manage ement
Detection
n x Datta analytics
x Fie
eld and Medi cal Audits
x Contract mana agement
Deterrenc
ce and Reco
overies x Enfforcement off contractua al provisions
x Stringent actionns against thhe offenderss
M
Minimu
um Req
quirem
ments for
f Aud
dits an
nd Inve
estigattions
Thhe Anti-Frau
ud Guideline
es developed
d by NHA sp
pecifies the mminimum sa amples for audits to be cconducted
byy the SHA under AB-PM MJAY. The sa
ame are outtlined in Tab
ble 2 below:
Table 2: Recommend
R ded minimu
um sample for audits
In
n addition, th
he model te
ender docum
ments specify minimum
m requiremen
nts for investigation of cases by
In
nsurance com mpany/ISA.
Th
he Claims Review
R Com
mmittee and Mortality & Morbidity Re eview Comm mittees set u
up at State llevel shall
be
e forwarded d all the se
erious/repeatt fraudulentt transaction aims/mortalitty cases for audit in
ns/reject cla
ad
ddition to be
elow mention
ned processees.
P
Proces
ss Flow
w and Standa
S ard Forrmats
Thhe following
g sections prrovide overv view of auditt and investtigation proccesses along g with releva ant format
fo
or each type. As per pro ovisions of Anti-fraud
A Gu uidelines, SH
HAs are requ uired to recrruit trained m
manpower
fo
or investigatiion and med dical audit, however
h undder certain ccircumstancces, SHAs m may utilize services of
sp
pecialized external
e agencies for ca arrying out investigation
n and auditts. The Stan ndard proce esses and
fo
ormats applyy to all agencies carrying g out the tas
sk of investi gation and aaudits underr PMJAY. SHAs may,
hoowever, include addition nal checks, provisions, data
d e and analyssis as requirred for their particular
capture
Sttate without diluting the provisions la
aid down under this man nual.
1.. Beneficia
ary Verificattion Audits
The proba
able frauds at
a the level of n of benefici ary can inclu
o verification ude:
Benefficiary audits
s will also be
e conducted on random
m basis or poost admissioon in cases w
where the
anti-fra
aud triggers
s flag the cllaim as sus
spicious – a
at pre-auth sstage, pre-d
discharge sttage, post
dischaarge or post payment.
Authorization Stage
A. Pre-A
Pre-Auth req
quest receivedd by SHA/IC/IISA
Fraud
F Triggerss flag pre-autth as ‘suspicio
ous’
Pre
e-auth team validates
v susppicion – Desk Audit
Addition
nal documentts requested
Do
ocuments Revviewed
Send fo
or further
Investtigations
Case
e sent for field investigatioon
Yes
Fraud
F confirm
med before Casee sent for
discharge aaction
No
Case is
processe
ed on
merits
Triiggered casess
Yees
Fraud Case sent for
Suspect med
dical audit
Yes
Fie
eld Investigattion or on-sitee investigatio
on
SSend Inve
estigation Needs
N further In
nvestigation confirms Case
reeports Confiirms Fraud Medical
M Auditt case as non
n fraud closed
and
finddings to Yees
medical Medical Audit
offiicer for
ffinal No
deecision C
Case
Frau
ud Confirmedd closed
Yes
Case sent
s for actio n
x Claim Review com mmittee shalll Review 100 percent cl aims that arre rejected bby the Insureer / TPA /
ISA / SHA
S and appealed by th he provider;
x Rando omly review / audit at lea
ast 2 percen
nt of the pre--authorizatio
ons and 3 pe
ercent of the claims of
each provider
p eac
ch quarter.
Process Flow
x Triggeered cases or
o randomly selected
s proved/paid cases are a
app assigned to tthe audit teaam
x Medic cal doctor of the audit tea
am validatess the docume ents submittted by the ho ospitals duriing claims
submission and sh hares reportt with finding
gs.
x SHA takes a final decision based on the report
r finding
gs and takess disciplinaryy action whe
erever
require
ed.
