You are on page 1of 5

SAMPLE SBM VALIDATION FORM

Name of School:

STEP 1: Determine the Performance Improvement (60%)

Thematic Area Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points


Access Enrollment Increase % of Inc
45% SY 2009-10: 6061 1 - Marginal: At leat 1% increase
SY 2010-11: 5007 -1054 2 - Average: At least 7% increase
SY 2011-12: 4609 -398 3 - High: At least 10% increase
Ave. % of Increase -15.75
Efficiency Dropout Rate (DR) % of Dec Baseline: 7.06
25% SY 2009-10: 4.89 1 - Marginal: At least 25% decrease
SY 2010-11: 9.11 4.22 2 - Average: At least 50% decrease
SY 2011-12: 6.51 -2.6 3 - High: Has 0 DR
Ave. % of Decrease 12.44
Completion Rate (CR) % of Inc Baseline: 75%
SY 2009-10: 87.75 1 - Marginal: At leat 5% increase
SY 2010-11: 77.71 -10.04 2 - Average: At least 7% increase
SY 2011-12: 93.88 16.17 3 - High: At least 10% increase
Ave. % of Increase 3.26
Cohort-Survival Rate (CSR) % of Inc Baseline: 76%
SY 2009-10: 91.24 1 - Marginal: At leat 5% increase
SY 2010-11: 80.85 -10.39 2 - Average: At least 7% increase
SY 2011-12: 82.00 1.15 3 - High: At least 10% increase
Ave. % of Increase -5.63
Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR): 10.07
Quality NAT MPS % of Inc
30% SY 2009-10: 37.39 1 - Marginal: 26 - 50 %
SY 2010-11: 40.79 3.4 2 - Average: 51 - 71 %
SY 2011-12: 40.50 -0.29 3 - High: 76 - 100 %
Ave. % of Increase 3.84

INTERPRETATION Good
Better
Best

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description


0.50 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

STEP 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

Commulative Scores of Validators per Principle


SBM Principle WEIGHT
SBM Principle WEIGHT Computation
Leadership 7/5 = 1.4 1.4 x 0.3
Curriculum & Learning 16/10 = 1.6 1.6 x 0.3
Accountability 9/5 = 1.8 1.8 x 0.25
Resource Mangement 10/5 = 2 2 x 0.15
Subtotal

INTERPRETATION Good
Better
Best

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description


0.50 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

Step 3: Compute for the Final Rating


AREAS Weight Computation
A. Performance Improvement 60% 0 x 0.60
B. SBM Assessment Score (D-O-D) 40% 1.65 x 0.40
TOTAL 100%

INTERPRETATION Developing (Level I)


Maturing(Level II)
Advanced (Level III)

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description


0.50 - 1.49 Developing
1.50 - 2.49 Maturing
2.50 - 3.00 Advanced
COMPUTATION RESULTS

_____ x 0.45 0

_____ x 0.25 0

_____ x 0.30 0

Results
Results
0.42
0.48
0.45
0.3
1.65

Results
0
0.66
0.66
Aspects of the Training Average Verbal Interpretation
1 Session 1 - Introduction to Access and Revised Framework 3.65 Highly Satisfactory
2 Session 2 - The Revised SBM-PASBE Framework 3.66 Highly Satisfactory
3 Session 3 - Revised Assessment 3.65 Highly Satisfactory
4 Session 4 - The SBM Assessment and Validation Process 3.66 Highly Satisfactory
5 Session 5 - DOD Validating System and Process 3.65 Highly Satisfactory
6 Session 6 - Monitoring and Evaluation 3.65 Highly Satisfactory
7 Session 7 - PASBE:What, Why, and How? 3.66 Highly Satisfactory
8 Workshop Activities 3.65 Highly Satisfactory
9 Time Management 3.75 Highly Satisfactory
10 Training Venue 3.69 Highly Satisfactory
11 Food 3.74 Highly Satisfactory
Overall Rating 3.67 Highly Satisfactory

Legend:
4- Highly Satisfactory
3- Very Satisfactory
2- Satisfactory
1- Not Satisfactory

You might also like