M
Monthly Repo
orts an
nd MIS
S to be Subm
mitted tto NHA
A
Thhe SHAs are e required to
o submit monthly report by 7th of evvery month to o NHA listing
g the measu ures taken
to
o control frau
ud, data ana
alysis, cases
s investigated d and audite ed and the rresults there
eof and punittive action
ta
aken againstt fraudulent parties, notices, issued d, recoveriess made etc. This would enable NHA A to track
th
he progress of the state es, draw coomparative analysis,
a proovide furthe
er support and feedback, to take
acction as neeed be. Refeer to Annexuure 7 for the e format of the report. It is suggested to the SHA that
m
monthly reporrt format to be
b collected at district le
evel for their own referen
nce and deta ailed analysis.
A. Patien
nt Information
1. PM
M-JAY FAMIILY ID: ____ __________________
2. Na
ame:
3. Fa
ather’s or Hu
usband’s nam
me:
4. Ad
ddress:
Dis
strict: State: P
Pin Code:
5. Co
ontact No.
6. Me
embers regis stered:
PM-JAY ID
S
S. No. Name Gender Ag
ge Re
elationship
number
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
B. Generral Informattion
2. If hospital,
h was
s the benefic
ciary charge
ed any mone
ey for the E ccard? If yes,, how much?
?
3. Ha
as s/he availled services under PM-J
JAY? If yes --proceed furrther
5. What symptom
ms were the patient exhiibiting when he/she visitted the hosp
pital?
8. Fo
or how many
y days was s/he
s hospitallized?
11. If any
a surgery,, is there a scar
s on the body,
b which could help in
n verification
n of the surg
gery. (If
ye
es, take phottograph of th
he same)
C. Match
h the photo of the bene
eficiary bein
ng interview
wed with the
e one subm
mitted in TM
MS
D. Any other
o remark
k or observ
vation:
S. No. Criteria
1 Pertaining to Clinical Information (Patient history and evidence of
physical examination is evident)
a. Is the chief complaint recorded? Pl look for package specific complaints Yes/ No
b. Are daily recorded progress reports available? Pl look for package Yes/ No
specific sequential information, which should have been captured.
c. Is each progress report signed and dated? Yes/ No
d. Are reports of patient’s progress filed chronologically? Yes/ No
e. Are Specific instructions to discharge the patient and line of treatment Yes/ No
after discharge captured in ICP's?
f. Is a Discharge summary available? Yes/ No
g. Does the discharge summary capture all details of presenting features, Yes/ No
investigations, line of treatment given during stay line of treatment
advised at discharge and (Select <No> if investigations and all treatment
details, missing as follow up will be not be rational)
Name of Hospital -
Address of Hospital -
C. Documents Review: Observations noticed for each parameter need to be entered in terms of completeness, errors, overwriting or any discrepancies noticed
Is IPD Collected Yes No
If yes, please upload
If no specify the reason
Indoor Register Entry Verified (upload) Yes No
Hospital Lab Register Verified (upload) Yes No
Treating Doctor Certificate Verified (upload) Yes No
All Medical Histroy of patient documented (upload) Yes No
Pateint clinical information is documented (upload) Yes No
Is there any previous hospitalization of same patient at the same hospital Yes No
Past history details documented Yes No
Complete Medication list on chart and nursing chart (upload) Yes No
Findings and follow ups are documented (upload) Yes No
Deatiled progress notes reflecting evaluation of each visit, reason for visit is documented as relevant Yes No
Any other remark or observation:
D. Patient profile
Patient Photograph collected with ID card (upload) Yes No
Patient Id's proof Collected (upload) Yes No
Any other remark or observation:
Comment of Investigator
Name of Investigator
Signature of Investigator
Source: Jo
oint Learning Network Toollkit to develop
p and strength
hen medical au
udit systems
1. On-s
site investig
gation at hos
spital
A.. Informatio
on of the In vestigation
n Team
Lo
ocation (State, District, Block
B and Village / Ward
d)
Hospital ID
Number of be
eds
Signature
es of Audit te
eam leader and membe
ers:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
RIGGERS FOR
TR F ONSITE E SOURCE OF F TOOLS F FOR PROCES SS OF ON-S SITE
IN
NVESTIGAT TION DATA
D INVESTIIGATION INVESTIGATION
Claims pattern triggers: E.g.;
E Claims
C details
s *Checklisst for -facilityy Based on n the predete ermined
1. High inncidence of day- su
ubmitted by inspectioon at triggers hhospitals witth
care procedures
p In
nsurance hospital, evaluation possible deviations from
(<24ho ours) Companies
C / of inpatie
ent case scheme g guidelines a are
2. Repea ated blockingg of State Health records & availabilityy identified
d and listed.
higherr-priced pack kages Agency
A / of staff On site vvisit to hospittals by
(>Rs. 15,000) NHA server *Questio onnaire for medical a audit team m members
3. Length h of stay at hospital
h deetails intervieww of and invesstigation of
> 15 days
d beneficiaary availabilitty of facility,
4. Number of claims infrastruccture & staff will be
disprooportionate with
w bed done.
strenggth of hospitaal Case reccords of patie ents will
district claims more
5. Inter-d be looked d for treatme ent given.
compa ared to with--in Intervieww of beneficia aries
district claims regarding g quality of ccare and
6. Blocking of cases, that a any dema and of mone ey for
hospittal is not equuipped treatmen nt or investigation.
for Detailed report of the e
7. Showiing admissio on in investigaation will be ssubmitted
ICU thhough not eq quipped for empa anelment and d
8. Blocking of multiple disciplina
ary committe ee for
packages/procedu ures further acction.
CHEC
CKLIST FOR
R AVAILABILITY OF ST
TAFF AT TH
HE HOSPITA
AL
STION
QUES Response
e REM
MARKS
At leas
st 1 medical officer (RMP
P) available at all times
Yes / No
At leas
st 1 nurse (R
RNP) availab
ble at all time
es
Yes / No
At leas
st 1 informattion providerr is present (staff)
( at all ttimes.
Yes / No
There is a registerred nurse ap
ppropriately qualified
q and
d/or
experienced who is i responsible for the maanagement o of each
ward on
o 24x7 basis Yes / No
All trea
ating doctors
s details ava
ailable at the
e hospital
Yes / No
Patien
nt’s post anaesthesia sta
atus is monitored and do
ocumented.
Yes / No
CH
HECKLIST FOR
F OPERA
ATION THE
EATRE/DEPA
ARTMENT
STION
QUES Response
e REM
MARKS
OT Ste
erilization facilities functional.
Yes / No
Adequ uate lights (g
general level illumination
n) and Air co
onditioning
is prov
vided in each h OT Yes / No
A heig
ght adjustable OT Table, shadow les ss Operatingg light is
availab
ble. Yes / No
The opperation theaatre is equip
pped for its purpose
p and includes:
- Anaeesthetic macchine and ventilator
- Laryn
ngoscopes (Adult
( / Paed
diatric)
- Endootracheal tubbes/laryngeaal masks
– Airw
ways
- Nasaal tubes
- Suctiion apparatuus and conne ectors
– Oxyggen
- Drugs for emerge ency situatio
ons
- Monitoring equippment including ECG, ET TCO2 (wherre
applicaable), pulse oximeter annd blood pres ssure, cardia
ac monitor,
Defibrillator Yes / No
Runnin
ng tap waterr supply in OT
O
Yes / No
Hot wa
ater supply in OT
Yes / No
Proced dures are avvailable and up to date fo
or:
med patient consent
- Inform
- Pre-ooperative assessment
- Post--operative ca
are Yes / No
Regula
ar documentted autoclav
ving of instru
uments & line
en.
Yes / No
Carbonization of th
he OT, Labo
our Room affter every pro
ocedure
mented)
(docum Yes / No
ar validation tests for ste
Regula erilization (ca
arried out an
nd
docum
mented) Yes / No
Were you/your
y fam
mily forced to
o give mone ey for treatmeent? Yes / No
If yes, total amounnt medical exxpenditure paid
p by patie
ent/family
for trea
atment
Will yoou recommend your rela atives/friends
s to take trea
atment from
the same hospital? ? Yes / No
Treated bad dly-1
Poor qualityy care-2
If no, why?
w
Not receptivve to
RSBY patieents-3
What are
a the patie
ent’s sugges
stions for imp
proving the sscheme?
Undertaking by Hos
spital
Source: www.sast.gov.i
w in
The commmittee com mprises of individuals constituted from the h hospital tha
at representt the key
departme
ents - including management, treatin
ng doctors a
and support d
departmentss.
Areas to
o be identified for each
h case
Area of CONCERN
C is where the clinician believes that a
areas of care
e SHOULD h
have been b
better.
mmittee wou
The com uld prepare ‘DEATH AU
UDIT REPO RT’ as men
ntioned belo
ow :
x Patient
P details:͒
x Name:͒
N
x Age:
A
x Sex:͒
S
x DOA:
D
x Date
D of Surg
gery:͒
x Diagnosis:
D
x Treatment
T given:
x Surgery/Pro
S cedure/ Rad
diotherapy/ Chemothera
C py/ Others ((specify)
x Hospital
H nam
me:
x Name
N of Tre
eating Doctor
Please provide
p mmary of the Case in th
a sum he form of n narrative – in
ncluding com
mplaints at th
he time of
admissio
on, chronolog
gy of events up to death
h of the patie
ent –
Section C: Case As
ssessment
Operation/procedure
e was perform
med, or treatment provid
ded? Yes N
No NA
Pre-anes
sthetic check
kup/fitness fo
or surgery/trreatment
Decision
n to operate
Choice of
o operation
Intra-ope
erative proce
ess
Problems
s in functioning of OT
Grade / experience
e of
o surgeon deciding
d
Grade / experience
e of
o surgeon operating
o
Post-ope
erative period
d
- Minimal/ Mild/
M Modera
ate/ Severe
If there any
a areas of CONCERN or ADVERS
SE EVENTS
S in the mana
agement of tthis patient:
Describe
e the significa
ant event/s during
d the co
ourse of trea
atment in the
e hospital:
Note any
y areas of co
oncern or Ad
dverse Eventt
Note if th
hese areas caused
c o the following:͒
any of
Made no difference to
t outcome __________
_ ___________
___________
__________
___________
______
May have
e contributed
d to death__
__________
___________
__________
__________
_________
Caused death
d of patient who would otherwis
se be expectted to survivve_________
_________
Section D: Record of
o cause of death
Primary cause
c of dea
ath: _______
__________
__________
___________
__________
_________
ICD code
e: ________
___________
__________
__________
___________
__________
________
Seconda
ary cause of death: ____
___________
__________
__________
___________
_______
Antecede
ent cause off death: ____
__________
__________
___________
__________
_________
ICD code
e: ________
___________
__________
__________
___________
__________
________
FINAL RECOMMEN
R NDATIONS (if any) OF THE
T MORTA
ALITY AUDIIT COMMITT
TEE
1. _____
___________
__________
___________
___________
__________
__________
________
2.______
__________
___________
__________
__________
___________
__________
________
3.______
__________
___________
__________
__________
___________
__________
________
Name
N Designatio
on Signatture
Date:
Aim
The aim is to ascertain the proportion of patients who died because of 'problems
in care', defined as patient harm resulting from healthcare processes including
acts of omission (inactions), such as failure to diagnose and treat, or from acts of
commission (affirmative actions) such as incorrect treatment or management.
An area of CONCERN is where the clinician believes that areas of care SHOULD
have been better.
Patient details:
Name:
DOA: DOD:
Diagnosis:
Reviewing Doctor:
___________________________________________________________
Yes
No
Were there any Areas of Consideration, of Concern, or Adverse Events in any of the
following areas if an operation was performed?
Area of:
Consideration
Concern
Adverse Event
Which:
Was it preventable?
Definitely
Probably
Probably not
Definitely not
Don’t know
Please provide evidence to support your statements given above by referring to specific
points relating to any investigation reports or progress of the patient, treatment provided
etc., which substantiate your observations
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Area of:
Consideration Concern
Adverse Event
Which:
Was it preventable?
Definitely
Probably
Probably not
Definitely not
Don’t know
Please provide evidence to support your statements given above by referring to specific
points relating to any investigation reports or progress of the patient, treatment provided
etc., which substantiate your observations
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Area of:
Consideration Concern
Adverse Event
Which:
Was it preventable?
Definitely
Probably
Definiitely not
Don’t know
______________________________________________________________________________________
Concllusion:
ICD code:
c __________________________________________________________________________
Seconndary cause of
o death:_____
_________________________________________________________
ICD code:_______
c ______________________________________________________________________
ICD code:
c _____________________________________________________________________________
Was there
t enough
h information
n to come to a conclusionn?
Yes No
______________________________________________________________________________________
Paym
ment:
Amount Claimed:
Amount Recommended:
Designation
Date:
Signature
ument Valid
B. Docu dation
Yes No
5 Do
oes the diagnosis match
h the package blocked?
8 Fo
or rejected ca
ases, was th
he reason off rejection jusstified?
C. Any other
o remarrks
D. Finall Conclusion
Date:
nd Signaturre of the inv
Name an vestigator:
C. Alleggation of Bribe/
B Misb
behave on investigato or: If theree is any pa articular alle
egation of
bride/misbehave on particula ar investigato or, will set u
up a third party to investigation agenncy to rule
he actual fac
out th ct in the cas
se, if allegatiion found to be correct, action to be e taken and dismissal
of the
e agency forr future case
es
E. Not able
a to assiign the casee to SHA in nvestigator//NHA team due IT/ technical issue e: in such
situattion if system
m is not worrking or therre is any IT issue, wherre our NHA team or FCM team is
not able
a to assign the triggered case to investigation n/FCM teamm, will do thiss exercise o
on manual
basis
s to investiga ate the case without anyy fail.
F. Veriffication of cases
c on Hoolidays: On any holidayy or especially on Saturd
day and Sunday, FCM
team will coo ordinate with internall team/inve estigator teelephonicallly and sh hare the
inves
stigator/intern
nal inputs on
n telephone//mobile.
x Impers sonation.
x Misma atch of in-hoouse docume ent with subm mitted docum ments.
x Claims s without sig
gnature of thhe beneficiarry on pre-autthorisation foorm.
x Secon nd claim in thhe same yea ar for an acuute medical i llness/surgiccal.
x Claims s from multip s with same owner.
ple hospitals
x Claims s from a hospital locate ed far away from benefiiciary’s resid dence, pharrmacy bills a away from
hospittal/residencee.
x Claims s for hospita
alization at a hospital alre
eady identifiied on a "waatch" list or b
black listed h
hospital.
x Claims s from members with no o claim free years,
y i.e. re
egular claim history.
x Same beneficiary claimed in multiple
m placces at the sa ame time.
x Excesssive utilization by a specific membe er belonging to the benefficiary Familly Unit.
x Delibeerate blockinng of higher-priced packa age rates to claim highe er amounts.
x Claims s with incom
mplete/ poor medical histtory: compla aints/ presen
nting symptoms not mentioned,
x only line of treatment given, supporting do ocumentatio on vague or iinsufficient.
x Claims s with missing information like postt-operative h histopathologgy reports, ssurgical / annaesthetist
notes missing in surgical
s case
es.
x Multip
ple claims witth repeated hospitalizatiion (under a specific pollicy at differe ent hospitalss or at one
hospittal of one me ember of the e beneficiaryy family unitt and different hospitals for other me embers of
the be
eneficiary fam mily unit,
x Multip
ple claims tow wards the en nd of policy cover
c period d, close proxximity of claims.
2.. Admissio
ons Specific
c Triggers
3.. Diagnosis
s Specific Triggers
T
4.. Billing an
nd Tariff bas
sed Triggerrs
5.. General
x Qualiffication of pra
actitioner do
oesn't match h treatment.
x Specia alty not available in hosp
pital.
x Delaye ed informatioon of claim details
d to the
e Insurer.
x Conveersion of out-patient to inn-patient casses (comparre with historrical data).
x Non-ppayment of trransportation n allowance.
x Not dispensing po ost-hospitaliz
zation medic cation to benneficiaries.